Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 958 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/irq/timings.c b/kernel/irq/timings.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..00d45b6bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/irq/timings.c
@@ -0,0 +1,958 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// Copyright (C) 2016, Linaro Ltd - Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "irq_timings: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/percpu.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/static_key.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/idr.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
+#include <linux/log2.h>
+
+#include <trace/events/irq.h>
+
+#include "internals.h"
+
+DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(irq_timing_enabled);
+
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct irq_timings, irq_timings);
+
+static DEFINE_IDR(irqt_stats);
+
+void irq_timings_enable(void)
+{
+	static_branch_enable(&irq_timing_enabled);
+}
+
+void irq_timings_disable(void)
+{
+	static_branch_disable(&irq_timing_enabled);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The main goal of this algorithm is to predict the next interrupt
+ * occurrence on the current CPU.
+ *
+ * Currently, the interrupt timings are stored in a circular array
+ * buffer every time there is an interrupt, as a tuple: the interrupt
+ * number and the associated timestamp when the event occurred <irq,
+ * timestamp>.
+ *
+ * For every interrupt occurring in a short period of time, we can
+ * measure the elapsed time between the occurrences for the same
+ * interrupt and we end up with a suite of intervals. The experience
+ * showed the interrupts are often coming following a periodic
+ * pattern.
+ *
+ * The objective of the algorithm is to find out this periodic pattern
+ * in a fastest way and use its period to predict the next irq event.
+ *
+ * When the next interrupt event is requested, we are in the situation
+ * where the interrupts are disabled and the circular buffer
+ * containing the timings is filled with the events which happened
+ * after the previous next-interrupt-event request.
+ *
+ * At this point, we read the circular buffer and we fill the irq
+ * related statistics structure. After this step, the circular array
+ * containing the timings is empty because all the values are
+ * dispatched in their corresponding buffers.
+ *
+ * Now for each interrupt, we can predict the next event by using the
+ * suffix array, log interval and exponential moving average
+ *
+ * 1. Suffix array
+ *
+ * Suffix array is an array of all the suffixes of a string. It is
+ * widely used as a data structure for compression, text search, ...
+ * For instance for the word 'banana', the suffixes will be: 'banana'
+ * 'anana' 'nana' 'ana' 'na' 'a'
+ *
+ * Usually, the suffix array is sorted but for our purpose it is
+ * not necessary and won't provide any improvement in the context of
+ * the solved problem where we clearly define the boundaries of the
+ * search by a max period and min period.
+ *
+ * The suffix array will build a suite of intervals of different
+ * length and will look for the repetition of each suite. If the suite
+ * is repeating then we have the period because it is the length of
+ * the suite whatever its position in the buffer.
+ *
+ * 2. Log interval
+ *
+ * We saw the irq timings allow to compute the interval of the
+ * occurrences for a specific interrupt. We can reasonibly assume the
+ * longer is the interval, the higher is the error for the next event
+ * and we can consider storing those interval values into an array
+ * where each slot in the array correspond to an interval at the power
+ * of 2 of the index. For example, index 12 will contain values
+ * between 2^11 and 2^12.
+ *
+ * At the end we have an array of values where at each index defines a
+ * [2^index - 1, 2 ^ index] interval values allowing to store a large
+ * number of values inside a small array.
+ *
+ * For example, if we have the value 1123, then we store it at
+ * ilog2(1123) = 10 index value.
+ *
+ * Storing those value at the specific index is done by computing an
+ * exponential moving average for this specific slot. For instance,
+ * for values 1800, 1123, 1453, ... fall under the same slot (10) and
+ * the exponential moving average is computed every time a new value
+ * is stored at this slot.
+ *
+ * 3. Exponential Moving Average
+ *
+ * The EMA is largely used to track a signal for stocks or as a low
+ * pass filter. The magic of the formula, is it is very simple and the
+ * reactivity of the average can be tuned with the factors called
+ * alpha.
+ *
+ * The higher the alphas are, the faster the average respond to the
+ * signal change. In our case, if a slot in the array is a big
+ * interval, we can have numbers with a big difference between
+ * them. The impact of those differences in the average computation
+ * can be tuned by changing the alpha value.
+ *
+ *
+ *  -- The algorithm --
+ *
+ * We saw the different processing above, now let's see how they are
+ * used together.
+ *
+ * For each interrupt:
+ *	For each interval:
+ *		Compute the index = ilog2(interval)
+ *		Compute a new_ema(buffer[index], interval)
+ *		Store the index in a circular buffer
+ *
+ *	Compute the suffix array of the indexes
+ *
+ *	For each suffix:
+ *		If the suffix is reverse-found 3 times
+ *			Return suffix
+ *
+ *	Return Not found
+ *
+ * However we can not have endless suffix array to be build, it won't
+ * make sense and it will add an extra overhead, so we can restrict
+ * this to a maximum suffix length of 5 and a minimum suffix length of
+ * 2. The experience showed 5 is the majority of the maximum pattern
+ * period found for different devices.
+ *
+ * The result is a pattern finding less than 1us for an interrupt.
+ *
+ * Example based on real values:
+ *
+ * Example 1 : MMC write/read interrupt interval:
+ *
+ *	223947, 1240, 1384, 1386, 1386,
+ *	217416, 1236, 1384, 1386, 1387,
+ *	214719, 1241, 1386, 1387, 1384,
+ *	213696, 1234, 1384, 1386, 1388,
+ *	219904, 1240, 1385, 1389, 1385,
+ *	212240, 1240, 1386, 1386, 1386,
+ *	214415, 1236, 1384, 1386, 1387,
+ *	214276, 1234, 1384, 1388, ?
+ *
+ * For each element, apply ilog2(value)
+ *
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, ?
+ *
+ * Max period of 5, we take the last (max_period * 3) 15 elements as
+ * we can be confident if the pattern repeats itself three times it is
+ * a repeating pattern.
+ *
+ *	             8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, 8,
+ *	15, 8, 8, 8, ?
+ *
+ * Suffixes are:
+ *
+ *  1) 8, 15, 8, 8, 8  <- max period
+ *  2) 8, 15, 8, 8
+ *  3) 8, 15, 8
+ *  4) 8, 15           <- min period
+ *
+ * From there we search the repeating pattern for each suffix.
+ *
+ * buffer: 8, 15, 8, 8, 8, 8, 15, 8, 8, 8, 8, 15, 8, 8, 8
+ *         |   |  |  |  |  |   |  |  |  |  |   |  |  |  |
+ *         8, 15, 8, 8, 8  |   |  |  |  |  |   |  |  |  |
+ *                         8, 15, 8, 8, 8  |   |  |  |  |
+ *                                         8, 15, 8, 8, 8
+ *
+ * When moving the suffix, we found exactly 3 matches.
+ *
+ * The first suffix with period 5 is repeating.
+ *
+ * The next event is (3 * max_period) % suffix_period
+ *
+ * In this example, the result 0, so the next event is suffix[0] => 8
+ *
+ * However, 8 is the index in the array of exponential moving average
+ * which was calculated on the fly when storing the values, so the
+ * interval is ema[8] = 1366
+ *
+ *
+ * Example 2:
+ *
+ *	4, 3, 5, 100,
+ *	3, 3, 5, 117,
+ *	4, 4, 5, 112,
+ *	4, 3, 4, 110,
+ *	3, 5, 3, 117,
+ *	4, 4, 5, 112,
+ *	4, 3, 4, 110,
+ *	3, 4, 5, 112,
+ *	4, 3, 4, 110
+ *
+ * ilog2
+ *
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4
+ *
+ * Max period 5:
+ *	   0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4,
+ *	0, 0, 0, 4
+ *
+ * Suffixes:
+ *
+ *  1) 0, 0, 4, 0, 0
+ *  2) 0, 0, 4, 0
+ *  3) 0, 0, 4
+ *  4) 0, 0
+ *
+ * buffer: 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 4
+ *         |  |  |  |  |  |  X
+ *         0, 0, 4, 0, 0, |  X
+ *                        0, 0
+ *
+ * buffer: 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0, 4
+ *         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+ *         0, 0, 4, 0, |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+ *                     0, 0, 4, 0, |  |  |  |  |  |  |
+ *                                 0, 0, 4, 0, |  |  |
+ *                                             0  0  4
+ *
+ * Pattern is found 3 times, the remaining is 1 which results from
+ * (max_period * 3) % suffix_period. This value is the index in the
+ * suffix arrays. The suffix array for a period 4 has the value 4
+ * at index 1.
+ */
+#define EMA_ALPHA_VAL		64
+#define EMA_ALPHA_SHIFT		7
+
+#define PREDICTION_PERIOD_MIN	3
+#define PREDICTION_PERIOD_MAX	5
+#define PREDICTION_FACTOR	4
+#define PREDICTION_MAX		10 /* 2 ^ PREDICTION_MAX useconds */
+#define PREDICTION_BUFFER_SIZE	16 /* slots for EMAs, hardly more than 16 */
+
+/*
+ * Number of elements in the circular buffer: If it happens it was
+ * flushed before, then the number of elements could be smaller than
+ * IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE, so the count is used, otherwise the array size is
+ * used as we wrapped. The index begins from zero when we did not
+ * wrap. That could be done in a nicer way with the proper circular
+ * array structure type but with the cost of extra computation in the
+ * interrupt handler hot path. We choose efficiency.
+ */
+#define for_each_irqts(i, irqts)					\
+	for (i = irqts->count < IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE ?			\
+		     0 : irqts->count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK,		\
+		     irqts->count = min(IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE,		\
+					irqts->count);			\
+	     irqts->count > 0; irqts->count--,				\
+		     i = (i + 1) & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK)
+
+struct irqt_stat {
+	u64	last_ts;
+	u64	ema_time[PREDICTION_BUFFER_SIZE];
+	int	timings[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE];
+	int	circ_timings[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE];
+	int	count;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Exponential moving average computation
+ */
+static u64 irq_timings_ema_new(u64 value, u64 ema_old)
+{
+	s64 diff;
+
+	if (unlikely(!ema_old))
+		return value;
+
+	diff = (value - ema_old) * EMA_ALPHA_VAL;
+	/*
+	 * We can use a s64 type variable to be added with the u64
+	 * ema_old variable as this one will never have its topmost
+	 * bit set, it will be always smaller than 2^63 nanosec
+	 * interrupt interval (292 years).
+	 */
+	return ema_old + (diff >> EMA_ALPHA_SHIFT);
+}
+
+static int irq_timings_next_event_index(int *buffer, size_t len, int period_max)
+{
+	int period;
+
+	/*
+	 * Move the beginning pointer to the end minus the max period x 3.
+	 * We are at the point we can begin searching the pattern
+	 */
+	buffer = &buffer[len - (period_max * 3)];
+
+	/* Adjust the length to the maximum allowed period x 3 */
+	len = period_max * 3;
+
+	/*
+	 * The buffer contains the suite of intervals, in a ilog2
+	 * basis, we are looking for a repetition. We point the
+	 * beginning of the search three times the length of the
+	 * period beginning at the end of the buffer. We do that for
+	 * each suffix.
+	 */
+	for (period = period_max; period >= PREDICTION_PERIOD_MIN; period--) {
+
+		/*
+		 * The first comparison always succeed because the
+		 * suffix is deduced from the first n-period bytes of
+		 * the buffer and we compare the initial suffix with
+		 * itself, so we can skip the first iteration.
+		 */
+		int idx = period;
+		size_t size = period;
+
+		/*
+		 * We look if the suite with period 'i' repeat
+		 * itself. If it is truncated at the end, as it
+		 * repeats we can use the period to find out the next
+		 * element with the modulo.
+		 */
+		while (!memcmp(buffer, &buffer[idx], size * sizeof(int))) {
+
+			/*
+			 * Move the index in a period basis
+			 */
+			idx += size;
+
+			/*
+			 * If this condition is reached, all previous
+			 * memcmp were successful, so the period is
+			 * found.
+			 */
+			if (idx == len)
+				return buffer[len % period];
+
+			/*
+			 * If the remaining elements to compare are
+			 * smaller than the period, readjust the size
+			 * of the comparison for the last iteration.
+			 */
+			if (len - idx < period)
+				size = len - idx;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return -1;
+}
+
+static u64 __irq_timings_next_event(struct irqt_stat *irqs, int irq, u64 now)
+{
+	int index, i, period_max, count, start, min = INT_MAX;
+
+	if ((now - irqs->last_ts) >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
+		irqs->count = irqs->last_ts = 0;
+		return U64_MAX;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * As we want to find three times the repetition, we need a
+	 * number of intervals greater or equal to three times the
+	 * maximum period, otherwise we truncate the max period.
+	 */
+	period_max = irqs->count > (3 * PREDICTION_PERIOD_MAX) ?
+		PREDICTION_PERIOD_MAX : irqs->count / 3;
+
+	/*
+	 * If we don't have enough irq timings for this prediction,
+	 * just bail out.
+	 */
+	if (period_max <= PREDICTION_PERIOD_MIN)
+		return U64_MAX;
+
+	/*
+	 * 'count' will depends if the circular buffer wrapped or not
+	 */
+	count = irqs->count < IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE ?
+		irqs->count : IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE;
+
+	start = irqs->count < IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE ?
+		0 : (irqs->count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK);
+
+	/*
+	 * Copy the content of the circular buffer into another buffer
+	 * in order to linearize the buffer instead of dealing with
+	 * wrapping indexes and shifted array which will be prone to
+	 * error and extremelly difficult to debug.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		int index = (start + i) & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK;
+
+		irqs->timings[i] = irqs->circ_timings[index];
+		min = min_t(int, irqs->timings[i], min);
+	}
+
+	index = irq_timings_next_event_index(irqs->timings, count, period_max);
+	if (index < 0)
+		return irqs->last_ts + irqs->ema_time[min];
+
+	return irqs->last_ts + irqs->ema_time[index];
+}
+
+static __always_inline int irq_timings_interval_index(u64 interval)
+{
+	/*
+	 * The PREDICTION_FACTOR increase the interval size for the
+	 * array of exponential average.
+	 */
+	u64 interval_us = (interval >> 10) / PREDICTION_FACTOR;
+
+	return likely(interval_us) ? ilog2(interval_us) : 0;
+}
+
+static __always_inline void __irq_timings_store(int irq, struct irqt_stat *irqs,
+						u64 interval)
+{
+	int index;
+
+	/*
+	 * Get the index in the ema table for this interrupt.
+	 */
+	index = irq_timings_interval_index(interval);
+
+	if (index > PREDICTION_BUFFER_SIZE - 1) {
+		irqs->count = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Store the index as an element of the pattern in another
+	 * circular array.
+	 */
+	irqs->circ_timings[irqs->count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK] = index;
+
+	irqs->ema_time[index] = irq_timings_ema_new(interval,
+						    irqs->ema_time[index]);
+
+	irqs->count++;
+}
+
+static inline void irq_timings_store(int irq, struct irqt_stat *irqs, u64 ts)
+{
+	u64 old_ts = irqs->last_ts;
+	u64 interval;
+
+	/*
+	 * The timestamps are absolute time values, we need to compute
+	 * the timing interval between two interrupts.
+	 */
+	irqs->last_ts = ts;
+
+	/*
+	 * The interval type is u64 in order to deal with the same
+	 * type in our computation, that prevent mindfuck issues with
+	 * overflow, sign and division.
+	 */
+	interval = ts - old_ts;
+
+	/*
+	 * The interrupt triggered more than one second apart, that
+	 * ends the sequence as predictable for our purpose. In this
+	 * case, assume we have the beginning of a sequence and the
+	 * timestamp is the first value. As it is impossible to
+	 * predict anything at this point, return.
+	 *
+	 * Note the first timestamp of the sequence will always fall
+	 * in this test because the old_ts is zero. That is what we
+	 * want as we need another timestamp to compute an interval.
+	 */
+	if (interval >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
+		irqs->count = 0;
+		return;
+	}
+
+	__irq_timings_store(irq, irqs, interval);
+}
+
+/**
+ * irq_timings_next_event - Return when the next event is supposed to arrive
+ *
+ * During the last busy cycle, the number of interrupts is incremented
+ * and stored in the irq_timings structure. This information is
+ * necessary to:
+ *
+ * - know if the index in the table wrapped up:
+ *
+ *      If more than the array size interrupts happened during the
+ *      last busy/idle cycle, the index wrapped up and we have to
+ *      begin with the next element in the array which is the last one
+ *      in the sequence, otherwise it is a the index 0.
+ *
+ * - have an indication of the interrupts activity on this CPU
+ *   (eg. irq/sec)
+ *
+ * The values are 'consumed' after inserting in the statistical model,
+ * thus the count is reinitialized.
+ *
+ * The array of values **must** be browsed in the time direction, the
+ * timestamp must increase between an element and the next one.
+ *
+ * Returns a nanosec time based estimation of the earliest interrupt,
+ * U64_MAX otherwise.
+ */
+u64 irq_timings_next_event(u64 now)
+{
+	struct irq_timings *irqts = this_cpu_ptr(&irq_timings);
+	struct irqt_stat *irqs;
+	struct irqt_stat __percpu *s;
+	u64 ts, next_evt = U64_MAX;
+	int i, irq = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * This function must be called with the local irq disabled in
+	 * order to prevent the timings circular buffer to be updated
+	 * while we are reading it.
+	 */
+	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
+
+	if (!irqts->count)
+		return next_evt;
+
+	/*
+	 * Number of elements in the circular buffer: If it happens it
+	 * was flushed before, then the number of elements could be
+	 * smaller than IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE, so the count is used,
+	 * otherwise the array size is used as we wrapped. The index
+	 * begins from zero when we did not wrap. That could be done
+	 * in a nicer way with the proper circular array structure
+	 * type but with the cost of extra computation in the
+	 * interrupt handler hot path. We choose efficiency.
+	 *
+	 * Inject measured irq/timestamp to the pattern prediction
+	 * model while decrementing the counter because we consume the
+	 * data from our circular buffer.
+	 */
+	for_each_irqts(i, irqts) {
+		irq = irq_timing_decode(irqts->values[i], &ts);
+		s = idr_find(&irqt_stats, irq);
+		if (s)
+			irq_timings_store(irq, this_cpu_ptr(s), ts);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Look in the list of interrupts' statistics, the earliest
+	 * next event.
+	 */
+	idr_for_each_entry(&irqt_stats, s, i) {
+
+		irqs = this_cpu_ptr(s);
+
+		ts = __irq_timings_next_event(irqs, i, now);
+		if (ts <= now)
+			return now;
+
+		if (ts < next_evt)
+			next_evt = ts;
+	}
+
+	return next_evt;
+}
+
+void irq_timings_free(int irq)
+{
+	struct irqt_stat __percpu *s;
+
+	s = idr_find(&irqt_stats, irq);
+	if (s) {
+		free_percpu(s);
+		idr_remove(&irqt_stats, irq);
+	}
+}
+
+int irq_timings_alloc(int irq)
+{
+	struct irqt_stat __percpu *s;
+	int id;
+
+	/*
+	 * Some platforms can have the same private interrupt per cpu,
+	 * so this function may be called several times with the
+	 * same interrupt number. Just bail out in case the per cpu
+	 * stat structure is already allocated.
+	 */
+	s = idr_find(&irqt_stats, irq);
+	if (s)
+		return 0;
+
+	s = alloc_percpu(*s);
+	if (!s)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
+	id = idr_alloc(&irqt_stats, s, irq, irq + 1, GFP_NOWAIT);
+	idr_preload_end();
+
+	if (id < 0) {
+		free_percpu(s);
+		return id;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_TEST_IRQ_TIMINGS
+struct timings_intervals {
+	u64 *intervals;
+	size_t count;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Intervals are given in nanosecond base
+ */
+static u64 intervals0[] __initdata = {
+	10000, 50000, 200000, 500000,
+	10000, 50000, 200000, 500000,
+	10000, 50000, 200000, 500000,
+	10000, 50000, 200000, 500000,
+	10000, 50000, 200000, 500000,
+	10000, 50000, 200000, 500000,
+	10000, 50000, 200000, 500000,
+	10000, 50000, 200000, 500000,
+	10000, 50000, 200000,
+};
+
+static u64 intervals1[] __initdata = {
+	223947000, 1240000, 1384000, 1386000, 1386000,
+	217416000, 1236000, 1384000, 1386000, 1387000,
+	214719000, 1241000, 1386000, 1387000, 1384000,
+	213696000, 1234000, 1384000, 1386000, 1388000,
+	219904000, 1240000, 1385000, 1389000, 1385000,
+	212240000, 1240000, 1386000, 1386000, 1386000,
+	214415000, 1236000, 1384000, 1386000, 1387000,
+	214276000, 1234000,
+};
+
+static u64 intervals2[] __initdata = {
+	4000, 3000, 5000, 100000,
+	3000, 3000, 5000, 117000,
+	4000, 4000, 5000, 112000,
+	4000, 3000, 4000, 110000,
+	3000, 5000, 3000, 117000,
+	4000, 4000, 5000, 112000,
+	4000, 3000, 4000, 110000,
+	3000, 4000, 5000, 112000,
+	4000,
+};
+
+static u64 intervals3[] __initdata = {
+	1385000, 212240000, 1240000,
+	1386000, 214415000, 1236000,
+	1384000, 214276000, 1234000,
+	1386000, 214415000, 1236000,
+	1385000, 212240000, 1240000,
+	1386000, 214415000, 1236000,
+	1384000, 214276000, 1234000,
+	1386000, 214415000, 1236000,
+	1385000, 212240000, 1240000,
+};
+
+static u64 intervals4[] __initdata = {
+	10000, 50000, 10000, 50000,
+	10000, 50000, 10000, 50000,
+	10000, 50000, 10000, 50000,
+	10000, 50000, 10000, 50000,
+	10000, 50000, 10000, 50000,
+	10000, 50000, 10000, 50000,
+	10000, 50000, 10000, 50000,
+	10000, 50000, 10000, 50000,
+	10000,
+};
+
+static struct timings_intervals tis[] __initdata = {
+	{ intervals0, ARRAY_SIZE(intervals0) },
+	{ intervals1, ARRAY_SIZE(intervals1) },
+	{ intervals2, ARRAY_SIZE(intervals2) },
+	{ intervals3, ARRAY_SIZE(intervals3) },
+	{ intervals4, ARRAY_SIZE(intervals4) },
+};
+
+static int __init irq_timings_test_next_index(struct timings_intervals *ti)
+{
+	int _buffer[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE];
+	int buffer[IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE];
+	int index, start, i, count, period_max;
+
+	count = ti->count - 1;
+
+	period_max = count > (3 * PREDICTION_PERIOD_MAX) ?
+		PREDICTION_PERIOD_MAX : count / 3;
+
+	/*
+	 * Inject all values except the last one which will be used
+	 * to compare with the next index result.
+	 */
+	pr_debug("index suite: ");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		index = irq_timings_interval_index(ti->intervals[i]);
+		_buffer[i & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK] = index;
+		pr_cont("%d ", index);
+	}
+
+	start = count < IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE ? 0 :
+		count & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK;
+
+	count = min_t(int, count, IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		int index = (start + i) & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK;
+		buffer[i] = _buffer[index];
+	}
+
+	index = irq_timings_next_event_index(buffer, count, period_max);
+	i = irq_timings_interval_index(ti->intervals[ti->count - 1]);
+
+	if (index != i) {
+		pr_err("Expected (%d) and computed (%d) next indexes differ\n",
+		       i, index);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init irq_timings_next_index_selftest(void)
+{
+	int i, ret;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tis); i++) {
+
+		pr_info("---> Injecting intervals number #%d (count=%zd)\n",
+			i, tis[i].count);
+
+		ret = irq_timings_test_next_index(&tis[i]);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int __init irq_timings_test_irqs(struct timings_intervals *ti)
+{
+	struct irqt_stat __percpu *s;
+	struct irqt_stat *irqs;
+	int i, index, ret, irq = 0xACE5;
+
+	ret = irq_timings_alloc(irq);
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_err("Failed to allocate irq timings\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	s = idr_find(&irqt_stats, irq);
+	if (!s) {
+		ret = -EIDRM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	irqs = this_cpu_ptr(s);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ti->count; i++) {
+
+		index = irq_timings_interval_index(ti->intervals[i]);
+		pr_debug("%d: interval=%llu ema_index=%d\n",
+			 i, ti->intervals[i], index);
+
+		__irq_timings_store(irq, irqs, ti->intervals[i]);
+		if (irqs->circ_timings[i & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK] != index) {
+			ret = -EBADSLT;
+			pr_err("Failed to store in the circular buffer\n");
+			goto out;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (irqs->count != ti->count) {
+		ret = -ERANGE;
+		pr_err("Count differs\n");
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret = 0;
+out:
+	irq_timings_free(irq);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int __init irq_timings_irqs_selftest(void)
+{
+	int i, ret;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tis); i++) {
+		pr_info("---> Injecting intervals number #%d (count=%zd)\n",
+			i, tis[i].count);
+		ret = irq_timings_test_irqs(&tis[i]);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int __init irq_timings_test_irqts(struct irq_timings *irqts,
+					 unsigned count)
+{
+	int start = count >= IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE ? count - IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE : 0;
+	int i, irq, oirq = 0xBEEF;
+	u64 ots = 0xDEAD, ts;
+
+	/*
+	 * Fill the circular buffer by using the dedicated function.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		pr_debug("%d: index=%d, ts=%llX irq=%X\n",
+			 i, i & IRQ_TIMINGS_MASK, ots + i, oirq + i);
+
+		irq_timings_push(ots + i, oirq + i);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Compute the first elements values after the index wrapped
+	 * up or not.
+	 */
+	ots += start;
+	oirq += start;
+
+	/*
+	 * Test the circular buffer count is correct.
+	 */
+	pr_debug("---> Checking timings array count (%d) is right\n", count);
+	if (WARN_ON(irqts->count != count))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Test the macro allowing to browse all the irqts.
+	 */
+	pr_debug("---> Checking the for_each_irqts() macro\n");
+	for_each_irqts(i, irqts) {
+
+		irq = irq_timing_decode(irqts->values[i], &ts);
+
+		pr_debug("index=%d, ts=%llX / %llX, irq=%X / %X\n",
+			 i, ts, ots, irq, oirq);
+
+		if (WARN_ON(ts != ots || irq != oirq))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ots++; oirq++;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The circular buffer should have be flushed when browsed
+	 * with for_each_irqts
+	 */
+	pr_debug("---> Checking timings array is empty after browsing it\n");
+	if (WARN_ON(irqts->count))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init irq_timings_irqts_selftest(void)
+{
+	struct irq_timings *irqts = this_cpu_ptr(&irq_timings);
+	int i, ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Test the circular buffer with different number of
+	 * elements. The purpose is to test at the limits (empty, half
+	 * full, full, wrapped with the cursor at the boundaries,
+	 * wrapped several times, etc ...
+	 */
+	int count[] = { 0,
+			IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE >> 1,
+			IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE,
+			IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE + (IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE >> 1),
+			2 * IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE,
+			(2 * IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE) + 3,
+	};
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(count); i++) {
+
+		pr_info("---> Checking the timings with %d/%d values\n",
+			count[i], IRQ_TIMINGS_SIZE);
+
+		ret = irq_timings_test_irqts(irqts, count[i]);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int __init irq_timings_selftest(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	pr_info("------------------- selftest start -----------------\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * At this point, we don't except any subsystem to use the irq
+	 * timings but us, so it should not be enabled.
+	 */
+	if (static_branch_unlikely(&irq_timing_enabled)) {
+		pr_warn("irq timings already initialized, skipping selftest\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	ret = irq_timings_irqts_selftest();
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = irq_timings_irqs_selftest();
+	if (ret)
+		goto out;
+
+	ret = irq_timings_next_index_selftest();
+out:
+	pr_info("---------- selftest end with %s -----------\n",
+		ret ? "failure" : "success");
+
+	return ret;
+}
+early_initcall(irq_timings_selftest);
+#endif