Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 332 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/mm/mmu_gather.c b/mm/mmu_gather.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..205fdbb57
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/mmu_gather.c
@@ -0,0 +1,332 @@
+#include <linux/gfp.h>
+#include <linux/highmem.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mmdebug.h>
+#include <linux/mm_types.h>
+#include <linux/pagemap.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
+#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <linux/swap.h>
+
+#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
+#include <asm/tlb.h>
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+
+static bool tlb_next_batch(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+	struct mmu_gather_batch *batch;
+
+	batch = tlb->active;
+	if (batch->next) {
+		tlb->active = batch->next;
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	if (tlb->batch_count == MAX_GATHER_BATCH_COUNT)
+		return false;
+
+	batch = (void *)__get_free_pages(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN, 0);
+	if (!batch)
+		return false;
+
+	tlb->batch_count++;
+	batch->next = NULL;
+	batch->nr   = 0;
+	batch->max  = MAX_GATHER_BATCH;
+
+	tlb->active->next = batch;
+	tlb->active = batch;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static void tlb_batch_pages_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+	struct mmu_gather_batch *batch;
+
+	for (batch = &tlb->local; batch && batch->nr; batch = batch->next) {
+		free_pages_and_swap_cache(batch->pages, batch->nr);
+		batch->nr = 0;
+	}
+	tlb->active = &tlb->local;
+}
+
+static void tlb_batch_list_free(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+	struct mmu_gather_batch *batch, *next;
+
+	for (batch = tlb->local.next; batch; batch = next) {
+		next = batch->next;
+		free_pages((unsigned long)batch, 0);
+	}
+	tlb->local.next = NULL;
+}
+
+bool __tlb_remove_page_size(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct page *page, int page_size)
+{
+	struct mmu_gather_batch *batch;
+
+	VM_BUG_ON(!tlb->end);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE
+	VM_WARN_ON(tlb->page_size != page_size);
+#endif
+
+	batch = tlb->active;
+	/*
+	 * Add the page and check if we are full. If so
+	 * force a flush.
+	 */
+	batch->pages[batch->nr++] = page;
+	if (batch->nr == batch->max) {
+		if (!tlb_next_batch(tlb))
+			return true;
+		batch = tlb->active;
+	}
+	VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(batch->nr > batch->max, page);
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+#endif /* MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER */
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE
+
+static void __tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < batch->nr; i++)
+		__tlb_remove_table(batch->tables[i]);
+
+	free_page((unsigned long)batch);
+}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
+
+/*
+ * Semi RCU freeing of the page directories.
+ *
+ * This is needed by some architectures to implement software pagetable walkers.
+ *
+ * gup_fast() and other software pagetable walkers do a lockless page-table
+ * walk and therefore needs some synchronization with the freeing of the page
+ * directories. The chosen means to accomplish that is by disabling IRQs over
+ * the walk.
+ *
+ * Architectures that use IPIs to flush TLBs will then automagically DTRT,
+ * since we unlink the page, flush TLBs, free the page. Since the disabling of
+ * IRQs delays the completion of the TLB flush we can never observe an already
+ * freed page.
+ *
+ * Architectures that do not have this (PPC) need to delay the freeing by some
+ * other means, this is that means.
+ *
+ * What we do is batch the freed directory pages (tables) and RCU free them.
+ * We use the sched RCU variant, as that guarantees that IRQ/preempt disabling
+ * holds off grace periods.
+ *
+ * However, in order to batch these pages we need to allocate storage, this
+ * allocation is deep inside the MM code and can thus easily fail on memory
+ * pressure. To guarantee progress we fall back to single table freeing, see
+ * the implementation of tlb_remove_table_one().
+ *
+ */
+
+static void tlb_remove_table_smp_sync(void *arg)
+{
+	/* Simply deliver the interrupt */
+}
+
+void tlb_remove_table_sync_one(void)
+{
+	/*
+	 * This isn't an RCU grace period and hence the page-tables cannot be
+	 * assumed to be actually RCU-freed.
+	 *
+	 * It is however sufficient for software page-table walkers that rely on
+	 * IRQ disabling.
+	 */
+	smp_call_function(tlb_remove_table_smp_sync, NULL, 1);
+}
+
+static void tlb_remove_table_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	__tlb_remove_table_free(container_of(head, struct mmu_table_batch, rcu));
+}
+
+static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
+{
+	call_rcu(&batch->rcu, tlb_remove_table_rcu);
+}
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
+
+static void tlb_remove_table_free(struct mmu_table_batch *batch)
+{
+	__tlb_remove_table_free(batch);
+}
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE */
+
+/*
+ * If we want tlb_remove_table() to imply TLB invalidates.
+ */
+static inline void tlb_table_invalidate(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+	if (tlb_needs_table_invalidate()) {
+		/*
+		 * Invalidate page-table caches used by hardware walkers. Then
+		 * we still need to RCU-sched wait while freeing the pages
+		 * because software walkers can still be in-flight.
+		 */
+		tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
+	}
+}
+
+static void tlb_remove_table_one(void *table)
+{
+	tlb_remove_table_sync_one();
+	__tlb_remove_table(table);
+}
+
+static void tlb_table_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+	struct mmu_table_batch **batch = &tlb->batch;
+
+	if (*batch) {
+		tlb_table_invalidate(tlb);
+		tlb_remove_table_free(*batch);
+		*batch = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table)
+{
+	struct mmu_table_batch **batch = &tlb->batch;
+
+	if (*batch == NULL) {
+		*batch = (struct mmu_table_batch *)__get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
+		if (*batch == NULL) {
+			tlb_table_invalidate(tlb);
+			tlb_remove_table_one(table);
+			return;
+		}
+		(*batch)->nr = 0;
+	}
+
+	(*batch)->tables[(*batch)->nr++] = table;
+	if ((*batch)->nr == MAX_TABLE_BATCH)
+		tlb_table_flush(tlb);
+}
+
+static inline void tlb_table_init(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+	tlb->batch = NULL;
+}
+
+#else /* !CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE */
+
+static inline void tlb_table_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb) { }
+static inline void tlb_table_init(struct mmu_gather *tlb) { }
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_TABLE_FREE */
+
+static void tlb_flush_mmu_free(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+	tlb_table_flush(tlb);
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+	tlb_batch_pages_flush(tlb);
+#endif
+}
+
+void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
+{
+	tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb);
+	tlb_flush_mmu_free(tlb);
+}
+
+/**
+ * tlb_gather_mmu - initialize an mmu_gather structure for page-table tear-down
+ * @tlb: the mmu_gather structure to initialize
+ * @mm: the mm_struct of the target address space
+ * @start: start of the region that will be removed from the page-table
+ * @end: end of the region that will be removed from the page-table
+ *
+ * Called to initialize an (on-stack) mmu_gather structure for page-table
+ * tear-down from @mm. The @start and @end are set to 0 and -1
+ * respectively when @mm is without users and we're going to destroy
+ * the full address space (exit/execve).
+ */
+void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
+			unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+	tlb->mm = mm;
+
+	/* Is it from 0 to ~0? */
+	tlb->fullmm     = !(start | (end+1));
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+	tlb->need_flush_all = 0;
+	tlb->local.next = NULL;
+	tlb->local.nr   = 0;
+	tlb->local.max  = ARRAY_SIZE(tlb->__pages);
+	tlb->active     = &tlb->local;
+	tlb->batch_count = 0;
+#endif
+
+	tlb_table_init(tlb);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_PAGE_SIZE
+	tlb->page_size = 0;
+#endif
+
+	__tlb_reset_range(tlb);
+	inc_tlb_flush_pending(tlb->mm);
+}
+
+/**
+ * tlb_finish_mmu - finish an mmu_gather structure
+ * @tlb: the mmu_gather structure to finish
+ * @start: start of the region that will be removed from the page-table
+ * @end: end of the region that will be removed from the page-table
+ *
+ * Called at the end of the shootdown operation to free up any resources that
+ * were required.
+ */
+void tlb_finish_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
+		unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+	/*
+	 * If there are parallel threads are doing PTE changes on same range
+	 * under non-exclusive lock (e.g., mmap_lock read-side) but defer TLB
+	 * flush by batching, one thread may end up seeing inconsistent PTEs
+	 * and result in having stale TLB entries.  So flush TLB forcefully
+	 * if we detect parallel PTE batching threads.
+	 *
+	 * However, some syscalls, e.g. munmap(), may free page tables, this
+	 * needs force flush everything in the given range. Otherwise this
+	 * may result in having stale TLB entries for some architectures,
+	 * e.g. aarch64, that could specify flush what level TLB.
+	 */
+	if (mm_tlb_flush_nested(tlb->mm)) {
+		/*
+		 * The aarch64 yields better performance with fullmm by
+		 * avoiding multiple CPUs spamming TLBI messages at the
+		 * same time.
+		 *
+		 * On x86 non-fullmm doesn't yield significant difference
+		 * against fullmm.
+		 */
+		tlb->fullmm = 1;
+		__tlb_reset_range(tlb);
+		tlb->freed_tables = 1;
+	}
+
+	tlb_flush_mmu(tlb);
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
+	tlb_batch_list_free(tlb);
+#endif
+	dec_tlb_flush_pending(tlb->mm);
+}