diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 10:05:51 +0000 |
commit | 5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 (patch) | |
tree | a94efe259b9009378be6d90eb30d2b019d95c194 /net/ax25/TODO | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744.tar.xz linux-5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744.zip |
Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/ax25/TODO')
-rw-r--r-- | net/ax25/TODO | 20 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/ax25/TODO b/net/ax25/TODO new file mode 100644 index 000000000..69fb4e368 --- /dev/null +++ b/net/ax25/TODO @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +Do the ax25_list_lock, ax25_dev_lock, linkfail_lockreally, ax25_frag_lock and +listen_lock have to be bh-safe? + +Do the netrom and rose locks have to be bh-safe? + +A device might be deleted after lookup in the SIOCADDRT ioctl but before it's +being used. + +Routes to a device being taken down might be deleted by ax25_rt_device_down +but added by somebody else before the device has been deleted fully. + +The ax25_rt_find_route synopsys is pervert but I somehow had to deal with +the race caused by the static variable in it's previous implementation. + +Implement proper socket locking in netrom and rose. + +Check socket locking when ax25_rcv is sending to raw sockets. In particular +ax25_send_to_raw() seems fishy. Heck - ax25_rcv is fishy. + +Handle XID and TEST frames properly. |