Adding upstream version 5.10.209.upstream/5.10.209upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 204 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c b/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f00e27df3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_ds_subr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) Jonathan Naylor G4KLX (g4klx@g4klx.demon.co.uk)
+ * Copyright (C) Joerg Reuter DL1BKE (jreuter@yaina.de)
+ */
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/socket.h>
+#include <linux/in.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/timer.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/sockios.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/net.h>
+#include <linux/gfp.h>
+#include <net/ax25.h>
+#include <linux/inet.h>
+#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/skbuff.h>
+#include <net/sock.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/fcntl.h>
+#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+
+void ax25_ds_nr_error_recovery(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+	ax25_ds_establish_data_link(ax25);
+}
+
+/*
+ *	dl1bke 960114: transmit I frames on DAMA poll
+ */
+void ax25_ds_enquiry_response(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+	ax25_cb *ax25o;
+
+	/* Please note that neither DK4EG's nor DG2FEF's
+	 * DAMA spec mention the following behaviour as seen
+	 * with TheFirmware:
+	 *
+	 * 	DB0ACH->DL1BKE <RR C P R0> [DAMA]
+	 *	DL1BKE->DB0ACH <I NR=0 NS=0>
+	 *	DL1BKE-7->DB0PRA-6 DB0ACH <I C S3 R5>
+	 *	DL1BKE->DB0ACH <RR R F R0>
+	 *
+	 * The Flexnet DAMA Master implementation apparently
+	 * insists on the "proper" AX.25 behaviour:
+	 *
+	 * 	DB0ACH->DL1BKE <RR C P R0> [DAMA]
+	 *	DL1BKE->DB0ACH <RR R F R0>
+	 *	DL1BKE->DB0ACH <I NR=0 NS=0>
+	 *	DL1BKE-7->DB0PRA-6 DB0ACH <I C S3 R5>
+	 *
+	 * Flexnet refuses to send us *any* I frame if we send
+	 * a REJ in case AX25_COND_REJECT is set. It is superfluous in
+	 * this mode anyway (a RR or RNR invokes the retransmission).
+	 * Is this a Flexnet bug?
+	 */
+
+	ax25_std_enquiry_response(ax25);
+
+	if (!(ax25->condition & AX25_COND_PEER_RX_BUSY)) {
+		ax25_requeue_frames(ax25);
+		ax25_kick(ax25);
+	}
+
+	if (ax25->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25->state == AX25_STATE_2 || skb_peek(&ax25->ack_queue) != NULL)
+		ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25);
+	else
+		ax25->n2count = 0;
+
+	ax25_start_t3timer(ax25);
+	ax25_ds_set_timer(ax25->ax25_dev);
+
+	spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
+	ax25_for_each(ax25o, &ax25_list) {
+		if (ax25o == ax25)
+			continue;
+
+		if (ax25o->ax25_dev != ax25->ax25_dev)
+			continue;
+
+		if (ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_2) {
+			ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25o);
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		if (!(ax25o->condition & AX25_COND_PEER_RX_BUSY) && ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_3) {
+			ax25_requeue_frames(ax25o);
+			ax25_kick(ax25o);
+		}
+
+		if (ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_1 || ax25o->state == AX25_STATE_2 || skb_peek(&ax25o->ack_queue) != NULL)
+			ax25_ds_t1_timeout(ax25o);
+
+		/* do not start T3 for listening sockets (tnx DD8NE) */
+
+		if (ax25o->state != AX25_STATE_0)
+			ax25_start_t3timer(ax25o);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
+}
+
+void ax25_ds_establish_data_link(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+	ax25->condition &= AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE;
+	ax25->n2count    = 0;
+	ax25_calculate_t1(ax25);
+	ax25_start_t1timer(ax25);
+	ax25_stop_t2timer(ax25);
+	ax25_start_t3timer(ax25);
+}
+
+/*
+ *	:::FIXME:::
+ *	This is a kludge. Not all drivers recognize kiss commands.
+ *	We need a driver level  request to switch duplex mode, that does
+ *	either SCC changing, PI config or KISS as required. Currently
+ *	this request isn't reliable.
+ */
+static void ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev *ax25_dev, unsigned char cmd, unsigned char param)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	unsigned char *p;
+
+	if (ax25_dev->dev == NULL)
+		return;
+
+	if ((skb = alloc_skb(2, GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL)
+		return;
+
+	skb_reset_network_header(skb);
+	p = skb_put(skb, 2);
+
+	*p++ = cmd;
+	*p++ = param;
+
+	skb->protocol = ax25_type_trans(skb, ax25_dev->dev);
+
+	dev_queue_xmit(skb);
+}
+
+/*
+ *	A nasty problem arises if we count the number of DAMA connections
+ *	wrong, especially when connections on the device already existed
+ *	and our network node (or the sysop) decides to turn on DAMA Master
+ *	mode. We thus flag the 'real' slave connections with
+ *	ax25->dama_slave=1 and look on every disconnect if still slave
+ *	connections exist.
+ */
+static int ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
+{
+	ax25_cb *ax25;
+	int res = 0;
+
+	spin_lock(&ax25_list_lock);
+	ax25_for_each(ax25, &ax25_list)
+		if (ax25->ax25_dev == ax25_dev && (ax25->condition & AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE) && ax25->state > AX25_STATE_1) {
+			res = 1;
+			break;
+		}
+	spin_unlock(&ax25_list_lock);
+
+	return res;
+}
+
+static void ax25_dev_dama_on(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
+{
+	if (ax25_dev == NULL)
+		return;
+
+	if (ax25_dev->dama.slave == 0)
+		ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev, 5, 1);
+
+	ax25_dev->dama.slave = 1;
+	ax25_ds_set_timer(ax25_dev);
+}
+
+void ax25_dev_dama_off(ax25_dev *ax25_dev)
+{
+	if (ax25_dev == NULL)
+		return;
+
+	if (ax25_dev->dama.slave && !ax25_check_dama_slave(ax25_dev)) {
+		ax25_kiss_cmd(ax25_dev, 5, 0);
+		ax25_dev->dama.slave = 0;
+		ax25_ds_del_timer(ax25_dev);
+	}
+}
+
+void ax25_dama_on(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+	ax25_dev_dama_on(ax25->ax25_dev);
+	ax25->condition |= AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE;
+}
+
+void ax25_dama_off(ax25_cb *ax25)
+{
+	ax25->condition &= ~AX25_COND_DAMA_MODE;
+	ax25_dev_dama_off(ax25->ax25_dev);
+}