From 5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 12:05:51 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 5.10.209. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst | 320 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 320 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst (limited to 'Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ee913ae16 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/device_link.rst @@ -0,0 +1,320 @@ +.. _device_link: + +============ +Device links +============ + +By default, the driver core only enforces dependencies between devices +that are borne out of a parent/child relationship within the device +hierarchy: When suspending, resuming or shutting down the system, devices +are ordered based on this relationship, i.e. children are always suspended +before their parent, and the parent is always resumed before its children. + +Sometimes there is a need to represent device dependencies beyond the +mere parent/child relationship, e.g. between siblings, and have the +driver core automatically take care of them. + +Secondly, the driver core by default does not enforce any driver presence +dependencies, i.e. that one device must be bound to a driver before +another one can probe or function correctly. + +Often these two dependency types come together, so a device depends on +another one both with regards to driver presence *and* with regards to +suspend/resume and shutdown ordering. + +Device links allow representation of such dependencies in the driver core. + +In its standard or *managed* form, a device link combines *both* dependency +types: It guarantees correct suspend/resume and shutdown ordering between a +"supplier" device and its "consumer" devices, and it guarantees driver +presence on the supplier. The consumer devices are not probed before the +supplier is bound to a driver, and they're unbound before the supplier +is unbound. + +When driver presence on the supplier is irrelevant and only correct +suspend/resume and shutdown ordering is needed, the device link may +simply be set up with the ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` flag. In other words, +enforcing driver presence on the supplier is optional. + +Another optional feature is runtime PM integration: By setting the +``DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME`` flag on addition of the device link, the PM core +is instructed to runtime resume the supplier and keep it active +whenever and for as long as the consumer is runtime resumed. + +Usage +===== + +The earliest point in time when device links can be added is after +:c:func:`device_add()` has been called for the supplier and +:c:func:`device_initialize()` has been called for the consumer. + +It is legal to add them later, but care must be taken that the system +remains in a consistent state: E.g. a device link cannot be added in +the midst of a suspend/resume transition, so either commencement of +such a transition needs to be prevented with :c:func:`lock_system_sleep()`, +or the device link needs to be added from a function which is guaranteed +not to run in parallel to a suspend/resume transition, such as from a +device ``->probe`` callback or a boot-time PCI quirk. + +Another example for an inconsistent state would be a device link that +represents a driver presence dependency, yet is added from the consumer's +``->probe`` callback while the supplier hasn't started to probe yet: Had the +driver core known about the device link earlier, it wouldn't have probed the +consumer in the first place. The onus is thus on the consumer to check +presence of the supplier after adding the link, and defer probing on +non-presence. [Note that it is valid to create a link from the consumer's +``->probe`` callback while the supplier is still probing, but the consumer must +know that the supplier is functional already at the link creation time (that is +the case, for instance, if the consumer has just acquired some resources that +would not have been available had the supplier not been functional then).] + +If a device link with ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` set (i.e. a stateless device link) +is added in the ``->probe`` callback of the supplier or consumer driver, it is +typically deleted in its ``->remove`` callback for symmetry. That way, if the +driver is compiled as a module, the device link is added on module load and +orderly deleted on unload. The same restrictions that apply to device link +addition (e.g. exclusion of a parallel suspend/resume transition) apply equally +to deletion. Device links managed by the driver core are deleted automatically +by it. + +Several flags may be specified on device link addition, two of which +have already been mentioned above: ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` to express that no +driver presence dependency is needed (but only correct suspend/resume and +shutdown ordering) and ``DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME`` to express that runtime PM +integration is desired. + +Two other flags are specifically targeted at use cases where the device +link is added from the consumer's ``->probe`` callback: ``DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE`` +can be specified to runtime resume the supplier and prevent it from suspending +before the consumer is runtime suspended. ``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER`` +causes the device link to be automatically purged when the consumer fails to +probe or later unbinds. + +Similarly, when the device link is added from supplier's ``->probe`` callback, +``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER`` causes the device link to be automatically +purged when the supplier fails to probe or later unbinds. + +If neither ``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER`` nor ``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER`` +is set, ``DL_FLAG_AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER`` can be used to request the driver core +to probe for a driver for the consumer driver on the link automatically after +a driver has been bound to the supplier device. + +Note, however, that any combinations of ``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER``, +``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER`` or ``DL_FLAG_AUTOPROBE_CONSUMER`` with +``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` are invalid and cannot be used. + +Limitations +=========== + +Driver authors should be aware that a driver presence dependency for managed +device links (i.e. when ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` is not specified on link addition) +may cause probing of the consumer to be deferred indefinitely. This can become +a problem if the consumer is required to probe before a certain initcall level +is reached. Worse, if the supplier driver is blacklisted or missing, the +consumer will never be probed. + +Moreover, managed device links cannot be deleted directly. They are deleted +by the driver core when they are not necessary any more in accordance with the +``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_CONSUMER`` and ``DL_FLAG_AUTOREMOVE_SUPPLIER`` flags. +However, stateless device links (i.e. device links with ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` +set) are expected to be removed by whoever called :c:func:`device_link_add()` +to add them with the help of either :c:func:`device_link_del()` or +:c:func:`device_link_remove()`. + +Passing ``DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE`` along with ``DL_FLAG_STATELESS`` to +:c:func:`device_link_add()` may cause the PM-runtime usage counter of the +supplier device to remain nonzero after a subsequent invocation of either +:c:func:`device_link_del()` or :c:func:`device_link_remove()` to remove the +device link returned by it. This happens if :c:func:`device_link_add()` is +called twice in a row for the same consumer-supplier pair without removing the +link between these calls, in which case allowing the PM-runtime usage counter +of the supplier to drop on an attempt to remove the link may cause it to be +suspended while the consumer is still PM-runtime-active and that has to be +avoided. [To work around this limitation it is sufficient to let the consumer +runtime suspend at least once, or call :c:func:`pm_runtime_set_suspended()` for +it with PM-runtime disabled, between the :c:func:`device_link_add()` and +:c:func:`device_link_del()` or :c:func:`device_link_remove()` calls.] + +Sometimes drivers depend on optional resources. They are able to operate +in a degraded mode (reduced feature set or performance) when those resources +are not present. An example is an SPI controller that can use a DMA engine +or work in PIO mode. The controller can determine presence of the optional +resources at probe time but on non-presence there is no way to know whether +they will become available in the near future (due to a supplier driver +probing) or never. Consequently it cannot be determined whether to defer +probing or not. It would be possible to notify drivers when optional +resources become available after probing, but it would come at a high cost +for drivers as switching between modes of operation at runtime based on the +availability of such resources would be much more complex than a mechanism +based on probe deferral. In any case optional resources are beyond the +scope of device links. + +Examples +======== + +* An MMU device exists alongside a busmaster device, both are in the same + power domain. The MMU implements DMA address translation for the busmaster + device and shall be runtime resumed and kept active whenever and as long + as the busmaster device is active. The busmaster device's driver shall + not bind before the MMU is bound. To achieve this, a device link with + runtime PM integration is added from the busmaster device (consumer) + to the MMU device (supplier). The effect with regards to runtime PM + is the same as if the MMU was the parent of the master device. + + The fact that both devices share the same power domain would normally + suggest usage of a struct dev_pm_domain or struct generic_pm_domain, + however these are not independent devices that happen to share a power + switch, but rather the MMU device serves the busmaster device and is + useless without it. A device link creates a synthetic hierarchical + relationship between the devices and is thus more apt. + +* A Thunderbolt host controller comprises a number of PCIe hotplug ports + and an NHI device to manage the PCIe switch. On resume from system sleep, + the NHI device needs to re-establish PCI tunnels to attached devices + before the hotplug ports can resume. If the hotplug ports were children + of the NHI, this resume order would automatically be enforced by the + PM core, but unfortunately they're aunts. The solution is to add + device links from the hotplug ports (consumers) to the NHI device + (supplier). A driver presence dependency is not necessary for this + use case. + +* Discrete GPUs in hybrid graphics laptops often feature an HDA controller + for HDMI/DP audio. In the device hierarchy the HDA controller is a sibling + of the VGA device, yet both share the same power domain and the HDA + controller is only ever needed when an HDMI/DP display is attached to the + VGA device. A device link from the HDA controller (consumer) to the + VGA device (supplier) aptly represents this relationship. + +* ACPI allows definition of a device start order by way of _DEP objects. + A classical example is when ACPI power management methods on one device + are implemented in terms of I\ :sup:`2`\ C accesses and require a specific + I\ :sup:`2`\ C controller to be present and functional for the power + management of the device in question to work. + +* In some SoCs a functional dependency exists from display, video codec and + video processing IP cores on transparent memory access IP cores that handle + burst access and compression/decompression. + +Alternatives +============ + +* A struct dev_pm_domain can be used to override the bus, + class or device type callbacks. It is intended for devices sharing + a single on/off switch, however it does not guarantee a specific + suspend/resume ordering, this needs to be implemented separately. + It also does not by itself track the runtime PM status of the involved + devices and turn off the power switch only when all of them are runtime + suspended. Furthermore it cannot be used to enforce a specific shutdown + ordering or a driver presence dependency. + +* A struct generic_pm_domain is a lot more heavyweight than a + device link and does not allow for shutdown ordering or driver presence + dependencies. It also cannot be used on ACPI systems. + +Implementation +============== + +The device hierarchy, which -- as the name implies -- is a tree, +becomes a directed acyclic graph once device links are added. + +Ordering of these devices during suspend/resume is determined by the +dpm_list. During shutdown it is determined by the devices_kset. With +no device links present, the two lists are a flattened, one-dimensional +representations of the device tree such that a device is placed behind +all its ancestors. That is achieved by traversing the ACPI namespace +or OpenFirmware device tree top-down and appending devices to the lists +as they are discovered. + +Once device links are added, the lists need to satisfy the additional +constraint that a device is placed behind all its suppliers, recursively. +To ensure this, upon addition of the device link the consumer and the +entire sub-graph below it (all children and consumers of the consumer) +are moved to the end of the list. (Call to :c:func:`device_reorder_to_tail()` +from :c:func:`device_link_add()`.) + +To prevent introduction of dependency loops into the graph, it is +verified upon device link addition that the supplier is not dependent +on the consumer or any children or consumers of the consumer. +(Call to :c:func:`device_is_dependent()` from :c:func:`device_link_add()`.) +If that constraint is violated, :c:func:`device_link_add()` will return +``NULL`` and a ``WARNING`` will be logged. + +Notably this also prevents the addition of a device link from a parent +device to a child. However the converse is allowed, i.e. a device link +from a child to a parent. Since the driver core already guarantees +correct suspend/resume and shutdown ordering between parent and child, +such a device link only makes sense if a driver presence dependency is +needed on top of that. In this case driver authors should weigh +carefully if a device link is at all the right tool for the purpose. +A more suitable approach might be to simply use deferred probing or +add a device flag causing the parent driver to be probed before the +child one. + +State machine +============= + +.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/device.h + :functions: device_link_state + +:: + + .=============================. + | | + v | + DORMANT <=> AVAILABLE <=> CONSUMER_PROBE => ACTIVE + ^ | + | | + '============ SUPPLIER_UNBIND <============' + +* The initial state of a device link is automatically determined by + :c:func:`device_link_add()` based on the driver presence on the supplier + and consumer. If the link is created before any devices are probed, it + is set to ``DL_STATE_DORMANT``. + +* When a supplier device is bound to a driver, links to its consumers + progress to ``DL_STATE_AVAILABLE``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_driver_bound()` from + :c:func:`driver_bound()`.) + +* Before a consumer device is probed, presence of supplier drivers is + verified by checking the consumer device is not in the wait_for_suppliers + list and by checking that links to suppliers are in ``DL_STATE_AVAILABLE`` + state. The state of the links is updated to ``DL_STATE_CONSUMER_PROBE``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_check_suppliers()` from + :c:func:`really_probe()`.) + This prevents the supplier from unbinding. + (Call to :c:func:`wait_for_device_probe()` from + :c:func:`device_links_unbind_consumers()`.) + +* If the probe fails, links to suppliers revert back to ``DL_STATE_AVAILABLE``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_no_driver()` from :c:func:`really_probe()`.) + +* If the probe succeeds, links to suppliers progress to ``DL_STATE_ACTIVE``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_driver_bound()` from :c:func:`driver_bound()`.) + +* When the consumer's driver is later on removed, links to suppliers revert + back to ``DL_STATE_AVAILABLE``. + (Call to :c:func:`__device_links_no_driver()` from + :c:func:`device_links_driver_cleanup()`, which in turn is called from + :c:func:`__device_release_driver()`.) + +* Before a supplier's driver is removed, links to consumers that are not + bound to a driver are updated to ``DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_busy()` from + :c:func:`__device_release_driver()`.) + This prevents the consumers from binding. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_check_suppliers()` from + :c:func:`really_probe()`.) + Consumers that are bound are freed from their driver; consumers that are + probing are waited for until they are done. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_unbind_consumers()` from + :c:func:`__device_release_driver()`.) + Once all links to consumers are in ``DL_STATE_SUPPLIER_UNBIND`` state, + the supplier driver is released and the links revert to ``DL_STATE_DORMANT``. + (Call to :c:func:`device_links_driver_cleanup()` from + :c:func:`__device_release_driver()`.) + +API +=== + +See device_link_add(), device_link_del() and device_link_remove(). -- cgit v1.2.3