From 5d1646d90e1f2cceb9f0828f4b28318cd0ec7744 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 12:05:51 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 5.10.209. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../driver-api/firmware/direct-fs-lookup.rst | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/firmware/direct-fs-lookup.rst (limited to 'Documentation/driver-api/firmware/direct-fs-lookup.rst') diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/direct-fs-lookup.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/direct-fs-lookup.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e04353d1b --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/direct-fs-lookup.rst @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +======================== +Direct filesystem lookup +======================== + +Direct filesystem lookup is the most common form of firmware lookup performed +by the kernel. The kernel looks for the firmware directly on the root +filesystem in the paths documented in the section 'Firmware search paths'. +The filesystem lookup is implemented in fw_get_filesystem_firmware(), it +uses common core kernel file loader facility kernel_read_file_from_path(). +The max path allowed is PATH_MAX -- currently this is 4096 characters. + +It is recommended you keep /lib/firmware paths on your root filesystem, +avoid having a separate partition for them in order to avoid possible +races with lookups and avoid uses of the custom fallback mechanisms +documented below. + +Firmware and initramfs +---------------------- + +Drivers which are built-in to the kernel should have the firmware integrated +also as part of the initramfs used to boot the kernel given that otherwise +a race is possible with loading the driver and the real rootfs not yet being +available. Stuffing the firmware into initramfs resolves this race issue, +however note that using initrd does not suffice to address the same race. + +There are circumstances that justify not wanting to include firmware into +initramfs, such as dealing with large firmware files for the +remote-proc subsystem. For such cases using a userspace fallback mechanism +is currently the only viable solution as only userspace can know for sure +when the real rootfs is ready and mounted. -- cgit v1.2.3