From b15a952c52a6825376d3e7f6c1bf5c886c6d8b74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 12:06:00 +0200 Subject: Adding debian version 5.10.209-2. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- ...Call-tick_irq_enter-inside-HARDIRQ_OFFSET.patch | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) create mode 100644 debian/patches-rt/0130-irq-Call-tick_irq_enter-inside-HARDIRQ_OFFSET.patch (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/0130-irq-Call-tick_irq_enter-inside-HARDIRQ_OFFSET.patch') diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0130-irq-Call-tick_irq_enter-inside-HARDIRQ_OFFSET.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0130-irq-Call-tick_irq_enter-inside-HARDIRQ_OFFSET.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..304fef0fa --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches-rt/0130-irq-Call-tick_irq_enter-inside-HARDIRQ_OFFSET.patch @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +From 5e2b7533340eb96a841068c309aac4985bd8180c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Frederic Weisbecker +Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:57:32 +0100 +Subject: [PATCH 130/323] irq: Call tick_irq_enter() inside HARDIRQ_OFFSET +Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz + +Now that account_hardirq_enter() is called after HARDIRQ_OFFSET has +been incremented, there is nothing left that prevents us from also +moving tick_irq_enter() after HARDIRQ_OFFSET is incremented. + +The desired outcome is to remove the nasty hack that prevents softirqs +from being raised through ksoftirqd instead of the hardirq bottom half. +Also tick_irq_enter() then becomes appropriately covered by lockdep. + +Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker +Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner +Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201202115732.27827-6-frederic@kernel.org +Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior +--- + kernel/softirq.c | 14 +++++--------- + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c +index b8f42b3ba8ca..d5bfd5e661fc 100644 +--- a/kernel/softirq.c ++++ b/kernel/softirq.c +@@ -377,16 +377,12 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void) + */ + void irq_enter_rcu(void) + { +- if (is_idle_task(current) && !in_interrupt()) { +- /* +- * Prevent raise_softirq from needlessly waking up ksoftirqd +- * here, as softirq will be serviced on return from interrupt. +- */ +- local_bh_disable(); ++ __irq_enter_raw(); ++ ++ if (is_idle_task(current) && (irq_count() == HARDIRQ_OFFSET)) + tick_irq_enter(); +- _local_bh_enable(); +- } +- __irq_enter(); ++ ++ account_hardirq_enter(current); + } + + /** +-- +2.43.0 + -- cgit v1.2.3