From 06c5210bfc8eff16e0d1df2430c7fcb07eae6c67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:29:53 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 185/323] fs/dcache: disable preemption on i_dir_seq's write side Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz i_dir_seq is an opencoded seqcounter. Based on the code it looks like we could have two writers in parallel despite the fact that the d_lock is held. The problem is that during the write process on RT the preemption is still enabled and if this process is interrupted by a reader with RT priority then we lock up. To avoid that lock up I am disabling the preemption during the update. The rename of i_dir_seq is here to ensure to catch new write sides in future. Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Oleg.Karfich@wago.com Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- fs/dcache.c | 12 +++++++----- fs/inode.c | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c index 1f4255ef8722..26a187abf13a 100644 --- a/fs/dcache.c +++ b/fs/dcache.c @@ -2503,9 +2503,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_rehash); static inline unsigned start_dir_add(struct inode *dir) { + preempt_disable_rt(); for (;;) { - unsigned n = dir->i_dir_seq; - if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(&dir->i_dir_seq, n, n + 1) == n) + unsigned n = dir->__i_dir_seq; + if (!(n & 1) && cmpxchg(&dir->__i_dir_seq, n, n + 1) == n) return n; cpu_relax(); } @@ -2513,7 +2514,8 @@ static inline unsigned start_dir_add(struct inode *dir) static inline void end_dir_add(struct inode *dir, unsigned n) { - smp_store_release(&dir->i_dir_seq, n + 2); + smp_store_release(&dir->__i_dir_seq, n + 2); + preempt_enable_rt(); } static void d_wait_lookup(struct dentry *dentry) @@ -2549,7 +2551,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct dentry *parent, retry: rcu_read_lock(); - seq = smp_load_acquire(&parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq); + seq = smp_load_acquire(&parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq); r_seq = read_seqbegin(&rename_lock); dentry = __d_lookup_rcu(parent, name, &d_seq); if (unlikely(dentry)) { @@ -2577,7 +2579,7 @@ struct dentry *d_alloc_parallel(struct dentry *parent, } hlist_bl_lock(b); - if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(parent->d_inode->i_dir_seq) != seq)) { + if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(parent->d_inode->__i_dir_seq) != seq)) { hlist_bl_unlock(b); rcu_read_unlock(); goto retry; diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 5c7139aa2bda..4ee8239c055f 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ int inode_init_always(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *inode) inode->i_bdev = NULL; inode->i_cdev = NULL; inode->i_link = NULL; - inode->i_dir_seq = 0; + inode->__i_dir_seq = 0; inode->i_rdev = 0; inode->dirtied_when = 0; diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 82316863c71f..a29a0b8a1eca 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ struct inode { struct block_device *i_bdev; struct cdev *i_cdev; char *i_link; - unsigned i_dir_seq; + unsigned __i_dir_seq; }; __u32 i_generation; -- 2.43.0