path: root/debian/patches-rt/0174-locking-rtmutex-add-rwlock-implementation-based-on-r.patch

From 85ee193953134a79ee60def58e6d8c98b8cd8e55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:18:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 174/323] locking/rtmutex: add rwlock implementation based on
 rtmutex
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz

The implementation is bias-based, similar to the rwsem implementation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 include/linux/rwlock_rt.h       | 109 +++++++++++
 include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h |  56 ++++++
 kernel/Kconfig.locks            |   2 +-
 kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c      | 328 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 494 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/rwlock_rt.h
 create mode 100644 include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h
 create mode 100644 kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c

diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_rt.h b/include/linux/rwlock_rt.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..aafdb0a685d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/rwlock_rt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#ifndef __LINUX_RWLOCK_RT_H
+#define __LINUX_RWLOCK_RT_H
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_H
+#error Do not include directly. Use spinlock.h
+#endif
+
+extern void __lockfunc rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern void __lockfunc rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_write_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_read_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern void __lockfunc rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern void __lockfunc rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_read_can_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_write_can_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, char *name, struct lock_class_key *key);
+
+#define read_can_lock(rwlock)		rt_read_can_lock(rwlock)
+#define write_can_lock(rwlock)		rt_write_can_lock(rwlock)
+
+#define read_trylock(lock)	__cond_lock(lock, rt_read_trylock(lock))
+#define write_trylock(lock)	__cond_lock(lock, rt_write_trylock(lock))
+
+static inline int __write_trylock_rt_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags)
+{
+	*flags = 0;
+	return rt_write_trylock(lock);
+}
+
+#define write_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags)		\
+	__cond_lock(lock, __write_trylock_rt_irqsave(lock, &(flags)))
+
+#define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)			\
+	do {						\
+		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
+		rt_read_lock(lock);			\
+		flags = 0;				\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)			\
+	do {						\
+		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
+		rt_write_lock(lock);			\
+		flags = 0;				\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define read_lock(lock)		rt_read_lock(lock)
+
+#define read_lock_bh(lock)				\
+	do {						\
+		local_bh_disable();			\
+		rt_read_lock(lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define read_lock_irq(lock)	read_lock(lock)
+
+#define write_lock(lock)	rt_write_lock(lock)
+
+#define write_lock_bh(lock)				\
+	do {						\
+		local_bh_disable();			\
+		rt_write_lock(lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define write_lock_irq(lock)	write_lock(lock)
+
+#define read_unlock(lock)	rt_read_unlock(lock)
+
+#define read_unlock_bh(lock)				\
+	do {						\
+		rt_read_unlock(lock);			\
+		local_bh_enable();			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define read_unlock_irq(lock)	read_unlock(lock)
+
+#define write_unlock(lock)	rt_write_unlock(lock)
+
+#define write_unlock_bh(lock)				\
+	do {						\
+		rt_write_unlock(lock);			\
+		local_bh_enable();			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define write_unlock_irq(lock)	write_unlock(lock)
+
+#define read_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)		\
+	do {						\
+		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
+		(void) flags;				\
+		rt_read_unlock(lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define write_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
+	do {						\
+		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
+		(void) flags;				\
+		rt_write_unlock(lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define rwlock_init(rwl)				\
+do {							\
+	static struct lock_class_key __key;		\
+							\
+	__rt_rwlock_init(rwl, #rwl, &__key);		\
+} while (0)
+
+#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h b/include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4762391d659b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#ifndef __LINUX_RWLOCK_TYPES_RT_H
+#define __LINUX_RWLOCK_TYPES_RT_H
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_TYPES_H
+#error "Do not include directly. Include spinlock_types.h instead"
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+# define RW_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)	.dep_map = { .name = #lockname }
+#else
+# define RW_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)
+#endif
+
+typedef struct rt_rw_lock rwlock_t;
+
+#define __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name) __RWLOCK_RT_INITIALIZER(name)
+
+#define DEFINE_RWLOCK(name) \
+	rwlock_t name = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name)
+
+/*
+ * A reader biased implementation primarily for CPU pinning.
+ *
+ * Can be selected as general replacement for the single reader RT rwlock
+ * variant
+ */
+struct rt_rw_lock {
+	struct rt_mutex		rtmutex;
+	atomic_t		readers;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+	struct lockdep_map	dep_map;
+#endif
+};
+
+#define READER_BIAS	(1U << 31)
+#define WRITER_BIAS	(1U << 30)
+
+#define __RWLOCK_RT_INITIALIZER(name)					\
+{									\
+	.readers = ATOMIC_INIT(READER_BIAS),				\
+	.rtmutex = __RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_SAVE_STATE(name.rtmutex),	\
+	RW_DEP_MAP_INIT(name)						\
+}
+
+void __rwlock_biased_rt_init(struct rt_rw_lock *lock, const char *name,
+			     struct lock_class_key *key);
+
+#define rwlock_biased_rt_init(rwlock)					\
+	do {								\
+		static struct lock_class_key __key;			\
+									\
+		__rwlock_biased_rt_init((rwlock), #rwlock, &__key);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+#endif
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
index 3de8fd11873b..4198f0273ecd 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ config ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
 
 config QUEUED_RWLOCKS
 	def_bool y if ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
-	depends on SMP
+	depends on SMP && !PREEMPT_RT
 
 config ARCH_HAS_MMIOWB
 	bool
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1ee16b8fedd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+
+#include "rtmutex_common.h"
+#include <linux/rwlock_types_rt.h>
+
+/*
+ * RT-specific reader/writer locks
+ *
+ * write_lock()
+ *  1) Lock lock->rtmutex
+ *  2) Remove the reader BIAS to force readers into the slow path
+ *  3) Wait until all readers have left the critical region
+ *  4) Mark it write locked
+ *
+ * write_unlock()
+ *  1) Remove the write locked marker
+ *  2) Set the reader BIAS so readers can use the fast path again
+ *  3) Unlock lock->rtmutex to release blocked readers
+ *
+ * read_lock()
+ *  1) Try fast path acquisition (reader BIAS is set)
+ *  2) Take lock->rtmutex.wait_lock which protects the writelocked flag
+ *  3) If !writelocked, acquire it for read
+ *  4) If writelocked, block on lock->rtmutex
+ *  5) unlock lock->rtmutex, goto 1)
+ *
+ * read_unlock()
+ *  1) Try fast path release (reader count != 1)
+ *  2) Wake the writer waiting in write_lock()#3
+ *
+ * read_lock()#3 has the consequence, that rw locks on RT are not writer
+ * fair, but writers, which should be avoided in RT tasks (think tasklist
+ * lock), are subject to the rtmutex priority/DL inheritance mechanism.
+ *
+ * It's possible to make the rw locks writer fair by keeping a list of
+ * active readers. A blocked writer would force all newly incoming readers
+ * to block on the rtmutex, but the rtmutex would have to be proxy locked
+ * for one reader after the other. We can't use multi-reader inheritance
+ * because there is no way to support that with
+ * SCHED_DEADLINE. Implementing the one by one reader boosting/handover
+ * mechanism is a major surgery for a very dubious value.
+ *
+ * The risk of writer starvation is there, but the pathological use cases
+ * which trigger it are not necessarily the typical RT workloads.
+ */
+
+void __rwlock_biased_rt_init(struct rt_rw_lock *lock, const char *name,
+			     struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held semaphore:
+	 */
+	debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
+	lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
+#endif
+	atomic_set(&lock->readers, READER_BIAS);
+	rt_mutex_init(&lock->rtmutex);
+	lock->rtmutex.save_state = 1;
+}
+
+static int __read_rt_trylock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	int r, old;
+
+	/*
+	 * Increment reader count, if lock->readers < 0, i.e. READER_BIAS is
+	 * set.
+	 */
+	for (r = atomic_read(&lock->readers); r < 0;) {
+		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->readers, r, r + 1);
+		if (likely(old == r))
+			return 1;
+		r = old;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __read_rt_lock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (__read_rt_trylock(lock))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	/*
+	 * Allow readers as long as the writer has not completely
+	 * acquired the semaphore for write.
+	 */
+	if (atomic_read(&lock->readers) != WRITER_BIAS) {
+		atomic_inc(&lock->readers);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Call into the slow lock path with the rtmutex->wait_lock
+	 * held, so this can't result in the following race:
+	 *
+	 * Reader1		Reader2		Writer
+	 *			read_lock()
+	 *					write_lock()
+	 *					rtmutex_lock(m)
+	 *					swait()
+	 * read_lock()
+	 * unlock(m->wait_lock)
+	 *			read_unlock()
+	 *			swake()
+	 *					lock(m->wait_lock)
+	 *					lock->writelocked=true
+	 *					unlock(m->wait_lock)
+	 *
+	 *					write_unlock()
+	 *					lock->writelocked=false
+	 *					rtmutex_unlock(m)
+	 *			read_lock()
+	 *					write_lock()
+	 *					rtmutex_lock(m)
+	 *					swait()
+	 * rtmutex_lock(m)
+	 *
+	 * That would put Reader1 behind the writer waiting on
+	 * Reader2 to call read_unlock() which might be unbound.
+	 */
+	rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter, true);
+	rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked(m, &waiter, flags);
+	/*
+	 * The slowlock() above is guaranteed to return with the rtmutex is
+	 * now held, so there can't be a writer active. Increment the reader
+	 * count and immediately drop the rtmutex again.
+	 */
+	atomic_inc(&lock->readers);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	rt_spin_lock_slowunlock(m);
+
+	debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
+}
+
+static void __read_rt_unlock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	struct task_struct *tsk;
+
+	/*
+	 * sem->readers can only hit 0 when a writer is waiting for the
+	 * active readers to leave the critical region.
+	 */
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&lock->readers))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+	/*
+	 * Wake the writer, i.e. the rtmutex owner. It might release the
+	 * rtmutex concurrently in the fast path, but to clean up the rw
+	 * lock it needs to acquire m->wait_lock. The worst case which can
+	 * happen is a spurious wakeup.
+	 */
+	tsk = rt_mutex_owner(m);
+	if (tsk)
+		wake_up_process(tsk);
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+}
+
+static void __write_unlock_common(struct rt_rw_lock *lock, int bias,
+				  unsigned long flags)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+
+	atomic_add(READER_BIAS - bias, &lock->readers);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	rt_spin_lock_slowunlock(m);
+}
+
+static void __write_rt_lock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	struct task_struct *self = current;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	/* Take the rtmutex as a first step */
+	__rt_spin_lock(m);
+
+	/* Force readers into slow path */
+	atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &lock->readers);
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&self->pi_lock);
+	self->saved_state = self->state;
+	__set_current_state_no_track(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&self->pi_lock);
+
+	for (;;) {
+		/* Have all readers left the critical region? */
+		if (!atomic_read(&lock->readers)) {
+			atomic_set(&lock->readers, WRITER_BIAS);
+			raw_spin_lock(&self->pi_lock);
+			__set_current_state_no_track(self->saved_state);
+			self->saved_state = TASK_RUNNING;
+			raw_spin_unlock(&self->pi_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+			return;
+		}
+
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+
+		if (atomic_read(&lock->readers) != 0)
+			schedule();
+
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+
+		raw_spin_lock(&self->pi_lock);
+		__set_current_state_no_track(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&self->pi_lock);
+	}
+}
+
+static int __write_rt_trylock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (!__rt_mutex_trylock(m))
+		return 0;
+
+	atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &lock->readers);
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	if (!atomic_read(&lock->readers)) {
+		atomic_set(&lock->readers, WRITER_BIAS);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+		return 1;
+	}
+	__write_unlock_common(lock, 0, flags);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __write_rt_unlock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	__write_unlock_common(lock, WRITER_BIAS, flags);
+}
+
+int __lockfunc rt_read_can_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	return  atomic_read(&rwlock->readers) < 0;
+}
+
+int __lockfunc rt_write_can_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	return atomic_read(&rwlock->readers) == READER_BIAS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The common functions which get wrapped into the rwlock API.
+ */
+int __lockfunc rt_read_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __read_rt_trylock(rwlock);
+	if (ret) {
+		rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+		migrate_disable();
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_trylock);
+
+int __lockfunc rt_write_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __write_rt_trylock(rwlock);
+	if (ret) {
+		rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+		migrate_disable();
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_trylock);
+
+void __lockfunc rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+	__read_rt_lock(rwlock);
+	migrate_disable();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_lock);
+
+void __lockfunc rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+	__write_rt_lock(rwlock);
+	migrate_disable();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_lock);
+
+void __lockfunc rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	migrate_enable();
+	__read_rt_unlock(rwlock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_unlock);
+
+void __lockfunc rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	migrate_enable();
+	__write_rt_unlock(rwlock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
+
+void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, char *name, struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+	__rwlock_biased_rt_init(rwlock, name, key);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rt_rwlock_init);
-- 
2.43.0