Adding upstream version 2.9.4.upstream/2.9.4upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 185 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gl/m4/pthread_rwlock_rdlock.m4 b/gl/m4/pthread_rwlock_rdlock.m4
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..049af50
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gl/m4/pthread_rwlock_rdlock.m4
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+# pthread_rwlock_rdlock.m4 serial 4
+dnl Copyright (C) 2017-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+dnl This file is free software; the Free Software Foundation
+dnl gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
+dnl with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
+
+dnl From Bruno Haible.
+dnl Inspired by
+dnl https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/blob/master/testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/pthread_rwlock_rdlock/2-2.c
+dnl by Intel Corporation.
+
+dnl Test whether in a situation where
+dnl   - an rwlock is taken by a reader and has a writer waiting,
+dnl   - an additional reader requests the lock,
+dnl   - the waiting writer and the requesting reader threads have the same
+dnl     priority,
+dnl the requesting reader thread gets blocked, so that at some point the
+dnl waiting writer can acquire the lock.
+dnl Without such a guarantee, when there a N readers and each of the readers
+dnl spends more than 1/Nth of the time with the lock held, there is a high
+dnl probability that the waiting writer will not get the lock in a given finite
+dnl time, a phenomenon called "writer starvation".
+dnl Without such a guarantee, applications have a hard time avoiding writer
+dnl starvation.
+dnl
+dnl POSIX:2017 makes this requirement only for implementations that support TPS
+dnl (Thread Priority Scheduling) and only for the scheduling policies SCHED_FIFO
+dnl and SCHED_RR, see
+dnl https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/pthread_rwlock_rdlock.html
+dnl but this test verifies the guarantee regardless of TPS and regardless of
+dnl scheduling policy.
+dnl Glibc does not provide this guarantee (and never will on Linux), see
+dnl https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13701
+dnl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410052
+AC_DEFUN([gl_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_RDLOCK_PREFER_WRITER],
+[
+  AC_REQUIRE([gl_THREADLIB_EARLY])
+  AC_REQUIRE([AC_CANONICAL_HOST]) dnl for cross-compiles
+  AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether pthread_rwlock_rdlock prefers a writer to a reader],
+    [gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer],
+    [save_LIBS="$LIBS"
+     LIBS="$LIBS $LIBMULTITHREAD"
+     AC_RUN_IFELSE(
+       [AC_LANG_SOURCE([[
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+#define SUCCEED() exit (0)
+#define FAILURE() exit (1)
+#define UNEXPECTED(n) (exit (10 + (n)))
+
+/* The main thread creates the waiting writer and the requesting reader threads
+   in the default way; this guarantees that they have the same priority.
+   We can reuse the main thread as first reader thread.  */
+
+static pthread_rwlock_t lock;
+static pthread_t reader1;
+static pthread_t writer;
+static pthread_t reader2;
+static pthread_t timer;
+/* Used to pass control from writer to reader2 and from reader2 to timer,
+   as in a relay race.
+   Passing control from one running thread to another running thread
+   is most likely faster than to create the second thread.  */
+static pthread_mutex_t baton;
+
+static void *
+timer_func (void *ignored)
+{
+  /* Step 13 (can be before or after step 12):
+     The timer thread takes the baton, then waits a moment to make sure
+     it can tell whether the second reader thread is blocked at step 12.  */
+  if (pthread_mutex_lock (&baton))
+    UNEXPECTED (13);
+  usleep (100000);
+  /* By the time we get here, it's clear that the second reader thread is
+     blocked at step 12.  This is the desired behaviour.  */
+  SUCCEED ();
+}
+
+static void *
+reader2_func (void *ignored)
+{
+  int err;
+
+  /* Step 8 (can be before or after step 7):
+     The second reader thread takes the baton, then waits a moment to make sure
+     the writer thread has reached step 7.  */
+  if (pthread_mutex_lock (&baton))
+    UNEXPECTED (8);
+  usleep (100000);
+  /* Step 9: The second reader thread requests the lock.  */
+  err = pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock (&lock);
+  if (err == 0)
+    FAILURE ();
+  else if (err != EBUSY)
+    UNEXPECTED (9);
+  /* Step 10: Launch a timer, to test whether the next call blocks.  */
+  if (pthread_create (&timer, NULL, timer_func, NULL))
+    UNEXPECTED (10);
+  /* Step 11: Release the baton.  */
+  if (pthread_mutex_unlock (&baton))
+    UNEXPECTED (11);
+  /* Step 12: The second reader thread requests the lock.  */
+  err = pthread_rwlock_rdlock (&lock);
+  if (err == 0)
+    FAILURE ();
+  else
+    UNEXPECTED (12);
+}
+
+static void *
+writer_func (void *ignored)
+{
+  /* Step 4: Take the baton, so that the second reader thread does not go ahead
+     too early.  */
+  if (pthread_mutex_lock (&baton))
+    UNEXPECTED (4);
+  /* Step 5: Create the second reader thread.  */
+  if (pthread_create (&reader2, NULL, reader2_func, NULL))
+    UNEXPECTED (5);
+  /* Step 6: Release the baton.  */
+  if (pthread_mutex_unlock (&baton))
+    UNEXPECTED (6);
+  /* Step 7: The writer thread requests the lock.  */
+  if (pthread_rwlock_wrlock (&lock))
+    UNEXPECTED (7);
+  return NULL;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  reader1 = pthread_self ();
+
+  /* Step 1: The main thread initializes the lock and the baton.  */
+  if (pthread_rwlock_init (&lock, NULL))
+    UNEXPECTED (1);
+  if (pthread_mutex_init (&baton, NULL))
+    UNEXPECTED (1);
+  /* Step 2: The main thread acquires the lock as a reader.  */
+  if (pthread_rwlock_rdlock (&lock))
+    UNEXPECTED (2);
+  /* Step 3: Create the writer thread.  */
+  if (pthread_create (&writer, NULL, writer_func, NULL))
+    UNEXPECTED (3);
+  /* Job done.  Go to sleep.  */
+  for (;;)
+    {
+      sleep (1);
+    }
+}
+]])],
+       [gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer=yes],
+       [gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer=no],
+       [case "$host_os" in
+                         # Guess no on glibc systems.
+          *-gnu* | gnu*) gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer="guessing no" ;;
+                         # Guess no on musl systems.
+          *-musl*)       gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer="guessing no" ;;
+                         # Guess no on bionic systems.
+          *-android*)    gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer="guessing no" ;;
+                         # Guess yes on native Windows with the mingw-w64 winpthreads library.
+                         # Guess no on native Windows with the gnulib windows-rwlock module.
+          mingw*)        if test "$gl_use_threads" = yes || test "$gl_use_threads" = posix; then
+                           gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer="guessing yes"
+                         else
+                           gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer="guessing no"
+                         fi
+                         ;;
+                         # If we don't know, obey --enable-cross-guesses.
+          *)             gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer="$gl_cross_guess_normal" ;;
+         esac
+       ])
+     LIBS="$save_LIBS"
+    ])
+  case "$gl_cv_pthread_rwlock_rdlock_prefer_writer" in
+    *yes)
+      AC_DEFINE([HAVE_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_RDLOCK_PREFER_WRITER], [1],
+        [Define if the 'pthread_rwlock_rdlock' function prefers a writer to a reader.])
+      ;;
+  esac
+])