diff options
| author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 12:06:34 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-27 12:06:34 +0000 |
| commit | 5e61585d76ae77fd5e9e96ebabb57afa4d74880d (patch) | |
| tree | 2b467823aaeebc7ef8bc9e3cabe8074eaef1666d /proto/LDAP_README.html | |
| parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
| download | postfix-5e61585d76ae77fd5e9e96ebabb57afa4d74880d.tar.xz postfix-5e61585d76ae77fd5e9e96ebabb57afa4d74880d.zip | |
Adding upstream version 3.5.24.upstream/3.5.24upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | proto/LDAP_README.html | 628 |
1 files changed, 628 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/proto/LDAP_README.html b/proto/LDAP_README.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7b46807 --- /dev/null +++ b/proto/LDAP_README.html @@ -0,0 +1,628 @@ +<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"> + +<html> + +<head> + +<title>Postfix LDAP Howto</title> + +<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + +</head> + +<body> + +<h1><img src="postfix-logo.jpg" width="203" height="98" ALT="">Postfix LDAP Howto</h1> + +<hr> + +<h2>LDAP Support in Postfix</h2> + +<p> Postfix can use an LDAP directory as a source for any of its +lookups: aliases(5), virtual(5), canonical(5), etc. This allows +you to keep information for your mail service in a replicated +network database with fine-grained access controls. By not storing +it locally on the mail server, the administrators can maintain it +from anywhere, and the users can control whatever bits of it you +think appropriate. You can have multiple mail servers using the +same information, without the hassle and delay of having to copy +it to each. </p> + +<p> Topics covered in this document:</p> + +<ul> + +<li><a href="#build">Building Postfix with LDAP support</a> + +<li><a href="#config">Configuring LDAP lookups</a> + +<li><a href="#example_alias">Example: aliases</a> + +<li><a href="#example_virtual">Example: virtual domains/addresses</a> + +<li><a href="#example_group">Example: expanding LDAP groups</a> + +<li><a href="#other">Other uses of LDAP lookups</a> + +<li><a href="#hmmmm">Notes and things to think about</a> + +<li><a href="#feedback">Feedback</a> + +<li><a href="#credits">Credits</a> + +</ul> + +<h2><a name="build">Building Postfix with LDAP support</a></h2> + +<p> These instructions assume that you build Postfix from source +code as described in the INSTALL document. Some modification may +be required if you build Postfix from a vendor-specific source +package. </p> + +<p> Note 1: Postfix no longer supports the LDAP version 1 interface. +</p> + +<p> Note 2: to use LDAP with Debian GNU/Linux's Postfix, all you +need is to install the postfix-ldap package and you're done. There +is no need to recompile Postfix. </p> + +<p> You need to have LDAP libraries and include files installed +somewhere on your system, and you need to configure the Postfix +Makefiles accordingly. </p> + +<p> For example, to build the OpenLDAP libraries for use with +Postfix (i.e. LDAP client code only), you could use the following +command: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +% ./configure --without-kerberos --without-cyrus-sasl --without-tls \ + --without-threads --disable-slapd --disable-slurpd \ + --disable-debug --disable-shared +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> If you're using the libraries from the UM distribution +(http://www.umich.edu/~dirsvcs/ldap/ldap.html) or OpenLDAP +(http://www.openldap.org), something like this in the top level of +your Postfix source tree should work: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +% make tidy +% make makefiles CCARGS="-I/usr/local/include -DHAS_LDAP" \ + AUXLIBS_LDAP="-L/usr/local/lib -lldap -L/usr/local/lib -llber" +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> Postfix versions before 3.0 use AUXLIBS instead of AUXLIBS_LDAP. +With Postfix 3.0 and later, the old AUXLIBS variable still supports +building a statically-loaded LDAP database client, but only the new +AUXLIBS_LDAP variable supports building a dynamically-loaded or +statically-loaded LDAP database client. </p> + +<blockquote> + +<p> Failure to use the AUXLIBS_LDAP variable will defeat the purpose +of dynamic database client loading. Every Postfix executable file +will have LDAP database library dependencies. And that was exactly +what dynamic database client loading was meant to avoid. </p> + +</blockquote> + +<p> On Solaris 2.x you may have to specify run-time link information, +otherwise ld.so will not find some of the shared libraries: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +% make tidy +% make makefiles CCARGS="-I/usr/local/include -DHAS_LDAP" \ + AUXLIBS_LDAP="-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib -lldap \ + -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib -llber" +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> The 'make tidy' command is needed only if you have previously +built Postfix without LDAP support. </p> + +<p> Instead of '/usr/local' specify the actual locations of your +LDAP include files and libraries. Be sure to not mix LDAP include +files and LDAP libraries of different versions!! </p> + +<p> If your LDAP libraries were built with Kerberos support, you'll +also need to include your Kerberos libraries in this line. Note +that the KTH Kerberos IV libraries might conflict with Postfix's +lib/libdns.a, which defines dns_lookup. If that happens, you'll +probably want to link with LDAP libraries that lack Kerberos support +just to build Postfix, as it doesn't support Kerberos binds to the +LDAP server anyway. Sorry about the bother. </p> + +<p> If you're using one of the Netscape LDAP SDKs, you'll need to +change the AUXLIBS line to point to libldap10.so or libldapssl30.so +or whatever you have, and you may need to use the appropriate linker +option (e.g. '-R') so the executables can find it at runtime. </p> + +<p> If you are using OpenLDAP, and the libraries were built with SASL +support, you can add -DUSE_LDAP_SASL to the CCARGS to enable SASL support. +For example: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> + CCARGS="-I/usr/local/include -DHAS_LDAP -DUSE_LDAP_SASL" +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<h2><a name="config">Configuring LDAP lookups</a></h2> + +<p> In order to use LDAP lookups, define an LDAP source +as a table lookup in main.cf, for example: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> The file /etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf can specify a great number +of parameters, including parameters that enable LDAP SSL or STARTTLS, +and LDAP SASL. For a complete description, see the ldap_table(5) +manual page. </p> + +<h2><a name="example_alias">Example: local(8) aliases</a></h2> + +<p> Here's a basic example for using LDAP to look up local(8) +aliases. Assume that in main.cf, you have: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases, ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> and in ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-aliases.cf you have: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +server_host = ldap.example.com +search_base = dc=example, dc=com +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> Upon receiving mail for a local address "ldapuser" that isn't +found in the /etc/aliases database, Postfix will search the LDAP +server listening at port 389 on ldap.example.com. It will bind anonymously, +search for any directory entries whose mailacceptinggeneralid +attribute is "ldapuser", read the "maildrop" attributes of those +found, and build a list of their maildrops, which will be treated +as RFC822 addresses to which the message will be delivered. </p> + +<h2><a name="example_virtual">Example: virtual domains/addresses</a></h2> + +<p> If you want to keep information for virtual lookups in your +directory, it's only a little more complicated. First, you need to +make sure Postfix knows about the virtual domain. An easy way to +do that is to add the domain to the mailacceptinggeneralid attribute +of some entry in the directory. Next, you'll want to make sure all +of your virtual recipient's mailacceptinggeneralid attributes are +fully qualified with their virtual domains. Finally, if you want +to designate a directory entry as the default user for a virtual +domain, just give it an additional mailacceptinggeneralid (or the +equivalent in your directory) of "@fake.dom". That's right, no +user part. If you don't want a catchall user, omit this step and +mail to unknown users in the domain will simply bounce. </p> + +<p> In summary, you might have a catchall user for a virtual domain +that looks like this: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> + dn: cn=defaultrecipient, dc=fake, dc=dom + objectclass: top + objectclass: virtualaccount + cn: defaultrecipient + owner: uid=root, dc=someserver, dc=isp, dc=dom +1 -> mailacceptinggeneralid: fake.dom +2 -> mailacceptinggeneralid: @fake.dom +3 -> maildrop: realuser@real.dom +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<dl compact> + +<dd> <p> 1: Postfix knows fake.dom is a valid virtual domain when +it looks for this and gets something (the maildrop) back. </p> + +<dd> <p> 2: This causes any mail for unknown users in fake.dom to +go to this entry ... </p> + +<dd> <p> 3: ... and then to its maildrop. </p> + +</dl> + +<p> Normal users might simply have one mailacceptinggeneralid and +maildrop, e.g. "normaluser@fake.dom" and "normaluser@real.dom". +</p> + +<h2><a name="example_group">Example: expanding LDAP groups</a></h2> + +<p> +LDAP is frequently used to store group member information. There are a +number of ways of handling LDAP groups. We will show a few examples in +order of increasing complexity, but owing to the number of independent +variables, we can only present a tiny portion of the solution space. +We show how to: +</p> + +<ol> + +<li> <p> query groups as lists of addresses; </p> + +<li> <p> query groups as lists of user objects containing addresses; </p> + +<li> <p> forward special lists unexpanded to a separate list server, +for moderation or other processing; </p> + +<li> <p> handle complex schemas by controlling expansion and by treating +leaf nodes specially, using features that are new in Postfix 2.4. </p> + +</ol> + +<p> +The example LDAP entries and implied schema below show two group entries +("agroup" and "bgroup") and four user entries ("auser", "buser", "cuser" +and "duser"). The group "agroup" has the users "auser" (1) and "buser" (2) +as members via DN references in the multi-valued attribute "memberdn", and +direct email addresses of two external users "auser@example.org" (3) and +"buser@example.org" (4) stored in the multi-valued attribute "memberaddr". +The same is true of "bgroup" and "cuser"/"duser" (6)/(7)/(8)/(9), but +"bgroup" also has a "maildrop" attribute of "bgroup@mlm.example.com" +(5): </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> + dn: cn=agroup, dc=example, dc=com + objectclass: top + objectclass: ldapgroup + cn: agroup + mail: agroup@example.com +1 -> memberdn: uid=auser, dc=example, dc=com +2 -> memberdn: uid=buser, dc=example, dc=com +3 -> memberaddr: auser@example.org +4 -> memberaddr: buser@example.org +</pre> +<br> + +<pre> + dn: cn=bgroup, dc=example, dc=com + objectclass: top + objectclass: ldapgroup + cn: bgroup + mail: bgroup@example.com +5 -> maildrop: bgroup@mlm.example.com +6 -> memberdn: uid=cuser, dc=example, dc=com +7 -> memberdn: uid=duser, dc=example, dc=com +8 -> memberaddr: cuser@example.org +9 -> memberaddr: duser@example.org +</pre> +<br> + +<pre> + dn: uid=auser, dc=example, dc=com + objectclass: top + objectclass: ldapuser + uid: auser +10 -> mail: auser@example.com +11 -> maildrop: auser@mailhub.example.com +</pre> +<br> + +<pre> + dn: uid=buser, dc=example, dc=com + objectclass: top + objectclass: ldapuser + uid: buser +12 -> mail: buser@example.com +13 -> maildrop: buser@mailhub.example.com +</pre> +<br> + +<pre> + dn: uid=cuser, dc=example, dc=com + objectclass: top + objectclass: ldapuser + uid: cuser +14 -> mail: cuser@example.com +</pre> +<br> + +<pre> + dn: uid=duser, dc=example, dc=com + objectclass: top + objectclass: ldapuser + uid: duser +15 -> mail: duser@example.com +</pre> +<br> + +</blockquote> + +<p> Our first use case ignores the "memberdn" attributes, and assumes +that groups hold only direct "memberaddr" strings as in (3), (4), (8) and +(9). The goal is to map the group address to the list of constituent +"memberaddr" values. This is simple, ignoring the various connection +related settings (hosts, ports, bind settings, timeouts, ...) we have: +</p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> + simple.cf: + ... + search_base = dc=example, dc=com + query_filter = mail=%s + result_attribute = memberaddr + $ postmap -q agroup@example.com ldap:/etc/postfix/simple.cf \ + auser@example.org,buser@example.org +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> We search "dc=example, dc=com". The "mail" attribute is used in the +query_filter to locate the right group, the "result_attribute" setting +described in ldap_table(5) is used to specify that "memberaddr" values +from the matching group are to be returned as a comma separated list. +Always check tables using postmap(1) with the "-q" option, before +deploying them into production use in main.cf. </p> + +<p> Our second use case instead expands "memberdn" attributes (1), (2), +(6) and (7), follows the DN references and returns the "maildrop" of the +referenced user entries. Here we use the "special_result_attribute" +setting from ldap_table(5) to designate the "memberdn" attribute +as holding DNs of the desired member entries. The "result_attribute" +setting selects which attributes are returned from the selected DNs. It +is important to choose a result attribute that is not also present in +the group object, because result attributes are collected from both +the group and the member DNs. In this case we choose "maildrop" and +assume for the moment that groups never have a "maildrop" (the "bgroup" +"maildrop" attribute is for a different use case). The returned data for +"auser" and "buser" is from items (11) and (13) in the example data. </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> + special.cf: + ... + search_base = dc=example, dc=com + query_filter = mail=%s + result_attribute = maildrop + special_result_attribute = memberdn + $ postmap -q agroup@example.com ldap:/etc/postfix/special.cf \ + auser@mailhub.example.com,buser@mailhub.example.com +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> Note: if the desired member object result attribute is always also +present in the group, you get surprising results: the expansion also +returns the address of the group. This is a known limitation of Postfix +releases prior to 2.4, and is addressed in the new with Postfix 2.4 +"leaf_result_attribute" feature described in ldap_table(5). </p> + +<p> Our third use case has some groups that are expanded immediately, +and other groups that are forwarded to a dedicated mailing list manager +host for delayed expansion. This uses two LDAP tables, one for users +and forwarded groups and a second for groups that can be expanded +immediately. It is assumed that groups that require forwarding are +never nested members of groups that are directly expanded. </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> + no_expand.cf: + ... + search_base = dc=example, dc=com + query_filter = mail=%s + result_attribute = maildrop + expand.cf + ... + search_base = dc=example, dc=com + query_filter = mail=%s + result_attribute = maildrop + special_result_attribute = memberdn + $ postmap -q auser@example.com \ + ldap:/etc/postfix/no_expand.cf ldap:/etc/postfix/expand.cf \ + auser@mailhub.example.com + $ postmap -q agroup@example.com \ + ldap:/etc/postfix/no_expand.cf ldap:/etc/postfix/expand.cf \ + auser@mailhub.example.com,buser@mailhub.example.com + $ postmap -q bgroup@example.com \ + ldap:/etc/postfix/no_expand.cf ldap:/etc/postfix/expand.cf \ + bgroup@mlm.example.com +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> Non-group objects and groups with delayed expansion (those that have a +maildrop attribute) are rewritten to a single maildrop value. Groups that +don't have a maildrop are expanded as the second use case. This admits +a more elegant solution with Postfix 2.4 and later. </p> + +<p> Our final use case is the same as the third, but this time uses new +features in Postfix 2.4. We now are able to use just one LDAP table and +no longer need to assume that forwarded groups are never nested inside +expanded groups. </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> + fancy.cf: + ... + search_base = dc=example, dc=com + query_filter = mail=%s + result_attribute = memberaddr + special_result_attribute = memberdn + terminal_result_attribute = maildrop + leaf_result_attribute = mail + $ postmap -q auser@example.com ldap:/etc/postfix/fancy.cf \ + auser@mailhub.example.com + $ postmap -q cuser@example.com ldap:/etc/postfix/fancy.cf \ + cuser@example.com + $ postmap -q agroup@example.com ldap:/etc/postfix/fancy.cf \ + auser@mailhub.example.com,buser@mailhub.example.com,auser@example.org,buser@example.org + $ postmap -q bgroup@example.com ldap:/etc/postfix/fancy.cf \ + bgroup@mlm.example.com +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<p> Above, delayed expansion is enabled via "terminal_result_attribute", +which, if present, is used as the sole result and all other expansion is +suppressed. Otherwise, the "leaf_result_attribute" is only returned for +leaf objects that don't have a "special_result_attribute" (non-groups), +while the "result_attribute" (direct member address of groups) is returned +at every level of recursive expansion, not just the leaf nodes. This fancy +example illustrates all the features of Postfix 2.4 group expansion. </p> + +<h2><a name="other">Other uses of LDAP lookups</a></h2> + +Other common uses for LDAP lookups include rewriting senders and +recipients with Postfix's canonical lookups, for example in order +to make mail leaving your site appear to be coming from +"First.Last@example.com" instead of "userid@example.com". + +<h2><a name="hmmmm">Notes and things to think about</a></h2> + +<ul> + +<li> <p> The bits of schema and attribute names used in this document are just + examples. There's nothing special about them, other than that some are + the defaults in the LDAP configuration parameters. You can use + whatever schema you like, and configure Postfix accordingly. </p> + +<li> <p> You probably want to make sure that mailacceptinggeneralids are + unique, and that not just anyone can specify theirs as postmaster or + root, say. </p> + +<li> <p> An entry can have an arbitrary number of mailacceptinggeneralids or + maildrops. Maildrops can also be comma-separated lists of addresses. + They will all be found and returned by the lookups. For example, you + could define an entry intended for use as a mailing list that looks + like this (Warning! Schema made up just for this example): </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +dn: cn=Accounting Staff List, dc=example, dc=com +cn: Accounting Staff List +o: example.com +objectclass: maillist +mailacceptinggeneralid: accountingstaff +mailacceptinggeneralid: accounting-staff +maildrop: mylist-owner +maildrop: an-accountant +maildrop: some-other-accountant +maildrop: this, that, theother +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<li> <p> If you use an LDAP map for lookups other than aliases, you may have to + make sure the lookup makes sense. In the case of virtual lookups, + maildrops other than mail addresses are pretty useless, because + Postfix can't know how to set the ownership for program or file + delivery. Your <b>query_filter</b> should probably look something like this: </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +query_filter = (&(mailacceptinggeneralid=%s)(!(|(maildrop="*|*")(maildrop="*:*")(maildrop="*/*")))) +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<li> <p> And for that matter, even for aliases, you may not want users able to + specify their maildrops as programs, includes, etc. This might be + particularly pertinent on a "sealed" server where they don't have + local UNIX accounts, but exist only in LDAP and Cyrus. You might allow + the fun stuff only for directory entries owned by an administrative + account, + so that if the object had a program as its maildrop and weren't owned + by "cn=root" it wouldn't be returned as a valid local user. This will + require some thought on your part to implement safely, considering the + ramifications of this type of delivery. You may decide it's not worth + the bother to allow any of that nonsense in LDAP lookups, ban it in + the <b>query_filter</b>, and keep things like majordomo lists in local alias + databases. </p> + +<blockquote> +<pre> +query_filter = (&(mailacceptinggeneralid=%s)(!(|(maildrop="*|*")(maildrop="*:*")(maildrop="*/*"))(owner=cn=root, dc=your, dc=com))) +</pre> +</blockquote> + +<li> <p> LDAP lookups are slower than local DB or DBM lookups. For most sites + they won't be a bottleneck, but it's a good idea to know how to tune + your directory service. </p> + +<li> <p> Multiple LDAP maps share the same LDAP connection if they differ + only in their query related parameters: base, scope, query_filter, and + so on. To take advantage of this, avoid spurious differences in the + definitions of LDAP maps: host selection order, version, bind, tls + parameters, ... should be the same for multiple maps whenever possible. </p> + +</ul> + +<h2><a name="feedback">Feedback</a></h2> + +<p> If you have questions, send them to postfix-users@postfix.org. Please +include relevant information about your Postfix setup: LDAP-related +output from postconf, which LDAP libraries you built with, and which +directory server you're using. If your question involves your directory +contents, please include the applicable bits of some directory entries. </p> + +<h2><a name="credits">Credits</a></h2> + +<ul> + +<li>Manuel Guesdon: Spotted a bug with the timeout attribute. + +<li>John Hensley: Multiple LDAP sources with more configurable attributes. + +<li>Carsten Hoeger: Search scope handling. + +<li>LaMont Jones: Domain restriction, URL and DN searches, multiple result + attributes. + +<li>Mike Mattice: Alias dereferencing control. + +<li>Hery Rakotoarisoa: Patches for LDAPv3 updating. + +<li>Prabhat K Singh: Wrote the initial Postfix LDAP lookups and connection caching. + +<li>Keith Stevenson: RFC 2254 escaping in queries. + +<li>Samuel Tardieu: Noticed that searches could include wildcards, prompting + the work on RFC 2254 escaping in queries. Spotted a bug + in binding. + +<li>Sami Haahtinen: Referral chasing and v3 support. + +<li>Victor Duchovni: ldap_bind() timeout. With fixes from LaMont Jones: + OpenLDAP cache deprecation. Limits on recursion, expansion + and search results size. LDAP connection sharing for maps + differing only in the query parameters. + +<li>Liviu Daia: Support for SSL/STARTTLS. Support for storing map definitions in + external files (ldap:/path/ldap.cf) needed to securely store + passwords for plain auth. + +<li>Liviu Daia revised the configuration interface and added the main.cf + configuration feature.</li> + +<li>Liviu Daia with further refinements from Jose Luis Tallon and +Victor Duchovni developed the common query, result_format, domain and +expansion_limit interface for LDAP, MySQL and PosgreSQL.</li> + +<li>Gunnar Wrobel provided a first implementation of a feature to +limit LDAP search results to leaf nodes only. Victor generalized +this into the Postfix 2.4 "leaf_result_attribute" feature. </li> + +<li>Quanah Gibson-Mount contributed support for advanced LDAP SASL +mechanisms, beyond the password-based LDAP "simple" bind. </li> + +</ul> + +And of course Wietse. + +</body> + +</html> |