Adding upstream version 18.2.2.upstream/18.2.2

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 286 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/doc/cephfs/multimds.rst b/doc/cephfs/multimds.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e50a5148e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/cephfs/multimds.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,286 @@
+.. _cephfs-multimds:
+
+Configuring multiple active MDS daemons
+---------------------------------------
+
+*Also known as: multi-mds, active-active MDS*
+
+Each CephFS file system is configured for a single active MDS daemon
+by default.  To scale metadata performance for large scale systems, you
+may enable multiple active MDS daemons, which will share the metadata
+workload with one another.
+
+When should I use multiple active MDS daemons?
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+You should configure multiple active MDS daemons when your metadata performance
+is bottlenecked on the single MDS that runs by default.
+
+Adding more daemons may not increase performance on all workloads.  Typically,
+a single application running on a single client will not benefit from an
+increased number of MDS daemons unless the application is doing a lot of
+metadata operations in parallel.
+
+Workloads that typically benefit from a larger number of active MDS daemons
+are those with many clients, perhaps working on many separate directories.
+
+
+Increasing the MDS active cluster size
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Each CephFS file system has a *max_mds* setting, which controls how many ranks
+will be created.  The actual number of ranks in the file system will only be
+increased if a spare daemon is available to take on the new rank. For example,
+if there is only one MDS daemon running, and max_mds is set to two, no second
+rank will be created. (Note that such a configuration is not Highly Available
+(HA) because no standby is available to take over for a failed rank. The
+cluster will complain via health warnings when configured this way.)
+
+Set ``max_mds`` to the desired number of ranks.  In the following examples
+the "fsmap" line of "ceph status" is shown to illustrate the expected
+result of commands.
+
+::
+
+    # fsmap e5: 1/1/1 up {0=a=up:active}, 2 up:standby
+
+    ceph fs set <fs_name> max_mds 2
+
+    # fsmap e8: 2/2/2 up {0=a=up:active,1=c=up:creating}, 1 up:standby
+    # fsmap e9: 2/2/2 up {0=a=up:active,1=c=up:active}, 1 up:standby
+
+The newly created rank (1) will pass through the 'creating' state
+and then enter this 'active state'.
+
+Standby daemons
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Even with multiple active MDS daemons, a highly available system **still
+requires standby daemons** to take over if any of the servers running
+an active daemon fail.
+
+Consequently, the practical maximum of ``max_mds`` for highly available systems
+is at most one less than the total number of MDS servers in your system.
+
+To remain available in the event of multiple server failures, increase the
+number of standby daemons in the system to match the number of server failures
+you wish to withstand.
+
+Decreasing the number of ranks
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Reducing the number of ranks is as simple as reducing ``max_mds``:
+
+::
+    
+    # fsmap e9: 2/2/2 up {0=a=up:active,1=c=up:active}, 1 up:standby
+    ceph fs set <fs_name> max_mds 1
+    # fsmap e10: 2/2/1 up {0=a=up:active,1=c=up:stopping}, 1 up:standby
+    # fsmap e10: 2/2/1 up {0=a=up:active,1=c=up:stopping}, 1 up:standby
+    ...
+    # fsmap e10: 1/1/1 up {0=a=up:active}, 2 up:standby
+
+The cluster will automatically stop extra ranks incrementally until ``max_mds``
+is reached.
+
+See :doc:`/cephfs/administration` for more details which forms ``<role>`` can
+take.
+
+Note: stopped ranks will first enter the stopping state for a period of
+time while it hands off its share of the metadata to the remaining active
+daemons.  This phase can take from seconds to minutes.  If the MDS appears to
+be stuck in the stopping state then that should be investigated as a possible
+bug.
+
+If an MDS daemon crashes or is killed while in the ``up:stopping`` state, a
+standby will take over and the cluster monitors will against try to stop
+the daemon.
+
+When a daemon finishes stopping, it will respawn itself and go back to being a
+standby.
+
+
+.. _cephfs-pinning:
+
+Manually pinning directory trees to a particular rank
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+In multiple active metadata server configurations, a balancer runs which works
+to spread metadata load evenly across the cluster. This usually works well
+enough for most users but sometimes it is desirable to override the dynamic
+balancer with explicit mappings of metadata to particular ranks. This can allow
+the administrator or users to evenly spread application load or limit impact of
+users' metadata requests on the entire cluster.
+
+The mechanism provided for this purpose is called an ``export pin``, an
+extended attribute of directories. The name of this extended attribute is
+``ceph.dir.pin``.  Users can set this attribute using standard commands:
+
+::
+
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin -v 2 path/to/dir
+
+The value of the extended attribute is the rank to assign the directory subtree
+to. A default value of ``-1`` indicates the directory is not pinned.
+
+A directory's export pin is inherited from its closest parent with a set export
+pin.  In this way, setting the export pin on a directory affects all of its
+children. However, the parents pin can be overridden by setting the child
+directory's export pin. For example:
+
+::
+
+    mkdir -p a/b
+    # "a" and "a/b" both start without an export pin set
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin -v 1 a/
+    # a and b are now pinned to rank 1
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin -v 0 a/b
+    # a/b is now pinned to rank 0 and a/ and the rest of its children are still pinned to rank 1
+
+
+.. _cephfs-ephemeral-pinning:
+
+Setting subtree partitioning policies
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+It is also possible to setup **automatic** static partitioning of subtrees via
+a set of **policies**. In CephFS, this automatic static partitioning is
+referred to as **ephemeral pinning**. Any directory (inode) which is
+ephemerally pinned will be automatically assigned to a particular rank
+according to a consistent hash of its inode number. The set of all
+ephemerally pinned directories should be uniformly distributed across all
+ranks.
+
+Ephemerally pinned directories are so named because the pin may not persist
+once the directory inode is dropped from cache. However, an MDS failover does
+not affect the ephemeral nature of the pinned directory. The MDS records what
+subtrees are ephemerally pinned in its journal so MDS failovers do not drop
+this information.
+
+A directory is either ephemerally pinned or not. Which rank it is pinned to is
+derived from its inode number and a consistent hash. This means that
+ephemerally pinned directories are somewhat evenly spread across the MDS
+cluster. The **consistent hash** also minimizes redistribution when the MDS
+cluster grows or shrinks. So, growing an MDS cluster may automatically increase
+your metadata throughput with no other administrative intervention.
+
+Presently, there are two types of ephemeral pinning:
+
+**Distributed Ephemeral Pins**: This policy causes a directory to fragment
+(even well below the normal fragmentation thresholds) and distribute its
+fragments as ephemerally pinned subtrees. This has the effect of distributing
+immediate children across a range of MDS ranks.  The canonical example use-case
+would be the ``/home`` directory: we want every user's home directory to be
+spread across the entire MDS cluster. This can be set via:
+
+::
+
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin.distributed -v 1 /cephfs/home
+
+
+**Random Ephemeral Pins**: This policy indicates any descendent sub-directory
+may be ephemerally pinned. This is set through the extended attribute
+``ceph.dir.pin.random`` with the value set to the percentage of directories
+that should be pinned. For example:
+
+::
+
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin.random -v 0.5 /cephfs/tmp
+
+Would cause any directory loaded into cache or created under ``/tmp`` to be
+ephemerally pinned 50 percent of the time.
+
+It is recommended to only set this to small values, like ``.001`` or ``0.1%``.
+Having too many subtrees may degrade performance. For this reason, the config
+``mds_export_ephemeral_random_max`` enforces a cap on the maximum of this
+percentage (default: ``.01``). The MDS returns ``EINVAL`` when attempting to
+set a value beyond this config.
+
+Both random and distributed ephemeral pin policies are off by default in
+Octopus. The features may be enabled via the
+``mds_export_ephemeral_random`` and ``mds_export_ephemeral_distributed``
+configuration options.
+
+Ephemeral pins may override parent export pins and vice versa. What determines
+which policy is followed is the rule of the closest parent: if a closer parent
+directory has a conflicting policy, use that one instead. For example:
+
+::
+
+    mkdir -p foo/bar1/baz foo/bar2
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin -v 0 foo
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin.distributed -v 1 foo/bar1
+
+The ``foo/bar1/baz`` directory will be ephemerally pinned because the
+``foo/bar1`` policy overrides the export pin on ``foo``. The ``foo/bar2``
+directory will obey the pin on ``foo`` normally.
+
+For the reverse situation:
+
+::
+
+    mkdir -p home/{patrick,john}
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin.distributed -v 1 home
+    setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin -v 2 home/patrick
+
+The ``home/patrick`` directory and its children will be pinned to rank 2
+because its export pin overrides the policy on ``home``.
+
+To remove a partitioning policy, remove the respective extended attribute
+or set the value to 0.
+
+.. code::bash
+   $ setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin.distributed -v 0 home
+   # or
+   $ setfattr -x ceph.dir.pin.distributed home
+
+For export pins, remove the extended attribute or set the extended attribute
+value to `-1`.
+
+.. code::bash
+   $ setfattr -n ceph.dir.pin -v -1 home
+
+
+Dynamic subtree partitioning with Balancer on specific ranks
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The CephFS file system provides the ``bal_rank_mask`` option to enable the balancer
+to dynamically rebalance subtrees within particular active MDS ranks. This
+allows administrators to employ both the dynamic subtree partitioning and
+static pining schemes in different active MDS ranks so that metadata loads
+are optimized based on user demand. For instance, in realistic cloud
+storage environments, where a lot of subvolumes are allotted to multiple
+computing nodes (e.g., VMs and containers), some subvolumes that require
+high performance are managed by static partitioning, whereas most subvolumes
+that experience a moderate workload are managed by the balancer. As the balancer
+evenly spreads the metadata workload to all active MDS ranks, performance of
+static pinned subvolumes inevitably may be affected or degraded. If this option
+is enabled, subtrees managed by the balancer are not affected by
+static pinned subtrees.
+
+This option can be configured with the ``ceph fs set`` command. For example:
+
+::
+
+    ceph fs set <fs_name> bal_rank_mask <hex> 
+
+Each bitfield of the ``<hex>`` number represents a dedicated rank. If the ``<hex>`` is
+set to ``0x3``, the balancer runs on active ``0`` and ``1`` ranks. For example:
+
+::
+
+    ceph fs set <fs_name> bal_rank_mask 0x3
+
+If the ``bal_rank_mask`` is set to ``-1`` or ``all``, all active ranks are masked
+and utilized by the balancer. As an example:
+
+::
+
+    ceph fs set <fs_name> bal_rank_mask -1
+
+On the other hand, if the balancer needs to be disabled,
+the ``bal_rank_mask`` should be set to ``0x0``. For example:
+
+::
+
+    ceph fs set <fs_name> bal_rank_mask 0x0