From e6918187568dbd01842d8d1d2c808ce16a894239 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 13:54:28 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 18.2.2. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- src/rocksdb/java/rocksjni/rocks_callback_object.cc | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/rocksdb/java/rocksjni/rocks_callback_object.cc (limited to 'src/rocksdb/java/rocksjni/rocks_callback_object.cc') diff --git a/src/rocksdb/java/rocksjni/rocks_callback_object.cc b/src/rocksdb/java/rocksjni/rocks_callback_object.cc new file mode 100644 index 000000000..35513e151 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/rocksdb/java/rocksjni/rocks_callback_object.cc @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +// Copyright (c) 2011-present, Facebook, Inc. All rights reserved. +// This source code is licensed under both the GPLv2 (found in the +// COPYING file in the root directory) and Apache 2.0 License +// (found in the LICENSE.Apache file in the root directory). +// +// This file implements the "bridge" between Java and C++ for +// JNI Callbacks from C++ to sub-classes or org.rocksdb.RocksCallbackObject + +#include + +#include "include/org_rocksdb_RocksCallbackObject.h" +#include "jnicallback.h" + +/* + * Class: org_rocksdb_RocksCallbackObject + * Method: disposeInternal + * Signature: (J)V + */ +void Java_org_rocksdb_RocksCallbackObject_disposeInternal(JNIEnv* /*env*/, + jobject /*jobj*/, + jlong handle) { + // TODO(AR) is deleting from the super class JniCallback OK, or must we delete + // the subclass? Example hierarchies: + // 1) Comparator -> BaseComparatorJniCallback + JniCallback -> + // DirectComparatorJniCallback 2) Comparator -> BaseComparatorJniCallback + + // JniCallback -> ComparatorJniCallback + // I think this is okay, as Comparator and JniCallback both have virtual + // destructors... + delete reinterpret_cast(handle); +} -- cgit v1.2.3