summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/docs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 06:23:09 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 06:23:09 +0000
commit30d479c28c831a0d4f1fdb54a9e346b0fc176be1 (patch)
treeaa35d7414ce9f1326abf6f723f6dfa5b0aa08b1d /docs
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadapr-30d479c28c831a0d4f1fdb54a9e346b0fc176be1.tar.xz
apr-30d479c28c831a0d4f1fdb54a9e346b0fc176be1.zip
Adding upstream version 1.7.2.upstream/1.7.2
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--docs/APRDesign.html399
-rw-r--r--docs/canonical_filenames.html156
-rw-r--r--docs/doxygen.conf38
-rw-r--r--docs/incomplete_types84
-rw-r--r--docs/non_apr_programs47
-rw-r--r--docs/pool-design.html96
-rw-r--r--docs/win32_builds.html57
7 files changed, 877 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/APRDesign.html b/docs/APRDesign.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0d6d6a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/APRDesign.html
@@ -0,0 +1,399 @@
+<HTML>
+<HEAD><TITLE>APR Design Document</TITLE></HEAD>
+<BODY>
+<h1>Design of APR</h1>
+
+<p>The Apache Portable Run-time libraries have been designed to provide a common
+interface to low level routines across any platform. The original goal of APR
+was to combine all code in Apache to one common code base. This is not the
+correct approach however, so the goal of APR has changed. There are places
+where common code is not a good thing. For example, how to map requests
+to either threads or processes should be platform specific. APR's place
+is now to combine any code that can be safely combined without sacrificing
+performance.</p>
+
+<p>To this end we have created a set of operations that are required for cross
+platform development. There may be other types that are desired and those
+will be implemented in the future.</p>
+
+<p>This document will discuss the structure of APR, and how best to contribute
+code to the effort.</p>
+
+<h2>APR On Windows and Netware</h2>
+
+<p>APR on Windows and Netware is different from APR on all other systems,
+because those platforms don't use autoconf. On Unix, apr_private.h (private to
+APR) and apr.h (public, used by applications that use APR) are generated by
+autoconf from acconfig.h and apr.h.in respectively. On Windows (and Netware),
+apr_private.h and apr.h are created from apr_private.hw (apr_private.hwn)
+and apr.hw (apr.hwn) respectively.</p>
+
+<p> <strong>
+ If you add code to acconfig.h or tests to configure.in or aclocal.m4,
+ please give some thought to whether or not Windows and Netware need
+ these additions as well. A general rule of thumb, is that if it is
+ a feature macro, such as APR_HAS_THREADS, Windows and Netware need it.
+ In other words, if the definition is going to be used in a public APR
+ header file, such as apr_general.h, Windows needs it.
+
+ The only time it is safe to add a macro or test without also adding
+ the macro to apr*.h[n]w, is if the macro tells APR how to build. For
+ example, a test for a header file does not need to be added to Windows.
+</strong></p>
+
+<h2>APR Features</h2>
+
+<p>One of the goals of APR is to provide a common set of features across all
+platforms. This is an admirable goal, it is also not realistic. We cannot
+expect to be able to implement ALL features on ALL platforms. So we are
+going to do the next best thing. Provide a common interface to ALL APR
+features on MOST platforms.</p>
+
+<p>APR developers should create FEATURE MACROS for any feature that is not
+available on ALL platforms. This should be a simple definition which has
+the form:</p>
+
+<code>APR_HAS_FEATURE</code>
+
+<p>This macro should evaluate to true if APR has this feature on this platform.
+For example, Linux and Windows have mmap'ed files, and APR is providing an
+interface for mmapp'ing a file. On both Linux and Windows, APR_HAS_MMAP
+should evaluate to one, and the ap_mmap_* functions should map files into
+memory and return the appropriate status codes.</p>
+
+<p>If your OS of choice does not have mmap'ed files, APR_HAS_MMAP should
+evaluate to zero, and all ap_mmap_* functions should not be defined. The
+second step is a precaution that will allow us to break at compile time if a
+programmer tries to use unsupported functions.</p>
+
+<h2>APR types</h2>
+
+<p>The base types in APR</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>dso<br>
+ Shared library routines
+<li>mmap<br>
+ Memory-mapped files
+<li>poll<br>
+ Polling I/O
+<li>time<br>
+ Time
+<li>user<br>
+ Users and groups
+<li>locks<br>
+ Process and thread locks (critical sections)
+<li>shmem<br>
+ Shared memory
+<li>file_io<br>
+ File I/O, including pipes
+<li>atomic<br>
+ Atomic integer operations
+<li>strings<br>
+ String handling routines
+<li>memory<br>
+ Pool-based memory allocation
+<li>passwd<br>
+ Reading passwords from the terminal
+<li>tables<br>
+ Tables and hashes
+<li>network_io<br>
+ Network I/O
+<li>threadproc<br>
+ Threads and processes
+<li>misc<br>
+ Any APR type which doesn't have any other place to belong. This
+ should be used sparingly.
+<li>support<br>
+ Functions meant to be used across multiple APR types. This area
+ is for internal functions only. If a function is exposed, it should
+ not be put here.
+</ul>
+
+<h2>Directory Structure</h2>
+
+<p>Each type has a base directory. Inside this base directory, are
+subdirectories, which contain the actual code. These subdirectories are named
+after the platforms the are compiled on. Unix is also used as a common
+directory. If the code you are writing is POSIX based, you should look at the
+code in the unix directory. A good rule of thumb, is that if more than half
+your code needs to be ifdef'ed out, and the structures required for your code
+are substantively different from the POSIX code, you should create a new
+directory.</p>
+
+<p>Currently, the APR code is written for Unix, BeOS, Windows, and OS/2. An
+example of the directory structure is the file I/O directory:</p>
+
+<pre>
+apr
+ |
+ -> file_io
+ |
+ -> unix The Unix and common base code
+ |
+ -> win32 The Windows code
+ |
+ -> os2 The OS/2 code
+</pre>
+
+<p>Obviously, BeOS does not have a directory. This is because BeOS is currently
+using the Unix directory for it's file_io.</p>
+
+<p>There are a few special top level directories. These are test and include.
+Test is a directory which stores all test programs. It is expected
+that if a new type is developed, there will also be a new test program, to
+help people port this new type to different platforms. A small document
+describing how to create new tests that integrate with the test suite can be
+found in the test/ directory. Include is a directory which stores all
+required APR header files for external use.</p>
+
+<h2>Creating an APR Type</h2>
+
+<p>The current design of APR requires that most APR types be incomplete.
+It is not possible to write flexible portable code if programs can access
+the internals of APR types. This is because different platforms are
+likely to define different native types. There are only two exceptions to
+this rule:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>The first exception to this rule is if the type can only reasonably be
+implemented one way. For example, time is a complete type because there
+is only one reasonable time implementation.
+
+<li>The second exception to the incomplete type rule can be found in
+apr_portable.h. This file defines the native types for each platform.
+Using these types, it is possible to extract native types for any APR type.</p>
+</ul>
+
+<p>For this reason, each platform defines a structure in their own directories.
+Those structures are then typedef'ed in an external header file. For example
+in file_io/unix/fileio.h:</p>
+
+<pre>
+ struct ap_file_t {
+ apr_pool_t *cntxt;
+ int filedes;
+ FILE *filehand;
+ ...
+ }
+</pre>
+
+<p>In include/apr_file_io.h:</p>
+ </pre>
+ typedef struct ap_file_t ap_file_t;
+ </pre>
+
+<p> This will cause a compiler error if somebody tries to access the filedes
+field in this structure. Windows does not have a filedes field, so obviously,
+it is important that programs not be able to access these.</p>
+
+<p>You may notice the apr_pool_t field. Most APR types have this field. This
+type is used to allocate memory within APR. Because every APR type has a pool,
+any APR function can allocate memory if it needs to. This is very important
+and it is one of the reasons that APR works. If you create a new type, you
+must add a pool to it. If you do not, then all functions that operate on that
+type will need a pool argument.</p>
+
+<h2>New Function</h2>
+
+<p>When creating a new function, please try to adhere to these rules.</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li> Result arguments should be the first arguments.
+<li> If a function needs a pool, it should be the last argument.
+<li> These rules are flexible, especially if it makes the code easier
+ to understand because it mimics a standard function.
+</ul>
+
+<h2>Documentation</h2>
+
+<p>Whenever a new function is added to APR, it MUST be documented. New
+functions will not be committed unless there are docs to go along with them.
+The documentation should be a comment block above the function in the header
+file.</p>
+
+<p>The format for the comment block is:</p>
+
+<pre>
+ /**
+ * Brief description of the function
+ * @param parma_1_name explanation
+ * @param parma_2_name explanation
+ * @param parma_n_name explanation
+ * @tip Any extra information people should know.
+ * @deffunc function prototype if required
+ */
+</pre>
+
+<p>For an actual example, look at any file in the include directory. The
+reason the docs are in the header files is to ensure that the docs always
+reflect the current code. If you change parameters or return values for a
+function, please be sure to update the documentation.</p>
+
+<h2>APR Error reporting</h2>
+
+<p>Most APR functions should return an ap_status_t type. The only time an
+APR function does not return an ap_status_t is if it absolutely CAN NOT
+fail. Examples of this would be filling out an array when you know you are
+not beyond the array's range. If it cannot fail on your platform, but it
+could conceivably fail on another platform, it should return an ap_status_t.
+Unless you are sure, return an ap_status_t.</p>
+
+<strong>
+ This includes functions that return TRUE/FALSE values. How that
+ is handled is discussed below
+</strong>
+
+<p>All platforms return errno values unchanged. Each platform can also have
+one system error type, which can be returned after an offset is added.
+There are five types of error values in APR, each with its own offset.</p>
+
+<!-- This should be turned into a table, but I am lazy today -->
+<pre>
+ Name Purpose
+0) This is 0 for all platforms and isn't really defined
+ anywhere, but it is the offset for errno values.
+ (This has no name because it isn't actually defined,
+ but for completeness we are discussing it here).
+
+1) APR_OS_START_ERROR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which
+ APR errors start to be defined. Error values are
+ defined as anything which caused the APR function to
+ fail. APR errors in this range should be named
+ APR_E* (i.e. APR_ENOSOCKET)
+
+2) APR_OS_START_STATUS This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which
+ APR status values start. Status values do not indicate
+ success or failure, and should be returned if
+ APR_SUCCESS does not make sense. APR status codes in
+ this range should be name APR_* (i.e. APR_DETACH)
+
+4) APR_OS_START_USEERR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which
+ APR apps can begin to add their own error codes.
+
+3) APR_OS_START_SYSERR This is platform dependent, and is the offset at which
+ system error values begin.
+</pre>
+
+<strong>The difference in naming between APR_OS_START_ERROR and
+APR_OS_START_STATUS mentioned above allows programmers to easily determine if
+the error code indicates an error condition or a status condition.</strong>
+
+<p>If your function has multiple return codes that all indicate success, but
+with different results, or if your function can only return PASS/FAIL, you
+should still return an apr_status_t. In the first case, define one
+APR status code for each return value, an example of this is
+<code>apr_proc_wait</code>, which can only return APR_CHILDDONE,
+APR_CHILDNOTDONE, or an error code. In the second case, please return
+APR_SUCCESS for PASS, and define a new APR status code for failure, an
+example of this is <code>apr_compare_users</code>, which can only return
+APR_SUCCESS, APR_EMISMATCH, or an error code.</p>
+
+<p>All of these definitions can be found in apr_errno.h for all platforms. When
+an error occurs in an APR function, the function must return an error code.
+If the error occurred in a system call and that system call uses errno to
+report an error, then the code is returned unchanged. For example: </p>
+
+<pre>
+ if (open(fname, oflags, 0777) < 0)
+ return errno;
+</pre>
+
+<p>The next place an error can occur is a system call that uses some error value
+other than the primary error value on a platform. This can also be handled
+by APR applications. For example:</p>
+
+<pre>
+ if (CreateFile(fname, oflags, sharemod, NULL,
+ createflags, attributes, 0) == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE
+ return (GetLAstError() + APR_OS_START_SYSERR);
+</pre>
+
+<p>These two examples implement the same function for two different platforms.
+Obviously even if the underlying problem is the same on both platforms, this
+will result in two different error codes being returned. This is OKAY, and
+is correct for APR. APR relies on the fact that most of the time an error
+occurs, the program logs the error and continues, it does not try to
+programatically solve the problem. This does not mean we have not provided
+support for programmatically solving the problem, it just isn't the default
+case. We'll get to how this problem is solved in a little while.</p>
+
+<p>If the error occurs in an APR function but it is not due to a system call,
+but it is actually an APR error or just a status code from APR, then the
+appropriate code should be returned. These codes are defined in apr_errno.h
+and should be self explanatory.</p>
+
+<p>No APR code should ever return a code between APR_OS_START_USEERR and
+APR_OS_START_SYSERR, those codes are reserved for APR applications.</p>
+
+<p>To programmatically correct an error in a running application, the error
+codes need to be consistent across platforms. This should make sense. APR
+has provided macros to test for status code equivalency. For example, to
+determine if the code that you received from the APR function means EOF, you
+would use the macro APR_STATUS_IS_EOF().</p>
+
+<p>Why did APR take this approach? There are two ways to deal with error
+codes portably.</p>
+
+<ol type=1>
+<li> Return the same error code across all platforms.
+<li> Return platform specific error codes and convert them when necessary.
+</ol>
+
+<p>The problem with option number one is that it takes time to convert error
+codes to a common code, and most of the time programs want to just output
+an error string. If we convert all errors to a common subset, we have four
+steps to output an error string:</p>
+
+<p>The second problem with option 1, is that it is a lossy conversion. For
+example, Windows and OS/2 have a couple hundred error codes, but POSIX errno
+only defines about 50 errno values. This means that if we convert to a
+canonical error value immediately, there is no way for the programmer to
+get the actual system error.</p>
+
+<pre>
+ make syscall that fails
+ convert to common error code step 1
+ return common error code
+ check for success
+ call error output function step 2
+ convert back to system error step 3
+ output error string step 4
+</pre>
+
+<p>By keeping the errors platform specific, we can output error strings in two
+steps.</p>
+
+<pre>
+ make syscall that fails
+ return error code
+ check for success
+ call error output function step 1
+ output error string step 2
+</pre>
+
+<p>Less often, programs change their execution based on what error was returned.
+This is no more expensive using option 2 than it is using option 1, but we
+put the onus of converting the error code on the programmer themselves.
+For example, using option 1:</p>
+
+<pre>
+ make syscall that fails
+ convert to common error code
+ return common error code
+ decide execution based on common error code
+</pre>
+
+<p>Using option 2:</p>
+
+<pre>
+ make syscall that fails
+ return error code
+ convert to common error code (using ap_canonical_error)
+ decide execution based on common error code
+</pre>
+
+<p>Finally, there is one more operation on error codes. You can get a string
+that explains in human readable form what has happened. To do this using
+APR, call ap_strerror().</p>
+
diff --git a/docs/canonical_filenames.html b/docs/canonical_filenames.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c1c03b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/canonical_filenames.html
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+<HTML>
+<HEAD><TITLE>APR Canonical Filenames</TITLE></HEAD>
+<BODY>
+<h1>APR Canonical Filename</h1>
+
+<h2>Requirements</h2>
+
+<p>APR porters need to address the underlying discrepancies between
+file systems. To achieve a reasonable degree of security, the
+program depending upon APR needs to know that two paths may be
+compared, and that a mismatch is guaranteed to reflect that the
+two paths do not return the same resource</p>.
+
+<p>The first discrepancy is in volume roots. Unix and pure derivatives
+have only one root path, "/". Win32 and OS2 share root paths of
+the form "D:/", D: is the volume designation. However, this can
+be specified as "//./D:/" as well, indicating D: volume of the
+'this' machine. Win32 and OS2 also may employ a UNC root path,
+of the form "//server/share/" where share is a share-point of the
+specified network server. Finally, NetWare root paths are of the
+form "server/volume:/", or the simpler "volume:/" syntax for 'this'
+machine. All these non-Unix file systems accept volume:path,
+without a slash following the colon, as a path relative to the
+current working directory, which APR will treat as ambiguous, that
+is, neither an absolute nor a relative path per se.</p>
+
+<p>The second discrepancy is in the meaning of the 'this' directory.
+In general, 'this' must be eliminated from the path where it occurs.
+The syntax "path/./" and "path/" are both aliases to path. However,
+this isn't file system independent, since the double slash "//" has
+a special meaning on OS2 and Win32 at the start of the path name,
+and is invalid on those platforms before the "//server/share/" UNC
+root path is completed. Finally, as noted above, "//./volume/" is
+legal root syntax on WinNT, and perhaps others.</p>
+
+<p>The third discrepancy is in the context of the 'parent' directory.
+When "parent/path/.." occurs, the path must be unwound to "parent".
+It's also critical to simply truncate leading "/../" paths to "/",
+since the parent of the root is root. This gets tricky on the
+Win32 and OS2 platforms, since the ".." element is invalid before
+the "//server/share/" is complete, and the "//server/share/../"
+sequence is the complete UNC root "//server/share/". In relative
+paths, leading ".." elements are significant, until they are merged
+with an absolute path. The relative form must only retain the ".."
+segments as leading segments, to be resolved once merged to another
+relative or an absolute path.</p>
+
+<p>The fourth discrepancy occurs with acceptance of alternate character
+codes for the same element. Path separators are not retained within
+the APR canonical forms. The OS filesystem and APR (slashed) forms
+can both be returned as strings, to be used in the proper context.
+Unix, Win32 and Netware all accept slashes and backslashes as the
+same path separator symbol, although unix strictly accepts slashes.
+While the APR form of the name strictly uses slashes, always consider
+that there could be a platform that actually accepts slashes as a
+character within a segment name.</p>
+
+<p>The fifth and worst discrepancy plagues Win32, OS2, Netware, and some
+filesystems mounted in Unix. Case insensitivity can permit the same
+file to slip through in both it's proper case and alternate cases.
+Simply changing the case is insufficient for any character set beyond
+ASCII, since various dialectic forms of characters suffer from one to
+many or many to one translations. An example would be u-umlaut, which
+might be accepted as a single character u-umlaut, a two character
+sequence u and the zero-width umlaut, the upper case form of the same,
+or perhaps even a capital U alone. This can be handled in different
+ways depending on the purposes of the APR based program, but the one
+requirement is that the path must be absolute in order to resolve these
+ambiguities. Methods employed include comparison of device and inode
+file uniqifiers, which is a fairly fast operation, or querying the OS
+for the true form of the name, which can be much slower. Only the
+acknowledgement of the file names by the OS can validate the equality
+of two different cases of the same filename.</p>
+
+<p>The sixth discrepancy, illegal or insignificant characters, is especially
+significant in non-unix file systems. Trailing periods are accepted
+but never stored, therefore trailing periods must be ignored for any
+form of comparison. And all OS's have certain expectations of what
+characters are illegal (or undesirable due to confusion.)</p>
+
+<p>A final warning, canonical functions don't transform or resolve case
+or character ambiguity issues until they are resolved into an absolute
+path. The relative canonical path, while useful, while useful for URL
+or similar identifiers, cannot be used for testing or comparison of file
+system objects.</p>
+
+<hr>
+
+<h2>Canonical API</h2>
+
+Functions to manipulate the apr_canon_file_t (an opaque type) include:
+
+<ul>
+<li>Create canon_file_t (from char* path and canon_file_t parent path)
+<li>Merged canon_file_t (from path and parent, both canon_file_t)
+<li>Get char* path of all or some segments
+<li>Get path flags of IsRelative, IsVirtualRoot, and IsAbsolute
+<li>Compare two canon_file_t structures for file equality
+</ul>
+
+<p>The path is corrected to the file system case only if is in absolute
+form. The apr_canon_file_t should be preserved as long as possible and
+used as the parent to create child entries to reduce the number of expensive
+stat and case canonicalization calls to the OS.</p>
+
+<p>The comparison operation provides that the APR can postpone correction
+of case by simply relying upon the device and inode for equivalence. The
+stat implementation provides that two files are the same, while their
+strings are not equivalent, and eliminates the need for the operating
+system to return the proper form of the name.</p>
+
+<p>In any case, returning the char* path, with a flag to request the proper
+case, forces the OS calls to resolve the true names of each segment. Where
+there is a penalty for this operation and the stat device and inode test
+is faster, case correction is postponed until the char* result is requested.
+On platforms that identify the inode, device, or proper name interchangably
+with no penalties, this may occur when the name is initially processed.</p>
+
+<hr>
+
+<h2>Unix Example</h2>
+
+<p>First the simplest case:</p>
+
+<pre>
+Parse Canonical Name
+accepts parent path as canonical_t
+ this path as string
+
+Split this path Segments on '/'
+
+For each of this path Segments
+ If first Segment
+ If this Segment is Empty ([nothing]/)
+ Append this Root Segment (don't merge)
+ Continue to next Segment
+ Else is relative
+ Append parent Segments (to merge)
+ Continue with this Segment
+ If Segment is '.' or empty (2 slashes)
+ Discard this Segment
+ Continue with next Segment
+ If Segment is '..'
+ If no previous Segment or previous Segment is '..'
+ Append this Segment
+ Continue with next Segment
+ If previous Segment and previous is not Root Segment
+ Discard previous Segment
+ Discard this Segment
+ Continue with next Segment
+ Append this Relative Segment
+ Continue with next Segment
+</pre>
+
+</BODY>
+</HTML>
diff --git a/docs/doxygen.conf b/docs/doxygen.conf
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..29c2cbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/doxygen.conf
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+PROJECT_NAME="Apache Portable Runtime"
+
+INPUT=.
+QUIET=YES
+RECURSIVE=YES
+FILE_PATTERNS=*.h
+
+OUTPUT_DIRECTORY=docs/dox
+
+MACRO_EXPANSION=YES
+EXPAND_ONLY_PREDEF=YES
+#EXPAND_AS_DEFINED=
+# not sure why this doesn't work as EXPAND_AS_DEFINED, it should!
+PREDEFINED="APR_DECLARE(x)=x" \
+ "APR_DECLARE_NONSTD(x)=x" \
+ "APR_DECLARE_DATA" \
+ "APR_POOL_DECLARE_ACCESSOR(x)=apr_pool_t* apr_##x##_pool_get (const apr_##x##_t *the##x)" \
+ "APR_DECLARE_INHERIT_SET(x)=apr_status_t apr_##x##_inherit_set(apr_##x##_t *the##x)" \
+ "APR_DECLARE_INHERIT_UNSET(x)=apr_status_t apr_##x##_inherit_unset(apr_##x##_t *the##x)" \
+ "APR_HAS_THREADS" \
+ "__attribute__(x)=" \
+ DOXYGEN=
+
+OPTIMIZE_OUTPUT_FOR_C=YES
+STRIP_CODE_COMMENTS=NO
+
+FULL_PATH_NAMES=NO
+CASE_SENSE_NAMES=NO
+# some autoconf guru needs to make configure set this correctly...
+# in the meantime, simply listing the headers should be alright
+#STRIP_FROM_PATH=/buildpath/apr
+
+EXCLUDE_PATTERNS="*/acconfig.h" \
+ "*/test/*" \
+ "*/arch/*"
+
+GENERATE_TAGFILE=docs/dox/apr.tag
+
diff --git a/docs/incomplete_types b/docs/incomplete_types
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..08b0c0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/incomplete_types
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+The question has been asked multiple times, "Why is APR using Incomplete
+types?" This document will try to explain that.
+
+Incomplete types are used in APR because they can enforce portability, and
+they make the APR developers job easier, as well as allowing APR to use native
+types on all platforms. Imagine a scenario where APR wasn't using incomplete
+types. The ap_file_t type would have to be defined as:
+
+typedef struct ap_file_t {
+ ap_pool_t *pool
+ char *fname;
+ int eof_hit;
+ int pipe;
+ ap_interval_time_t timeout;
+#ifdef WIN32
+ HANDLE file_handle;
+ DWORD dwFileAttributes;
+#elif defined(OS2)
+ HFILE filedes;
+ HEV PipeSem
+#else
+ int filedes;
+ int ungetchar;
+#endif
+
+#ifndef WIN32
+ int buffered;
+ ap_int32_flags
+ int isopen;
+
+ /* Stuff for buffered mode */
+ char *buffer;
+ int bufpos;
+ unsigned long dataRead;
+ int direction;
+ unsigned long filePtr;
+ ap_lock_t *mutex;
+#endif
+} ap_file_t;
+
+This captures the essence of what is currently being defined for ap_file_t
+using incomplete types. However, using this structure leads developers to
+believe that they are safe accessing any of the fields in this structure.
+This is not true. On some platforms, such as Windows, about half of the
+structure disappears. We could combine some of these definitions with
+macros, for example:
+
+#ifdef WIN32
+#define filetype HANDLE
+#elif OS2
+#define filetype HFILE
+#else
+#define filetype int
+#endif
+
+And then in the definition for ap_file_t, we could say:
+ filetype filedes;
+
+This gets rid of some of the complexity, by moving it off to the side, but
+it is still not safe for a programmers to access the filedes field directly
+outside of APR, because the programmer has no way of knowing what the actual
+type is. So for example printing the filedes using printf would yield wildly
+varying results on Windows and OS2 when compared to Unix.
+
+Another option also presents itself. Stick strictly to POSIX. This means
+that all code can be shared on any POSIX compliant platform. The problem
+with this is performance. One of the benefits to APR, is that it allows
+developers to easily use native types on all platforms with the same code.
+This has proven to provide a substantial performance boost on most non-Unix
+platforms.
+
+Having said all of that, sometimes incomplete types just don't make sense.
+For example, the first implementation of time functions used incomplete types,
+which added a layer of complexity that turned out to be unnecessary. If
+a platform cannot provide a simple number that represents the number of seconds
+elapsed since a specified date and time, then APR doesn't really want to
+provide support for that platform.
+
+APR is trying hard to provide a balance of incomplete and complete types,
+but like all things, sometimes the developers make mistakes. If you are
+using APR and find that there is an incomplete type that doesn't need to be
+an incomplete type, please let us know, we are more than willing to listen
+and design parts of APR that do not use incomplete types.
+
diff --git a/docs/non_apr_programs b/docs/non_apr_programs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5003a8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/non_apr_programs
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+How do I use APR'ized programs in connection with programs that don't
+use APR? These darn incomplete types don't let me fill out the APR types.
+
+The APR developers acknowledge that most programs are not using APR, and
+we don't expect them to migrate to using APR just because APR has been
+released. So, we have provided a way for non-APR'ized programs to interact
+very cleanly with APR.
+
+There are a set of functions, all documented in apr_portable.h, which allow
+a programmer to either get a native type from an APR type, or to setup an
+APR type from a native type.
+
+For example, if you are writing an add-on to another program that does not use
+APR for file I/O, but you (in your infinite wisdom) want to use APR to make
+sure your section is portable. Assume the program provides a type foo_t with
+a file descriptor in it (fd).
+
+void function_using_apr(foo_t non_apr_struct, ap_pool_t *p)
+{
+ ap_file_t *apr_file = NULL;
+
+ ap_put_os_file(&apr_file, &non_apr_struct->fd, p);
+
+ ...
+}
+
+There are portable functions for each APR incomplete type. They are all
+called ap_put_os_foobar(), and they each take the same basic arguments, a
+pointer to a pointer to the incomplete type (the last pointer in that list
+should be NULL), a pointer to the native type, and a pool. Each of these can
+be found in apr_portable.h.
+
+If you have to do the exact opposite (take an APR type and convert it to a
+native type, there are functions for that too. For example:
+
+void function_not_using_apr(apr_file_t *apr_file)
+{
+ int unix_file_desc;
+
+ ap_get_os_file(&unix_file_desc, apr_file);
+
+ ...
+}
+
+For each ap_put_os_foobar, there is a corresponding ap_get_os_file. These are
+also documented in apr_portable.h.
+
diff --git a/docs/pool-design.html b/docs/pool-design.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..46b63d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/pool-design.html
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
+<html><head>
+ <title>Using APR Pools</title>
+ </head>
+ <body>
+ <h1>Using APR Pools</h1>
+
+ <p>
+ From <a href="http://subversion.tigris.org/">Subversion</a>, we
+ have learned a <em>lot</em> about how to use pools in a heavily
+ structured/object-based environment.
+ <a href="http://httpd.apache.org/">Apache httpd</a> is a
+ completely different beast: "allocate a request pool. use
+ it. destroy it."
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ In a complex app, that request-style of behavior is not
+ present. Luckily, the "proper" use of pools can be described in
+ just a few rules:
+ </p>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>
+ Objects should not have their own pools. An object is
+ allocated into a pool defined by the constructor's caller. The
+ <strong>caller</strong> knows the lifetime of the object and
+ will manage it via the pool. Generally, this also means that
+ objects will not have a "close" or a "free" since those
+ operations will happen implicitly as part of the destruction
+ of the pool the objects live within.
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
+ <p>
+ Functions should not create/destroy pools for their
+ operation; they should use a pool provided by the
+ caller. Again, the <strong>caller</strong> knows more about
+ how the function will be used, how often, how many times,
+ etc. Thus, it should be in charge of the function's memory
+ usage.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ As an example, the caller might know that the app will exit
+ upon the function's return. Thus, the function would be
+ creating extra work if it built and destroyed a
+ pool. Instead, it should use the passed-in pool, which the
+ caller is going to be tossing as part of app-exit anyways.
+ </p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
+ <p>
+ Whenever an unbounded iteration occurs, a subpool should be
+ used. The general pattern is:
+ </p>
+ <blockquote>
+ <pre>
+subpool = apr_create_subpool(pool);
+for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
+ apr_pool_clear(subpool);
+
+ do_operation(..., subpool);
+}
+apr_pool_destroy(subpool);</pre>
+ </blockquote>
+ <p>
+ This pattern prevents the 'pool' from growing unbounded and
+ consuming all of memory. Note that it is slightly more
+ optimal to clear the pool on loop-entry. This pattern also
+ allows for a '<tt>continue</tt>' to occur within the loop,
+ yet still ensure the pool will be cleared.
+ </p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
+ Given all of the above, it is pretty well mandatory to pass a
+ pool to <em>every</em> function. Since objects are not
+ recording pools for themselves, and the caller is always
+ supposed to be managing memory, then each function needs a
+ pool, rather than relying on some hidden magic pool. In
+ limited cases, objects may record the pool used for their
+ construction so that they can construct sub-parts, but these
+ cases should be examined carefully. Internal pools can lead to
+ unbounded pool usage if the object is not careful.
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+
+ <hr>
+ <address>Greg Stein</address>
+ <!-- Created: Wed Jun 25 14:39:57 PDT 2003 -->
+ <!-- hhmts start -->
+Last modified: Wed Jun 25 14:50:19 PDT 2003
+<!-- hhmts end -->
+
+</body></html>
diff --git a/docs/win32_builds.html b/docs/win32_builds.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ad57d8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/win32_builds.html
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+<HTML>
+<HEAD><TITLE>APR Win32 Builds and Debugging</TITLE></HEAD>
+<BODY>
+<h1>APR Win32 Builds and Debugging</h1>
+
+<h2>Configuration and Flavors</h2>
+
+<p>The Win32 APR Developer Studio projects consist of</p>
+
+<dl>
+ <dt>apr/apr.dsp</dt>
+ <dd>Builds the static apr.lib library (-D APR_DECLARE_STATIC)</dd>
+ <dt>apr/libapr.dsp</dt>
+ <dd>Builds the dynamic libapr.dll library (no define required)</dd>
+ <dt>apr-util/aprutil.dsp</dt>
+ <dd>Builds the static aprutil.lib library (-D APU_DECLARE_STATIC)</dd>
+ <dt>apr-util/libaprutil.dsp</dt>
+ <dd>Builds the dynamic libaprutil.dll library (no define required)</dd>
+ <dt>apr-iconv/apriconv.dsp</dt>
+ <dd>Builds the static apriconv.lib library (-D API_DECLARE_STATIC)</dd>
+ <dt>apr-iconv/libapriconv.dsp</dt>
+ <dd>Builds the dynamic libapriconv.dll library (no define required)</dd>
+</dl>
+
+<p>In order to prepare to use one of the <em>static</em> libraries above,
+ your application must be compiled with the define shown above, so that the
+ correct linkage is created. The APR authors intended the use of dynamic
+ libraries by default, so application authors do not need any special
+ defines in order to link to the dynamic library flavors.</p>
+
+<p>In order to build APR, you must use the proper dependencies. A good
+ example of those dependencies is given in the apr-util/aprutil.dsw
+ Developer Studio workspace. You can borrow the parts of that structure
+ your application needs, that workspace defines both the dynamic and static
+ library dependencies.</p>
+
+<p>The APR libraries (dynamic and static) are compiled with debugging symbols,
+ even in Release builds. The dynamic library symbols are always usable,
+ simply keep the correspond .pdb file in the same path as the library .dll.
+ (E.g. both libapr.dll and libapr.pdb should be copied to the same path.)</p>
+
+<p>The static symbols will only be fully usable if your application does <em>not<em>
+ link with the /pdbtype:sept flag! At the time your application links to
+ an APR library, the corresponding _src.pdb file should exist in the original
+ path the library was built, or it may be sufficient to keep the _src.pdb file
+ in the same path as the library file. (E.g. apr.lib and apr_src.pdb should
+ reside together in your lib directory.) The later option is unconfirmed.</p>
+
+<p>In order to keep the symbols compiled into the static library, your application
+ must use the linker's /debug flag. If you do not want the application to be
+ debuggable with its corresponding .pdb file, omit the /debug flag and all debug
+ symbolic information is discarded. Note that your application can only be
+ debugged with the corresponding .pdb file created by the linker, unless you use
+ /debugtype:coff or /debugtype:both in your link options.</p>
+
+</BODY>
+</HTML>