diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-13 09:59:37 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-13 09:59:37 +0000 |
commit | 76e2632459410dec81337edb6a9fee33c9a660f3 (patch) | |
tree | a73345df208eede4a4daad340515c9328f34625c /apt-pkg/orderlist.cc | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | apt-76e2632459410dec81337edb6a9fee33c9a660f3.tar.xz apt-76e2632459410dec81337edb6a9fee33c9a660f3.zip |
Adding upstream version 2.7.12.upstream/2.7.12
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'apt-pkg/orderlist.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | apt-pkg/orderlist.cc | 1138 |
1 files changed, 1138 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc b/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..33d17fc --- /dev/null +++ b/apt-pkg/orderlist.cc @@ -0,0 +1,1138 @@ +// -*- mode: cpp; mode: fold -*- +// Description /*{{{*/ +/* ###################################################################### + + Order List - Represents and Manipulates an ordered list of packages. + + A list of packages can be ordered by a number of conflicting criteria + each given a specific priority. Each package also has a set of flags + indicating some useful things about it that are derived in the + course of sorting. The pkgPackageManager class uses this class for + all of it's installation ordering needs. + + This is a modified version of Manoj's Routine B. It consists of four + independent ordering algorithms that can be applied at for different + points in the ordering. By applying progressively fewer ordering + operations it is possible to give each consideration it's own + priority and create an order that satisfies the lowest applicable + consideration. + + The rules for unpacking ordering are: + 1) Unpacking ignores Depends: on all packages + 2) Unpacking requires Conflicts: on -ALL- packages to be satisfied + 3) Unpacking requires PreDepends: on this package only to be satisfied + 4) Removing requires that no packages depend on the package to be + removed. + + And the rule for configuration ordering is: + 1) Configuring requires that the Depends: of the package be satisfied + Conflicts+PreDepends are ignored because unpacking says they are + already correct [exageration, it does check but we need not be + concerned] + + And some features that are valuable for unpacking ordering. + f1) Unpacking a new package should advoid breaking dependencies of + configured packages + f2) Removal should not require a force, corrolory of f1 + f3) Unpacking should order by depends rather than fall back to random + ordering. + + Each of the features can be enabled in the sorting routine at an + arbitrary priority to give quite abit of control over the final unpacking + order. + + The rules listed above may never be violated and are called Critical. + When a critical rule is violated then a loop condition is recorded + and will have to be delt with in the caller. + + The ordering keeps two lists, the main list and the 'After List'. The + purpose of the after list is to allow packages to be delayed. This is done + by setting the after flag on the package. Any package which requires this + package to be ordered before will inherit the after flag and so on. This + is used for CD swap ordering where all packages on a second CD have the + after flag set. This forces them and all their dependents to be ordered + toward the end. + + There are complications in this algorithm when presented with cycles. + For all known practical cases it works, all cases where it doesn't work + is fixable by tweaking the package descriptions. However, it should be + possible to improve this further to make some better choices when + presented with cycles. + + ##################################################################### */ + /*}}}*/ +// Include Files /*{{{*/ +#include <config.h> + +#include <apt-pkg/configuration.h> +#include <apt-pkg/depcache.h> +#include <apt-pkg/error.h> +#include <apt-pkg/orderlist.h> +#include <apt-pkg/pkgcache.h> + +#include <algorithm> +#include <cstdlib> +#include <cstring> +#include <iostream> + /*}}}*/ + +using namespace std; + +// OrderList::pkgOrderList - Constructor /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* */ +pkgOrderList::pkgOrderList(pkgDepCache *pCache) : d(NULL), Cache(*pCache), + Primary(NULL), Secondary(NULL), + RevDepends(NULL), Remove(NULL), + AfterEnd(NULL), FileList(NULL), + LoopCount(-1), Depth(0) +{ + Debug = _config->FindB("Debug::pkgOrderList",false); + + /* Construct the arrays, egcs 1.0.1 bug requires the package count + hack */ + auto const Size = Cache.Head().PackageCount; + Flags = new unsigned short[Size]; + End = List = new Package *[Size]; + memset(Flags,0,sizeof(*Flags)*Size); +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::~pkgOrderList - Destructor /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* */ +pkgOrderList::~pkgOrderList() +{ + delete [] List; + delete [] Flags; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::IsMissing - Check if a file is missing /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* */ +bool pkgOrderList::IsMissing(PkgIterator Pkg) +{ + // Skip packages to erase + if (Cache[Pkg].Delete() == true) + return false; + + // Skip Packages that need configure only. + if ((Pkg.State() == pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsConfigure || + Pkg.State() == pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing) && + Cache[Pkg].Keep() == true) + return false; + + if (FileList == 0) + return false; + + if (FileList[Pkg->ID].empty() == false) + return false; + + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::DoRun - Does an order run /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* The caller is expected to have setup the desired probe state */ +bool pkgOrderList::DoRun() +{ + // Temp list + unsigned long Size = Cache.Head().PackageCount; + std::unique_ptr<Package *[]> NList(new Package *[Size]); + std::unique_ptr<Package *[]> AfterList(new Package *[Size]); + AfterEnd = AfterList.get(); + + Depth = 0; + WipeFlags(Added | AddPending | Loop | InList); + + for (iterator I = List; I != End; ++I) + Flag(*I,InList); + + // Rebuild the main list into the temp list. + iterator OldEnd = End; + End = NList.get(); + for (iterator I = List; I != OldEnd; ++I) + if (VisitNode(PkgIterator(Cache,*I), "DoRun") == false) + { + End = OldEnd; + return false; + } + + // Copy the after list to the end of the main list + for (Package **I = AfterList.get(); I != AfterEnd; I++) + *End++ = *I; + + // Swap the main list to the new list + delete [] List; + List = NList.release(); + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::OrderCritical - Perform critical unpacking ordering /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This performs predepends and immediate configuration ordering only. + This is termed critical unpacking ordering. Any loops that form are + fatal and indicate that the packages cannot be installed. */ +bool pkgOrderList::OrderCritical() +{ + FileList = 0; + + Primary = &pkgOrderList::DepUnPackPreD; + Secondary = 0; + RevDepends = 0; + Remove = 0; + LoopCount = 0; + + // Sort + std::sort(List,End, [this](Package *a, Package *b) { return OrderCompareB(a, b) < 0; } ); + + if (DoRun() == false) + return false; + + if (LoopCount != 0) + return _error->Error("Fatal, predepends looping detected"); + + if (Debug == true) + { + clog << "** Critical Unpack ordering done" << endl; + + for (iterator I = List; I != End; ++I) + { + PkgIterator P(Cache,*I); + if (IsNow(P) == true) + clog << " " << P.FullName() << ' ' << IsMissing(P) << ',' << IsFlag(P,After) << endl; + } + } + + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::OrderUnpack - Perform complete unpacking ordering /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This performs complete unpacking ordering and creates an order that is + suitable for unpacking */ +bool pkgOrderList::OrderUnpack(string *FileList) +{ + this->FileList = FileList; + + // Setup the after flags + if (FileList != 0) + { + WipeFlags(After); + + // Set the inlist flag + for (iterator I = List; I != End; ++I) + { + PkgIterator P(Cache,*I); + if (IsMissing(P) == true && IsNow(P) == true) + Flag(*I,After); + } + } + + Primary = &pkgOrderList::DepUnPackCrit; + Secondary = &pkgOrderList::DepConfigure; + RevDepends = &pkgOrderList::DepUnPackDep; + Remove = &pkgOrderList::DepRemove; + LoopCount = -1; + + // Sort + std::sort(List,End, [this](Package *a, Package *b) { return OrderCompareA(a, b) < 0; }); + + if (Debug == true) + clog << "** Pass A" << endl; + if (DoRun() == false) + return false; + + if (Debug == true) + clog << "** Pass B" << endl; + Secondary = 0; + if (DoRun() == false) + return false; + + if (Debug == true) + clog << "** Pass C" << endl; + LoopCount = 0; + RevDepends = 0; + Remove = 0; // Otherwise the libreadline remove problem occurs + if (DoRun() == false) + return false; + + if (Debug == true) + clog << "** Pass D" << endl; + LoopCount = 0; + Primary = &pkgOrderList::DepUnPackPre; + if (DoRun() == false) + return false; + + if (Debug == true) + { + clog << "** Unpack ordering done" << endl; + + for (iterator I = List; I != End; ++I) + { + PkgIterator P(Cache,*I); + if (IsNow(P) == true) + clog << " " << P.FullName() << ' ' << IsMissing(P) << ',' << IsFlag(P,After) << endl; + } + } + + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::OrderConfigure - Perform configuration ordering /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This orders by depends only and produces an order which is suitable + for configuration */ +bool pkgOrderList::OrderConfigure() +{ + FileList = 0; + Primary = &pkgOrderList::DepConfigure; + Secondary = 0; + RevDepends = 0; + Remove = 0; + LoopCount = -1; + return DoRun(); +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::Score - Score the package for sorting /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* Higher scores order earlier */ +int pkgOrderList::Score(PkgIterator Pkg) +{ + // Removals should be done after we dealt with essentials + static int const ScoreDelete = _config->FindI("OrderList::Score::Delete", 100); + if (Cache[Pkg].Delete() == true) + return ScoreDelete; + + // This should never happen.. + if (Cache[Pkg].InstVerIter(Cache).end() == true) + return -1; + + static int const ScoreEssential = _config->FindI("OrderList::Score::Essential", 200); + static int const ScoreImmediate = _config->FindI("OrderList::Score::Immediate", 10); + static int const ScorePreDepends = _config->FindI("OrderList::Score::PreDepends", 50); + + int Score = 0; + if ((Pkg->Flags & pkgCache::Flag::Essential) == pkgCache::Flag::Essential) + Score += ScoreEssential; + + if (IsFlag(Pkg,Immediate) == true) + Score += ScoreImmediate; + + for (DepIterator D = Cache[Pkg].InstVerIter(Cache).DependsList(); + D.end() == false; ++D) + if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + { + Score += ScorePreDepends; + break; + } + + // Required Important Standard Optional Extra + if (Cache[Pkg].InstVerIter(Cache)->Priority <= 5) + { + signed short PrioMap[] = {0,5,4,3,1,0}; + Score += PrioMap[Cache[Pkg].InstVerIter(Cache)->Priority]; + } + return Score; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::FileCmp - Compare by package file /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This compares by the package file that the install version is in. */ +int pkgOrderList::FileCmp(PkgIterator A,PkgIterator B) +{ + if (Cache[A].Delete() == true && Cache[B].Delete() == true) + return 0; + if (Cache[A].Delete() == true) + return -1; + if (Cache[B].Delete() == true) + return 1; + + if (Cache[A].InstVerIter(Cache).FileList().end() == true) + return -1; + if (Cache[B].InstVerIter(Cache).FileList().end() == true) + return 1; + + pkgCache::PackageFile *FA = Cache[A].InstVerIter(Cache).FileList().File(); + pkgCache::PackageFile *FB = Cache[B].InstVerIter(Cache).FileList().File(); + if (FA < FB) + return -1; + if (FA > FB) + return 1; + return 0; +} + /*}}}*/ +// BoolCompare - Comparison function for two booleans /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* */ +static int BoolCompare(bool A,bool B) +{ + if (A == B) + return 0; + if (A == false) + return -1; + return 1; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::OrderCompareA - Order the installation by op /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This provides a first-pass sort of the list and gives a decent starting + point for further complete ordering. It is used by OrderUnpack only */ +int pkgOrderList::OrderCompareA(Package *a, Package *b) +{ + PkgIterator A(Cache,a); + PkgIterator B(Cache,b); + + // We order packages with a set state toward the front + int Res; + if ((Res = BoolCompare(IsNow(A),IsNow(B))) != 0) + return -1*Res; + + // We order missing files to toward the end +/* if (FileList != 0) + { + if ((Res = BoolCompare(IsMissing(A), + IsMissing(B))) != 0) + return Res; + }*/ + + if (A.State() != pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing && + B.State() == pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing) + return -1; + + if (A.State() == pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing && + B.State() != pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing) + return 1; + + int ScoreA = Score(A); + int ScoreB = Score(B); + + if (ScoreA > ScoreB) + return -1; + + if (ScoreA < ScoreB) + return 1; + + return strcmp(A.Name(),B.Name()); +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::OrderCompareB - Order the installation by source /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This orders by installation source. This is useful to handle + inter-source breaks */ +int pkgOrderList::OrderCompareB(Package *a, Package *b) +{ + PkgIterator A(Cache,a); + PkgIterator B(Cache,b); + + if (A.State() != pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing && + B.State() == pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing) + return -1; + + if (A.State() == pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing && + B.State() != pkgCache::PkgIterator::NeedsNothing) + return 1; + + int F = FileCmp(A,B); + if (F != 0) + { + if (F > 0) + return -1; + return 1; + } + + int ScoreA = Score(A); + int ScoreB = Score(B); + + if (ScoreA > ScoreB) + return -1; + + if (ScoreA < ScoreB) + return 1; + + return strcmp(A.Name(),B.Name()); +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::VisitDeps - Visit forward install dependencies /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This calls the dependency function for the normal forwards dependencies + of the package */ +bool pkgOrderList::VisitDeps(DepFunc F,PkgIterator Pkg) +{ + if (F == 0 || Pkg.end() == true || Cache[Pkg].InstallVer == 0) + return true; + + return (this->*F)(Cache[Pkg].InstVerIter(Cache).DependsList()); +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::VisitRDeps - Visit reverse dependencies /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This calls the dependency function for all of the normal reverse depends + of the package */ +bool pkgOrderList::VisitRDeps(DepFunc F,PkgIterator Pkg) +{ + if (F == 0 || Pkg.end() == true) + return true; + + return (this->*F)(Pkg.RevDependsList()); +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::VisitRProvides - Visit provides reverse dependencies /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This calls the dependency function for all reverse dependencies + generated by the provides line on the package. */ +bool pkgOrderList::VisitRProvides(DepFunc F,VerIterator Ver) +{ + if (F == 0 || Ver.end() == true) + return true; + + bool Res = true; + for (PrvIterator P = Ver.ProvidesList(); P.end() == false; ++P) + Res &= (this->*F)(P.ParentPkg().RevDependsList()); + return Res; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::VisitProvides - Visit all of the providing packages /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This routine calls visit on all providing packages. + + If the dependency is negative it first visits packages which are + intended to be removed and after that all other packages. + It does so to avoid situations in which this package is used to + satisfy a (or-group/provides) dependency of another package which + could have been satisfied also by upgrading another package - + otherwise we have more broken packages dpkg needs to auto- + deconfigure and in very complicated situations it even decides + against it! */ +bool pkgOrderList::VisitProvides(DepIterator D,bool Critical) +{ + std::unique_ptr<Version *[]> List(D.AllTargets()); + for (Version **I = List.get(); *I != 0; ++I) + { + VerIterator Ver(Cache,*I); + PkgIterator Pkg = Ver.ParentPkg(); + + if (D.IsNegative() == true && Cache[Pkg].Delete() == false) + continue; + + if (Cache[Pkg].Keep() == true && Pkg.State() == PkgIterator::NeedsNothing) + continue; + + if (D.IsNegative() == false && + Cache[Pkg].InstallVer != *I) + continue; + + if (D.IsNegative() == true && + (Version *)Pkg.CurrentVer() != *I) + continue; + + // Skip over missing files + if (Critical == false && IsMissing(D.ParentPkg()) == true) + continue; + + if (VisitNode(Pkg, "Provides-1") == false) + return false; + } + if (D.IsNegative() == false) + return true; + for (Version **I = List.get(); *I != 0; ++I) + { + VerIterator Ver(Cache,*I); + PkgIterator Pkg = Ver.ParentPkg(); + + if (Cache[Pkg].Delete() == true) + continue; + + if (Cache[Pkg].Keep() == true && Pkg.State() == PkgIterator::NeedsNothing) + continue; + + if ((Version *)Pkg.CurrentVer() != *I) + continue; + + // Skip over missing files + if (Critical == false && IsMissing(D.ParentPkg()) == true) + continue; + + if (VisitNode(Pkg, "Provides-2") == false) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::VisitNode - Recursive ordering director /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This is the core ordering routine. It calls the set dependency + consideration functions which then potentially call this again. Finite + depth is achieved through the colouring mechanism. */ +bool pkgOrderList::VisitNode(PkgIterator Pkg, char const* from) +{ + // Looping or irrelevant. + // This should probably trancend not installed packages + if (Pkg.end() == true || IsFlag(Pkg,Added) == true || + IsFlag(Pkg,AddPending) == true || IsFlag(Pkg,InList) == false) + return true; + + if (Debug == true) + { + for (int j = 0; j != Depth; j++) clog << ' '; + clog << "Visit " << Pkg.FullName() << " from " << from << endl; + } + + Depth++; + + // Color grey + Flag(Pkg,AddPending); + + DepFunc Old = Primary; + + // Perform immediate configuration of the package if so flagged. + if (IsFlag(Pkg,Immediate) == true && Primary != &pkgOrderList::DepUnPackPre) + Primary = &pkgOrderList::DepUnPackPreD; + + if (IsNow(Pkg) == true) + { + bool Res = true; + if (Cache[Pkg].Delete() == false) + { + // Primary + Res &= Res && VisitDeps(Primary,Pkg); + Res &= Res && VisitRDeps(Primary,Pkg); + Res &= Res && VisitRProvides(Primary,Pkg.CurrentVer()); + Res &= Res && VisitRProvides(Primary,Cache[Pkg].InstVerIter(Cache)); + + // RevDep + Res &= Res && VisitRDeps(RevDepends,Pkg); + Res &= Res && VisitRProvides(RevDepends,Pkg.CurrentVer()); + Res &= Res && VisitRProvides(RevDepends,Cache[Pkg].InstVerIter(Cache)); + + // Secondary + Res &= Res && VisitDeps(Secondary,Pkg); + Res &= Res && VisitRDeps(Secondary,Pkg); + Res &= Res && VisitRProvides(Secondary,Pkg.CurrentVer()); + Res &= Res && VisitRProvides(Secondary,Cache[Pkg].InstVerIter(Cache)); + } + else + { + // RevDep + Res &= Res && VisitRDeps(Remove,Pkg); + Res &= Res && VisitRProvides(Remove,Pkg.CurrentVer()); + } + } + + if (IsFlag(Pkg,Added) == false) + { + Flag(Pkg,Added,Added | AddPending); + if (IsFlag(Pkg,After) == true) + *AfterEnd++ = Pkg; + else + *End++ = Pkg; + } + + Primary = Old; + Depth--; + + if (Debug == true) + { + for (int j = 0; j != Depth; j++) clog << ' '; + clog << "Leave " << Pkg.FullName() << ' ' << IsFlag(Pkg,Added) << ',' << IsFlag(Pkg,AddPending) << endl; + } + + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::DepUnPackCrit - Critical UnPacking ordering /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* Critical unpacking ordering strives to satisfy Conflicts: and + PreDepends: only. When a prdepends is encountered the Primary + DepFunc is changed to be DepUnPackPreD. + + Loops are preprocessed and logged. */ +bool pkgOrderList::DepUnPackCrit(DepIterator D) +{ + for (; D.end() == false; ++D) + { + if (D.Reverse() == true) + { + /* Reverse depenanices are only interested in conflicts, + predepend breakage is ignored here */ + if (D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts && + D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes) + continue; + + // Duplication elimination, consider only the current version + if (D.ParentPkg().CurrentVer() != D.ParentVer()) + continue; + + /* For reverse dependencies we wish to check if the + dependency is satisfied in the install state. The + target package (caller) is going to be in the installed + state. */ + if (CheckDep(D) == true) + continue; + + if (VisitNode(D.ParentPkg(), "UnPackCrit") == false) + return false; + } + else + { + /* Forward critical dependencies MUST be correct before the + package can be unpacked. */ + if (D.IsNegative() == false && + D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + continue; + + /* We wish to check if the dep is okay in the now state of the + target package against the install state of this package. */ + if (CheckDep(D) == true) + { + /* We want to catch predepends loops with the code below. + Conflicts loops that are Dep OK are ignored */ + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == false || + D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + continue; + } + + // This is the loop detection + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),Added) == true || + IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == true) + { + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == true) + AddLoop(D); + continue; + } + + /* Predepends require a special ordering stage, they must have + all dependents installed as well */ + DepFunc Old = Primary; + bool Res = false; + if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + Primary = &pkgOrderList::DepUnPackPreD; + Res = VisitProvides(D,true); + Primary = Old; + if (Res == false) + return false; + } + } + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::DepUnPackPreD - Critical UnPacking ordering with depends /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* Critical PreDepends (also configure immediate and essential) strives to + ensure not only that all conflicts+predepends are met but that this + package will be immediately configurable when it is unpacked. + Loops are preprocessed and logged. */ +bool pkgOrderList::DepUnPackPreD(DepIterator D) +{ + if (D.Reverse() == true) + return DepUnPackCrit(D); + + for (; D.end() == false; ++D) + { + if (D.IsCritical() == false) + continue; + + /* We wish to check if the dep is okay in the now state of the + target package against the install state of this package. */ + if (CheckDep(D) == true) + { + /* We want to catch predepends loops with the code below. + Conflicts loops that are Dep OK are ignored */ + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == false || + D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + continue; + } + + // This is the loop detection + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),Added) == true || + IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == true) + { + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == true) + AddLoop(D); + continue; + } + + if (VisitProvides(D,true) == false) + return false; + } + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::DepUnPackPre - Critical Predepends ordering /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* Critical PreDepends (also configure immediate and essential) strives to + ensure not only that all conflicts+predepends are met but that this + package will be immediately configurable when it is unpacked. + + Loops are preprocessed and logged. All loops will be fatal. */ +bool pkgOrderList::DepUnPackPre(DepIterator D) +{ + if (D.Reverse() == true) + return true; + + for (; D.end() == false; ++D) + { + /* Only consider the PreDepends or Depends. Depends are only + considered at the lowest depth or in the case of immediate + configure */ + if (D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + { + if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Depends) + { + if (Depth == 1 && IsFlag(D.ParentPkg(),Immediate) == false) + continue; + } + else + continue; + } + + /* We wish to check if the dep is okay in the now state of the + target package against the install state of this package. */ + if (CheckDep(D) == true) + { + /* We want to catch predepends loops with the code below. + Conflicts loops that are Dep OK are ignored */ + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == false) + continue; + } + + // This is the loop detection + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),Added) == true || + IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == true) + { + if (IsFlag(D.TargetPkg(),AddPending) == true) + AddLoop(D); + continue; + } + + if (VisitProvides(D,true) == false) + return false; + } + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::DepUnPackDep - Reverse dependency considerations /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* Reverse dependencies are considered to determine if unpacking this + package will break any existing dependencies. If so then those + packages are ordered before this one so that they are in the + UnPacked state. + + The forwards depends loop is designed to bring the packages dependents + close to the package. This helps reduce deconfigure time. + + Loops are irrelevant to this. */ +bool pkgOrderList::DepUnPackDep(DepIterator D) +{ + + for (; D.end() == false; ++D) + if (D.IsCritical() == true) + { + if (D.Reverse() == true) + { + /* Duplication prevention. We consider rev deps only on + the current version, a not installed package + cannot break */ + if (D.ParentPkg()->CurrentVer == 0 || + D.ParentPkg().CurrentVer() != D.ParentVer()) + continue; + + // The dep will not break so it is irrelevant. + if (CheckDep(D) == true) + continue; + + // Skip over missing files + if (IsMissing(D.ParentPkg()) == true) + continue; + + if (VisitNode(D.ParentPkg(), "UnPackDep-Parent") == false) + return false; + } + else + { + if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Depends) + if (VisitProvides(D,false) == false) + return false; + + if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::DpkgBreaks) + { + if (CheckDep(D) == true) + continue; + + if (VisitNode(D.TargetPkg(), "UnPackDep-Target") == false) + return false; + } + } + } + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::DepConfigure - Configuration ordering /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* Configuration only ordering orders by the Depends: line only. It + orders configuration so that when a package comes to be configured it's + dependents are configured. + + Loops are ignored. Depends loop entry points are chaotic. */ +bool pkgOrderList::DepConfigure(DepIterator D) +{ + // Never consider reverse configuration dependencies. + if (D.Reverse() == true) + return true; + + for (; D.end() == false; ++D) + if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Depends) + if (VisitProvides(D,false) == false) + return false; + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::DepRemove - Removal ordering /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* Checks all given dependencies if they are broken by the removal of a + package and if so fix it by visiting another provider or or-group + member to ensure that the dependee keeps working which is especially + important for Immediate packages like e.g. those depending on an + awk implementation. If the dependency can't be fixed with another + package this means an upgrade of the package will solve the problem. */ +bool pkgOrderList::DepRemove(DepIterator Broken) +{ + if (Broken.Reverse() == false) + return true; + + for (; Broken.end() == false; ++Broken) + { + if (Broken->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Depends && + Broken->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + continue; + + PkgIterator BrokenPkg = Broken.ParentPkg(); + // uninstalled packages can't break via a remove + if (BrokenPkg->CurrentVer == 0) + continue; + + // if its already added, we can't do anything useful + if (IsFlag(BrokenPkg, AddPending) == true || IsFlag(BrokenPkg, Added) == true) + continue; + + // if the dependee is going to be removed, visit it now + if (Cache[BrokenPkg].Delete() == true) + return VisitNode(BrokenPkg, "Remove-Dependee"); + + // The package stays around, so find out how this is possible + for (DepIterator D = BrokenPkg.CurrentVer().DependsList(); D.end() == false;) + { + // only important or-groups need fixing + if (D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::Depends && + D->Type != pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + { + ++D; + continue; + } + + // Start is the beginning of the or-group, D is the first one after or + DepIterator Start = D; + bool foundBroken = false; + for (bool LastOR = true; D.end() == false && LastOR == true; ++D) + { + LastOR = (D->CompareOp & pkgCache::Dep::Or) == pkgCache::Dep::Or; + if (D == Broken) + foundBroken = true; + } + + // this or-group isn't the broken one: keep searching + if (foundBroken == false) + continue; + + // iterate over all members of the or-group searching for a ready replacement + bool readyReplacement = false; + for (DepIterator OrMember = Start; OrMember != D && readyReplacement == false; ++OrMember) + { + Version ** Replacements = OrMember.AllTargets(); + for (Version **R = Replacements; *R != 0; ++R) + { + VerIterator Ver(Cache,*R); + // only currently installed packages can be a replacement + PkgIterator RPkg = Ver.ParentPkg(); + if (RPkg.CurrentVer() != Ver) + continue; + + // packages going to be removed can't be a replacement + if (Cache[RPkg].Delete() == true) + continue; + + readyReplacement = true; + break; + } + delete[] Replacements; + } + + // something else is ready to take over, do nothing + if (readyReplacement == true) + continue; + + // see if we can visit a replacement + bool visitReplacement = false; + for (DepIterator OrMember = Start; OrMember != D && visitReplacement == false; ++OrMember) + { + Version ** Replacements = OrMember.AllTargets(); + for (Version **R = Replacements; *R != 0; ++R) + { + VerIterator Ver(Cache,*R); + // consider only versions we plan to install + PkgIterator RPkg = Ver.ParentPkg(); + if (Cache[RPkg].Install() == false || Cache[RPkg].InstallVer != Ver) + continue; + + // loops are not going to help us, so don't create them + if (IsFlag(RPkg, AddPending) == true) + continue; + + if (IsMissing(RPkg) == true) + continue; + + visitReplacement = true; + if (IsFlag(BrokenPkg, Immediate) == false) + { + if (VisitNode(RPkg, "Remove-Rep") == true) + break; + } + else + { + Flag(RPkg, Immediate); + if (VisitNode(RPkg, "Remove-ImmRep") == true) + break; + } + visitReplacement = false; + } + delete[] Replacements; + } + if (visitReplacement == true) + continue; + + // the broken package in current version can't be fixed, so install new version + if (IsMissing(BrokenPkg) == true) + break; + + if (VisitNode(BrokenPkg, "Remove-Upgrade") == false) + return false; + } + } + + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::AddLoop - Add a loop to the loop list /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* We record the loops. This is a relic since loop breaking is done + genericaly as part of the safety routines. */ +bool pkgOrderList::AddLoop(DepIterator D) +{ + if (LoopCount < 0 || LoopCount >= 20) + return false; + + // Skip dups + if (LoopCount != 0) + { + if (Loops[LoopCount - 1].ParentPkg() == D.ParentPkg() || + Loops[LoopCount - 1].TargetPkg() == D.ParentPkg()) + return true; + } + + Loops[LoopCount++] = D; + + // Mark the packages as being part of a loop. + //Flag(D.TargetPkg(),Loop); + //Flag(D.ParentPkg(),Loop); + /* This is currently disabled because the Loop flag is being used for + loop management in the package manager. Check the orderlist.h file for more info */ + return true; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::WipeFlags - Unset the given flags from all packages /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* */ +void pkgOrderList::WipeFlags(unsigned long F) +{ + auto Size = Cache.Head().PackageCount; + for (decltype(Size) I = 0; I != Size; ++I) + Flags[I] &= ~F; +} + /*}}}*/ +// OrderList::CheckDep - Check a dependency for truth /*{{{*/ +// --------------------------------------------------------------------- +/* This performs a complete analysis of the dependency wrt to the + current add list. It returns true if after all events are + performed it is still true. This sort of routine can be approximated + by examining the DepCache, however in convoluted cases of provides + this fails to produce a suitable result. */ +bool pkgOrderList::CheckDep(DepIterator D) +{ + std::unique_ptr<Version *[]> List(D.AllTargets()); + bool Hit = false; + for (Version **I = List.get(); *I != 0; I++) + { + VerIterator Ver(Cache,*I); + PkgIterator Pkg = Ver.ParentPkg(); + + /* The meaning of Added and AddPending is subtle. AddPending is + an indication that the package is looping. Because of the + way ordering works Added means the package will be unpacked + before this one and AddPending means after. It is therefore + correct to ignore AddPending in all cases, but that exposes + reverse-ordering loops which should be ignored. */ + if (IsFlag(Pkg,Added) == true || + (IsFlag(Pkg,AddPending) == true && D.Reverse() == true)) + { + if (Cache[Pkg].InstallVer != *I) + continue; + } + else + if ((Version *)Pkg.CurrentVer() != *I || + Pkg.State() != PkgIterator::NeedsNothing) + continue; + + /* Conflicts requires that all versions are not present, depends + just needs one */ + if (D.IsNegative() == false) + { + // ignore provides by older versions of this package + if (((D.Reverse() == false && Pkg == D.ParentPkg()) || + (D.Reverse() == true && Pkg == D.TargetPkg())) && + Cache[Pkg].InstallVer != *I) + continue; + + /* Try to find something that does not have the after flag set + if at all possible */ + if (IsFlag(Pkg,After) == true) + { + Hit = true; + continue; + } + + return true; + } + else + { + if (IsFlag(Pkg,After) == true) + Flag(D.ParentPkg(),After); + + return false; + } + } + + // We found a hit, but it had the after flag set + if (Hit == true && D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::PreDepends) + { + Flag(D.ParentPkg(),After); + return true; + } + + /* Conflicts requires that all versions are not present, depends + just needs one */ + if (D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Conflicts || + D->Type == pkgCache::Dep::Obsoletes) + return true; + return false; +} + /*}}}*/ |