summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/crates/resolver-tests/tests/resolve.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--crates/resolver-tests/tests/resolve.rs1504
1 files changed, 1504 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/crates/resolver-tests/tests/resolve.rs b/crates/resolver-tests/tests/resolve.rs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9d8f25a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/crates/resolver-tests/tests/resolve.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,1504 @@
+use cargo::core::dependency::DepKind;
+use cargo::core::Dependency;
+use cargo::util::Config;
+use cargo_util::is_ci;
+
+use resolver_tests::{
+ assert_contains, assert_same, dep, dep_kind, dep_loc, dep_req, dep_req_kind, loc_names, names,
+ pkg, pkg_id, pkg_loc, registry, registry_strategy, remove_dep, resolve, resolve_and_validated,
+ resolve_with_config, PrettyPrintRegistry, SatResolve, ToDep, ToPkgId,
+};
+
+use proptest::prelude::*;
+
+// NOTE: proptest is a form of fuzz testing. It generates random input and makes sure that
+// certain universal truths are upheld. Therefore, it can pass when there is a problem,
+// but if it fails then there really is something wrong. When testing something as
+// complicated as the resolver, the problems can be very subtle and hard to generate.
+// We have had a history of these tests only failing on PRs long after a bug is introduced.
+// If you have one of these test fail please report it on #6258,
+// and if you did not change the resolver then feel free to retry without concern.
+proptest! {
+ #![proptest_config(ProptestConfig {
+ max_shrink_iters:
+ if is_ci() || !is_terminal::IsTerminal::is_terminal(&std::io::stderr()){
+ // This attempts to make sure that CI will fail fast,
+ 0
+ } else {
+ // but that local builds will give a small clear test case.
+ u32::MAX
+ },
+ result_cache: prop::test_runner::basic_result_cache,
+ .. ProptestConfig::default()
+ })]
+
+ /// NOTE: if you think this test has failed spuriously see the note at the top of this macro.
+ #[test]
+ fn prop_passes_validation(
+ PrettyPrintRegistry(input) in registry_strategy(50, 20, 60)
+ ) {
+ let reg = registry(input.clone());
+ let sat_resolve = SatResolve::new(&reg);
+ // there is only a small chance that any one
+ // crate will be interesting.
+ // So we try some of the most complicated.
+ for this in input.iter().rev().take(20) {
+ let _ = resolve_and_validated(
+ vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))],
+ &reg,
+ Some(sat_resolve.clone()),
+ );
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// NOTE: if you think this test has failed spuriously see the note at the top of this macro.
+ #[test]
+ fn prop_minimum_version_errors_the_same(
+ PrettyPrintRegistry(input) in registry_strategy(50, 20, 60)
+ ) {
+ let mut config = Config::default().unwrap();
+ config.nightly_features_allowed = true;
+ config
+ .configure(
+ 1,
+ false,
+ None,
+ false,
+ false,
+ false,
+ &None,
+ &["minimal-versions".to_string()],
+ &[],
+ )
+ .unwrap();
+
+ let reg = registry(input.clone());
+ // there is only a small chance that any one
+ // crate will be interesting.
+ // So we try some of the most complicated.
+ for this in input.iter().rev().take(10) {
+ // minimal-versions change what order the candidates
+ // are tried but not the existence of a solution
+ let res = resolve(
+ vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))],
+ &reg,
+ );
+
+ let mres = resolve_with_config(
+ vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))],
+ &reg,
+ &config,
+ );
+
+ prop_assert_eq!(
+ res.is_ok(),
+ mres.is_ok(),
+ "minimal-versions and regular resolver disagree about whether `{} = \"={}\"` can resolve",
+ this.name(),
+ this.version()
+ )
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// NOTE: if you think this test has failed spuriously see the note at the top of this macro.
+ #[test]
+ fn prop_removing_a_dep_cant_break(
+ PrettyPrintRegistry(input) in registry_strategy(50, 20, 60),
+ indexes_to_remove in prop::collection::vec((any::<prop::sample::Index>(), any::<prop::sample::Index>()), ..10)
+ ) {
+ let reg = registry(input.clone());
+ let mut removed_input = input.clone();
+ for (summary_idx, dep_idx) in indexes_to_remove {
+ if !removed_input.is_empty() {
+ let summary_idx = summary_idx.index(removed_input.len());
+ let deps = removed_input[summary_idx].dependencies();
+ if !deps.is_empty() {
+ let new = remove_dep(&removed_input[summary_idx], dep_idx.index(deps.len()));
+ removed_input[summary_idx] = new;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ let removed_reg = registry(removed_input);
+ // there is only a small chance that any one
+ // crate will be interesting.
+ // So we try some of the most complicated.
+ for this in input.iter().rev().take(10) {
+ if resolve(
+ vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))],
+ &reg,
+ ).is_ok() {
+ prop_assert!(
+ resolve(
+ vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))],
+ &removed_reg,
+ ).is_ok(),
+ "full index worked for `{} = \"={}\"` but removing some deps broke it!",
+ this.name(),
+ this.version(),
+ )
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// NOTE: if you think this test has failed spuriously see the note at the top of this macro.
+ #[test]
+ fn prop_limited_independence_of_irrelevant_alternatives(
+ PrettyPrintRegistry(input) in registry_strategy(50, 20, 60),
+ indexes_to_unpublish in prop::collection::vec(any::<prop::sample::Index>(), ..10)
+ ) {
+ let reg = registry(input.clone());
+ // there is only a small chance that any one
+ // crate will be interesting.
+ // So we try some of the most complicated.
+ for this in input.iter().rev().take(10) {
+ let res = resolve(
+ vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))],
+ &reg,
+ );
+
+ match res {
+ Ok(r) => {
+ // If resolution was successful, then unpublishing a version of a crate
+ // that was not selected should not change that.
+ let not_selected: Vec<_> = input
+ .iter()
+ .cloned()
+ .filter(|x| !r.contains(&x.package_id()))
+ .collect();
+ if !not_selected.is_empty() {
+ let indexes_to_unpublish: Vec<_> = indexes_to_unpublish.iter().map(|x| x.get(&not_selected)).collect();
+
+ let new_reg = registry(
+ input
+ .iter()
+ .cloned()
+ .filter(|x| !indexes_to_unpublish.contains(&x))
+ .collect(),
+ );
+
+ let res = resolve(
+ vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))],
+ &new_reg,
+ );
+
+ // Note: that we can not assert that the two `res` are identical
+ // as the resolver does depend on irrelevant alternatives.
+ // It uses how constrained a dependency requirement is
+ // to determine what order to evaluate requirements.
+
+ prop_assert!(
+ res.is_ok(),
+ "unpublishing {:?} stopped `{} = \"={}\"` from working",
+ indexes_to_unpublish.iter().map(|x| x.package_id()).collect::<Vec<_>>(),
+ this.name(),
+ this.version()
+ )
+ }
+ }
+
+ Err(_) => {
+ // If resolution was unsuccessful, then it should stay unsuccessful
+ // even if any version of a crate is unpublished.
+ let indexes_to_unpublish: Vec<_> = indexes_to_unpublish.iter().map(|x| x.get(&input)).collect();
+
+ let new_reg = registry(
+ input
+ .iter()
+ .cloned()
+ .filter(|x| !indexes_to_unpublish.contains(&x))
+ .collect(),
+ );
+
+ let res = resolve(
+ vec![dep_req(&this.name(), &format!("={}", this.version()))],
+ &new_reg,
+ );
+
+ prop_assert!(
+ res.is_err(),
+ "full index did not work for `{} = \"={}\"` but unpublishing {:?} fixed it!",
+ this.name(),
+ this.version(),
+ indexes_to_unpublish.iter().map(|x| x.package_id()).collect::<Vec<_>>(),
+ )
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+#[test]
+#[should_panic(expected = "pub dep")] // The error handling is not yet implemented.
+fn pub_fail() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.4")),
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.5")),
+ pkg!(("e", "0.0.6") => [dep_req_kind("a", "<= 0.0.4", DepKind::Normal, true),]),
+ pkg!(("kB", "0.0.3") => [dep_req("a", ">= 0.0.5"),dep("e"),]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input);
+ assert!(resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("kB")], &reg, None).is_err());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn basic_public_dependency() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("A", "0.1.0")),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.2.0")),
+ pkg!("B" => [dep_req_kind("A", "0.1", DepKind::Normal, true)]),
+ pkg!("C" => [dep("A"), dep("B")]),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("C")], &reg, None).unwrap();
+ assert_same(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("C", "1.0.0"),
+ ("B", "1.0.0"),
+ ("A", "0.1.0"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn public_dependency_filling_in() {
+ // The resolver has an optimization where if a candidate to resolve a dependency
+ // has already bean activated then we skip looking at the candidates dependencies.
+ // However, we have to be careful as the new path may make pub dependencies invalid.
+
+ // Triggering this case requires dependencies to be resolved in a specific order.
+ // Fuzzing found this unintuitive case, that triggers this unfortunate order of operations:
+ // 1. `d`'s dep on `c` is resolved
+ // 2. `d`'s dep on `a` is resolved with `0.1.1`
+ // 3. `c`'s dep on `b` is resolved with `0.0.2`
+ // 4. `b`'s dep on `a` is resolved with `0.0.6` no pub dev conflict as `b` is private to `c`
+ // 5. `d`'s dep on `b` is resolved with `0.0.2` triggering the optimization.
+ // Do we notice that `d` has a pub dep conflict on `a`? Lets try it and see.
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.6")),
+ pkg!(("a", "0.1.1")),
+ pkg!(("b", "0.0.0") => [dep("bad")]),
+ pkg!(("b", "0.0.1") => [dep("bad")]),
+ pkg!(("b", "0.0.2") => [dep_req_kind("a", "=0.0.6", DepKind::Normal, true)]),
+ pkg!("c" => [dep_req("b", ">=0.0.1")]),
+ pkg!("d" => [dep("c"), dep("a"), dep("b")]),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("d")], &reg, None).unwrap();
+ assert_same(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("d", "1.0.0"),
+ ("c", "1.0.0"),
+ ("b", "0.0.2"),
+ ("a", "0.0.6"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn public_dependency_filling_in_and_update() {
+ // The resolver has an optimization where if a candidate to resolve a dependency
+ // has already bean activated then we skip looking at the candidates dependencies.
+ // However, we have to be careful as the new path may make pub dependencies invalid.
+
+ // Triggering this case requires dependencies to be resolved in a specific order.
+ // Fuzzing found this unintuitive case, that triggers this unfortunate order of operations:
+ // 1. `D`'s dep on `B` is resolved
+ // 2. `D`'s dep on `C` is resolved
+ // 3. `B`'s dep on `A` is resolved with `0.0.0`
+ // 4. `C`'s dep on `B` triggering the optimization.
+ // So did we add `A 0.0.0` to the deps `C` can see?
+ // Or are we going to resolve `C`'s dep on `A` with `0.0.2`?
+ // Lets try it and see.
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.2")),
+ pkg!("B" => [dep_req_kind("A", "=0.0.0", DepKind::Normal, true),]),
+ pkg!("C" => [dep("A"),dep("B")]),
+ pkg!("D" => [dep("B"),dep("C")]),
+ ]);
+ let res = resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("D")], &reg, None).unwrap();
+ assert_same(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("D", "1.0.0"),
+ ("C", "1.0.0"),
+ ("B", "1.0.0"),
+ ("A", "0.0.0"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn public_dependency_skipping() {
+ // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is
+ // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must
+ // the effects of pub dep must be accounted for.
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("a", "0.2.0")),
+ pkg!(("a", "2.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("b", "0.0.0") => [dep("bad")]),
+ pkg!(("b", "0.2.1") => [dep_req_kind("a", "0.2.0", DepKind::Normal, true)]),
+ pkg!("c" => [dep("a"),dep("b")]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input);
+
+ resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("c")], &reg, None).unwrap();
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn public_dependency_skipping_in_backtracking() {
+ // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is
+ // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must
+ // the effects of pub dep must be accounted for.
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.0") => [dep("bad")]),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.1") => [dep("bad")]),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.2") => [dep("bad")]),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.3") => [dep("bad")]),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.4")),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.5")),
+ pkg!("B" => [dep_req_kind("A", ">= 0.0.3", DepKind::Normal, true)]),
+ pkg!("C" => [dep_req("A", "<= 0.0.4"), dep("B")]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input);
+
+ resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("C")], &reg, None).unwrap();
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn public_sat_topological_order() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("b", "0.0.1") => [dep_req_kind("a", "= 0.0.1", DepKind::Normal, true),]),
+ pkg!(("b", "0.0.0") => [dep("bad"),]),
+ pkg!("A" => [dep_req("a", "= 0.0.0"),dep_req_kind("b", "*", DepKind::Normal, true)]),
+ ];
+
+ let reg = registry(input);
+ assert!(resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("A")], &reg, None).is_err());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn public_sat_unused_makes_things_pub() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("b", "8.0.1") => [dep_req_kind("a", "= 0.0.1", DepKind::Normal, true),]),
+ pkg!(("b", "8.0.0") => [dep_req("a", "= 0.0.1"),]),
+ pkg!("c" => [dep_req("b", "= 8.0.0"),dep_req("a", "= 0.0.0"),]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input);
+
+ resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("c")], &reg, None).unwrap();
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn public_sat_unused_makes_things_pub_2() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("c", "0.0.2")),
+ pkg!(("c", "0.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("a-sys", "0.0.2")),
+ pkg!(("a-sys", "0.0.1") => [dep_req_kind("c", "= 0.0.1", DepKind::Normal, true),]),
+ pkg!("P" => [dep_req_kind("a-sys", "*", DepKind::Normal, true),dep_req("c", "= 0.0.1"),]),
+ pkg!("A" => [dep("P"),dep_req("c", "= 0.0.2"),]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input);
+
+ resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("A")], &reg, None).unwrap();
+}
+
+#[test]
+#[should_panic(expected = "assertion failed: !name.is_empty()")]
+fn test_dependency_with_empty_name() {
+ // Bug 5229, dependency-names must not be empty
+ "".to_dep();
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_empty_dependency_list() {
+ let res = resolve(Vec::new(), &registry(vec![])).unwrap();
+
+ assert_eq!(res, names(&["root"]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_only_package() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo")]);
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("foo")], &reg).unwrap();
+ assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo"]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_one_dep() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo"), pkg!("bar")]);
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("foo")], &reg).unwrap();
+ assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo"]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_multiple_deps() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo"), pkg!("bar"), pkg!("baz")]);
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("foo"), dep("baz")], &reg).unwrap();
+ assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo", "baz"]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_transitive_deps() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo"), pkg!("bar" => ["foo"])]);
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("bar")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo", "bar"]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_common_transitive_deps() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo" => ["bar"]), pkg!("bar")]);
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("foo"), dep("bar")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo", "bar"]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_with_same_name() {
+ let list = vec![
+ pkg_loc("foo", "https://first.example.com"),
+ pkg_loc("bar", "https://second.example.com"),
+ ];
+
+ let reg = registry(list);
+ let res = resolve(
+ vec![
+ dep_loc("foo", "https://first.example.com"),
+ dep_loc("bar", "https://second.example.com"),
+ ],
+ &reg,
+ )
+ .unwrap();
+
+ let mut names = loc_names(&[
+ ("foo", "https://first.example.com"),
+ ("bar", "https://second.example.com"),
+ ]);
+
+ names.push(pkg_id("root"));
+ assert_same(&res, &names);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_with_dev_deps() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!("foo" => ["bar", dep_kind("baz", DepKind::Development)]),
+ pkg!("baz" => ["bat", dep_kind("bam", DepKind::Development)]),
+ pkg!("bar"),
+ pkg!("bat"),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(
+ vec![dep("foo"), dep_kind("baz", DepKind::Development)],
+ &reg,
+ )
+ .unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(&res, &names(&["root", "foo", "bar", "baz", "bat"]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_many_versions() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1")), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2"))]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("foo")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(&res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.2")]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_specific_version() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1")), pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2"))]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "=1.0.1")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(&res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.1")]));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_maximum_version_with_transitive_deps() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("util", "1.2.2")),
+ pkg!(("util", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("util", "1.1.1")),
+ pkg!("foo" => [dep_req("util", "1.0.0")]),
+ pkg!("bar" => [dep_req("util", ">=1.0.1")]),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "1.0.0"), dep_req("bar", "1.0.0")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("foo", "1.0.0"),
+ ("bar", "1.0.0"),
+ ("util", "1.2.2"),
+ ]),
+ );
+ assert!(!res.contains(&("util", "1.0.1").to_pkgid()));
+ assert!(!res.contains(&("util", "1.1.1").to_pkgid()));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_resolving_minimum_version_with_transitive_deps() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("util", "1.2.2")),
+ pkg!(("util", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("util", "1.1.1")),
+ pkg!("foo" => [dep_req("util", "1.0.0")]),
+ pkg!("bar" => [dep_req("util", ">=1.0.1")]),
+ ]);
+
+ let mut config = Config::default().unwrap();
+ // -Z minimal-versions
+ // When the minimal-versions config option is specified then the lowest
+ // possible version of a package should be selected. "util 1.0.0" can't be
+ // selected because of the requirements of "bar", so the minimum version
+ // must be 1.1.1.
+ config.nightly_features_allowed = true;
+ config
+ .configure(
+ 1,
+ false,
+ None,
+ false,
+ false,
+ false,
+ &None,
+ &["minimal-versions".to_string()],
+ &[],
+ )
+ .unwrap();
+
+ let res = resolve_with_config(
+ vec![dep_req("foo", "1.0.0"), dep_req("bar", "1.0.0")],
+ &reg,
+ &config,
+ )
+ .unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("foo", "1.0.0"),
+ ("bar", "1.0.0"),
+ ("util", "1.1.1"),
+ ]),
+ );
+ assert!(!res.contains(&("util", "1.2.2").to_pkgid()));
+ assert!(!res.contains(&("util", "1.0.0").to_pkgid()));
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_incompat_versions() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2")),
+ pkg!("bar" => [dep_req("foo", "=1.0.2")]),
+ ]);
+
+ assert!(resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "=1.0.1"), dep("bar")], &reg).is_err());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_wrong_case_from_registry() {
+ // In the future we may #5678 allow this to happen.
+ // For back compatibility reasons, we probably won't.
+ // But we may want to future prove ourselves by understanding it.
+ // This test documents the current behavior.
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0")), pkg!("bar" => ["Foo"])]);
+
+ assert!(resolve(vec![dep("bar")], &reg).is_err());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_mis_hyphenated_from_registry() {
+ // In the future we may #2775 allow this to happen.
+ // For back compatibility reasons, we probably won't.
+ // But we may want to future prove ourselves by understanding it.
+ // This test documents the current behavior.
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!(("fo-o", "1.0.0")), pkg!("bar" => ["fo_o"])]);
+
+ assert!(resolve(vec![dep("bar")], &reg).is_err());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_backtrack() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2") => [dep("bar")]),
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1") => [dep("baz")]),
+ pkg!("bar" => [dep_req("foo", "=2.0.2")]),
+ pkg!("baz"),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "^1")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.1"), ("baz", "1.0.0")]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_backtrack_features() {
+ // test for cargo/issues/4347
+ let mut bad = dep("bar");
+ bad.set_features(vec!["bad"]);
+
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.2") => [bad]),
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1") => [dep("bar")]),
+ pkg!("bar"),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "^1")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.1"), ("bar", "1.0.0")]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_allows_multiple_compatible_versions() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("foo", "2.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("foo", "0.1.0")),
+ pkg!(("foo", "0.2.0")),
+ pkg!("bar" => ["d1", "d2", "d3", "d4"]),
+ pkg!("d1" => [dep_req("foo", "1")]),
+ pkg!("d2" => [dep_req("foo", "2")]),
+ pkg!("d3" => [dep_req("foo", "0.1")]),
+ pkg!("d4" => [dep_req("foo", "0.2")]),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("bar")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("foo", "1.0.0"),
+ ("foo", "2.0.0"),
+ ("foo", "0.1.0"),
+ ("foo", "0.2.0"),
+ ("d1", "1.0.0"),
+ ("d2", "1.0.0"),
+ ("d3", "1.0.0"),
+ ("d4", "1.0.0"),
+ ("bar", "1.0.0"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_deep_backtracking() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1") => [dep_req("bar", "1")]),
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("bar", "2")]),
+ pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("baz", "=1.0.2"),
+ dep_req("other", "1")]),
+ pkg!(("bar", "2.0.0") => [dep_req("baz", "=1.0.1")]),
+ pkg!(("baz", "1.0.2") => [dep_req("other", "2")]),
+ pkg!(("baz", "1.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("dep_req", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("dep_req", "2.0.0")),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("foo", "1.0.0"),
+ ("bar", "2.0.0"),
+ ("baz", "1.0.1"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_sys_crates() {
+ // This is based on issues/4902
+ // With `l` a normal library we get 2copies so everyone gets the newest compatible.
+ // But `l-sys` a library with a links attribute we make sure there is only one.
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("l-sys", "0.9.1")),
+ pkg!(("l-sys", "0.10.0")),
+ pkg!(("l", "0.9.1")),
+ pkg!(("l", "0.10.0")),
+ pkg!(("d", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("l-sys", ">=0.8.0, <=0.10.0"), dep_req("l", ">=0.8.0, <=0.10.0")]),
+ pkg!(("r", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("l-sys", "0.9"), dep_req("l", "0.9")]),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("d", "1"), dep_req("r", "1")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("d", "1.0.0"),
+ ("r", "1.0.0"),
+ ("l-sys", "0.9.1"),
+ ("l", "0.9.1"),
+ ("l", "0.10.0"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_constrained_sibling_backtrack_parent() {
+ // There is no point in considering all of the backtrack_trap{1,2}
+ // candidates since they can't change the result of failing to
+ // resolve 'constrained'. Cargo should (ideally) skip past them and resume
+ // resolution once the activation of the parent, 'bar', is rolled back.
+ // Note that the traps are slightly more constrained to make sure they
+ // get picked first.
+ let mut reglist = vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("bar", "1.0"),
+ dep_req("constrained", "=1.0.0")]),
+ pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("backtrack_trap1", "1.0.2"),
+ dep_req("backtrack_trap2", "1.0.2"),
+ dep_req("constrained", "1.0.0")]),
+ pkg!(("constrained", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("backtrack_trap1", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("backtrack_trap2", "1.0.0")),
+ ];
+ // Bump this to make the test harder - it adds more versions of bar that will
+ // fail to resolve, and more versions of the traps to consider.
+ const NUM_BARS_AND_TRAPS: usize = 50; // minimum 2
+ for i in 1..NUM_BARS_AND_TRAPS {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(
+ pkg!(("bar", vsn.clone()) => [dep_req("backtrack_trap1", "1.0.2"),
+ dep_req("backtrack_trap2", "1.0.2"),
+ dep_req("constrained", "1.0.1")]),
+ );
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap1", vsn.clone())));
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap2", vsn.clone())));
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", vsn.clone())));
+ }
+ let reg = registry(reglist);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("foo", "1.0.0"),
+ ("bar", "1.0.0"),
+ ("constrained", "1.0.0"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_many_equivalent_backtracking() {
+ let mut reglist = Vec::new();
+
+ const DEPTH: usize = 200;
+ const BRANCHING_FACTOR: usize = 100;
+
+ // Each level depends on the next but the last level does not exist.
+ // Without cashing we need to test every path to the last level O(BRANCHING_FACTOR ^ DEPTH)
+ // and this test will time out. With cashing we need to discover that none of these
+ // can be activated O(BRANCHING_FACTOR * DEPTH)
+ for l in 0..DEPTH {
+ let name = format!("level{}", l);
+ let next = format!("level{}", l + 1);
+ for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep(next.as_str())]));
+ }
+ }
+
+ let reg = registry(reglist.clone());
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("level0")], &reg);
+
+ assert!(res.is_err());
+
+ // It is easy to write code that quickly returns an error.
+ // Lets make sure we can find a good answer if it is there.
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("level0", "1.0.0")));
+
+ let reg = registry(reglist.clone());
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("level0")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(&res, &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("level0", "1.0.0")]));
+
+ // Make sure we have not special case no candidates.
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "1.1.0")));
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "1.0.0")));
+ reglist.push(
+ pkg!((format!("level{}", DEPTH).as_str(), "1.0.0") => [dep_req("constrained", "=1.0.0")]),
+ );
+
+ let reg = registry(reglist.clone());
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("level0"), dep("constrained")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("level0", "1.0.0"),
+ ("constrained", "1.1.0"),
+ ]),
+ );
+
+ let reg = registry(reglist.clone());
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("level0", "1.0.1"), dep("constrained")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ (format!("level{}", DEPTH).as_str(), "1.0.0"),
+ ("constrained", "1.0.0"),
+ ]),
+ );
+
+ let reg = registry(reglist);
+
+ let res = resolve(
+ vec![dep_req("level0", "1.0.1"), dep_req("constrained", "1.1.0")],
+ &reg,
+ );
+
+ assert!(res.is_err());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_deep_traps() {
+ let mut reglist = Vec::new();
+
+ const DEPTH: usize = 200;
+ const BRANCHING_FACTOR: usize = 100;
+
+ // Each backtrack_trap depends on the next, and adds a backtrack frame.
+ // None of witch is going to help with `bad`.
+ for l in 0..DEPTH {
+ let name = format!("backtrack_trap{}", l);
+ let next = format!("backtrack_trap{}", l + 1);
+ for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep(next.as_str())]));
+ }
+ }
+ {
+ let name = format!("backtrack_trap{}", DEPTH);
+ for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str())));
+ }
+ }
+ {
+ // slightly less constrained to make sure `cloaking` gets picked last.
+ for i in 1..(BRANCHING_FACTOR + 10) {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("cloaking", vsn.as_str()) => [dep_req("bad", "1.0.1")]));
+ }
+ }
+
+ let reg = registry(reglist);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("backtrack_trap0"), dep("cloaking")], &reg);
+
+ assert!(res.is_err());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_constrained_cousins_backtrack() {
+ let mut reglist = Vec::new();
+
+ const DEPTH: usize = 100;
+ const BRANCHING_FACTOR: usize = 50;
+
+ // Each backtrack_trap depends on the next.
+ // The last depends on a specific ver of constrained.
+ for l in 0..DEPTH {
+ let name = format!("backtrack_trap{}", l);
+ let next = format!("backtrack_trap{}", l + 1);
+ for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep(next.as_str())]));
+ }
+ }
+ {
+ let name = format!("backtrack_trap{}", DEPTH);
+ for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(
+ pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep_req("constrained", ">=1.1.0, <=2.0.0")]),
+ );
+ }
+ }
+ {
+ // slightly less constrained to make sure `constrained` gets picked last.
+ for i in 0..(BRANCHING_FACTOR + 10) {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", vsn.as_str())));
+ }
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "1.1.0")));
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "2.0.0")));
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", "2.0.1")));
+ }
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("cloaking", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("constrained", "~1.0.0")]));
+
+ let reg = registry(reglist.clone());
+
+ // `backtrack_trap0 = "*"` is a lot of ways of saying `constrained = ">=1.1.0, <=2.0.0"`
+ // but `constrained= "2.0.1"` is already picked.
+ // Only then to try and solve `constrained= "~1.0.0"` which is incompatible.
+ let res = resolve(
+ vec![
+ dep("backtrack_trap0"),
+ dep_req("constrained", "2.0.1"),
+ dep("cloaking"),
+ ],
+ &reg,
+ );
+
+ assert!(res.is_err());
+
+ // Each level depends on the next but the last depends on incompatible deps.
+ // Let's make sure that we can cache that a dep has incompatible deps.
+ for l in 0..DEPTH {
+ let name = format!("level{}", l);
+ let next = format!("level{}", l + 1);
+ for i in 1..BRANCHING_FACTOR {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!((name.as_str(), vsn.as_str()) => [dep(next.as_str())]));
+ }
+ }
+ reglist.push(
+ pkg!((format!("level{}", DEPTH).as_str(), "1.0.0") => [dep("backtrack_trap0"),
+ dep("cloaking")
+ ]),
+ );
+
+ let reg = registry(reglist);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("level0"), dep_req("constrained", "2.0.1")], &reg);
+
+ assert!(res.is_err());
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("level0"), dep_req("constrained", "2.0.0")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[("constrained", "2.0.0"), ("cloaking", "1.0.0")]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_constrained_sibling_backtrack_activation() {
+ // It makes sense to resolve most-constrained deps first, but
+ // with that logic the backtrack traps here come between the two
+ // attempted resolutions of 'constrained'. When backtracking,
+ // cargo should skip past them and resume resolution once the
+ // number of activations for 'constrained' changes.
+ let mut reglist = vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("bar", "=1.0.0"),
+ dep_req("backtrack_trap1", "1.0"),
+ dep_req("backtrack_trap2", "1.0"),
+ dep_req("constrained", "<=1.0.60")]),
+ pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("constrained", ">=1.0.60")]),
+ ];
+ // Bump these to make the test harder, but you'll also need to
+ // change the version constraints on `constrained` above. To correctly
+ // exercise Cargo, the relationship between the values is:
+ // NUM_CONSTRAINED - vsn < NUM_TRAPS < vsn
+ // to make sure the traps are resolved between `constrained`.
+ const NUM_TRAPS: usize = 45; // min 1
+ const NUM_CONSTRAINED: usize = 100; // min 1
+ for i in 0..NUM_TRAPS {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap1", vsn.clone())));
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap2", vsn.clone())));
+ }
+ for i in 0..NUM_CONSTRAINED {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", vsn.clone())));
+ }
+ let reg = registry(reglist);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_contains(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("foo", "1.0.0"),
+ ("bar", "1.0.0"),
+ ("constrained", "1.0.60"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_public_constrained_sibling() {
+ // It makes sense to resolve most-constrained deps first, but
+ // with that logic the backtrack traps here come between the two
+ // attempted resolutions of 'constrained'. When backtracking,
+ // cargo should skip past them and resume resolution once the
+ // number of activations for 'constrained' changes.
+ let mut reglist = vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("bar", "=1.0.0"),
+ dep_req("backtrack_trap1", "1.0"),
+ dep_req("backtrack_trap2", "1.0"),
+ dep_req("constrained", "<=60")]),
+ pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req_kind("constrained", ">=60", DepKind::Normal, true)]),
+ ];
+ // Bump these to make the test harder, but you'll also need to
+ // change the version constraints on `constrained` above. To correctly
+ // exercise Cargo, the relationship between the values is:
+ // NUM_CONSTRAINED - vsn < NUM_TRAPS < vsn
+ // to make sure the traps are resolved between `constrained`.
+ const NUM_TRAPS: usize = 45; // min 1
+ const NUM_CONSTRAINED: usize = 100; // min 1
+ for i in 0..NUM_TRAPS {
+ let vsn = format!("1.0.{}", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap1", vsn.clone())));
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("backtrack_trap2", vsn.clone())));
+ }
+ for i in 0..NUM_CONSTRAINED {
+ let vsn = format!("{}.0.0", i);
+ reglist.push(pkg!(("constrained", vsn.clone())));
+ }
+ let reg = registry(reglist);
+
+ let _ = resolve_and_validated(vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], &reg, None);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_with_constrained_sibling_transitive_dep_effects() {
+ // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is
+ // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must
+ // be taken to not miss the transitive effects of alternatives. E.g.
+ // in the right-to-left resolution of the graph below, B may
+ // affect whether D is successfully resolved.
+ //
+ // A
+ // / | \
+ // B C D
+ // | |
+ // C D
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("A", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("B", "1.0"),
+ dep_req("C", "1.0"),
+ dep_req("D", "1.0.100")]),
+ pkg!(("B", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("C", ">=1.0.0")]),
+ pkg!(("B", "1.0.1") => [dep_req("C", ">=1.0.1")]),
+ pkg!(("C", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("D", "1.0.0")]),
+ pkg!(("C", "1.0.1") => [dep_req("D", ">=1.0.1,<1.0.100")]),
+ pkg!(("C", "1.0.2") => [dep_req("D", ">=1.0.2,<1.0.100")]),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.2")),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.100")),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.101")),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.102")),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.103")),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.104")),
+ pkg!(("D", "1.0.105")),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("A", "1")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[
+ ("root", "1.0.0"),
+ ("A", "1.0.0"),
+ ("B", "1.0.0"),
+ ("C", "1.0.0"),
+ ("D", "1.0.105"),
+ ]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn incomplete_information_skipping() {
+ // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is
+ // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must
+ // be taken to not miss the transitive effects of alternatives.
+ // Fuzzing discovered that for some reason cargo was skipping based
+ // on incomplete information in the following case:
+ // minimized bug found in:
+ // https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/commit/003c29b0c71e5ea28fbe8e72c148c755c9f3f8d9
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("a", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("a", "1.1.0")),
+ pkg!("b" => [dep("a")]),
+ pkg!(("c", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("c", "1.1.0")),
+ pkg!("d" => [dep_req("c", "=1.0")]),
+ pkg!(("e", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("e", "1.1.0") => [dep_req("c", "1.1")]),
+ pkg!("to_yank"),
+ pkg!(("f", "1.0.0") => [
+ dep("to_yank"),
+ dep("d"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("f", "1.1.0") => [dep("d")]),
+ pkg!("g" => [
+ dep("b"),
+ dep("e"),
+ dep("f"),
+ ]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input.clone());
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("g")], &reg).unwrap();
+ let package_to_yank = "to_yank".to_pkgid();
+ // this package is not used in the resolution.
+ assert!(!res.contains(&package_to_yank));
+ // so when we yank it
+ let new_reg = registry(
+ input
+ .iter()
+ .cloned()
+ .filter(|x| package_to_yank != x.package_id())
+ .collect(),
+ );
+ assert_eq!(input.len(), new_reg.len() + 1);
+ // it should still build
+ assert!(resolve(vec![dep("g")], &new_reg).is_ok());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn incomplete_information_skipping_2() {
+ // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is
+ // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must
+ // be taken to not miss the transitive effects of alternatives.
+ // Fuzzing discovered that for some reason cargo was skipping based
+ // on incomplete information in the following case:
+ // https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/commit/003c29b0c71e5ea28fbe8e72c148c755c9f3f8d9
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("b", "3.8.10")),
+ pkg!(("b", "8.7.4")),
+ pkg!(("b", "9.4.6")),
+ pkg!(("c", "1.8.8")),
+ pkg!(("c", "10.2.5")),
+ pkg!(("d", "4.1.2") => [
+ dep_req("bad", "=6.10.9"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("d", "5.5.6")),
+ pkg!(("d", "5.6.10")),
+ pkg!(("to_yank", "8.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("to_yank", "8.8.1")),
+ pkg!(("e", "4.7.8") => [
+ dep_req("d", ">=5.5.6, <=5.6.10"),
+ dep_req("to_yank", "=8.0.1"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("e", "7.4.9") => [
+ dep_req("bad", "=4.7.5"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!("f" => [
+ dep_req("d", ">=4.1.2, <=5.5.6"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!("g" => [
+ dep("bad"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("h", "3.8.3") => [
+ dep("g"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("h", "6.8.3") => [
+ dep("f"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("h", "8.1.9") => [
+ dep_req("to_yank", "=8.8.1"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!("i" => [
+ dep("b"),
+ dep("c"),
+ dep("e"),
+ dep("h"),
+ ]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input.clone());
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("i")], &reg).unwrap();
+ let package_to_yank = ("to_yank", "8.8.1").to_pkgid();
+ // this package is not used in the resolution.
+ assert!(!res.contains(&package_to_yank));
+ // so when we yank it
+ let new_reg = registry(
+ input
+ .iter()
+ .cloned()
+ .filter(|x| package_to_yank != x.package_id())
+ .collect(),
+ );
+ assert_eq!(input.len(), new_reg.len() + 1);
+ // it should still build
+ assert!(resolve(vec![dep("i")], &new_reg).is_ok());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn incomplete_information_skipping_3() {
+ // When backtracking due to a failed dependency, if Cargo is
+ // trying to be clever and skip irrelevant dependencies, care must
+ // be taken to not miss the transitive effects of alternatives.
+ // Fuzzing discovered that for some reason cargo was skipping based
+ // on incomplete information in the following case:
+ // minimized bug found in:
+ // https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/commit/003c29b0c71e5ea28fbe8e72c148c755c9f3f8d9
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg! {("to_yank", "3.0.3")},
+ pkg! {("to_yank", "3.3.0")},
+ pkg! {("to_yank", "3.3.1")},
+ pkg! {("a", "3.3.0") => [
+ dep_req("to_yank", "=3.0.3"),
+ ] },
+ pkg! {("a", "3.3.2") => [
+ dep_req("to_yank", "<=3.3.0"),
+ ] },
+ pkg! {("b", "0.1.3") => [
+ dep_req("a", "=3.3.0"),
+ ] },
+ pkg! {("b", "2.0.2") => [
+ dep_req("to_yank", "3.3.0"),
+ dep("a"),
+ ] },
+ pkg! {("b", "2.3.3") => [
+ dep_req("to_yank", "3.3.0"),
+ dep_req("a", "=3.3.0"),
+ ] },
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input.clone());
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep("b")], &reg).unwrap();
+ let package_to_yank = ("to_yank", "3.0.3").to_pkgid();
+ // this package is not used in the resolution.
+ assert!(!res.contains(&package_to_yank));
+ // so when we yank it
+ let new_reg = registry(
+ input
+ .iter()
+ .cloned()
+ .filter(|x| package_to_yank != x.package_id())
+ .collect(),
+ );
+ assert_eq!(input.len(), new_reg.len() + 1);
+ // it should still build
+ assert!(resolve(vec![dep("b")], &new_reg).is_ok());
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_but_no_exists() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], &reg);
+ assert!(res.is_err());
+
+ assert_eq!(
+ res.err().unwrap().to_string(),
+ "no matching package named `foo` found\n\
+ location searched: registry `https://example.com/`\n\
+ required by package `root v1.0.0 (registry `https://example.com/`)`\
+ "
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn resolving_cycle() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![pkg!("foo" => ["foo"])]);
+
+ let _ = resolve(vec![dep_req("foo", "1")], &reg);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn hard_equality() {
+ let reg = registry(vec![
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("foo", "1.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("bar", "1.0.0") => [dep_req("foo", "1.0.0")]),
+ ]);
+
+ let res = resolve(vec![dep_req("bar", "1"), dep_req("foo", "=1.0.0")], &reg).unwrap();
+
+ assert_same(
+ &res,
+ &names(&[("root", "1.0.0"), ("foo", "1.0.0"), ("bar", "1.0.0")]),
+ );
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn large_conflict_cache() {
+ let mut input = vec![
+ pkg!(("last", "0.0.0") => [dep("bad")]), // just to make sure last is less constrained
+ ];
+ let mut root_deps = vec![dep("last")];
+ const NUM_VERSIONS: u8 = 20;
+ for name in 0..=NUM_VERSIONS {
+ // a large number of conflicts can easily be generated by a sys crate.
+ let sys_name = format!("{}-sys", (b'a' + name) as char);
+ let in_len = input.len();
+ input.push(pkg!(("last", format!("{}.0.0", in_len)) => [dep_req(&sys_name, "=0.0.0")]));
+ root_deps.push(dep_req(&sys_name, ">= 0.0.1"));
+
+ // a large number of conflicts can also easily be generated by a major release version.
+ let plane_name = format!("{}", (b'a' + name) as char);
+ let in_len = input.len();
+ input.push(pkg!(("last", format!("{}.0.0", in_len)) => [dep_req(&plane_name, "=1.0.0")]));
+ root_deps.push(dep_req(&plane_name, ">= 1.0.1"));
+
+ for i in 0..=NUM_VERSIONS {
+ input.push(pkg!((&sys_name, format!("{}.0.0", i))));
+ input.push(pkg!((&plane_name, format!("1.0.{}", i))));
+ }
+ }
+ let reg = registry(input);
+ let _ = resolve(root_deps, &reg);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn off_by_one_bug() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.4")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.6")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.7")),
+ pkg!(("NA", "0.0.0") => [dep_req("A-sys", "<= 0.0.5"),]),
+ pkg!(("NA", "0.0.1") => [dep_req("A-sys", ">= 0.0.6, <= 0.0.8"),]),
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("a", "0.0.2")),
+ pkg!(("aa", "0.0.0") => [dep_req("A-sys", ">= 0.0.4, <= 0.0.6"),dep_req("NA", "<= 0.0.0"),]),
+ pkg!(("f", "0.0.3") => [dep("NA"),dep_req("a", "<= 0.0.2"),dep("aa"),]),
+ ];
+
+ let reg = registry(input);
+ let _ = resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("f")], &reg, None);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn conflict_store_bug() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.3")),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.5")),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.9") => [dep("bad"),]),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.10") => [dep("bad"),]),
+ pkg!(("L-sys", "0.0.1") => [dep("bad"),]),
+ pkg!(("L-sys", "0.0.5")),
+ pkg!(("R", "0.0.4") => [
+ dep_req("L-sys", "= 0.0.5"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("R", "0.0.6")),
+ pkg!(("a-sys", "0.0.5")),
+ pkg!(("a-sys", "0.0.11")),
+ pkg!(("c", "0.0.12") => [
+ dep_req("R", ">= 0.0.3, <= 0.0.4"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("c", "0.0.13") => [
+ dep_req("a-sys", ">= 0.0.8, <= 0.0.11"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("c0", "0.0.6") => [
+ dep_req("L-sys", "<= 0.0.2"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("c0", "0.0.10") => [
+ dep_req("A", ">= 0.0.9, <= 0.0.10"),
+ dep_req("a-sys", "= 0.0.5"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!("j" => [
+ dep_req("A", ">= 0.0.3, <= 0.0.5"),
+ dep_req("R", ">=0.0.4, <= 0.0.6"),
+ dep_req("c", ">= 0.0.9"),
+ dep_req("c0", ">= 0.0.6"),
+ ]),
+ ];
+
+ let reg = registry(input);
+ let _ = resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("j")], &reg, None);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn conflict_store_more_then_one_match() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.2")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.3")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.12")),
+ pkg!(("A-sys", "0.0.16")),
+ pkg!(("B-sys", "0.0.0")),
+ pkg!(("B-sys", "0.0.1")),
+ pkg!(("B-sys", "0.0.2") => [dep_req("A-sys", "= 0.0.12"),]),
+ pkg!(("BA-sys", "0.0.0") => [dep_req("A-sys","= 0.0.16"),]),
+ pkg!(("BA-sys", "0.0.1") => [dep("bad"),]),
+ pkg!(("BA-sys", "0.0.2") => [dep("bad"),]),
+ pkg!("nA" => [
+ dep("A"),
+ dep_req("A-sys", "<= 0.0.3"),
+ dep("B-sys"),
+ dep("BA-sys"),
+ ]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input);
+ let _ = resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("nA")], &reg, None);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn bad_lockfile_from_8249() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("a-sys", "0.2.0")),
+ pkg!(("a-sys", "0.1.0")),
+ pkg!(("b", "0.1.0") => [
+ dep_req("a-sys", "0.1"), // should be optional: true, but not deeded for now
+ ]),
+ pkg!(("c", "1.0.0") => [
+ dep_req("b", "=0.1.0"),
+ ]),
+ pkg!("foo" => [
+ dep_req("a-sys", "=0.2.0"),
+ {
+ let mut b = dep_req("b", "=0.1.0");
+ b.set_features(vec!["a-sys"]);
+ b
+ },
+ dep_req("c", "=1.0.0"),
+ ]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input);
+ let _ = resolve_and_validated(vec![dep("foo")], &reg, None);
+}
+
+#[test]
+fn cyclic_good_error_message() {
+ let input = vec![
+ pkg!(("A", "0.0.0") => [dep("C")]),
+ pkg!(("B", "0.0.0") => [dep("C")]),
+ pkg!(("C", "0.0.0") => [dep("A")]),
+ ];
+ let reg = registry(input);
+ let error = resolve(vec![dep("A"), dep("B")], &reg).unwrap_err();
+ println!("{}", error);
+ assert_eq!("\
+cyclic package dependency: package `A v0.0.0 (registry `https://example.com/`)` depends on itself. Cycle:
+package `A v0.0.0 (registry `https://example.com/`)`
+ ... which satisfies dependency `A = \"*\"` of package `C v0.0.0 (registry `https://example.com/`)`
+ ... which satisfies dependency `C = \"*\"` of package `A v0.0.0 (registry `https://example.com/`)`\
+", error.to_string());
+}
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-11-28 22:57:39 +0000