Adding upstream version 115.8.0esr.upstream/115.8.0esr

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 153 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/build/docs/slow.rst b/build/docs/slow.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3dfdd5b631
--- /dev/null
+++ b/build/docs/slow.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+.. _slow:
+
+==================================
+Why the Build System might be slow
+==================================
+
+A common complaint about the build system is that it can be slow. There are
+many reasons contributing to its slowness.
+However, on modern hardware, Firefox can be built in less than 10 minutes.
+
+First, it is important to distinguish between a :term:`clobber build`
+and an :term:`incremental build`. The reasons for why each are slow can
+be different.
+
+The build does a lot of work
+============================
+
+It may not be obvious, but the main reason the build system is slow is
+because it does a lot of work! The source tree consists of a few
+thousand C++ files. On a modern machine, we spend over 120 minutes of CPU
+core time compiling files! So, if you are looking for the root cause of
+slow clobber builds, look at the sheer volume of C++ files in the tree.
+
+You don't have enough CPU cores and MHz
+=======================================
+
+The build should be CPU bound. If the build system maintainers are
+optimizing the build system perfectly, every CPU core in your machine
+should be 100% saturated during a build. While this isn't currently the
+case (keep reading below), generally speaking, the more CPU cores you
+have in your machine and the more total MHz in your machine, the better.
+
+**We highly recommend building with no fewer than 4 physical CPU
+cores.** Please note the *physical* in this sentence. Hyperthreaded
+cores (an Intel Core i7 will report 8 CPU cores but only 4 are physical
+for example) only yield at most a 1.25x speedup per core.
+
+This cause impacts both clobber and incremental builds.
+
+You are building with a slow I/O layer
+======================================
+
+The build system can be I/O bound if your I/O layer is slow. Linking
+libxul on some platforms and build architectures can perform gigabytes
+of I/O.
+
+To minimize the impact of slow I/O on build performance, **we highly
+recommend building with an SSD.** Power users with enough memory may opt
+to build from a RAM disk. Mechanical disks should be avoided if at all
+possible.
+
+Some may dispute the importance of an SSD on build times. It is true
+that the beneficial impact of an SSD can be mitigated if your system has
+lots of memory and the build files stay in the page cache. However,
+operating system memory management is complicated. You don't really have
+control over what or when something is evicted from the page cache.
+Therefore, unless your machine is a dedicated build machine or you have
+more memory than is needed by everything running on your machine,
+chances are you'll run into page cache eviction and you I/O layer will
+impact build performance. That being said, an SSD certainly doesn't
+hurt build times. And, anyone who has used a machine with an SSD will
+tell you how great of an investment it is for performance all around the
+operating system. On top of that, some automated tests are I/O bound
+(like those touching SQLite databases), so an SSD will make tests
+faster.
+
+This cause impacts both clobber and incremental builds.
+
+You don't have enough memory
+============================
+
+The build system allocates a lot of memory, especially when building
+many things in parallel. If you don't have enough free system memory,
+the build will cause swap activity, slowing down your system and the
+build. Even if you never get to the point of swapping, the build system
+performs a lot of I/O and having all accessed files in memory and the
+page cache can significantly reduce the influence of the I/O layer on
+the build system.
+
+**We recommend building with no less than 8 GB of system memory.** As
+always, the more memory you have, the better. For a bare bones machine
+doing nothing more than building the source tree, anything more than 16
+GB is likely entering the point of diminishing returns.
+
+This cause impacts both clobber and incremental builds.
+
+You are building on Windows
+===========================
+
+New processes on Windows are about a magnitude slower to spawn than on
+UNIX-y systems such as Linux. This is because Windows has optimized new
+threads while the \*NIX platforms typically optimize new processes.
+Anyway, the build system spawns thousands of new processes during a
+build. Parts of the build that rely on rapid spawning of new processes
+are slow on Windows as a result. This is most pronounced when running
+*configure*. The configure file is a giant shell script and shell
+scripts rely heavily on new processes. This is why configure
+can run over a minute slower on Windows.
+
+Another reason Windows builds are slower is because Windows lacks proper
+symlink support. On systems that support symlinks, we can generate a
+file into a staging area then symlink it into the final directory very
+quickly. On Windows, we have to perform a full file copy. This incurs
+much more I/O. And if done poorly, can muck with file modification
+times, messing up build dependencies.
+
+These issues impact both clobber and incremental builds.
+
+make is inefficient
+===================
+
+Compared to modern build backends like Tup or Ninja, `make` is slow and
+inefficient. We can only make `make` so fast. At some point, we'll hit a
+performance plateau and will need to use a different tool to make builds
+faster.
+
+Please note that clobber and incremental builds are different. A clobber build
+with `make` will likely be as fast as a clobber build with a modern build
+system.
+
+C++ header dependency hell
+==========================
+
+Modifying a *.h* file can have significant impact on the build system.
+If you modify a *.h* that is used by 1000 C++ files, all of those 1000
+C++ files will be recompiled.
+
+Our code base has traditionally been sloppy managing the impact of
+changed headers on build performance. Bug 785103 tracks improving the
+situation.
+
+This issue mostly impacts the times of an :term:`incremental build`.
+
+A search/indexing service on your machine is running
+====================================================
+
+Many operating systems have a background service that automatically
+indexes filesystem content to make searching faster. On Windows, you
+have the Windows Search Service. On OS X, you have Finder.
+
+These background services sometimes take a keen interest in the files
+being produced as part of the build. Since the build system produces
+hundreds of megabytes or even a few gigabytes of file data, you can
+imagine how much work this is to index! If this work is being performed
+while the build is running, your build will be slower.
+
+OS X's Finder is notorious for indexing when the build is running. And,
+it has a tendency to suck up a whole CPU core. This can make builds
+several minutes slower. If you build with ``mach`` and have the optional
+``psutil`` package built (it requires Python development headers - see
+:ref:`python` for more) and Finder is running during a build, mach will
+print a warning at the end of the build, complete with instructions on
+how to fix it.