1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
|
/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
* License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
* file, You can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
//! Code related to the style sharing cache, an optimization that allows similar
//! nodes to share style without having to run selector matching twice.
//!
//! The basic setup is as follows. We have an LRU cache of style sharing
//! candidates. When we try to style a target element, we first check whether
//! we can quickly determine that styles match something in this cache, and if
//! so we just use the cached style information. This check is done with a
//! StyleBloom filter set up for the target element, which may not be a correct
//! state for the cached candidate element if they're cousins instead of
//! siblings.
//!
//! The complicated part is determining that styles match. This is subject to
//! the following constraints:
//!
//! 1) The target and candidate must be inheriting the same styles.
//! 2) The target and candidate must have exactly the same rules matching them.
//! 3) The target and candidate must have exactly the same non-selector-based
//! style information (inline styles, presentation hints).
//! 4) The target and candidate must have exactly the same rules matching their
//! pseudo-elements, because an element's style data points to the style
//! data for its pseudo-elements.
//!
//! These constraints are satisfied in the following ways:
//!
//! * We check that the parents of the target and the candidate have the same
//! computed style. This addresses constraint 1.
//!
//! * We check that the target and candidate have the same inline style and
//! presentation hint declarations. This addresses constraint 3.
//!
//! * We ensure that a target matches a candidate only if they have the same
//! matching result for all selectors that target either elements or the
//! originating elements of pseudo-elements. This addresses constraint 4
//! (because it prevents a target that has pseudo-element styles from matching
//! a candidate that has different pseudo-element styles) as well as
//! constraint 2.
//!
//! The actual checks that ensure that elements match the same rules are
//! conceptually split up into two pieces. First, we do various checks on
//! elements that make sure that the set of possible rules in all selector maps
//! in the stylist (for normal styling and for pseudo-elements) that might match
//! the two elements is the same. For example, we enforce that the target and
//! candidate must have the same localname and namespace. Second, we have a
//! selector map of "revalidation selectors" that the stylist maintains that we
//! actually match against the target and candidate and then check whether the
//! two sets of results were the same. Due to the up-front selector map checks,
//! we know that the target and candidate will be matched against the same exact
//! set of revalidation selectors, so the match result arrays can be compared
//! directly.
//!
//! It's very important that a selector be added to the set of revalidation
//! selectors any time there are two elements that could pass all the up-front
//! checks but match differently against some ComplexSelector in the selector.
//! If that happens, then they can have descendants that might themselves pass
//! the up-front checks but would have different matching results for the
//! selector in question. In this case, "descendants" includes pseudo-elements,
//! so there is a single selector map of revalidation selectors that includes
//! both selectors targeting elements and selectors targeting pseudo-element
//! originating elements. We ensure that the pseudo-element parts of all these
//! selectors are effectively stripped off, so that matching them all against
//! elements makes sense.
use crate::applicable_declarations::ApplicableDeclarationBlock;
use crate::bloom::StyleBloom;
use crate::computed_value_flags::ComputedValueFlags;
use crate::context::{SharedStyleContext, StyleContext};
use crate::dom::{SendElement, TElement};
use crate::properties::ComputedValues;
use crate::rule_tree::StrongRuleNode;
use crate::style_resolver::{PrimaryStyle, ResolvedElementStyles};
use crate::stylist::Stylist;
use crate::values::AtomIdent;
use atomic_refcell::{AtomicRefCell, AtomicRefMut};
use owning_ref::OwningHandle;
use selectors::matching::{NeedsSelectorFlags, VisitedHandlingMode};
use selectors::NthIndexCache;
use servo_arc::Arc;
use smallbitvec::SmallBitVec;
use smallvec::SmallVec;
use std::marker::PhantomData;
use std::mem::{self, ManuallyDrop};
use std::ops::Deref;
use std::ptr::NonNull;
use uluru::LRUCache;
mod checks;
/// The amount of nodes that the style sharing candidate cache should hold at
/// most.
///
/// The cache size was chosen by measuring style sharing and resulting
/// performance on a few pages; sizes up to about 32 were giving good sharing
/// improvements (e.g. 3x fewer styles having to be resolved than at size 8) and
/// slight performance improvements. Sizes larger than 32 haven't really been
/// tested.
pub const SHARING_CACHE_SIZE: usize = 32;
/// Opaque pointer type to compare ComputedValues identities.
#[derive(Clone, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)]
pub struct OpaqueComputedValues(NonNull<()>);
unsafe impl Send for OpaqueComputedValues {}
unsafe impl Sync for OpaqueComputedValues {}
impl OpaqueComputedValues {
fn from(cv: &ComputedValues) -> Self {
let p =
unsafe { NonNull::new_unchecked(cv as *const ComputedValues as *const () as *mut ()) };
OpaqueComputedValues(p)
}
fn eq(&self, cv: &ComputedValues) -> bool {
Self::from(cv) == *self
}
}
/// Some data we want to avoid recomputing all the time while trying to share
/// style.
#[derive(Debug, Default)]
pub struct ValidationData {
/// The class list of this element.
///
/// TODO(emilio): Maybe check whether rules for these classes apply to the
/// element?
class_list: Option<SmallVec<[AtomIdent; 5]>>,
/// The part list of this element.
///
/// TODO(emilio): Maybe check whether rules with these part names apply to
/// the element?
part_list: Option<SmallVec<[AtomIdent; 5]>>,
/// The list of presentational attributes of the element.
pres_hints: Option<SmallVec<[ApplicableDeclarationBlock; 5]>>,
/// The pointer identity of the parent ComputedValues.
parent_style_identity: Option<OpaqueComputedValues>,
/// The cached result of matching this entry against the revalidation
/// selectors.
revalidation_match_results: Option<SmallBitVec>,
}
impl ValidationData {
/// Move the cached data to a new instance, and return it.
pub fn take(&mut self) -> Self {
mem::replace(self, Self::default())
}
/// Get or compute the list of presentational attributes associated with
/// this element.
pub fn pres_hints<E>(&mut self, element: E) -> &[ApplicableDeclarationBlock]
where
E: TElement,
{
self.pres_hints.get_or_insert_with(|| {
let mut pres_hints = SmallVec::new();
element.synthesize_presentational_hints_for_legacy_attributes(
VisitedHandlingMode::AllLinksUnvisited,
&mut pres_hints,
);
pres_hints
})
}
/// Get or compute the part-list associated with this element.
pub fn part_list<E>(&mut self, element: E) -> &[AtomIdent]
where
E: TElement,
{
if !element.has_part_attr() {
return &[];
}
self.part_list.get_or_insert_with(|| {
let mut list = SmallVec::<[_; 5]>::new();
element.each_part(|p| list.push(p.clone()));
// See below for the reasoning.
if !list.spilled() {
list.sort_unstable_by_key(|a| a.get_hash());
}
list
})
}
/// Get or compute the class-list associated with this element.
pub fn class_list<E>(&mut self, element: E) -> &[AtomIdent]
where
E: TElement,
{
self.class_list.get_or_insert_with(|| {
let mut list = SmallVec::<[_; 5]>::new();
element.each_class(|c| list.push(c.clone()));
// Assuming there are a reasonable number of classes (we use the
// inline capacity as "reasonable number"), sort them to so that
// we don't mistakenly reject sharing candidates when one element
// has "foo bar" and the other has "bar foo".
if !list.spilled() {
list.sort_unstable_by_key(|a| a.get_hash());
}
list
})
}
/// Get or compute the parent style identity.
pub fn parent_style_identity<E>(&mut self, el: E) -> OpaqueComputedValues
where
E: TElement,
{
self.parent_style_identity
.get_or_insert_with(|| {
let parent = el.inheritance_parent().unwrap();
let values =
OpaqueComputedValues::from(parent.borrow_data().unwrap().styles.primary());
values
})
.clone()
}
/// Computes the revalidation results if needed, and returns it.
/// Inline so we know at compile time what bloom_known_valid is.
#[inline]
fn revalidation_match_results<E>(
&mut self,
element: E,
stylist: &Stylist,
bloom: &StyleBloom<E>,
nth_index_cache: &mut NthIndexCache,
bloom_known_valid: bool,
needs_selector_flags: NeedsSelectorFlags,
) -> &SmallBitVec
where
E: TElement,
{
self.revalidation_match_results.get_or_insert_with(|| {
// The bloom filter may already be set up for our element.
// If it is, use it. If not, we must be in a candidate
// (i.e. something in the cache), and the element is one
// of our cousins, not a sibling. In that case, we'll
// just do revalidation selector matching without a bloom
// filter, to avoid thrashing the filter.
let bloom_to_use = if bloom_known_valid {
debug_assert_eq!(bloom.current_parent(), element.traversal_parent());
Some(bloom.filter())
} else {
if bloom.current_parent() == element.traversal_parent() {
Some(bloom.filter())
} else {
None
}
};
stylist.match_revalidation_selectors(
element,
bloom_to_use,
nth_index_cache,
needs_selector_flags,
)
})
}
}
/// Information regarding a style sharing candidate, that is, an entry in the
/// style sharing cache.
///
/// Note that this information is stored in TLS and cleared after the traversal,
/// and once here, the style information of the element is immutable, so it's
/// safe to access.
///
/// Important: If you change the members/layout here, You need to do the same for
/// FakeCandidate below.
#[derive(Debug)]
pub struct StyleSharingCandidate<E: TElement> {
/// The element.
element: E,
validation_data: ValidationData,
considered_relative_selector: bool,
}
struct FakeCandidate {
_element: usize,
_validation_data: ValidationData,
_considered_relative_selector: bool,
}
impl<E: TElement> Deref for StyleSharingCandidate<E> {
type Target = E;
fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
&self.element
}
}
impl<E: TElement> StyleSharingCandidate<E> {
/// Get the classlist of this candidate.
fn class_list(&mut self) -> &[AtomIdent] {
self.validation_data.class_list(self.element)
}
/// Get the part list of this candidate.
fn part_list(&mut self) -> &[AtomIdent] {
self.validation_data.part_list(self.element)
}
/// Get the pres hints of this candidate.
fn pres_hints(&mut self) -> &[ApplicableDeclarationBlock] {
self.validation_data.pres_hints(self.element)
}
/// Get the parent style identity.
fn parent_style_identity(&mut self) -> OpaqueComputedValues {
self.validation_data.parent_style_identity(self.element)
}
/// Compute the bit vector of revalidation selector match results
/// for this candidate.
fn revalidation_match_results(
&mut self,
stylist: &Stylist,
bloom: &StyleBloom<E>,
nth_index_cache: &mut NthIndexCache,
) -> &SmallBitVec {
self.validation_data.revalidation_match_results(
self.element,
stylist,
bloom,
nth_index_cache,
/* bloom_known_valid = */ false,
// The candidate must already have the right bits already, if
// needed.
NeedsSelectorFlags::No,
)
}
}
impl<E: TElement> PartialEq<StyleSharingCandidate<E>> for StyleSharingCandidate<E> {
fn eq(&self, other: &Self) -> bool {
self.element == other.element
}
}
/// An element we want to test against the style sharing cache.
pub struct StyleSharingTarget<E: TElement> {
element: E,
validation_data: ValidationData,
}
impl<E: TElement> Deref for StyleSharingTarget<E> {
type Target = E;
fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
&self.element
}
}
impl<E: TElement> StyleSharingTarget<E> {
/// Trivially construct a new StyleSharingTarget to test against the cache.
pub fn new(element: E) -> Self {
Self {
element: element,
validation_data: ValidationData::default(),
}
}
fn class_list(&mut self) -> &[AtomIdent] {
self.validation_data.class_list(self.element)
}
fn part_list(&mut self) -> &[AtomIdent] {
self.validation_data.part_list(self.element)
}
/// Get the pres hints of this candidate.
fn pres_hints(&mut self) -> &[ApplicableDeclarationBlock] {
self.validation_data.pres_hints(self.element)
}
/// Get the parent style identity.
fn parent_style_identity(&mut self) -> OpaqueComputedValues {
self.validation_data.parent_style_identity(self.element)
}
fn revalidation_match_results(
&mut self,
stylist: &Stylist,
bloom: &StyleBloom<E>,
nth_index_cache: &mut NthIndexCache,
) -> &SmallBitVec {
// It's important to set the selector flags. Otherwise, if we succeed in
// sharing the style, we may not set the slow selector flags for the
// right elements (which may not necessarily be |element|), causing
// missed restyles after future DOM mutations.
//
// Gecko's test_bug534804.html exercises this. A minimal testcase is:
// <style> #e:empty + span { ... } </style>
// <span id="e">
// <span></span>
// </span>
// <span></span>
//
// The style sharing cache will get a hit for the second span. When the
// child span is subsequently removed from the DOM, missing selector
// flags would cause us to miss the restyle on the second span.
self.validation_data.revalidation_match_results(
self.element,
stylist,
bloom,
nth_index_cache,
/* bloom_known_valid = */ true,
NeedsSelectorFlags::Yes,
)
}
/// Attempts to share a style with another node.
pub fn share_style_if_possible(
&mut self,
context: &mut StyleContext<E>,
) -> Option<ResolvedElementStyles> {
let cache = &mut context.thread_local.sharing_cache;
let shared_context = &context.shared;
let bloom_filter = &context.thread_local.bloom_filter;
let nth_index_cache = &mut context.thread_local.nth_index_cache;
if cache.dom_depth != bloom_filter.matching_depth() {
debug!(
"Can't share style, because DOM depth changed from {:?} to {:?}, element: {:?}",
cache.dom_depth,
bloom_filter.matching_depth(),
self.element
);
return None;
}
debug_assert_eq!(
bloom_filter.current_parent(),
self.element.traversal_parent()
);
cache.share_style_if_possible(shared_context, bloom_filter, nth_index_cache, self)
}
/// Gets the validation data used to match against this target, if any.
pub fn take_validation_data(&mut self) -> ValidationData {
self.validation_data.take()
}
}
struct SharingCacheBase<Candidate> {
entries: LRUCache<Candidate, SHARING_CACHE_SIZE>,
}
impl<Candidate> Default for SharingCacheBase<Candidate> {
fn default() -> Self {
Self {
entries: LRUCache::default(),
}
}
}
impl<Candidate> SharingCacheBase<Candidate> {
fn clear(&mut self) {
self.entries.clear();
}
fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
self.entries.len() == 0
}
}
impl<E: TElement> SharingCache<E> {
fn insert(
&mut self,
element: E,
considered_relative_selector: bool,
validation_data_holder: Option<&mut StyleSharingTarget<E>>,
) {
let validation_data = match validation_data_holder {
Some(v) => v.take_validation_data(),
None => ValidationData::default(),
};
self.entries.insert(StyleSharingCandidate {
element,
considered_relative_selector,
validation_data,
});
}
}
/// Style sharing caches are are large allocations, so we store them in thread-local
/// storage such that they can be reused across style traversals. Ideally, we'd just
/// stack-allocate these buffers with uninitialized memory, but right now rustc can't
/// avoid memmoving the entire cache during setup, which gets very expensive. See
/// issues like [1] and [2].
///
/// Given that the cache stores entries of type TElement, we transmute to usize
/// before storing in TLS. This is safe as long as we make sure to empty the cache
/// before we let it go.
///
/// [1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/42763
/// [2] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/13707
type SharingCache<E> = SharingCacheBase<StyleSharingCandidate<E>>;
type TypelessSharingCache = SharingCacheBase<FakeCandidate>;
type StoredSharingCache = Arc<AtomicRefCell<TypelessSharingCache>>;
thread_local! {
// See the comment on bloom.rs about why do we leak this.
static SHARING_CACHE_KEY: ManuallyDrop<StoredSharingCache> =
ManuallyDrop::new(Arc::new_leaked(Default::default()));
}
/// An LRU cache of the last few nodes seen, so that we can aggressively try to
/// reuse their styles.
///
/// Note that this cache is flushed every time we steal work from the queue, so
/// storing nodes here temporarily is safe.
pub struct StyleSharingCache<E: TElement> {
/// The LRU cache, with the type cast away to allow persisting the allocation.
cache_typeless: OwningHandle<StoredSharingCache, AtomicRefMut<'static, TypelessSharingCache>>,
/// Bind this structure to the lifetime of E, since that's what we effectively store.
marker: PhantomData<SendElement<E>>,
/// The DOM depth we're currently at. This is used as an optimization to
/// clear the cache when we change depths, since we know at that point
/// nothing in the cache will match.
dom_depth: usize,
}
impl<E: TElement> Drop for StyleSharingCache<E> {
fn drop(&mut self) {
self.clear();
}
}
impl<E: TElement> StyleSharingCache<E> {
#[allow(dead_code)]
fn cache(&self) -> &SharingCache<E> {
let base: &TypelessSharingCache = &*self.cache_typeless;
unsafe { mem::transmute(base) }
}
fn cache_mut(&mut self) -> &mut SharingCache<E> {
let base: &mut TypelessSharingCache = &mut *self.cache_typeless;
unsafe { mem::transmute(base) }
}
/// Create a new style sharing candidate cache.
// Forced out of line to limit stack frame sizes after extra inlining from
// https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/43931
//
// See https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/18420#issuecomment-328769322
#[inline(never)]
pub fn new() -> Self {
assert_eq!(
mem::size_of::<SharingCache<E>>(),
mem::size_of::<TypelessSharingCache>()
);
assert_eq!(
mem::align_of::<SharingCache<E>>(),
mem::align_of::<TypelessSharingCache>()
);
let cache_arc = SHARING_CACHE_KEY.with(|c| Arc::clone(&*c));
let cache =
OwningHandle::new_with_fn(cache_arc, |x| unsafe { x.as_ref() }.unwrap().borrow_mut());
debug_assert!(cache.is_empty());
StyleSharingCache {
cache_typeless: cache,
marker: PhantomData,
dom_depth: 0,
}
}
/// Tries to insert an element in the style sharing cache.
///
/// Fails if we know it should never be in the cache.
///
/// NB: We pass a source for the validation data, rather than the data itself,
/// to avoid memmoving at each function call. See rust issue #42763.
pub fn insert_if_possible(
&mut self,
element: &E,
style: &PrimaryStyle,
validation_data_holder: Option<&mut StyleSharingTarget<E>>,
dom_depth: usize,
shared_context: &SharedStyleContext,
) {
let parent = match element.traversal_parent() {
Some(element) => element,
None => {
debug!("Failing to insert to the cache: no parent element");
return;
},
};
if !element.matches_user_and_content_rules() {
debug!("Failing to insert into the cache: no tree rules:");
return;
}
// We can't share style across shadow hosts right now, because they may
// match different :host rules.
//
// TODO(emilio): We could share across the ones that don't have :host
// rules or have the same.
if element.shadow_root().is_some() {
debug!("Failing to insert into the cache: Shadow Host");
return;
}
// If the element has running animations, we can't share style.
//
// This is distinct from the specifies_{animations,transitions} check below,
// because:
// * Animations can be triggered directly via the Web Animations API.
// * Our computed style can still be affected by animations after we no
// longer match any animation rules, since removing animations involves
// a sequential task and an additional traversal.
if element.has_animations(shared_context) {
debug!("Failing to insert to the cache: running animations");
return;
}
// If this element was considered for matching a relative selector, we can't
// share style, as that requires evaluating the relative selector in the
// first place. A couple notes:
// - This means that a document that contains a standalone `:has()`
// rule would basically turn style sharing off.
// - Since the flag is set on the element, we may be overly pessimistic:
// For example, given `<div class="foo"><div class="bar"></div></div>`,
// if we run into a `.foo:has(.bar) .baz` selector, we refuse any selector
// matching `.foo`, even if `:has()` may not even be used. Ideally we'd
// have something like `RelativeSelectorConsidered::RightMost`, but the
// element flag is required for invalidation, and this reduces more tracking.
if element.anchors_relative_selector() {
debug!("Failing to insert to the cache: may anchor relative selector");
return;
}
// In addition to the above running animations check, we also need to
// check CSS animation and transition styles since it's possible that
// we are about to create CSS animations/transitions.
//
// These are things we don't check in the candidate match because they
// are either uncommon or expensive.
let ui_style = style.style().get_ui();
if ui_style.specifies_transitions() {
debug!("Failing to insert to the cache: transitions");
return;
}
if ui_style.specifies_animations() {
debug!("Failing to insert to the cache: animations");
return;
}
debug!(
"Inserting into cache: {:?} with parent {:?}",
element, parent
);
if self.dom_depth != dom_depth {
debug!(
"Clearing cache because depth changed from {:?} to {:?}, element: {:?}",
self.dom_depth, dom_depth, element
);
self.clear();
self.dom_depth = dom_depth;
}
self.cache_mut().insert(
*element,
style
.style
.0
.flags
.intersects(ComputedValueFlags::CONSIDERED_RELATIVE_SELECTOR),
validation_data_holder,
);
}
/// Clear the style sharing candidate cache.
pub fn clear(&mut self) {
self.cache_mut().clear();
}
/// Attempts to share a style with another node.
fn share_style_if_possible(
&mut self,
shared_context: &SharedStyleContext,
bloom_filter: &StyleBloom<E>,
nth_index_cache: &mut NthIndexCache,
target: &mut StyleSharingTarget<E>,
) -> Option<ResolvedElementStyles> {
if shared_context.options.disable_style_sharing_cache {
debug!(
"{:?} Cannot share style: style sharing cache disabled",
target.element
);
return None;
}
if target.inheritance_parent().is_none() {
debug!(
"{:?} Cannot share style: element has no parent",
target.element
);
return None;
}
if !target.matches_user_and_content_rules() {
debug!("{:?} Cannot share style: content rules", target.element);
return None;
}
self.cache_mut().entries.lookup(|candidate| {
Self::test_candidate(
target,
candidate,
&shared_context,
bloom_filter,
nth_index_cache,
shared_context,
)
})
}
fn test_candidate(
target: &mut StyleSharingTarget<E>,
candidate: &mut StyleSharingCandidate<E>,
shared: &SharedStyleContext,
bloom: &StyleBloom<E>,
nth_index_cache: &mut NthIndexCache,
shared_context: &SharedStyleContext,
) -> Option<ResolvedElementStyles> {
debug_assert!(target.matches_user_and_content_rules());
// Check that we have the same parent, or at least that the parents
// share styles and permit sharing across their children. The latter
// check allows us to share style between cousins if the parents
// shared style.
if !checks::parents_allow_sharing(target, candidate) {
trace!("Miss: Parent");
return None;
}
if target.local_name() != candidate.element.local_name() {
trace!("Miss: Local Name");
return None;
}
if target.namespace() != candidate.element.namespace() {
trace!("Miss: Namespace");
return None;
}
// We do not ignore visited state here, because Gecko needs to store
// extra bits on visited styles, so these contexts cannot be shared.
if target.element.state() != candidate.state() {
trace!("Miss: User and Author State");
return None;
}
if target.is_link() != candidate.element.is_link() {
trace!("Miss: Link");
return None;
}
// If two elements belong to different shadow trees, different rules may
// apply to them, from the respective trees.
if target.element.containing_shadow() != candidate.element.containing_shadow() {
trace!("Miss: Different containing shadow roots");
return None;
}
// If the elements are not assigned to the same slot they could match
// different ::slotted() rules in the slot scope.
//
// If two elements are assigned to different slots, even within the same
// shadow root, they could match different rules, due to the slot being
// assigned to yet another slot in another shadow root.
if target.element.assigned_slot() != candidate.element.assigned_slot() {
// TODO(emilio): We could have a look at whether the shadow roots
// actually have slotted rules and such.
trace!("Miss: Different assigned slots");
return None;
}
if target.element.shadow_root().is_some() {
trace!("Miss: Shadow host");
return None;
}
if target.element.has_animations(shared_context) {
trace!("Miss: Has Animations");
return None;
}
if target.matches_user_and_content_rules() !=
candidate.element.matches_user_and_content_rules()
{
trace!("Miss: User and Author Rules");
return None;
}
// It's possible that there are no styles for either id.
if checks::may_match_different_id_rules(shared, target.element, candidate.element) {
trace!("Miss: ID Attr");
return None;
}
if !checks::have_same_style_attribute(target, candidate) {
trace!("Miss: Style Attr");
return None;
}
if !checks::have_same_class(target, candidate) {
trace!("Miss: Class");
return None;
}
if !checks::have_same_presentational_hints(target, candidate) {
trace!("Miss: Pres Hints");
return None;
}
if !checks::have_same_parts(target, candidate) {
trace!("Miss: Shadow parts");
return None;
}
if !checks::revalidate(target, candidate, shared, bloom, nth_index_cache) {
trace!("Miss: Revalidation");
return None;
}
debug!(
"Sharing allowed between {:?} and {:?}",
target.element, candidate.element
);
Some(candidate.element.borrow_data().unwrap().share_styles())
}
/// Attempts to find an element in the cache with the given primary rule
/// node and parent.
///
/// FIXME(emilio): re-measure this optimization, and remove if it's not very
/// useful... It's probably not worth the complexity / obscure bugs.
pub fn lookup_by_rules(
&mut self,
shared_context: &SharedStyleContext,
inherited: &ComputedValues,
rules: &StrongRuleNode,
visited_rules: Option<&StrongRuleNode>,
target: E,
) -> Option<PrimaryStyle> {
if shared_context.options.disable_style_sharing_cache {
return None;
}
self.cache_mut().entries.lookup(|candidate| {
debug_assert_ne!(candidate.element, target);
if !candidate.parent_style_identity().eq(inherited) {
return None;
}
let data = candidate.element.borrow_data().unwrap();
let style = data.styles.primary();
if style.rules.as_ref() != Some(&rules) {
return None;
}
if style.visited_rules() != visited_rules {
return None;
}
// NOTE(emilio): We only need to check name / namespace because we
// do name-dependent style adjustments, like the display: contents
// to display: none adjustment.
if target.namespace() != candidate.element.namespace() {
return None;
}
if target.local_name() != candidate.element.local_name() {
return None;
}
// Rule nodes and styles are computed independent of the element's
// actual visitedness, but at the end of the cascade (in
// `adjust_for_visited`) we do store the visitedness as a flag in
// style. (This is a subtle change from initial visited work that
// landed when computed values were fused, see
// https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1381635.)
// So at the moment, we need to additionally compare visitedness,
// since that is not accounted for by rule nodes alone.
// FIXME(jryans): This seems like it breaks the constant time
// requirements of visited, assuming we get a cache hit on only one
// of unvisited vs. visited.
// TODO(emilio): We no longer have such a flag, remove this check.
if target.is_visited_link() != candidate.element.is_visited_link() {
return None;
}
Some(data.share_primary_style())
})
}
}
|