summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/third_party/python/looseversion
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-19 00:47:55 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-19 00:47:55 +0000
commit26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 (patch)
treef435a8308119effd964b339f76abb83a57c29483 /third_party/python/looseversion
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadfirefox-26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6.tar.xz
firefox-26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6.zip
Adding upstream version 124.0.1.upstream/124.0.1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'third_party/python/looseversion')
-rw-r--r--third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/LICENSE48
-rw-r--r--third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/METADATA56
-rw-r--r--third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/RECORD6
-rw-r--r--third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/WHEEL5
-rw-r--r--third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/top_level.txt1
-rw-r--r--third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion.py204
6 files changed, 320 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/LICENSE b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/LICENSE
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a9b2196fd1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/LICENSE
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+PYTHON SOFTWARE FOUNDATION LICENSE VERSION 2
+--------------------------------------------
+
+1. This LICENSE AGREEMENT is between the Python Software Foundation
+("PSF"), and the Individual or Organization ("Licensee") accessing and
+otherwise using this software ("Python") in source or binary form and
+its associated documentation.
+
+2. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License Agreement, PSF hereby
+grants Licensee a nonexclusive, royalty-free, world-wide license to reproduce,
+analyze, test, perform and/or display publicly, prepare derivative works,
+distribute, and otherwise use Python alone or in any derivative version,
+provided, however, that PSF's License Agreement and PSF's notice of copyright,
+i.e., "Copyright (c) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010,
+2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022 Python Software Foundation;
+All Rights Reserved" are retained in Python alone or in any derivative version
+prepared by Licensee.
+
+3. In the event Licensee prepares a derivative work that is based on
+or incorporates Python or any part thereof, and wants to make
+the derivative work available to others as provided herein, then
+Licensee hereby agrees to include in any such work a brief summary of
+the changes made to Python.
+
+4. PSF is making Python available to Licensee on an "AS IS"
+basis. PSF MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR
+IMPLIED. BY WAY OF EXAMPLE, BUT NOT LIMITATION, PSF MAKES NO AND
+DISCLAIMS ANY REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
+FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR THAT THE USE OF PYTHON WILL NOT
+INFRINGE ANY THIRD PARTY RIGHTS.
+
+5. PSF SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO LICENSEE OR ANY OTHER USERS OF PYTHON
+FOR ANY INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR LOSS AS
+A RESULT OF MODIFYING, DISTRIBUTING, OR OTHERWISE USING PYTHON,
+OR ANY DERIVATIVE THEREOF, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY THEREOF.
+
+6. This License Agreement will automatically terminate upon a material
+breach of its terms and conditions.
+
+7. Nothing in this License Agreement shall be deemed to create any
+relationship of agency, partnership, or joint venture between PSF and
+Licensee. This License Agreement does not grant permission to use PSF
+trademarks or trade name in a trademark sense to endorse or promote
+products or services of Licensee, or any third party.
+
+8. By copying, installing or otherwise using Python, Licensee
+agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of this License
+Agreement.
diff --git a/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/METADATA b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/METADATA
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2ba9f265d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/METADATA
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+Metadata-Version: 2.1
+Name: looseversion
+Version: 1.0.1
+Summary: Version numbering for anarchists and software realists
+Home-page: https://github.com/effigies/looseversion
+Author: Chris Markiewicz
+Author-email: effigies@gmail.com
+License: PSF-2.0
+Classifier: Programming Language :: Python :: 3
+Classifier: Development Status :: 6 - Mature
+Classifier: License :: OSI Approved :: Python Software Foundation License
+Requires-Python: >=3
+Description-Content-Type: text/markdown
+License-File: LICENSE
+
+# looseversion - Version numbering for anarchists and software realists
+
+A backwards/forwards-compatible fork of `distutils.version.LooseVersion`,
+for times when PEP-440 isn't what you need.
+
+The goal of this package is to be a drop-in replacement for the original `LooseVersion`.
+It implements an identical interface and comparison logic to `LooseVersion`.
+The only major change is that a `looseversion.LooseVersion` is comparable to a
+`distutils.version.LooseVersion`, which means tools should not need to worry whether
+all dependencies that use LooseVersion have migrated.
+
+If you are simply comparing versions of Python packages, consider moving to
+[packaging.version.Version](https://packaging.pypa.io/en/latest/version.html#packaging.version.Version),
+which follows [PEP-440](https://peps.python.org/pep-0440).
+`LooseVersion` is better suited to interacting with heterogeneous version schemes that
+do not follow PEP-440.
+
+## Installation
+
+### From PyPI
+
+```
+pip install looseversion
+```
+
+### From source
+
+```
+git clone https://github.com/effigies/looseversion.git
+pip install looseversion/
+```
+
+## Usage
+
+```Python
+>>> from looseversion import LooseVersion
+>>> LooseVersion("1.0.0") < LooseVersion("2.0.0")
+True
+>>> LooseVersion("1.0.0") < "2"
+True
+```
diff --git a/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/RECORD b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/RECORD
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8cdae607b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/RECORD
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+looseversion.py,sha256=ZcTnLvMPdx3yVGbgcaUuwK3-s40QkaOR0_usF_VbrHU,8029
+looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/LICENSE,sha256=9PgMmBYfVjIATURxO1y5XkABRbQMvAKX8fUMJ7VL79s,2490
+looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/METADATA,sha256=-c48feSKsGGyLOWaWQfPNMawhA6OGKNoy5PjUhLlCk8,1757
+looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/WHEEL,sha256=G16H4A3IeoQmnOrYV4ueZGKSjhipXx8zc8nu9FGlvMA,92
+looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/top_level.txt,sha256=gZsH8AUlCFqOEpKD_foyCUB2uKao5ePwjMqWWO7hpoM,13
+looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/RECORD,,
diff --git a/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/WHEEL b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/WHEEL
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..becc9a66ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/WHEEL
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+Wheel-Version: 1.0
+Generator: bdist_wheel (0.37.1)
+Root-Is-Purelib: true
+Tag: py3-none-any
+
diff --git a/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/top_level.txt b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/top_level.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c08202104d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion-1.0.1.dist-info/top_level.txt
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+looseversion
diff --git a/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion.py b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c75bdf3878
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/python/looseversion/looseversion.py
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+"""Provides classes to represent module version numbers (one class for
+each style of version numbering). There are currently two such classes
+implemented: StrictVersion and LooseVersion.
+
+Every version number class implements the following interface:
+ * the 'parse' method takes a string and parses it to some internal
+ representation; if the string is an invalid version number,
+ 'parse' raises a ValueError exception
+ * the class constructor takes an optional string argument which,
+ if supplied, is passed to 'parse'
+ * __str__ reconstructs the string that was passed to 'parse' (or
+ an equivalent string -- ie. one that will generate an equivalent
+ version number instance)
+ * __repr__ generates Python code to recreate the version number instance
+ * _cmp compares the current instance with either another instance
+ of the same class or a string (which will be parsed to an instance
+ of the same class, thus must follow the same rules)
+"""
+
+import sys
+import re
+
+
+# The rules according to Greg Stein:
+# 1) a version number has 1 or more numbers separated by a period or by
+# sequences of letters. If only periods, then these are compared
+# left-to-right to determine an ordering.
+# 2) sequences of letters are part of the tuple for comparison and are
+# compared lexicographically
+# 3) recognize the numeric components may have leading zeroes
+#
+# The LooseVersion class below implements these rules: a version number
+# string is split up into a tuple of integer and string components, and
+# comparison is a simple tuple comparison. This means that version
+# numbers behave in a predictable and obvious way, but a way that might
+# not necessarily be how people *want* version numbers to behave. There
+# wouldn't be a problem if people could stick to purely numeric version
+# numbers: just split on period and compare the numbers as tuples.
+# However, people insist on putting letters into their version numbers;
+# the most common purpose seems to be:
+# - indicating a "pre-release" version
+# ('alpha', 'beta', 'a', 'b', 'pre', 'p')
+# - indicating a post-release patch ('p', 'pl', 'patch')
+# but of course this can't cover all version number schemes, and there's
+# no way to know what a programmer means without asking him.
+#
+# The problem is what to do with letters (and other non-numeric
+# characters) in a version number. The current implementation does the
+# obvious and predictable thing: keep them as strings and compare
+# lexically within a tuple comparison. This has the desired effect if
+# an appended letter sequence implies something "post-release":
+# eg. "0.99" < "0.99pl14" < "1.0", and "5.001" < "5.001m" < "5.002".
+#
+# However, if letters in a version number imply a pre-release version,
+# the "obvious" thing isn't correct. Eg. you would expect that
+# "1.5.1" < "1.5.2a2" < "1.5.2", but under the tuple/lexical comparison
+# implemented here, this just isn't so.
+#
+# Two possible solutions come to mind. The first is to tie the
+# comparison algorithm to a particular set of semantic rules, as has
+# been done in the StrictVersion class above. This works great as long
+# as everyone can go along with bondage and discipline. Hopefully a
+# (large) subset of Python module programmers will agree that the
+# particular flavour of bondage and discipline provided by StrictVersion
+# provides enough benefit to be worth using, and will submit their
+# version numbering scheme to its domination. The free-thinking
+# anarchists in the lot will never give in, though, and something needs
+# to be done to accommodate them.
+#
+# Perhaps a "moderately strict" version class could be implemented that
+# lets almost anything slide (syntactically), and makes some heuristic
+# assumptions about non-digits in version number strings. This could
+# sink into special-case-hell, though; if I was as talented and
+# idiosyncratic as Larry Wall, I'd go ahead and implement a class that
+# somehow knows that "1.2.1" < "1.2.2a2" < "1.2.2" < "1.2.2pl3", and is
+# just as happy dealing with things like "2g6" and "1.13++". I don't
+# think I'm smart enough to do it right though.
+#
+# In any case, I've coded the test suite for this module (see
+# ../test/test_version.py) specifically to fail on things like comparing
+# "1.2a2" and "1.2". That's not because the *code* is doing anything
+# wrong, it's because the simple, obvious design doesn't match my
+# complicated, hairy expectations for real-world version numbers. It
+# would be a snap to fix the test suite to say, "Yep, LooseVersion does
+# the Right Thing" (ie. the code matches the conception). But I'd rather
+# have a conception that matches common notions about version numbers.
+
+
+class LooseVersion:
+
+ """Version numbering for anarchists and software realists.
+ Implements the standard interface for version number classes as
+ described above. A version number consists of a series of numbers,
+ separated by either periods or strings of letters. When comparing
+ version numbers, the numeric components will be compared
+ numerically, and the alphabetic components lexically. The following
+ are all valid version numbers, in no particular order:
+
+ 1.5.1
+ 1.5.2b2
+ 161
+ 3.10a
+ 8.02
+ 3.4j
+ 1996.07.12
+ 3.2.pl0
+ 3.1.1.6
+ 2g6
+ 11g
+ 0.960923
+ 2.2beta29
+ 1.13++
+ 5.5.kw
+ 2.0b1pl0
+
+ In fact, there is no such thing as an invalid version number under
+ this scheme; the rules for comparison are simple and predictable,
+ but may not always give the results you want (for some definition
+ of "want").
+ """
+
+ component_re = re.compile(r"(\d+ | [a-z]+ | \.)", re.VERBOSE)
+
+ def __init__(self, vstring=None):
+ if vstring:
+ self.parse(vstring)
+
+ def __eq__(self, other):
+ c = self._cmp(other)
+ if c is NotImplemented:
+ return c
+ return c == 0
+
+ def __lt__(self, other):
+ c = self._cmp(other)
+ if c is NotImplemented:
+ return c
+ return c < 0
+
+ def __le__(self, other):
+ c = self._cmp(other)
+ if c is NotImplemented:
+ return c
+ return c <= 0
+
+ def __gt__(self, other):
+ c = self._cmp(other)
+ if c is NotImplemented:
+ return c
+ return c > 0
+
+ def __ge__(self, other):
+ c = self._cmp(other)
+ if c is NotImplemented:
+ return c
+ return c >= 0
+
+ def parse(self, vstring):
+ # I've given up on thinking I can reconstruct the version string
+ # from the parsed tuple -- so I just store the string here for
+ # use by __str__
+ self.vstring = vstring
+ components = [x for x in self.component_re.split(vstring) if x and x != "."]
+ for i, obj in enumerate(components):
+ try:
+ components[i] = int(obj)
+ except ValueError:
+ pass
+
+ self.version = components
+
+ def __str__(self):
+ return self.vstring
+
+ def __repr__(self):
+ return "LooseVersion ('%s')" % str(self)
+
+ def _cmp(self, other):
+ other = self._coerce(other)
+ if other is NotImplemented:
+ return NotImplemented
+
+ if self.version == other.version:
+ return 0
+ if self.version < other.version:
+ return -1
+ if self.version > other.version:
+ return 1
+
+ @staticmethod
+ def _coerce(other):
+ if isinstance(other, LooseVersion):
+ return other
+ elif isinstance(other, str):
+ return LooseVersion(other)
+ elif "distutils" in sys.modules:
+ # Using this check to avoid importing distutils and suppressing the warning
+ try:
+ from distutils.version import LooseVersion as deprecated
+ except ImportError:
+ return NotImplemented
+ if isinstance(other, deprecated):
+ return LooseVersion(str(other))
+ return NotImplemented