summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/xpcom/docs/hashtables.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-19 00:47:55 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-19 00:47:55 +0000
commit26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 (patch)
treef435a8308119effd964b339f76abb83a57c29483 /xpcom/docs/hashtables.rst
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadfirefox-26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6.tar.xz
firefox-26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6.zip
Adding upstream version 124.0.1.upstream/124.0.1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--xpcom/docs/hashtables.rst141
1 files changed, 141 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/xpcom/docs/hashtables.rst b/xpcom/docs/hashtables.rst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8debd11eb7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/xpcom/docs/hashtables.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+XPCOM Hashtable Guide
+=====================
+
+.. note::
+
+ For a deep-dive into the underlying mechanisms that power our hashtables,
+ check out the :ref:`XPCOM Hashtable Technical Details`
+ document.
+
+What Is a Hashtable?
+--------------------
+
+A hashtable is a data construct that stores a set of **items**. Each
+item has a **key** that identifies the item. Items are found, added, and
+removed from the hashtable by using the key. Hashtables may seem like
+arrays, but there are important differences:
+
++-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+| | Array | Hashtable |
++=========================+======================+======================+
+| **Keys** | *integer:* arrays | *any type:* almost |
+| | are always keyed on | any datatype can be |
+| | integers and must | used as key, |
+| | be contiguous. | including strings, |
+| | | integers, XPCOM |
+| | | interface pointers, |
+| | | IIDs, and almost |
+| | | anything else. Keys |
+| | | can be disjunct |
+| | | (i.e. you can store |
+| | | entries with keys 1, |
+| | | 5, and 3000). |
++-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+| **Lookup Time** | *O(1):* lookup time | *O(1):* lookup time |
+| | is a simple constant | is mostly-constant, |
+| | | but the constant |
+| | | time can be larger |
+| | | than an array lookup |
++-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+| **Sorting** | *sorted:* stored | *unsorted:* stored |
+| | sorted; iterated | unsorted; cannot be |
+| | over in a sorted | iterated over in a |
+| | fashion. | sorted manner. |
++-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+| **Inserting/Removing** | *O(n):* adding and | *O(1):* adding and |
+| | removing items from | removing items from |
+| | a large array can be | hashtables is a |
+| | time-consuming | quick operation |
++-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+| **Wasted space** | *none:* Arrays are | *some:* hashtables |
+| | packed structures, | are not packed |
+| | so there is no | structures; |
+| | wasted space. | depending on the |
+| | | implementation, |
+| | | there may be |
+| | | significant wasted |
+| | | memory. |
++-------------------------+----------------------+----------------------+
+
+In their implementation, hashtables take the key and apply a
+mathematical **hash function** to **randomize** the key and then use the
+hash to find the location in the hashtable. Good hashtable
+implementations will automatically resize the hashtable in memory if
+extra space is needed, or if too much space has been allocated.
+
+.. _When_Should_I_Use_a_Hashtable.3F:
+
+When Should I Use a Hashtable?
+------------------------------
+
+Hashtables are useful for
+
+- sets of data that need swift **random access**
+- with **non-integral keys** or **non-contiguous integral keys**
+- or where **items will be frequently added or removed**
+
+Hashtables should *not* be used for
+
+- Sets that need to be **sorted**
+- Very small datasets (less than 12-16 items)
+- Data that does not need random access
+
+In these situations, an array, a linked-list, or various tree data
+structures are more efficient.
+
+.. _Which_Hashtable_Should_I_Use.3F:
+
+Which Hashtable Should I Use?
+-----------------------------
+
+If there is **no** key type, you should use an ``nsTHashSet``.
+
+If there is a key type, you should use an ``nsTHashMap``.
+
+``nsTHashMap`` is a template with two parameters. The first is the hash key
+and the second is the data to be stored as the value in the map. Most of
+the time, you can simply pass the raw key type as the first parameter,
+so long as its supported by `nsTHashMap.h <https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/ds/nsTHashMap.h>`_.
+It is also possible to specify custom keys if necessary. See `nsHashKeys.h
+<https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/ds/nsHashKeys.h>`_ for examples.
+
+There are a number of more esoteric hashkey classes in nsHashKeys.h, and
+you can always roll your own if none of these fit your needs (make sure
+you're not duplicating an existing hashkey class though!)
+
+Once you've determined what hashtable and hashkey classes you need, you
+can put it all together. A few examples:
+
+- A hashtable that maps UTF-8 origin names to a DOM Window -
+ ``nsTHashMap<nsCString, nsCOMPtr<nsIDOMWindow>>``
+- A hashtable that maps 32-bit integers to floats -
+ ``nsTHashMap<uint32_t, float>``
+- A hashtable that maps ``nsISupports`` pointers to reference counted
+ ``CacheEntry``\ s -
+ ``nsTHashMap<nsCOMPtr<nsISupports>, RefPtr<CacheEntry>>``
+- A hashtable that maps ``JSContext`` pointers to a ``ContextInfo``
+ struct - ``nsTHashMap<JSContext*, UniquePtr<ContextInfo>>``
+- A hashset of strings - ``nsTHashSet<nsString>``
+
+.. _nsBaseHashtable_and_friends:_nsDataHashtable.2C_nsInterfaceHashtable.2C_and_nsClassHashtable:
+
+Hashtable API
+-------------
+
+The hashtable classes all expose the same basic API. There are three
+key methods, ``Get``, ``InsertOrUpdate``, and ``Remove``, which retrieve entries from the
+hashtable, write entries into the hashtable, and remove entries from the
+hashtable respectively. See `nsBaseHashtable.h <https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/ds/nsBaseHashtable.h>`_
+for more details.
+
+The hashtables that hold references to pointers (nsRefPtrHashtable and
+nsInterfaceHashtable) also have GetWeak methods that return non-AddRefed
+pointers.
+
+Note that ``nsRefPtrHashtable``, ``nsInterfaceHashtable`` and ``nsClassHashtable``
+are legacy hashtable types which have some extra methods, and don't have automatic
+key type handling.
+
+All of these hashtable classes can be iterated over via the ``Iterator``
+class, with normal C++11 iterators or using the ``Keys()`` / ``Values()`` ranges,
+and all can be cleared via the ``Clear`` method.