summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/testing/web-platform/tests/html/rendering/the-css-user-agent-style-sheet-and-presentational-hints/no-help-cursor-on-links-wrapped-in-svg.historical.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'testing/web-platform/tests/html/rendering/the-css-user-agent-style-sheet-and-presentational-hints/no-help-cursor-on-links-wrapped-in-svg.historical.html')
-rw-r--r--testing/web-platform/tests/html/rendering/the-css-user-agent-style-sheet-and-presentational-hints/no-help-cursor-on-links-wrapped-in-svg.historical.html52
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/testing/web-platform/tests/html/rendering/the-css-user-agent-style-sheet-and-presentational-hints/no-help-cursor-on-links-wrapped-in-svg.historical.html b/testing/web-platform/tests/html/rendering/the-css-user-agent-style-sheet-and-presentational-hints/no-help-cursor-on-links-wrapped-in-svg.historical.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..da6ffe15bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/testing/web-platform/tests/html/rendering/the-css-user-agent-style-sheet-and-presentational-hints/no-help-cursor-on-links-wrapped-in-svg.historical.html
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<meta charset="utf-8">
+<title>link with rel="help" cursor tests</title>
+<script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>
+<script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
+
+<link rel="help" href="https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#phrasing-content-3">
+<link rel="help" href="https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/468">
+
+<div id="log"></div>
+
+<svg>
+<a href="/common/blank.html?unvisited" rel="help" id="unvisited">unvisited</a>
+<a href="/common/blank.html?willbevisited" rel="help" id="willbevisited">will be visited</a>
+</svg>
+
+<script>
+"use strict";
+
+
+test(() => {
+ const el = document.querySelector("#unvisited");
+ const style = window.getComputedStyle(el);
+
+ assert_equals(style.cursor, "pointer");
+},"Unvisited help links must have pointer cursor, not help cursor");
+
+
+// This test is kind of dubious. Browsers don't allow you to distinguish visited and unvisited links
+// from script, for privacy reasons. So we can't really be sure that loading the iframe would make
+// the link count as visited. Manually running this test turns the link purple in some browsers,
+// but leaves it blue in others. Even then it's not clear whether it turned purple before or after
+// the onload; this test assumes that once the iframe onload fires, it counts as visited, which
+// may not be justified even in the purple-turning browsers.
+//
+// Still, the test doesn't really hurt. At worst it's redundant with the above.
+//
+// If someone comes up with a better way of testing this (i.e. something that truly guarantees that
+// the link will count as "visited" for UA stylesheet purposes), then please submit a PR.
+async_test(t => {
+ const el = document.querySelector("#willbevisited");
+
+ const iframe = document.createElement("iframe");
+ iframe.src = el.href;
+ iframe.onload = t.step_func_done(() => {
+ const style = window.getComputedStyle(el);
+ assert_equals(style.cursor, "pointer");
+ });
+
+ document.body.appendChild(iframe);
+}, "Visited help links must have pointer cursor, not help cursor");
+</script>