From 26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:47:55 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 124.0.1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- js/src/gdb/tests/test-Root.py | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) create mode 100644 js/src/gdb/tests/test-Root.py (limited to 'js/src/gdb/tests/test-Root.py') diff --git a/js/src/gdb/tests/test-Root.py b/js/src/gdb/tests/test-Root.py new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e593a972ab --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/gdb/tests/test-Root.py @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# Test printing Handles. +# Ignore flake8 errors "undefined name 'assert_pretty'" +# As it caused by the way we instanciate this file +# flake8: noqa: F821 + +assert_subprinter_registered("SpiderMonkey", "instantiations-of-JS::Rooted") +assert_subprinter_registered("SpiderMonkey", "instantiations-of-JS::Handle") +assert_subprinter_registered("SpiderMonkey", "instantiations-of-JS::MutableHandle") +assert_subprinter_registered("SpiderMonkey", "instantiations-of-js::BarrieredBase") + +run_fragment("Root.handle") + +assert_pretty("obj", "(JSObject * const) [object global]") +assert_pretty("mutableObj", "(JSObject *) [object global]") + +run_fragment("Root.HeapSlot") + +# This depends on implementation details of arrays, but since HeapSlot is +# not a public type, I'm not sure how to avoid doing *something* ugly. +assert_pretty("((js::NativeObject *) array.ptr)->elements_[0]", '$JS::Value("plinth")') + +run_fragment("Root.barriers") + +assert_pretty("prebarriered", "(JSObject *) [object Object]") +assert_pretty("heapptr", "(JSObject *) [object Object]") +assert_pretty("relocatable", "(JSObject *) [object Object]") +assert_pretty("val", "$JS::Value((JSObject *) [object Object])") +assert_pretty("heapValue", "$JS::Value((JSObject *) [object Object])") +assert_pretty("prebarrieredValue", "$JS::Value((JSObject *) [object Object])") +assert_pretty("relocatableValue", "$JS::Value((JSObject *) [object Object])") -- cgit v1.2.3