From 26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:47:55 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 124.0.1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- js/src/jit-test/tests/gc/jsscript-mark-children.js | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+) create mode 100644 js/src/jit-test/tests/gc/jsscript-mark-children.js (limited to 'js/src/jit-test/tests/gc/jsscript-mark-children.js') diff --git a/js/src/jit-test/tests/gc/jsscript-mark-children.js b/js/src/jit-test/tests/gc/jsscript-mark-children.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..c74a19c0f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/jit-test/tests/gc/jsscript-mark-children.js @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +// Bug 758509 changed things so that a JSScript is partially initialized when +// it is created, which is prior to bytecode generation; full initialization +// only occurs after bytecode generation. This means that +// JSScript::markChildren() must deal with partially-initialized JSScripts. +// This test forces that to happen, because each let block allocates a +// StaticBlockObject. All that should happen is that we don't crash. + +let t = 0; +gczeal(2,1); +eval("\ +let x0 = 3, y = 4;\ +{ let x = x0+0, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+1, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+2, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+3, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+4, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+5, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+6, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+7, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+8, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +{ let x = x0+9, y = 12; t += (x + y); } \ +t += (x0 + y);\ +assertEq(t, 202);\ +"); -- cgit v1.2.3