From 26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:47:55 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 124.0.1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- .../Atomics/wait/bigint/value-not-equal.js | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+) create mode 100644 js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Atomics/wait/bigint/value-not-equal.js (limited to 'js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Atomics/wait/bigint/value-not-equal.js') diff --git a/js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Atomics/wait/bigint/value-not-equal.js b/js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Atomics/wait/bigint/value-not-equal.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ff5cda2f9a --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Atomics/wait/bigint/value-not-equal.js @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +// |reftest| skip-if(!this.hasOwnProperty('Atomics')||!this.hasOwnProperty('SharedArrayBuffer')||(this.hasOwnProperty('getBuildConfiguration')&&getBuildConfiguration('arm64-simulator'))) -- Atomics,SharedArrayBuffer is not enabled unconditionally, ARM64 Simulator cannot emulate atomics +// Copyright (C) 2018 Amal Hussein. All rights reserved. +// This code is governed by the BSD license found in the LICENSE file. + +/*--- +esid: sec-atomics.wait +description: > + Returns "not-equal" when value arg does not match an index in the typedArray +info: | + Atomics.wait( typedArray, index, value, timeout ) + + 3.Let v be ? ToBigInt64(value). + ... + 14.If v is not equal to w, then + a.Perform LeaveCriticalSection(WL). + b. Return the String "not-equal". + +includes: [atomicsHelper.js] +features: [Atomics, BigInt, SharedArrayBuffer, TypedArray] +---*/ + +const RUNNING = 1; +const value = "42n"; + +const i64a = new BigInt64Array( + new SharedArrayBuffer(BigInt64Array.BYTES_PER_ELEMENT * 4) +); + +$262.agent.start(` + $262.agent.receiveBroadcast(function(sab) { + const i64a = new BigInt64Array(sab); + Atomics.add(i64a, ${RUNNING}, 1n); + + $262.agent.report(Atomics.store(i64a, 0, ${value})); + $262.agent.report(Atomics.wait(i64a, 0, 0n)); + $262.agent.leaving(); + }); +`); + +// NB: We don't actually explicitly need to wait for the agent to start in this +// test case, we only do it for consistency with other test cases which do +// require the main agent to wait and yield control. + +$262.agent.safeBroadcast(i64a); +$262.agent.waitUntil(i64a, RUNNING, 1n); + +// Try to yield control to ensure the agent actually started to wait. +$262.agent.tryYield(); + +assert.sameValue( + $262.agent.getReport(), + '42', + '$262.agent.getReport() returns "42"' +); +assert.sameValue( + $262.agent.getReport(), + 'not-equal', + '$262.agent.getReport() returns "not-equal"' +); + + +reportCompare(0, 0); -- cgit v1.2.3