From 26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:47:55 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 124.0.1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- security/manager/ssl/tests/unit/test_pinning.js | 318 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 318 insertions(+) create mode 100644 security/manager/ssl/tests/unit/test_pinning.js (limited to 'security/manager/ssl/tests/unit/test_pinning.js') diff --git a/security/manager/ssl/tests/unit/test_pinning.js b/security/manager/ssl/tests/unit/test_pinning.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..1a0fa866aa --- /dev/null +++ b/security/manager/ssl/tests/unit/test_pinning.js @@ -0,0 +1,318 @@ +// -*- indent-tabs-mode: nil; js-indent-level: 2 -*- +// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public +// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this +// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. +// +// For all cases, the acceptable pinset includes only certificates pinned to +// Test End Entity Cert (signed by issuer testCA). Other certificates +// are issued by otherCA, which is never in the pinset but is a user-specified +// trust anchor. This test covers multiple cases: +// +// Pinned domain include-subdomains.pinning.example.com includes subdomains +// - PASS: include-subdomains.pinning.example.com serves a correct cert +// - PASS: good.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com serves a correct cert +// - FAIL (strict): bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com serves a cert +// not in the pinset +// - PASS (mitm): bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com serves a cert not +// in the pinset, but issued by a user-specified trust domain +// +// Pinned domain exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com excludes subdomains +// - PASS: exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com serves a correct cert +// - FAIL: exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com serves an incorrect cert +// (TODO: test using verifyCertNow) +// - PASS: sub.exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com serves an incorrect cert + +"use strict"; + +// Enable the collection (during test) for all products so even products +// that don't collect the data will be able to run the test without failure. +Services.prefs.setBoolPref( + "toolkit.telemetry.testing.overrideProductsCheck", + true +); + +do_get_profile(); // must be called before getting nsIX509CertDB +const certdb = Cc["@mozilla.org/security/x509certdb;1"].getService( + Ci.nsIX509CertDB +); + +function add_clear_override(host) { + add_test(function () { + let certOverrideService = Cc[ + "@mozilla.org/security/certoverride;1" + ].getService(Ci.nsICertOverrideService); + certOverrideService.clearValidityOverride(host, 8443, {}); + run_next_test(); + }); +} + +function test_strict() { + // In strict mode, we always evaluate pinning data, regardless of whether the + // issuer is a built-in trust anchor. We only enforce pins that are not in + // test mode. + add_test(function () { + Services.prefs.setIntPref("security.cert_pinning.enforcement_level", 2); + run_next_test(); + }); + + // Normally this is overridable. But, since we have pinning information for + // this host, we don't allow overrides. + add_prevented_cert_override_test( + "unknownissuer.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER + ); + add_clear_override("unknownissuer.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com"); + + // Issued by otherCA, which is not in the pinset for pinning.example.com. + add_connection_test( + "bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_KEY_PINNING_FAILURE + ); + + // Check that using a FQDN doesn't bypass pinning. + add_connection_test( + "bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com.", + MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_KEY_PINNING_FAILURE + ); + // For some reason this is also navigable (see bug 1118522). + add_connection_test( + "bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com..", + MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_KEY_PINNING_FAILURE + ); + + // These domains serve certs that match the pinset. + add_connection_test( + "include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "good.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + + // This domain serves a cert that doesn't match the pinset, but subdomains + // are excluded. + add_connection_test( + "sub.exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + + // This domain's pinset is exactly the same as + // include-subdomains.pinning.example.com, serves the same cert as + // bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com, but it should pass because + // it's in test_mode. + add_connection_test("test-mode.pinning.example.com", PRErrorCodeSuccess); + // Similarly, this pin is in test-mode, so it should be overridable. + add_cert_override_test( + "unknownissuer.test-mode.pinning.example.com", + SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER + ); + add_clear_override("unknownissuer.test-mode.pinning.example.com"); +} + +function test_mitm() { + // In MITM mode, we allow pinning to pass if the chain resolves to any + // user-specified trust anchor, even if it is not in the pinset. + add_test(function () { + Services.prefs.setIntPref("security.cert_pinning.enforcement_level", 1); + run_next_test(); + }); + + add_connection_test( + "include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "good.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + + // Normally this is overridable. But, since we have pinning information for + // this host, we don't allow overrides (since building a trusted chain fails, + // we have no reason to believe this was issued by a user-added trust + // anchor, so we can't allow overrides for it). + add_prevented_cert_override_test( + "unknownissuer.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER + ); + add_clear_override("unknownissuer.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com"); + + // In this case, even though otherCA is not in the pinset, it is a + // user-specified trust anchor and the pinning check succeeds. + add_connection_test( + "bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + + add_connection_test( + "exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "sub.exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test("test-mode.pinning.example.com", PRErrorCodeSuccess); + add_cert_override_test( + "unknownissuer.test-mode.pinning.example.com", + SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER + ); + add_clear_override("unknownissuer.test-mode.pinning.example.com"); +} + +function test_disabled() { + // Disable pinning. + add_test(function () { + Services.prefs.setIntPref("security.cert_pinning.enforcement_level", 0); + run_next_test(); + }); + + add_connection_test( + "include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "good.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "sub.exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test("test-mode.pinning.example.com", PRErrorCodeSuccess); + + add_cert_override_test( + "unknownissuer.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER + ); + add_clear_override("unknownissuer.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com"); + add_cert_override_test( + "unknownissuer.test-mode.pinning.example.com", + SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER + ); + add_clear_override("unknownissuer.test-mode.pinning.example.com"); +} + +function test_enforce_test_mode() { + // In enforce test mode, we always enforce all pins, even test pins. + add_test(function () { + Services.prefs.setIntPref("security.cert_pinning.enforcement_level", 3); + run_next_test(); + }); + + // Normally this is overridable. But, since we have pinning information for + // this host, we don't allow overrides. + add_prevented_cert_override_test( + "unknownissuer.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER + ); + add_clear_override("unknownissuer.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com"); + + // Issued by otherCA, which is not in the pinset for pinning.example.com. + add_connection_test( + "bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_KEY_PINNING_FAILURE + ); + + // These domains serve certs that match the pinset. + add_connection_test( + "include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "good.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + add_connection_test( + "exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + + // This domain serves a cert that doesn't match the pinset, but subdomains + // are excluded. + add_connection_test( + "sub.exclude-subdomains.pinning.example.com", + PRErrorCodeSuccess + ); + + // This domain's pinset is exactly the same as + // include-subdomains.pinning.example.com, serves the same cert as + // bad.include-subdomains.pinning.example.com, is in test-mode, but we are + // enforcing test mode pins. + add_connection_test( + "test-mode.pinning.example.com", + MOZILLA_PKIX_ERROR_KEY_PINNING_FAILURE + ); + // Normally this is overridable. But, since we have pinning information for + // this host (and since we're enforcing test mode), we don't allow overrides. + add_prevented_cert_override_test( + "unknownissuer.test-mode.pinning.example.com", + SEC_ERROR_UNKNOWN_ISSUER + ); + add_clear_override("unknownissuer.test-mode.pinning.example.com"); +} + +function check_pinning_telemetry() { + let prod_histogram = Services.telemetry + .getHistogramById("CERT_PINNING_RESULTS") + .snapshot(); + let test_histogram = Services.telemetry + .getHistogramById("CERT_PINNING_TEST_RESULTS") + .snapshot(); + // Because all of our test domains are pinned to user-specified trust + // anchors, effectively only strict mode and enforce test-mode get evaluated + equal( + prod_histogram.values[0], + 4, + "Actual and expected prod (non-Mozilla) failure count should match" + ); + equal( + prod_histogram.values[1], + 6, + "Actual and expected prod (non-Mozilla) success count should match" + ); + equal( + test_histogram.values[0], + 2, + "Actual and expected test (non-Mozilla) failure count should match" + ); + equal( + test_histogram.values[1] || 0, + 0, + "Actual and expected test (non-Mozilla) success count should match" + ); + + run_next_test(); +} + +function run_test() { + // Ensure that static pinning works when HPKP is disabled. + Services.prefs.setBoolPref("security.cert_pinning.hpkp.enabled", false); + + add_tls_server_setup("BadCertAndPinningServer", "bad_certs"); + + // Add a user-specified trust anchor. + addCertFromFile(certdb, "bad_certs/other-test-ca.pem", "CTu,u,u"); + + test_strict(); + test_mitm(); + test_disabled(); + test_enforce_test_mode(); + + add_test(function () { + check_pinning_telemetry(); + }); + run_next_test(); +} -- cgit v1.2.3