From 26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 02:47:55 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 124.0.1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- ...uestStorageAccessFor-insecure.sub.window.js.ini | 23 +++++++++++ ...requestStorageAccessFor.sub.https.window.js.ini | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++ ...orage-access-permission.sub.https.window.js.ini | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+) create mode 100644 testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/requestStorageAccessFor-insecure.sub.window.js.ini create mode 100644 testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/requestStorageAccessFor.sub.https.window.js.ini create mode 100644 testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/top-level-storage-access-permission.sub.https.window.js.ini (limited to 'testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api') diff --git a/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/requestStorageAccessFor-insecure.sub.window.js.ini b/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/requestStorageAccessFor-insecure.sub.window.js.ini new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..6acaaddef0 --- /dev/null +++ b/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/requestStorageAccessFor-insecure.sub.window.js.ini @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +[requestStorageAccessFor-insecure.sub.window.html] + [[non-fully-active\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should not resolve when run in a detached frame] + expected: FAIL + + [[non-fully-active\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should not resolve when run in a detached DOMParser document] + expected: FAIL + + [[frame-on-insecure-page\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected when called in an iframe] + expected: FAIL + + [[frame-on-insecure-page\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be supported on the document interface in embedded iframes] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be supported on the document interface] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected by default with no user gesture] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected when called in an insecure context] + expected: + if (os == "linux") and fission and not swgl: FAIL + [FAIL, NOTRUN] diff --git a/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/requestStorageAccessFor.sub.https.window.js.ini b/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/requestStorageAccessFor.sub.https.window.js.ini new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..aecad7876f --- /dev/null +++ b/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/requestStorageAccessFor.sub.https.window.js.ini @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +[requestStorageAccessFor.sub.https.window.html] + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be supported on the document interface] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected when called with no argument] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected by default with no user gesture] + expected: FAIL + + [[non-fully-active\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should not resolve when run in a detached frame] + expected: FAIL + + [[non-fully-active\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should not resolve when run in a detached DOMParser document] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be resolved without a user gesture with an existing permission] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccess() should be resolved without a user gesture after a successful requestStorageAccessFor() call] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected when called with an opaque origin] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be resolved when called properly with a user gesture and the same origin] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected when called with an invalid origin] + expected: FAIL + + [[top-level-context\] Top-level storage access only allows cross-site subresource requests to access cookie when using CORS mode.] + expected: FAIL + + [[same-origin-iframe\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be supported on the document interface] + expected: FAIL + + [[same-origin-iframe\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected when called with no argument] + expected: FAIL + + [[same-origin-iframe\] document.requestStorageAccessFor() should be rejected when called in an iframe] + expected: FAIL + + [[same-origin-iframe\] Existing top-level storage access permission should not allow cookie access for the cross-site subresource requests made in a non-top-level context.] + expected: FAIL diff --git a/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/top-level-storage-access-permission.sub.https.window.js.ini b/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/top-level-storage-access-permission.sub.https.window.js.ini new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7053d56ae2 --- /dev/null +++ b/testing/web-platform/meta/top-level-storage-access-api/tentative/top-level-storage-access-permission.sub.https.window.js.ini @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +[top-level-storage-access-permission.sub.https.window.html] + [Permission default state can be queried] + expected: FAIL -- cgit v1.2.3