/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this * file, You can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */ //! The struct that takes care of encapsulating all the logic on where and how //! element styles need to be invalidated. use crate::context::StackLimitChecker; use crate::dom::{TElement, TNode, TShadowRoot}; use crate::invalidation::element::invalidation_map::{ Dependency, DependencyInvalidationKind, NormalDependencyInvalidationKind, RelativeDependencyInvalidationKind, }; use selectors::matching::matches_compound_selector_from; use selectors::matching::{CompoundSelectorMatchingResult, MatchingContext}; use selectors::parser::{Combinator, Component}; use selectors::OpaqueElement; use smallvec::SmallVec; use std::fmt; use std::fmt::Write; struct SiblingInfo where E: TElement, { affected: E, prev_sibling: Option, next_sibling: Option, } /// Traversal mapping for elements under consideration. It acts like a snapshot map, /// though this only "maps" one element at most. /// For general invalidations, this has no effect, especially since when /// DOM mutates, the mutation's effect should not escape the subtree being mutated. /// This is not the case for relative selectors, unfortunately, so we may end up /// traversing a portion of the DOM tree that mutated. In case the mutation is removal, /// its sibling relation is severed by the time the invalidation happens. This structure /// recovers that relation. Note - it assumes that there is only one element under this /// effect. pub struct SiblingTraversalMap where E: TElement, { info: Option>, } impl Default for SiblingTraversalMap where E: TElement, { fn default() -> Self { Self { info: None } } } impl SiblingTraversalMap where E: TElement, { /// Create a new traversal map with the affected element. pub fn new(affected: E, prev_sibling: Option, next_sibling: Option) -> Self { Self { info: Some(SiblingInfo { affected, prev_sibling, next_sibling, }), } } /// Get the element's previous sibling element. pub fn next_sibling_for(&self, element: &E) -> Option { if let Some(ref info) = self.info { if *element == info.affected { return info.next_sibling; } } element.next_sibling_element() } /// Get the element's previous sibling element. pub fn prev_sibling_for(&self, element: &E) -> Option { if let Some(ref info) = self.info { if *element == info.affected { return info.prev_sibling; } } element.prev_sibling_element() } } /// A trait to abstract the collection of invalidations for a given pass. pub trait InvalidationProcessor<'a, 'b, E> where E: TElement, { /// Whether an invalidation that contains only a pseudo-element selector /// like ::before or ::after triggers invalidation of the element that would /// originate it. fn invalidates_on_pseudo_element(&self) -> bool { false } /// Whether the invalidation processor only cares about light-tree /// descendants of a given element, that is, doesn't invalidate /// pseudo-elements, NAC, shadow dom... fn light_tree_only(&self) -> bool { false } /// When a dependency from a :where or :is selector matches, it may still be /// the case that we don't need to invalidate the full style. Consider the /// case of: /// /// div .foo:where(.bar *, .baz) .qux /// /// We can get to the `*` part after a .bar class change, but you only need /// to restyle the element if it also matches .foo. /// /// Similarly, you only need to restyle .baz if the whole result of matching /// the selector changes. /// /// This function is called to check the result of matching the "outer" /// dependency that we generate for the parent of the `:where` selector, /// that is, in the case above it should match /// `div .foo:where(.bar *, .baz)`. /// /// Returning true unconditionally here is over-optimistic and may /// over-invalidate. fn check_outer_dependency(&mut self, dependency: &Dependency, element: E) -> bool; /// The matching context that should be used to process invalidations. fn matching_context(&mut self) -> &mut MatchingContext<'b, E::Impl>; /// The traversal map that should be used to process invalidations. fn sibling_traversal_map(&self) -> &SiblingTraversalMap; /// Collect invalidations for a given element's descendants and siblings. /// /// Returns whether the element itself was invalidated. fn collect_invalidations( &mut self, element: E, self_invalidations: &mut InvalidationVector<'a>, descendant_invalidations: &mut DescendantInvalidationLists<'a>, sibling_invalidations: &mut InvalidationVector<'a>, ) -> bool; /// Returns whether the invalidation process should process the descendants /// of the given element. fn should_process_descendants(&mut self, element: E) -> bool; /// Executes an arbitrary action when the recursion limit is exceded (if /// any). fn recursion_limit_exceeded(&mut self, element: E); /// Executes an action when `Self` is invalidated. fn invalidated_self(&mut self, element: E); /// Executes an action when `sibling` is invalidated as a sibling of /// `of`. fn invalidated_sibling(&mut self, sibling: E, of: E); /// Executes an action when any descendant of `Self` is invalidated. fn invalidated_descendants(&mut self, element: E, child: E); /// Executes an action when an element in a relative selector is reached. /// Lets the dependency to be borrowed for further processing out of the /// invalidation traversal. fn found_relative_selector_invalidation( &mut self, _element: E, _kind: RelativeDependencyInvalidationKind, _relative_dependency: &'a Dependency, ) { debug_assert!(false, "Reached relative selector dependency"); } } /// Different invalidation lists for descendants. #[derive(Debug, Default)] pub struct DescendantInvalidationLists<'a> { /// Invalidations for normal DOM children and pseudo-elements. /// /// TODO(emilio): Having a list of invalidations just for pseudo-elements /// may save some work here and there. pub dom_descendants: InvalidationVector<'a>, /// Invalidations for slotted children of an element. pub slotted_descendants: InvalidationVector<'a>, /// Invalidations for ::part()s of an element. pub parts: InvalidationVector<'a>, } impl<'a> DescendantInvalidationLists<'a> { fn is_empty(&self) -> bool { self.dom_descendants.is_empty() && self.slotted_descendants.is_empty() && self.parts.is_empty() } } /// The struct that takes care of encapsulating all the logic on where and how /// element styles need to be invalidated. pub struct TreeStyleInvalidator<'a, 'b, 'c, E, P: 'a> where 'b: 'a, E: TElement, P: InvalidationProcessor<'b, 'c, E>, { element: E, stack_limit_checker: Option<&'a StackLimitChecker>, processor: &'a mut P, _marker: std::marker::PhantomData<(&'b (), &'c ())>, } /// A vector of invalidations, optimized for small invalidation sets. pub type InvalidationVector<'a> = SmallVec<[Invalidation<'a>; 10]>; /// The kind of descendant invalidation we're processing. #[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)] enum DescendantInvalidationKind { /// A DOM descendant invalidation. Dom, /// A ::slotted() descendant invalidation. Slotted, /// A ::part() descendant invalidation. Part, } /// The kind of invalidation we're processing. /// /// We can use this to avoid pushing invalidations of the same kind to our /// descendants or siblings. #[derive(Clone, Copy, Debug, Eq, PartialEq)] enum InvalidationKind { Descendant(DescendantInvalidationKind), Sibling, } /// An `Invalidation` is a complex selector that describes which elements, /// relative to a current element we are processing, must be restyled. #[derive(Clone)] pub struct Invalidation<'a> { /// The dependency that generated this invalidation. /// /// Note that the offset inside the dependency is not really useful after /// construction. dependency: &'a Dependency, /// The right shadow host from where the rule came from, if any. /// /// This is needed to ensure that we match the selector with the right /// state, as whether some selectors like :host and ::part() match depends /// on it. scope: Option, /// The offset of the selector pointing to a compound selector. /// /// This order is a "parse order" offset, that is, zero is the leftmost part /// of the selector written as parsed / serialized. /// /// It is initialized from the offset from `dependency`. offset: usize, /// Whether the invalidation was already matched by any previous sibling or /// ancestor. /// /// If this is the case, we can avoid pushing invalidations generated by /// this one if the generated invalidation is effective for all the siblings /// or descendants after us. matched_by_any_previous: bool, } impl<'a> Invalidation<'a> { /// Create a new invalidation for matching a dependency. pub fn new(dependency: &'a Dependency, scope: Option) -> Self { debug_assert!( dependency.selector_offset == dependency.selector.len() + 1 || dependency.normal_invalidation_kind() != NormalDependencyInvalidationKind::Element, "No point to this, if the dependency matched the element we should just invalidate it" ); Self { dependency, scope, // + 1 to go past the combinator. offset: dependency.selector.len() + 1 - dependency.selector_offset, matched_by_any_previous: false, } } /// Whether this invalidation is effective for the next sibling or /// descendant after us. fn effective_for_next(&self) -> bool { if self.offset == 0 { return true; } // TODO(emilio): For pseudo-elements this should be mostly false, except // for the weird pseudos in . // // We should be able to do better here! match self .dependency .selector .combinator_at_parse_order(self.offset - 1) { Combinator::Descendant | Combinator::LaterSibling | Combinator::PseudoElement => true, Combinator::Part | Combinator::SlotAssignment | Combinator::NextSibling | Combinator::Child => false, } } fn kind(&self) -> InvalidationKind { if self.offset == 0 { return InvalidationKind::Descendant(DescendantInvalidationKind::Dom); } match self .dependency .selector .combinator_at_parse_order(self.offset - 1) { Combinator::Child | Combinator::Descendant | Combinator::PseudoElement => { InvalidationKind::Descendant(DescendantInvalidationKind::Dom) }, Combinator::Part => InvalidationKind::Descendant(DescendantInvalidationKind::Part), Combinator::SlotAssignment => { InvalidationKind::Descendant(DescendantInvalidationKind::Slotted) }, Combinator::NextSibling | Combinator::LaterSibling => InvalidationKind::Sibling, } } } impl<'a> fmt::Debug for Invalidation<'a> { fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result { use cssparser::ToCss; f.write_str("Invalidation(")?; for component in self .dependency .selector .iter_raw_parse_order_from(self.offset) { if matches!(*component, Component::Combinator(..)) { break; } component.to_css(f)?; } f.write_char(')') } } /// The result of processing a single invalidation for a given element. struct SingleInvalidationResult { /// Whether the element itself was invalidated. invalidated_self: bool, /// Whether the invalidation matched, either invalidating the element or /// generating another invalidation. matched: bool, } /// The result of a whole invalidation process for a given element. pub struct InvalidationResult { /// Whether the element itself was invalidated. invalidated_self: bool, /// Whether the element's descendants were invalidated. invalidated_descendants: bool, /// Whether the element's siblings were invalidated. invalidated_siblings: bool, } impl InvalidationResult { /// Create an emtpy result. pub fn empty() -> Self { Self { invalidated_self: false, invalidated_descendants: false, invalidated_siblings: false, } } /// Whether the invalidation has invalidate the element itself. pub fn has_invalidated_self(&self) -> bool { self.invalidated_self } /// Whether the invalidation has invalidate desendants. pub fn has_invalidated_descendants(&self) -> bool { self.invalidated_descendants } /// Whether the invalidation has invalidate siblings. pub fn has_invalidated_siblings(&self) -> bool { self.invalidated_siblings } } impl<'a, 'b, 'c, E, P: 'a> TreeStyleInvalidator<'a, 'b, 'c, E, P> where 'b: 'a, E: TElement, P: InvalidationProcessor<'b, 'c, E>, { /// Trivially constructs a new `TreeStyleInvalidator`. pub fn new( element: E, stack_limit_checker: Option<&'a StackLimitChecker>, processor: &'a mut P, ) -> Self { Self { element, stack_limit_checker, processor, _marker: std::marker::PhantomData, } } /// Perform the invalidation pass. pub fn invalidate(mut self) -> InvalidationResult { debug!("StyleTreeInvalidator::invalidate({:?})", self.element); let mut self_invalidations = InvalidationVector::new(); let mut descendant_invalidations = DescendantInvalidationLists::default(); let mut sibling_invalidations = InvalidationVector::new(); let mut invalidated_self = self.processor.collect_invalidations( self.element, &mut self_invalidations, &mut descendant_invalidations, &mut sibling_invalidations, ); debug!("Collected invalidations (self: {}): ", invalidated_self); debug!( " > self: {}, {:?}", self_invalidations.len(), self_invalidations ); debug!(" > descendants: {:?}", descendant_invalidations); debug!( " > siblings: {}, {:?}", sibling_invalidations.len(), sibling_invalidations ); let invalidated_self_from_collection = invalidated_self; invalidated_self |= self.process_descendant_invalidations( &self_invalidations, &mut descendant_invalidations, &mut sibling_invalidations, DescendantInvalidationKind::Dom, ); if invalidated_self && !invalidated_self_from_collection { self.processor.invalidated_self(self.element); } let invalidated_descendants = self.invalidate_descendants(&descendant_invalidations); let invalidated_siblings = self.invalidate_siblings(&mut sibling_invalidations); InvalidationResult { invalidated_self, invalidated_descendants, invalidated_siblings, } } /// Go through later DOM siblings, invalidating style as needed using the /// `sibling_invalidations` list. /// /// Returns whether any sibling's style or any sibling descendant's style /// was invalidated. fn invalidate_siblings(&mut self, sibling_invalidations: &mut InvalidationVector<'b>) -> bool { if sibling_invalidations.is_empty() { return false; } let mut current = self .processor .sibling_traversal_map() .next_sibling_for(&self.element); let mut any_invalidated = false; while let Some(sibling) = current { let mut sibling_invalidator = TreeStyleInvalidator::new(sibling, self.stack_limit_checker, self.processor); let mut invalidations_for_descendants = DescendantInvalidationLists::default(); let invalidated_sibling = sibling_invalidator.process_sibling_invalidations( &mut invalidations_for_descendants, sibling_invalidations, ); if invalidated_sibling { sibling_invalidator .processor .invalidated_sibling(sibling, self.element); } any_invalidated |= invalidated_sibling; any_invalidated |= sibling_invalidator.invalidate_descendants(&invalidations_for_descendants); if sibling_invalidations.is_empty() { break; } current = self .processor .sibling_traversal_map() .next_sibling_for(&sibling); } any_invalidated } fn invalidate_pseudo_element_or_nac( &mut self, child: E, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>], ) -> bool { let mut sibling_invalidations = InvalidationVector::new(); let result = self.invalidate_child( child, invalidations, &mut sibling_invalidations, DescendantInvalidationKind::Dom, ); // Roots of NAC subtrees can indeed generate sibling invalidations, but // they can be just ignored, since they have no siblings. // // Note that we can end up testing selectors that wouldn't end up // matching due to this being NAC, like those coming from document // rules, but we overinvalidate instead of checking this. result } /// Invalidate a child and recurse down invalidating its descendants if /// needed. fn invalidate_child( &mut self, child: E, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>], sibling_invalidations: &mut InvalidationVector<'b>, descendant_invalidation_kind: DescendantInvalidationKind, ) -> bool { let mut invalidations_for_descendants = DescendantInvalidationLists::default(); let mut invalidated_child = false; let invalidated_descendants = { let mut child_invalidator = TreeStyleInvalidator::new(child, self.stack_limit_checker, self.processor); invalidated_child |= child_invalidator.process_sibling_invalidations( &mut invalidations_for_descendants, sibling_invalidations, ); invalidated_child |= child_invalidator.process_descendant_invalidations( invalidations, &mut invalidations_for_descendants, sibling_invalidations, descendant_invalidation_kind, ); if invalidated_child { child_invalidator.processor.invalidated_self(child); } child_invalidator.invalidate_descendants(&invalidations_for_descendants) }; // The child may not be a flattened tree child of the current element, // but may be arbitrarily deep. // // Since we keep the traversal flags in terms of the flattened tree, // we need to propagate it as appropriate. if invalidated_child || invalidated_descendants { self.processor.invalidated_descendants(self.element, child); } invalidated_child || invalidated_descendants } fn invalidate_nac(&mut self, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>]) -> bool { let mut any_nac_root = false; let element = self.element; element.each_anonymous_content_child(|nac| { any_nac_root |= self.invalidate_pseudo_element_or_nac(nac, invalidations); }); any_nac_root } // NB: It's important that this operates on DOM children, which is what // selector-matching operates on. fn invalidate_dom_descendants_of( &mut self, parent: E::ConcreteNode, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>], ) -> bool { let mut any_descendant = false; let mut sibling_invalidations = InvalidationVector::new(); for child in parent.dom_children() { let child = match child.as_element() { Some(e) => e, None => continue, }; any_descendant |= self.invalidate_child( child, invalidations, &mut sibling_invalidations, DescendantInvalidationKind::Dom, ); } any_descendant } fn invalidate_parts_in_shadow_tree( &mut self, shadow: ::ConcreteShadowRoot, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>], ) -> bool { debug_assert!(!invalidations.is_empty()); let mut any = false; let mut sibling_invalidations = InvalidationVector::new(); for node in shadow.as_node().dom_descendants() { let element = match node.as_element() { Some(e) => e, None => continue, }; if element.has_part_attr() { any |= self.invalidate_child( element, invalidations, &mut sibling_invalidations, DescendantInvalidationKind::Part, ); debug_assert!( sibling_invalidations.is_empty(), "::part() shouldn't have sibling combinators to the right, \ this makes no sense! {:?}", sibling_invalidations ); } if let Some(shadow) = element.shadow_root() { if element.exports_any_part() { any |= self.invalidate_parts_in_shadow_tree(shadow, invalidations) } } } any } fn invalidate_parts(&mut self, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>]) -> bool { if invalidations.is_empty() { return false; } let shadow = match self.element.shadow_root() { Some(s) => s, None => return false, }; self.invalidate_parts_in_shadow_tree(shadow, invalidations) } fn invalidate_slotted_elements(&mut self, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>]) -> bool { if invalidations.is_empty() { return false; } let slot = self.element; self.invalidate_slotted_elements_in_slot(slot, invalidations) } fn invalidate_slotted_elements_in_slot( &mut self, slot: E, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>], ) -> bool { let mut any = false; let mut sibling_invalidations = InvalidationVector::new(); for node in slot.slotted_nodes() { let element = match node.as_element() { Some(e) => e, None => continue, }; if element.is_html_slot_element() { any |= self.invalidate_slotted_elements_in_slot(element, invalidations); } else { any |= self.invalidate_child( element, invalidations, &mut sibling_invalidations, DescendantInvalidationKind::Slotted, ); } debug_assert!( sibling_invalidations.is_empty(), "::slotted() shouldn't have sibling combinators to the right, \ this makes no sense! {:?}", sibling_invalidations ); } any } fn invalidate_non_slotted_descendants(&mut self, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>]) -> bool { if invalidations.is_empty() { return false; } if self.processor.light_tree_only() { let node = self.element.as_node(); return self.invalidate_dom_descendants_of(node, invalidations); } let mut any_descendant = false; // NOTE(emilio): This is only needed for Shadow DOM to invalidate // correctly on :host(..) changes. Instead of doing this, we could add // a third kind of invalidation list that walks shadow root children, // but it's not clear it's worth it. // // Also, it's needed as of right now for document state invalidation, // where we rely on iterating every element that ends up in the composed // doc, but we could fix that invalidating per subtree. if let Some(root) = self.element.shadow_root() { any_descendant |= self.invalidate_dom_descendants_of(root.as_node(), invalidations); } if let Some(marker) = self.element.marker_pseudo_element() { any_descendant |= self.invalidate_pseudo_element_or_nac(marker, invalidations); } if let Some(before) = self.element.before_pseudo_element() { any_descendant |= self.invalidate_pseudo_element_or_nac(before, invalidations); } let node = self.element.as_node(); any_descendant |= self.invalidate_dom_descendants_of(node, invalidations); if let Some(after) = self.element.after_pseudo_element() { any_descendant |= self.invalidate_pseudo_element_or_nac(after, invalidations); } any_descendant |= self.invalidate_nac(invalidations); any_descendant } /// Given the descendant invalidation lists, go through the current /// element's descendants, and invalidate style on them. fn invalidate_descendants(&mut self, invalidations: &DescendantInvalidationLists<'b>) -> bool { if invalidations.is_empty() { return false; } debug!( "StyleTreeInvalidator::invalidate_descendants({:?})", self.element ); debug!(" > {:?}", invalidations); let should_process = self.processor.should_process_descendants(self.element); if !should_process { return false; } if let Some(checker) = self.stack_limit_checker { if checker.limit_exceeded() { self.processor.recursion_limit_exceeded(self.element); return true; } } let mut any_descendant = false; any_descendant |= self.invalidate_non_slotted_descendants(&invalidations.dom_descendants); any_descendant |= self.invalidate_slotted_elements(&invalidations.slotted_descendants); any_descendant |= self.invalidate_parts(&invalidations.parts); any_descendant } /// Process the given sibling invalidations coming from our previous /// sibling. /// /// The sibling invalidations are somewhat special because they can be /// modified on the fly. New invalidations may be added and removed. /// /// In particular, all descendants get the same set of invalidations from /// the parent, but the invalidations from a given sibling depend on the /// ones we got from the previous one. /// /// Returns whether invalidated the current element's style. fn process_sibling_invalidations( &mut self, descendant_invalidations: &mut DescendantInvalidationLists<'b>, sibling_invalidations: &mut InvalidationVector<'b>, ) -> bool { let mut i = 0; let mut new_sibling_invalidations = InvalidationVector::new(); let mut invalidated_self = false; while i < sibling_invalidations.len() { let result = self.process_invalidation( &sibling_invalidations[i], descendant_invalidations, &mut new_sibling_invalidations, InvalidationKind::Sibling, ); invalidated_self |= result.invalidated_self; sibling_invalidations[i].matched_by_any_previous |= result.matched; if sibling_invalidations[i].effective_for_next() { i += 1; } else { sibling_invalidations.remove(i); } } sibling_invalidations.extend(new_sibling_invalidations.drain(..)); invalidated_self } /// Process a given invalidation list coming from our parent, /// adding to `descendant_invalidations` and `sibling_invalidations` as /// needed. /// /// Returns whether our style was invalidated as a result. fn process_descendant_invalidations( &mut self, invalidations: &[Invalidation<'b>], descendant_invalidations: &mut DescendantInvalidationLists<'b>, sibling_invalidations: &mut InvalidationVector<'b>, descendant_invalidation_kind: DescendantInvalidationKind, ) -> bool { let mut invalidated = false; for invalidation in invalidations { let result = self.process_invalidation( invalidation, descendant_invalidations, sibling_invalidations, InvalidationKind::Descendant(descendant_invalidation_kind), ); invalidated |= result.invalidated_self; if invalidation.effective_for_next() { let mut invalidation = invalidation.clone(); invalidation.matched_by_any_previous |= result.matched; debug_assert_eq!( descendant_invalidation_kind, DescendantInvalidationKind::Dom, "Slotted or part invalidations don't propagate." ); descendant_invalidations.dom_descendants.push(invalidation); } } invalidated } /// Processes a given invalidation, potentially invalidating the style of /// the current element. /// /// Returns whether invalidated the style of the element, and whether the /// invalidation should be effective to subsequent siblings or descendants /// down in the tree. fn process_invalidation( &mut self, invalidation: &Invalidation<'b>, descendant_invalidations: &mut DescendantInvalidationLists<'b>, sibling_invalidations: &mut InvalidationVector<'b>, invalidation_kind: InvalidationKind, ) -> SingleInvalidationResult { debug!( "TreeStyleInvalidator::process_invalidation({:?}, {:?}, {:?})", self.element, invalidation, invalidation_kind ); let matching_result = { let context = self.processor.matching_context(); context.current_host = invalidation.scope; matches_compound_selector_from( &invalidation.dependency.selector, invalidation.offset, context, &self.element, ) }; let next_invalidation = match matching_result { CompoundSelectorMatchingResult::NotMatched => { return SingleInvalidationResult { invalidated_self: false, matched: false, } }, CompoundSelectorMatchingResult::FullyMatched => { debug!(" > Invalidation matched completely"); // We matched completely. If we're an inner selector now we need // to go outside our selector and carry on invalidating. let mut cur_dependency = invalidation.dependency; loop { cur_dependency = match cur_dependency.parent { None => { return SingleInvalidationResult { invalidated_self: true, matched: true, } }, Some(ref p) => { let invalidation_kind = p.invalidation_kind(); match invalidation_kind { DependencyInvalidationKind::Normal(_) => &**p, DependencyInvalidationKind::Relative(kind) => { self.processor.found_relative_selector_invalidation( self.element, kind, &**p, ); return SingleInvalidationResult { invalidated_self: false, matched: true, }; }, } }, }; debug!(" > Checking outer dependency {:?}", cur_dependency); // The inner selector changed, now check if the full // previous part of the selector did, before keeping // checking for descendants. if !self .processor .check_outer_dependency(cur_dependency, self.element) { return SingleInvalidationResult { invalidated_self: false, matched: false, }; } if cur_dependency.normal_invalidation_kind() == NormalDependencyInvalidationKind::Element { continue; } debug!(" > Generating invalidation"); break Invalidation::new(cur_dependency, invalidation.scope); } }, CompoundSelectorMatchingResult::Matched { next_combinator_offset, } => Invalidation { dependency: invalidation.dependency, scope: invalidation.scope, offset: next_combinator_offset + 1, matched_by_any_previous: false, }, }; debug_assert_ne!( next_invalidation.offset, 0, "Rightmost selectors shouldn't generate more invalidations", ); let mut invalidated_self = false; let next_combinator = next_invalidation .dependency .selector .combinator_at_parse_order(next_invalidation.offset - 1); if matches!(next_combinator, Combinator::PseudoElement) && self.processor.invalidates_on_pseudo_element() { // We need to invalidate the element whenever pseudos change, for // two reasons: // // * Eager pseudo styles are stored as part of the originating // element's computed style. // // * Lazy pseudo-styles might be cached on the originating // element's pseudo-style cache. // // This could be more fine-grained (perhaps with a RESTYLE_PSEUDOS // hint?). // // Note that we'll also restyle the pseudo-element because it would // match this invalidation. // // FIXME: For non-element-backed pseudos this is still not quite // correct. For example for ::selection even though we invalidate // the style properly there's nothing that triggers a repaint // necessarily. Though this matches old Gecko behavior, and the // ::selection implementation needs to change significantly anyway // to implement https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2474 for // example. invalidated_self = true; } debug!( " > Invalidation matched, next: {:?}, ({:?})", next_invalidation, next_combinator ); let next_invalidation_kind = next_invalidation.kind(); // We can skip pushing under some circumstances, and we should // because otherwise the invalidation list could grow // exponentially. // // * First of all, both invalidations need to be of the same // kind. This is because of how we propagate them going to // the right of the tree for sibling invalidations and going // down the tree for children invalidations. A sibling // invalidation that ends up generating a children // invalidation ends up (correctly) in five different lists, // not in the same list five different times. // // * Then, the invalidation needs to be matched by a previous // ancestor/sibling, in order to know that this invalidation // has been generated already. // // * Finally, the new invalidation needs to be // `effective_for_next()`, in order for us to know that it is // still in the list, since we remove the dependencies that // aren't from the lists for our children / siblings. // // To go through an example, let's imagine we are processing a // dom subtree like: // //
// // And an invalidation list with a single invalidation like: // // [div div div] // // When we process the invalidation list for the outer div, we // match it, and generate a `div div` invalidation, so for the //
child we have: // // [div div div, div div] // // With the first of them marked as `matched`. // // When we process the
child, we don't match any of // them, so both invalidations go untouched to our children. // // When we process the second
, we match _both_ // invalidations. // // However, when matching the first, we can tell it's been // matched, and not push the corresponding `div div` // invalidation, since we know it's necessarily already on the // list. // // Thus, without skipping the push, we'll arrive to the // innermost
with: // // [div div div, div div, div div, div] // // While skipping it, we won't arrive here with duplicating // dependencies: // // [div div div, div div, div] // let can_skip_pushing = next_invalidation_kind == invalidation_kind && invalidation.matched_by_any_previous && next_invalidation.effective_for_next(); if can_skip_pushing { debug!( " > Can avoid push, since the invalidation had \ already been matched before" ); } else { match next_invalidation_kind { InvalidationKind::Descendant(DescendantInvalidationKind::Dom) => { descendant_invalidations .dom_descendants .push(next_invalidation); }, InvalidationKind::Descendant(DescendantInvalidationKind::Part) => { descendant_invalidations.parts.push(next_invalidation); }, InvalidationKind::Descendant(DescendantInvalidationKind::Slotted) => { descendant_invalidations .slotted_descendants .push(next_invalidation); }, InvalidationKind::Sibling => { sibling_invalidations.push(next_invalidation); }, } } SingleInvalidationResult { invalidated_self, matched: true, } } }