diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-09 13:16:35 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-09 13:16:35 +0000 |
commit | e2bbf175a2184bd76f6c54ccf8456babeb1a46fc (patch) | |
tree | f0b76550d6e6f500ada964a3a4ee933a45e5a6f1 /doc/developer/scripting.rst | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | frr-e2bbf175a2184bd76f6c54ccf8456babeb1a46fc.tar.xz frr-e2bbf175a2184bd76f6c54ccf8456babeb1a46fc.zip |
Adding upstream version 9.1.upstream/9.1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/developer/scripting.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/developer/scripting.rst | 628 |
1 files changed, 628 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/developer/scripting.rst b/doc/developer/scripting.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..202f003 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/developer/scripting.rst @@ -0,0 +1,628 @@ +.. _scripting: + +Scripting +========= + +.. seealso:: User docs for scripting + +Overview +-------- + +FRR has the ability to call Lua scripts to perform calculations, make +decisions, or otherwise extend builtin behavior with arbitrary user code. This +is implemented using the standard Lua C bindings. The supported version of Lua +is 5.3. + +C objects may be passed into Lua and Lua objects may be retrieved by C code via +a encoding/decoding system. In this way, arbitrary data from FRR may be passed to +scripts. + +The Lua environment is isolated from the C environment; user scripts cannot +access FRR's address space unless explicitly allowed by FRR. + +For general information on how Lua is used to extend C, refer to Part IV of +"Programming in Lua". + +https://www.lua.org/pil/contents.html#24 + + +Design +------ + +Why Lua +^^^^^^^ + +Lua is designed to be embedded in C applications. It is very small; the +standard library is 220K. It is relatively fast. It has a simple, minimal +syntax that is relatively easy to learn and can be understood by someone with +little to no programming experience. Moreover it is widely used to add +scripting capabilities to applications. In short it is designed for this task. + +Reasons against supporting multiple scripting languages: + +- Each language would require different FFI methods, and specifically + different object encoders; a lot of code +- Languages have different capabilities that would have to be brought to + parity with each other; a lot of work +- Languages have vastly different performance characteristics; this would + create alot of basically unfixable issues, and result in a single de facto + standard scripting language (the fastest) +- Each language would need a dedicated maintainer for the above reasons; + this is pragmatically difficult +- Supporting multiple languages fractures the community and limits the audience + with which a given script can be shared + +General +------- + +FRR's scripting functionality is provided in the form of Lua functions in Lua +scripts (``.lua`` files). One Lua script may contain many Lua functions. These +are respectively encapsulated in the following structures: + +.. code-block:: c + + struct frrscript { + /* Lua file name */ + char *name; + + /* hash of lua_function_states */ + struct hash *lua_function_hash; + }; + + struct lua_function_state { + /* Lua function name */ + char *name; + + lua_State *L; + }; + + +`struct frrscript`: Since all Lua functions are contained within scripts, the +following APIs manipulates this structure. ``name`` contains the +Lua script name and a hash of Lua functions to their function names. + +`struct lua_function_state` is an internal structure, but it essentially contains +the name of the Lua function and its state (a stack), which is run using Lua +library functions. + +In general, to run a Lua function, these steps must take place: + +- Initialization +- Load +- Call +- Delete + +Initialization +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +The ``frrscript`` object encapsulates the Lua function state(s) from +one Lua script file. To create, use ``frrscript_new()`` which takes the +name of the Lua script. +The string ".lua" is appended to the script name, and the resultant filename +will be used to look for the script when we want to load a Lua function from it. + +For example, to create ``frrscript`` for ``/etc/frr/scripts/bingus.lua``: + +.. code-block:: c + + struct frrscript *fs = frrscript_new("bingus"); + + +The script is *not* read at this stage. +This function cannot be used to test for a script's presence. + +Load +^^^^ + +The function to be called must first be loaded. Use ``frrscript_load()`` +which takes a ``frrscript`` object, the name of the Lua function +and a callback function. +The script file will be read to load and compile the function. + +For example, to load the Lua function ``on_foo`` +in ``/etc/frr/scripts/bingus.lua``: + +.. code-block:: c + + int ret = frrscript_load(fs, "on_foo", NULL); + + +This function returns 0 if and only if the Lua function was successfully loaded. +A non-zero return could indicate either a missing Lua script, a missing +Lua function, or an error when loading the function. + +During loading the script is validated for syntax and its environment +is set up. By default this does not include the Lua standard library; there are +security issues to consider, though for practical purposes untrusted users +should not be able to write the scripts directory anyway. + +Call +^^^^ + +After loading, a Lua function can be called any number of times. + +Input +""""" + +Inputs to the Lua script should be given by providing a list of parenthesized +pairs, +where the first and second field identify the name of the variable and the +value it is bound to, respectively. +The types of the values must have registered encoders (more below); the compiler +will warn you otherwise. + +These variables are first encoded in-order, then provided as arguments +to the Lua function. In the example, note that ``c`` is passed in as a value +while ``a`` and ``b`` are passed in as pointers. + +.. code-block:: c + + int a = 100, b = 200, c = 300; + frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo", ("a", &a), ("b", &b), ("c", c)); + + +.. code-block:: lua + + function on_foo(a, b, c) + -- a is 100, b is 200, c is 300 + ... + + +Output +"""""" + +.. code-block:: c + + int a = 100, b = 200, c = 300; + frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo", ("a", &a), ("b", &b), ("c", c)); + // a is 500, b is 200, c is 300 + + int* d = frrscript_get_result(fs, "on_foo", "d", lua_tointegerp); + // d is 800 + + +.. code-block:: lua + + function on_foo(a, b, c) + b = 600 + return { ["a"] = 500, ["c"] = 700, ["d"] = 800 } + end + + +**Lua functions being called must return a single table of string names to +values.** +(Lua functions should return an empty table if there is no output.) +The keys of the table are mapped back to names of variables in C. Note that +the values in the table can also be tables. Since tables are Lua's primary +data structure, this design lets us return any Lua value. + +After the Lua function returns, the names of variables to ``frrscript_call()`` +are matched against keys of the returned table, and then decoded. The types +being decoded must have registered decoders (more below); the compiler will +warn you otherwise. + +In the example, since ``a`` was in the returned table and ``b`` was not, +``a`` was decoded and its value modified, while ``b`` was not decoded. +``c`` was decoded as well, but its decoder is a noop. +What modifications happen given a variable depends whether its name was +in the returned table and the decoder's implementation. + +.. warning:: + Always keep in mind that non const-qualified pointers in + ``frrscript_call()`` may be modified - this may be a source of bugs. + On the other hand, const-qualified pointers and other values cannot + be modified. + + +.. tip:: + You can make a copy of a data structure and pass that in instead, + so that modifications only happen to that copy. + +``frrscript_call()`` returns 0 if and only if the Lua function was successfully +called. A non-zero return could indicate either a missing Lua script, a missing +Lua function, or an error from the Lua interpreter. + +In the above example, ``d`` was not an input to ``frrscript_call()``, so its +value must be explicitly retrieved with ``frrscript_get_result``. + +``frrscript_get_result()`` takes a +decoder and string name which is used as a key to search the returned table. +Returns the pointer to the decoded value, or NULL if it was not found. +In the example, ``d`` is a "new" value in C space, +so memory allocation might take place. Hence the caller is +responsible for memory deallocation. + +``frrscript_call()`` may be called multiple times without re-loading with +``frrscript_load()``. Results are not preserved between consecutive calls. + +.. code-block:: c + + frrscript_load(fs, "on_foo"); + + frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo"); + frrscript_get_result(fs, "on_foo", ...); + frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo"); + frrscript_get_result(fs, "on_foo", ...); + + +Delete +^^^^^^ + +To delete a script and the all Lua states associated with it: + +.. code-block:: c + + frrscript_delete(fs); + + +A complete example +"""""""""""""""""" + +So, a typical execution call, with error checking, looks something like this: + +.. code-block:: c + + struct frrscript *fs = frrscript_new("my_script"); // name *without* .lua + + int ret = frrscript_load(fs, "on_foo", NULL); + if (ret != 0) + goto DONE; // Lua script or function might have not been found + + int a = 100, b = 200, c = 300; + ret = frrscript_call(fs, "on_foo", ("a", &a), ("b", &b), ("c", c)); + if (ret != 0) + goto DONE; // Lua function might have not successfully run + + // a and b might be modified + assert(a == 500); + assert(b == 200); + + // c could not have been modified + assert(c == 300); + + // d is new + int* d = frrscript_get_result(fs, "on_foo", "d", lua_tointegerp); + + if (!d) + goto DONE; // "d" might not have been in returned table + + assert(*d == 800); + XFREE(MTYPE_SCRIPT_RES, d); // caller responsible for free + + DONE: + frrscript_delete(fs); + + +.. code-block:: lua + + function on_foo(a, b, c) + b = 600 + return { a = 500, c = 700, d = 800 } + end + + +Note that ``{ a = ...`` is same as ``{ ["a"] = ...``; it is Lua shorthand to +use the variable name as the key in a table. + +Encoding and Decoding +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Earlier sections glossed over the types of values that can be passed into +``frrscript_call()`` and how data is passed between C and Lua. Lua, as a +dynamically typed, garbage collected language, cannot directly use C values +without some kind of encoding / decoding system to +translate types between the two runtimes. + +Lua communicates with C code using a stack. C code wishing to provide data to +Lua scripts must provide a function that encodes the C data into a Lua +representation and pushes it on the stack. C code wishing to retrieve data from +Lua must provide a corresponding decoder function that retrieves a Lua +value from the stack and converts it to the corresponding C type. + +Encoders and decoders are provided for common data types. +Developers wishing to pass their own data structures between C and Lua need to +create encoders and decoders for that data type. + +We try to keep them named consistently. +There are three kinds of encoders and decoders: + +1. lua_push*: encodes a value onto the Lua stack. + Required for ``frrscript_call``. + +2. lua_decode*: decodes a value from the Lua stack. + Required for ``frrscript_call``. + Only non const-qualified pointers may be actually decoded (more below). + +3. lua_to*: allocates memory and decodes a value from the Lua stack. + Required for ``frrscript_get_result``. + +This design allows us to combine typesafe *modification* of C values as well as +*allocation* of new C values. + +In the following sections, we will use the encoders/decoders for ``struct prefix`` as an example. + +Encoding +"""""""" + +An encoder function takes a ``lua_State *``, a C type and pushes that value onto +the Lua state (a stack). +For C structs, the usual case, +this will typically be encoded to a Lua table, then pushed onto the Lua stack. + +Here is the encoder function for ``struct prefix``: + +.. code-block:: c + + void lua_pushprefix(lua_State *L, struct prefix *prefix) + { + char buffer[PREFIX_STRLEN]; + + lua_newtable(L); + lua_pushstring(L, prefix2str(prefix, buffer, PREFIX_STRLEN)); + lua_setfield(L, -2, "network"); + lua_pushinteger(L, prefix->prefixlen); + lua_setfield(L, -2, "length"); + lua_pushinteger(L, prefix->family); + lua_setfield(L, -2, "family"); + } + +This function pushes a single value, a table, onto the Lua stack, whose +equivalent in Lua is: + +.. code-block:: c + + { ["network"] = "1.2.3.4/24", ["prefixlen"] = 24, ["family"] = 2 } + + +Decoding +"""""""" + +Decoders are a bit more involved. They do the reverse; a decoder function takes +a ``lua_State *``, pops a value off the Lua stack and converts it back into its +C type. + +There are two: ``lua_decode*`` and ``lua_to*``. The former does no mememory +allocation and is needed for ``frrscript_call``. +The latter performs allocation and is optional. + +A ``lua_decode_*`` function takes a ``lua_State*``, an index, and a pointer +to a C data structure, and directly modifies the structure with values from the +Lua stack. Note that only non const-qualified pointers may be modified; +``lua_decode_*`` for other types will be noops. + +Again, for ``struct prefix *``: + +.. code-block:: c + + void lua_decode_prefix(lua_State *L, int idx, struct prefix *prefix) + { + lua_getfield(L, idx, "network"); + (void)str2prefix(lua_tostring(L, -1), prefix); + /* pop the network string */ + lua_pop(L, 1); + /* pop the prefix table */ + lua_pop(L, 1); + } + + +Note: + - Before ``lua_decode*`` is run, the "prefix" table is already on the top of + the stack. ``frrscript_call`` does this for us. + - However, at the end of ``lua_decode*``, the "prefix" table should be popped. + - The other two fields in the "network" table are disregarded, meaning that any + modification to them is discarded in C space. In this case, this is desired + behavior. + +.. warning:: + + ``lua_decode*`` functions should pop all values that ``lua_to*`` pushed onto + the Lua stack. + For encoders that pushed a table, its decoder should pop the table at the end. + The above is an example. + + + +``int`` is not a non const-qualified pointer, so for ``int``: + +.. code-block:: c + + void lua_decode_int_noop(lua_State *L, int idx, int i) + { //noop + } + + +A ``lua_to*`` function provides identical functionality except that it first +allocates memory for the new C type before decoding the value from the Lua stack, +then returns a pointer to the newly allocated C type. You only need to implement +this function to use with ``frrscript_get_result`` to retrieve a result of +this type. + +This function can and should be implemented using ``lua_decode_*``: + +.. code-block:: c + + void *lua_toprefix(lua_State *L, int idx) + { + struct prefix *p = XCALLOC(MTYPE_SCRIPT_RES, sizeof(struct prefix)); + + lua_decode_prefix(L, idx, p); + return p; + } + + +The returned data must always be copied off the stack and the copy must be +allocated with ``MTYPE_SCRIPT_RES``. This way it is possible to unload the script +(destroy the state) without invalidating any references to values stored in it. +Note that it is the caller's responsibility to free the data. + + +Registering encoders and decoders for frrscript_call +"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" + +To register a new type with its ``lua_push*`` and ``lua_decode*`` functions, +add the mapping in the following macros in ``frrscript.h``: + +.. code-block:: diff + + #define ENCODE_ARGS_WITH_STATE(L, value) \ + _Generic((value), \ + ... + - struct peer * : lua_pushpeer \ + + struct peer * : lua_pushpeer, \ + + struct prefix * : lua_pushprefix \ + )((L), (value)) + + #define DECODE_ARGS_WITH_STATE(L, value) \ + _Generic((value), \ + ... + - struct peer * : lua_decode_peer \ + + struct peer * : lua_decode_peer, \ + + struct prefix * : lua_decode_prefix \ + )((L), -1, (value)) + + +At compile time, the compiler will search for encoders/decoders for the type of +each value passed in via ``frrscript_call``. If a encoder/decoder cannot be +found, it will appear as a compile warning. Note that the types must +match *exactly*. +In the above example, we defined encoders/decoders for a value of +``struct prefix *``, but not ``struct prefix`` or ``const struct prefix *``. + +``const`` values are a special case. We want to use them in our Lua scripts +but not modify them, so creating a decoder for them would be meaningless. +But we still need a decoder for the type of value so that the compiler will be +satisfied. +For that, use ``lua_decode_noop``: + +.. code-block:: diff + + #define DECODE_ARGS_WITH_STATE(L, value) \ + _Generic((value), \ + ... + + const struct prefix * : lua_decode_noop \ + )(L, -1, value) + + +.. note:: + + Encodable/decodable types are not restricted to simple values like integers, + strings and tables. + It is possible to encode a type such that the resultant object in Lua + is an actual object-oriented object, complete with methods that call + back into defined C functions. See the Lua manual for how to do this; + for a code example, look at how zlog is exported into the script environment. + + +Script Environment +------------------ + +Logging +^^^^^^^ + +For convenience, script environments are populated by default with a ``log`` +object which contains methods corresponding to each of the ``zlog`` levels: + +.. code-block:: lua + + log.info("info") + log.warn("warn") + log.error("error") + log.notice("notice") + log.debug("debug") + +The log messages will show up in the daemon's log output. + + +Examples +-------- + +For a complete code example involving passing custom types, retrieving results, +and doing complex calculations in Lua, look at the implementation of the +``match script SCRIPT`` command for BGP routemaps. This example calls into a +script with a function named ``route_match``, +provides route prefix and attributes received from a peer and expects the +function to return a match / no match / match and update result. + +An example script to use with this follows. This function matches, does not match +or updates a route depending on how many BGP UPDATE messages the peer has +received when the script is called, simply as a demonstration of what can be +accomplished with scripting. + +.. code-block:: lua + + + -- Example route map matching + -- author: qlyoung + -- + -- The following variables are available in the global environment: + -- log + -- logging library, with the usual functions + -- + -- route_match arguments: + -- table prefix + -- the route under consideration + -- table attributes + -- the route's attributes + -- table peer + -- the peer which received this route + -- integer RM_FAILURE + -- status code in case of failure + -- integer RM_NOMATCH + -- status code for no match + -- integer RM_MATCH + -- status code for match + -- integer RM_MATCH_AND_CHANGE + -- status code for match-and-set + -- + -- route_match returns table with following keys: + -- integer action, required + -- resultant status code. Should be one of RM_* + -- table attributes, optional + -- updated route attributes + -- + + function route_match(prefix, attributes, peer, + RM_FAILURE, RM_NOMATCH, RM_MATCH, RM_MATCH_AND_CHANGE) + + log.info("Evaluating route " .. prefix.network .. " from peer " .. peer.remote_id.string) + + function on_match (prefix, attributes) + log.info("Match") + return { + attributes = RM_MATCH + } + end + + function on_nomatch (prefix, attributes) + log.info("No match") + return { + action = RM_NOMATCH + } + end + + function on_match_and_change (prefix, attributes) + log.info("Match and change") + attributes["metric"] = attributes["metric"] + 7 + return { + action = RM_MATCH_AND_CHANGE, + attributes = attributes + } + end + + special_routes = { + ["172.16.10.4/24"] = on_match, + ["172.16.13.1/8"] = on_nomatch, + ["192.168.0.24/8"] = on_match_and_change, + } + + + if special_routes[prefix.network] then + return special_routes[prefix.network](prefix, attributes) + elseif peer.stats.update_in % 3 == 0 then + return on_match(prefix, attributes) + elseif peer.stats.update_in % 2 == 0 then + return on_nomatch(prefix, attributes) + else + return on_match_and_change(prefix, attributes) + end + end |