summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/SubmittingPatches45
1 files changed, 35 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index bce7f97..c647c7e 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -355,9 +355,21 @@ If you like, you can put extra tags at the end:
patch after a detailed analysis.
. `Tested-by:` is used to indicate that the person applied the patch
and found it to have the desired effect.
-
-You can also create your own tag or use one that's in common usage
-such as "Thanks-to:", "Based-on-patch-by:", or "Mentored-by:".
+. `Co-authored-by:` is used to indicate that people exchanged drafts
+ of a patch before submitting it.
+. `Helped-by:` is used to credit someone who suggested ideas for
+ changes without providing the precise changes in patch form.
+. `Mentored-by:` is used to credit someone with helping develop a
+ patch as part of a mentorship program (e.g., GSoC or Outreachy).
+. `Suggested-by:` is used to credit someone with suggesting the idea
+ for a patch.
+
+While you can also create your own trailer if the situation warrants it, we
+encourage you to instead use one of the common trailers in this project
+highlighted above.
+
+Only capitalize the very first letter of tags, i.e. favor
+"Signed-off-by" over "Signed-Off-By" and "Acked-by:" over "Acked-By".
[[git-tools]]
=== Generate your patch using Git tools out of your commits.
@@ -447,6 +459,18 @@ an explanation of changes between each iteration can be kept in
Git-notes and inserted automatically following the three-dash
line via `git format-patch --notes`.
+[[the-topic-summary]]
+*This is EXPERIMENTAL*.
+
+When sending a topic, you can propose a one-paragraph summary that
+should appear in the "What's cooking" report when it is picked up to
+explain the topic. If you choose to do so, please write a 2-5 line
+paragraph that will fit well in our release notes (see many bulleted
+entries in the Documentation/RelNotes/* files for examples), and make
+it the first paragraph of the cover letter. For a single-patch
+series, use the space between the three-dash line and the diffstat, as
+described earlier.
+
[[attachment]]
Do not attach the patch as a MIME attachment, compressed or not.
Do not let your e-mail client send quoted-printable. Do not let
@@ -570,7 +594,7 @@ their trees themselves.
master).
* Read the Git mailing list, the maintainer regularly posts messages
- entitled "What's cooking in git.git" and "What's in git.git" giving
+ entitled "What's cooking in git.git" giving
the status of various proposed changes.
== GitHub CI[[GHCI]]
@@ -590,11 +614,12 @@ After the initial setup, CI will run whenever you push new changes
to your fork of Git on GitHub. You can monitor the test state of all your
branches here: `https://github.com/<Your GitHub handle>/git/actions/workflows/main.yml`
-If a branch did not pass all test cases then it is marked with a red
-cross. In that case you can click on the failing job and navigate to
-"ci/run-build-and-tests.sh" and/or "ci/print-test-failures.sh". You
-can also download "Artifacts" which are tarred (or zipped) archives
-with test data relevant for debugging.
+If a branch does not pass all test cases then it will be marked with a
+red +x+, instead of a green check. In that case, you can click on the
+failing job and navigate to "ci/run-build-and-tests.sh" and/or
+"ci/print-test-failures.sh". You can also download "Artifacts" which
+are zip archives containing tarred (or zipped) archives with test data
+relevant for debugging.
Then fix the problem and push your fix to your GitHub fork. This will
trigger a new CI build to ensure all tests pass.
@@ -686,7 +711,7 @@ message to an external program, and this is a handy way to drive
`git am`. However, if the message is MIME encoded, what is
piped into the program is the representation you see in your
`*Article*` buffer after unwrapping MIME. This is often not what
-you would want for two reasons. It tends to screw up non ASCII
+you would want for two reasons. It tends to screw up non-ASCII
characters (most notably in people's names), and also
whitespaces (fatal in patches). Running "C-u g" to display the
message in raw form before using "|" to run the pipe can work