Adding upstream version 1.20.14.upstream/1.20.14upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 181 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/internal/intern/intern.go b/src/internal/intern/intern.go
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0e6852f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/internal/intern/intern.go
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+// Copyright 2020 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
+// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+// Package intern lets you make smaller comparable values by boxing
+// a larger comparable value (such as a 16 byte string header) down
+// into a globally unique 8 byte pointer.
+//
+// The globally unique pointers are garbage collected with weak
+// references and finalizers. This package hides that.
+package intern
+
+import (
+	"internal/godebug"
+	"runtime"
+	"sync"
+	"unsafe"
+)
+
+// A Value pointer is the handle to an underlying comparable value.
+// See func Get for how Value pointers may be used.
+type Value struct {
+	_      [0]func() // prevent people from accidentally using value type as comparable
+	cmpVal any
+	// resurrected is guarded by mu (for all instances of Value).
+	// It is set true whenever v is synthesized from a uintptr.
+	resurrected bool
+}
+
+// Get returns the comparable value passed to the Get func
+// that returned v.
+func (v *Value) Get() any { return v.cmpVal }
+
+// key is a key in our global value map.
+// It contains type-specialized fields to avoid allocations
+// when converting common types to empty interfaces.
+type key struct {
+	s      string
+	cmpVal any
+	// isString reports whether key contains a string.
+	// Without it, the zero value of key is ambiguous.
+	isString bool
+}
+
+// keyFor returns a key to use with cmpVal.
+func keyFor(cmpVal any) key {
+	if s, ok := cmpVal.(string); ok {
+		return key{s: s, isString: true}
+	}
+	return key{cmpVal: cmpVal}
+}
+
+// Value returns a *Value built from k.
+func (k key) Value() *Value {
+	if k.isString {
+		return &Value{cmpVal: k.s}
+	}
+	return &Value{cmpVal: k.cmpVal}
+}
+
+var (
+	// mu guards valMap, a weakref map of *Value by underlying value.
+	// It also guards the resurrected field of all *Values.
+	mu      sync.Mutex
+	valMap  = map[key]uintptr{} // to uintptr(*Value)
+	valSafe = safeMap()         // non-nil in safe+leaky mode
+)
+
+var intern = godebug.New("intern")
+
+// safeMap returns a non-nil map if we're in safe-but-leaky mode,
+// as controlled by GODEBUG=intern=leaky
+func safeMap() map[key]*Value {
+	if intern.Value() == "leaky" {
+		return map[key]*Value{}
+	}
+	return nil
+}
+
+// Get returns a pointer representing the comparable value cmpVal.
+//
+// The returned pointer will be the same for Get(v) and Get(v2)
+// if and only if v == v2, and can be used as a map key.
+func Get(cmpVal any) *Value {
+	return get(keyFor(cmpVal))
+}
+
+// GetByString is identical to Get, except that it is specialized for strings.
+// This avoids an allocation from putting a string into an interface{}
+// to pass as an argument to Get.
+func GetByString(s string) *Value {
+	return get(key{s: s, isString: true})
+}
+
+// We play unsafe games that violate Go's rules (and assume a non-moving
+// collector). So we quiet Go here.
+// See the comment below Get for more implementation details.
+//
+//go:nocheckptr
+func get(k key) *Value {
+	mu.Lock()
+	defer mu.Unlock()
+
+	var v *Value
+	if valSafe != nil {
+		v = valSafe[k]
+	} else if addr, ok := valMap[k]; ok {
+		v = (*Value)(unsafe.Pointer(addr))
+		v.resurrected = true
+	}
+	if v != nil {
+		return v
+	}
+	v = k.Value()
+	if valSafe != nil {
+		valSafe[k] = v
+	} else {
+		// SetFinalizer before uintptr conversion (theoretical concern;
+		// see https://github.com/go4org/intern/issues/13)
+		runtime.SetFinalizer(v, finalize)
+		valMap[k] = uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(v))
+	}
+	return v
+}
+
+func finalize(v *Value) {
+	mu.Lock()
+	defer mu.Unlock()
+	if v.resurrected {
+		// We lost the race. Somebody resurrected it while we
+		// were about to finalize it. Try again next round.
+		v.resurrected = false
+		runtime.SetFinalizer(v, finalize)
+		return
+	}
+	delete(valMap, keyFor(v.cmpVal))
+}
+
+// Interning is simple if you don't require that unused values be
+// garbage collectable. But we do require that; we don't want to be
+// DOS vector. We do this by using a uintptr to hide the pointer from
+// the garbage collector, and using a finalizer to eliminate the
+// pointer when no other code is using it.
+//
+// The obvious implementation of this is to use a
+// map[interface{}]uintptr-of-*interface{}, and set up a finalizer to
+// delete from the map. Unfortunately, this is racy. Because pointers
+// are being created in violation of Go's unsafety rules, it's
+// possible to create a pointer to a value concurrently with the GC
+// concluding that the value can be collected. There are other races
+// that break the equality invariant as well, but the use-after-free
+// will cause a runtime crash.
+//
+// To make this work, the finalizer needs to know that no references
+// have been unsafely created since the finalizer was set up. To do
+// this, values carry a "resurrected" sentinel, which gets set
+// whenever a pointer is unsafely created. If the finalizer encounters
+// the sentinel, it clears the sentinel and delays collection for one
+// additional GC cycle, by re-installing itself as finalizer. This
+// ensures that the unsafely created pointer is visible to the GC, and
+// will correctly prevent collection.
+//
+// This technique does mean that interned values that get reused take
+// at least 3 GC cycles to fully collect (1 to clear the sentinel, 1
+// to clean up the unsafe map, 1 to be actually deleted).
+//
+// @ianlancetaylor commented in
+// https://github.com/golang/go/issues/41303#issuecomment-717401656
+// that it is possible to implement weak references in terms of
+// finalizers without unsafe. Unfortunately, the approach he outlined
+// does not work here, for two reasons. First, there is no way to
+// construct a strong pointer out of a weak pointer; our map stores
+// weak pointers, but we must return strong pointers to callers.
+// Second, and more fundamentally, we must return not just _a_ strong
+// pointer to callers, but _the same_ strong pointer to callers. In
+// order to return _the same_ strong pointer to callers, we must track
+// it, which is exactly what we cannot do with strong pointers.
+//
+// See https://github.com/inetaf/netaddr/issues/53 for more
+// discussion, and https://github.com/go4org/intern/issues/2 for an
+// illustration of the subtleties at play.