Adding upstream version 1.22.1.upstream/1.22.1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 270 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/runtime/mwbbuf.go b/src/runtime/mwbbuf.go
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7419bd2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/runtime/mwbbuf.go
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+// Copyright 2017 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
+// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+// This implements the write barrier buffer. The write barrier itself
+// is gcWriteBarrier and is implemented in assembly.
+//
+// See mbarrier.go for algorithmic details on the write barrier. This
+// file deals only with the buffer.
+//
+// The write barrier has a fast path and a slow path. The fast path
+// simply enqueues to a per-P write barrier buffer. It's written in
+// assembly and doesn't clobber any general purpose registers, so it
+// doesn't have the usual overheads of a Go call.
+//
+// When the buffer fills up, the write barrier invokes the slow path
+// (wbBufFlush) to flush the buffer to the GC work queues. In this
+// path, since the compiler didn't spill registers, we spill *all*
+// registers and disallow any GC safe points that could observe the
+// stack frame (since we don't know the types of the spilled
+// registers).
+
+package runtime
+
+import (
+	"internal/goarch"
+	"runtime/internal/atomic"
+	"unsafe"
+)
+
+// testSmallBuf forces a small write barrier buffer to stress write
+// barrier flushing.
+const testSmallBuf = false
+
+// wbBuf is a per-P buffer of pointers queued by the write barrier.
+// This buffer is flushed to the GC workbufs when it fills up and on
+// various GC transitions.
+//
+// This is closely related to a "sequential store buffer" (SSB),
+// except that SSBs are usually used for maintaining remembered sets,
+// while this is used for marking.
+type wbBuf struct {
+	// next points to the next slot in buf. It must not be a
+	// pointer type because it can point past the end of buf and
+	// must be updated without write barriers.
+	//
+	// This is a pointer rather than an index to optimize the
+	// write barrier assembly.
+	next uintptr
+
+	// end points to just past the end of buf. It must not be a
+	// pointer type because it points past the end of buf and must
+	// be updated without write barriers.
+	end uintptr
+
+	// buf stores a series of pointers to execute write barriers on.
+	buf [wbBufEntries]uintptr
+}
+
+const (
+	// wbBufEntries is the maximum number of pointers that can be
+	// stored in the write barrier buffer.
+	//
+	// This trades latency for throughput amortization. Higher
+	// values amortize flushing overhead more, but increase the
+	// latency of flushing. Higher values also increase the cache
+	// footprint of the buffer.
+	//
+	// TODO: What is the latency cost of this? Tune this value.
+	wbBufEntries = 512
+
+	// Maximum number of entries that we need to ask from the
+	// buffer in a single call.
+	wbMaxEntriesPerCall = 8
+)
+
+// reset empties b by resetting its next and end pointers.
+func (b *wbBuf) reset() {
+	start := uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&b.buf[0]))
+	b.next = start
+	if testSmallBuf {
+		// For testing, make the buffer smaller but more than
+		// 1 write barrier's worth, so it tests both the
+		// immediate flush and delayed flush cases.
+		b.end = uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&b.buf[wbMaxEntriesPerCall+1]))
+	} else {
+		b.end = start + uintptr(len(b.buf))*unsafe.Sizeof(b.buf[0])
+	}
+
+	if (b.end-b.next)%unsafe.Sizeof(b.buf[0]) != 0 {
+		throw("bad write barrier buffer bounds")
+	}
+}
+
+// discard resets b's next pointer, but not its end pointer.
+//
+// This must be nosplit because it's called by wbBufFlush.
+//
+//go:nosplit
+func (b *wbBuf) discard() {
+	b.next = uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&b.buf[0]))
+}
+
+// empty reports whether b contains no pointers.
+func (b *wbBuf) empty() bool {
+	return b.next == uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&b.buf[0]))
+}
+
+// getX returns space in the write barrier buffer to store X pointers.
+// getX will flush the buffer if necessary. Callers should use this as:
+//
+//	buf := &getg().m.p.ptr().wbBuf
+//	p := buf.get2()
+//	p[0], p[1] = old, new
+//	... actual memory write ...
+//
+// The caller must ensure there are no preemption points during the
+// above sequence. There must be no preemption points while buf is in
+// use because it is a per-P resource. There must be no preemption
+// points between the buffer put and the write to memory because this
+// could allow a GC phase change, which could result in missed write
+// barriers.
+//
+// getX must be nowritebarrierrec to because write barriers here would
+// corrupt the write barrier buffer. It (and everything it calls, if
+// it called anything) has to be nosplit to avoid scheduling on to a
+// different P and a different buffer.
+//
+//go:nowritebarrierrec
+//go:nosplit
+func (b *wbBuf) get1() *[1]uintptr {
+	if b.next+goarch.PtrSize > b.end {
+		wbBufFlush()
+	}
+	p := (*[1]uintptr)(unsafe.Pointer(b.next))
+	b.next += goarch.PtrSize
+	return p
+}
+
+//go:nowritebarrierrec
+//go:nosplit
+func (b *wbBuf) get2() *[2]uintptr {
+	if b.next+2*goarch.PtrSize > b.end {
+		wbBufFlush()
+	}
+	p := (*[2]uintptr)(unsafe.Pointer(b.next))
+	b.next += 2 * goarch.PtrSize
+	return p
+}
+
+// wbBufFlush flushes the current P's write barrier buffer to the GC
+// workbufs.
+//
+// This must not have write barriers because it is part of the write
+// barrier implementation.
+//
+// This and everything it calls must be nosplit because 1) the stack
+// contains untyped slots from gcWriteBarrier and 2) there must not be
+// a GC safe point between the write barrier test in the caller and
+// flushing the buffer.
+//
+// TODO: A "go:nosplitrec" annotation would be perfect for this.
+//
+//go:nowritebarrierrec
+//go:nosplit
+func wbBufFlush() {
+	// Note: Every possible return from this function must reset
+	// the buffer's next pointer to prevent buffer overflow.
+
+	if getg().m.dying > 0 {
+		// We're going down. Not much point in write barriers
+		// and this way we can allow write barriers in the
+		// panic path.
+		getg().m.p.ptr().wbBuf.discard()
+		return
+	}
+
+	// Switch to the system stack so we don't have to worry about
+	// safe points.
+	systemstack(func() {
+		wbBufFlush1(getg().m.p.ptr())
+	})
+}
+
+// wbBufFlush1 flushes p's write barrier buffer to the GC work queue.
+//
+// This must not have write barriers because it is part of the write
+// barrier implementation, so this may lead to infinite loops or
+// buffer corruption.
+//
+// This must be non-preemptible because it uses the P's workbuf.
+//
+//go:nowritebarrierrec
+//go:systemstack
+func wbBufFlush1(pp *p) {
+	// Get the buffered pointers.
+	start := uintptr(unsafe.Pointer(&pp.wbBuf.buf[0]))
+	n := (pp.wbBuf.next - start) / unsafe.Sizeof(pp.wbBuf.buf[0])
+	ptrs := pp.wbBuf.buf[:n]
+
+	// Poison the buffer to make extra sure nothing is enqueued
+	// while we're processing the buffer.
+	pp.wbBuf.next = 0
+
+	if useCheckmark {
+		// Slow path for checkmark mode.
+		for _, ptr := range ptrs {
+			shade(ptr)
+		}
+		pp.wbBuf.reset()
+		return
+	}
+
+	// Mark all of the pointers in the buffer and record only the
+	// pointers we greyed. We use the buffer itself to temporarily
+	// record greyed pointers.
+	//
+	// TODO: Should scanobject/scanblock just stuff pointers into
+	// the wbBuf? Then this would become the sole greying path.
+	//
+	// TODO: We could avoid shading any of the "new" pointers in
+	// the buffer if the stack has been shaded, or even avoid
+	// putting them in the buffer at all (which would double its
+	// capacity). This is slightly complicated with the buffer; we
+	// could track whether any un-shaded goroutine has used the
+	// buffer, or just track globally whether there are any
+	// un-shaded stacks and flush after each stack scan.
+	gcw := &pp.gcw
+	pos := 0
+	for _, ptr := range ptrs {
+		if ptr < minLegalPointer {
+			// nil pointers are very common, especially
+			// for the "old" values. Filter out these and
+			// other "obvious" non-heap pointers ASAP.
+			//
+			// TODO: Should we filter out nils in the fast
+			// path to reduce the rate of flushes?
+			continue
+		}
+		obj, span, objIndex := findObject(ptr, 0, 0)
+		if obj == 0 {
+			continue
+		}
+		// TODO: Consider making two passes where the first
+		// just prefetches the mark bits.
+		mbits := span.markBitsForIndex(objIndex)
+		if mbits.isMarked() {
+			continue
+		}
+		mbits.setMarked()
+
+		// Mark span.
+		arena, pageIdx, pageMask := pageIndexOf(span.base())
+		if arena.pageMarks[pageIdx]&pageMask == 0 {
+			atomic.Or8(&arena.pageMarks[pageIdx], pageMask)
+		}
+
+		if span.spanclass.noscan() {
+			gcw.bytesMarked += uint64(span.elemsize)
+			continue
+		}
+		ptrs[pos] = obj
+		pos++
+	}
+
+	// Enqueue the greyed objects.
+	gcw.putBatch(ptrs[:pos])
+
+	pp.wbBuf.reset()
+}