summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-06-03 05:11:10 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-06-03 05:11:10 +0000
commitcff6d757e3ba609c08ef2aaa00f07e53551e5bf6 (patch)
tree08c4fc3255483ad397d712edb4214ded49149fd9 /dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt
parentAdding upstream version 2.9.7. (diff)
downloadhaproxy-cff6d757e3ba609c08ef2aaa00f07e53551e5bf6.tar.xz
haproxy-cff6d757e3ba609c08ef2aaa00f07e53551e5bf6.zip
Adding upstream version 3.0.0.upstream/3.0.0
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt')
-rw-r--r--dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt28
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9906132
--- /dev/null
+++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+
+### Instruction:
+
+You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much
+as you can, responding to a single question using a single response.
+
+The developer wants to know if he needs to backport the patch above to fix
+maintenance branches, for which branches, and what possible dependencies might
+be mentioned in the commit message. Carefully study the commit message and its
+backporting instructions if any (otherwise it should probably not be backported),
+then provide a very concise and short summary that will help the developer decide
+to backport it, or simply to skip it.
+
+Start by explaining in one or two sentences what you recommend for this one and why.
+Finally, based on your analysis, give your general conclusion as "Conclusion: X"
+where X is a single word among:
+ - "yes", if you recommend to backport the patch right now either because
+ it explicitly states this or because it's a fix for a bug that affects
+ a maintenance branch (2.8 or lower);
+ - "wait", if this patch explicitly mentions that it must be backported, but
+ only after waiting some time.
+ - "no", if nothing clearly indicates a necessity to backport this patch (e.g.
+ lack of explicit backport instructions, or it's just an improvement);
+ - "uncertain" otherwise for cases not covered above
+
+### Response:
+
+Explanation: