From cff6d757e3ba609c08ef2aaa00f07e53551e5bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 07:11:10 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 3.0.0. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- dev/patchbot/README | 395 +++++++++++++++++++++ dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-airo14-pfx.txt | 70 ++++ dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-pfx.txt | 68 ++++ dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt | 28 ++ dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-pfx.txt | 67 ++++ dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-sfx.txt | 28 ++ dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-mist7b-sfx.txt | 29 ++ dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-pfx.txt | 70 ++++ dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-sfx.txt | 29 ++ dev/patchbot/scripts/post-ai.sh | 372 +++++++++++++++++++ dev/patchbot/scripts/process-patch-v15.sh | 63 ++++ dev/patchbot/scripts/submit-ai.sh | 79 +++++ dev/patchbot/scripts/update-3.0.sh | 66 ++++ 13 files changed, 1364 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/README create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-airo14-pfx.txt create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-pfx.txt create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-pfx.txt create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-sfx.txt create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-mist7b-sfx.txt create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-pfx.txt create mode 100644 dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-sfx.txt create mode 100755 dev/patchbot/scripts/post-ai.sh create mode 100755 dev/patchbot/scripts/process-patch-v15.sh create mode 100755 dev/patchbot/scripts/submit-ai.sh create mode 100755 dev/patchbot/scripts/update-3.0.sh (limited to 'dev/patchbot') diff --git a/dev/patchbot/README b/dev/patchbot/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a645cc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/README @@ -0,0 +1,395 @@ +Patchbot: AI bot making use of Natural Language Processing to suggest backports +=============================================================== 2023-12-18 ==== + + +Background +---------- + +Selecting patches to backport from the development branch is a tedious task, in +part due to the abundance of patches and the fact that many bug fixes are for +that same version and not for backporting. The more it gets delayed, the harder +it becomes, and the harder it is to start, the less likely it gets started. The +urban legend along which one "just" has to do that periodically doesn't work +because certain patches need to be left hanging for a while under observation, +others need to be merged urgently, and for some, the person in charge of the +backport might simply need an opinion from the patch's author or the affected +subsystem maintainer, and this cannot make the whole backport process stall. + +The information needed to figure if a patch needs to be backported is present +in the commit message, with varying nuances such as "may", "may not", "should", +"probably", "shouldn't unless", "keep under observation" etc. One particularly +that is specific to backports is that the opinion on a patch may change over +time, either because it was later found to be wrong or insufficient, or because +the former analysis mistakenly suggested to backport or not to. + +This means that the person in charge of the backports has to read the whole +commit message for each patch, to figure the backporting instructions, and this +takes a while. + +Several attempts were made over the years to try to partially automate this +task, including the cherry-pick mode of the "git-show-backports" utility that +eases navigation back-and-forth between commits. + +Lately, a lot of progress was made in the domain of Natural Language +Understanding (NLU) and more generally Natural Language Processing (NLP). Since +the first attempts in early 2023 involving successive layers of the Roberta +model, called from totally unreliable Python code, and December 2023, the +situation evolved from promising but unusable to mostly autonomous. + +For those interested in history, the first attempts in early 2023 involved +successive layers of the Roberta model, but these were relying on totally +unreliable Python code that broke all the time and could barely be transferred +to another machine without upgrading or downgrading the installed modules, and +it used to use huge amounts of resources for a somewhat disappointing result: +the verdicts were correct roughly 60-70% of the time, it was not possible to +get hints such as "wait" nor even "uncertain". It could just be qualified as +promising. Another big limitation was the limit to 256 tokens, forcing the +script to select only the last few lines of the commit message to take the +decision. Roughly at the same time, in March 2023 Meta issued their much larger +LLaMa model, and Georgi Gerganov released "llama.cpp", an open-source C++ +engine that loads and runs such large models without all the usual problems +inherent to the Python ecosystem. New attempts were made with LLaMa and it was +already much better than Roberta, but the output was difficult to parse, and it +required to be combined with the final decision layer of Roberta. Then new +variants of LLaMa appeared such as Alpaca, which follows instructions, but +tends to forget them if given before the patch, then Vicuna which was pretty +reliable but very slow at 33B size and difficult to tune, then Airoboros, +which was the first one to give very satisfying results in a reasonable time, +following instructions reasonably closely with a stable output, but with +sometimes surprising analysis and contradictions. It was already about 90% +reliable and considered as a time saver in 13B size. Other models were later +tried as they appeared such as OpenChat-3.5, Juna, OpenInstruct, Orca-2, +Mistral-0.1 and it variants Neural and OpenHermes-2.5. Mistral showed an +unrivaled understanding despite being smaller and much faster than other ones, +but was a bit freewheeling regarding instructions. Dolphin-2.1 rebased on top +of it gave extremely satisfying results, with less variations in the output +format, but still the script had difficulties trying to catch its conclusion +from time to time, though it was pretty much readable for the human in charge +of the task. And finally just before releasing, Mistral-0.2 was released and +addressed all issues, with a human-like understanding and perfectly obeying +instructions, providing an extremely stable output format that is easy to parse +from simple scripts. The decisions now match the human's ones in close to 100% +of the patches, unless the human is aware of extra context, of course. + + +Architecture +------------ + +The current solution relies on the llama.cpp engine, which is a simple, fast, +reliable and portable engine to load models and run inference, and the +Mistral-0.2 LLM. + +A collection of patches is built from the development branch since the -dev0 +tag, and for each of them, the engine is called to evaluate the developer's +intent based on the commit message. A detailed context explaining the haproxy +maintenance model and what the user wants is passed, then the LLM is invited to +provide its opinion on the need for a backport and an explanation of the reason +for its choice. This often helps the user to find a quick summary about the +patch. All these outputs are then converted to a long HTML page with colors and +radio buttons, where patches are pre-selected based on this classification, +that the user can consult and adjust, read the commits if needed, and the +selected patches finally provide some copy-pastable commands in a text-area to +select commit IDs to work on, typically in a form that's suitable for a simple +"git cherry-pick -sx". + +The scripts are designed to be able to run on a headless machine, called from a +crontab and with the output served from a static HTTP server. + +The code is currently found from Georgi Gerganov's repository: + + https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp + +Tag b1505 is known to work fine, and uses the GGUF file format. + +The model(s) can be found on Hugging Face user "TheBloke"'s collection of +models: + + https://huggingface.co/TheBloke + +Model Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2-GGUF quantized at Q5K_M is known to work well +with the llama.cpp version above. + + +Deployment +---------- + +Note: it is a good idea to start to download the model(s) in the background as + such files are typically 5 GB or more and can take some time to download + depending on the internet bandwidth. + +It seems reasonable to create a dedicated user to periodically run this task. +Let's call it "patchbot". Developers should be able to easily run a shell from +this user to perform some maintenance or testing (e.g. "sudo"). + +All paths are specified in the example "update-3.0.sh" script, and assume a +deployment in the user's home, so this is what is being described here. The +proposed deployment layout is the following: + + $HOME (e.g. /home/patchbot) + | + +- data + | | + | +-- models # GGUF files from TheBloke's collection + | | + | +-- prompts # prompt*-pfx*, prompt*-sfx*, cache + | | + | +-- in + | | | + | | +-- haproxy # haproxy Git repo + | | | + | | +-- patches-3.0 # patches from development branch 3.0 + | | + | +-- out # report directory (HTML) + | + +- prog + | | + | +-- bin # program(s) + | | + | +-- scripts # processing scripts + | | + | +-- llama.cpp # llama Git repository + + +- Let's first create the structure: + + mkdir -p ~/data/{in,models,prompts} ~/prog/{bin,scripts} + +- data/in/haproxy must contain a clone of the haproxy development tree that + will periodically be pulled from: + + cd ~/data/in + git clone https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy + cd ~ + +- The prompt files are a copy of haproxy's "dev/patchbot/prompt/" subdirectory. + The prompt files are per-version because they contain references to the + haproxy development version number. For each prompt, there is a prefix + ("-pfx"), that is loaded before the patch, and a suffix ("-sfx") that + precises the user's expectations after reading the patch. For best efficiency + it's useful to place most of the explanation in the prefix and the least + possible in the suffix, because the prefix is cacheable. Different models + will use different instructions formats and different explanations, so it's + fine to keep a collection of prompts and use only one. Different instruction + formats are commonly used, "llama-2", "alpaca", "vicuna", "chatml" being + common. When experimenting with a new model, just copy-paste the closest one + and tune it for best results. Since we already cloned haproxy above, we'll + take the files from there: + + cp ~/data/in/haproxy/dev/patchbot/prompt/*txt ~/data/prompts/ + + Upon first run, a cache file will be produced in this directory by parsing + an empty file and saving the current model's context. The cache file will + automatically be deleted and rebuilt if it is absent or older than the prefix + or suffix file. The cache files are specific to a model so when experimenting + with other models, be sure not to reuse the same cache file, or in doubt, + just delete them. Rebuilding the cache file typically takes around 2 minutes + of processing on a 8-core machine. + +- The model(s) from TheBloke's Hugging Face account have to be downloaded in + GGUF file format, quantized at Q5K_M, and stored as-is into data/models/. + +- data/in/patches-3.0/ is where the "mk-patch-list.sh" script will emit the + patches corresponding to new commits in the development branch. Its suffix + must match the name of the current development branch for patches to be found + there. In addition, the classification of the patches will be emitted there + next to the input patches, with the same name as the original file with a + suffix indicating what model/prompt combination was used. + + mkdir -p ~/data/in/patches-3.0 + +- data/out is where the final report will be emitted. If running on a headless + machine, it is worth making sure that this directory is accessible from a + static web server. Thus either create a directory and place a symlink or + configuration somewhere in the web server's settings to reference this + location, or make it a symlink to another place already exported by the web + server and make sure the user has the permissions to write there. + + mkdir -p ~/data/out + + On Ubuntu-20.04 it was found that the package "micro-httpd" works out of the + box serving /var/www/html and follows symlinks. As such this is sufficient to + expose the reports: + + sudo ln -s ~patchbot/data/out /var/www/html/patchbot + +- prog/bin will contain the executable(s) needed to operate, namely "main" from + llama.cpp: + + mkdir -p ~/prog/bin + +- prog/llama.cpp is a clone of the "llama.cpp" GitHub repository. As of + december 2023, the project has improved its forward compatibility and it's + generally both safe and recommended to stay on the last version, hence to + just clone the master branch. In case of difficulties, tag b1505 was proven + to work well with the aforementioned model. Building is done by default for + the local platform, optimised for speed with native CPU. + + mkdir -p ~/prog + cd ~/prog + git clone https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cpp + [ only in case of problems: cd llama.cpp && git checkout b1505 ] + + make -j$(nproc) main LLAMA_FAST=1 + cp main ~/prog/bin/ + cd ~ + +- prog/scripts needs the following scripts: + - mk-patch-list.sh from haproxy's scripts/ subdirectory + - submit-ai.sh, process-*.sh, post-ai.sh, update-*.sh + + cp ~/data/in/haproxy/scripts/mk-patch-list.sh ~/prog/scripts/ + cp ~/data/in/haproxy/dev/patchbot/scripts/*.sh ~/prog/scripts/ + + - verify that the various paths in update-3.0.sh match your choices, or + adjust them: + + vi ~/prog/scripts/update-3.0.sh + + - the tool is memory-bound, so a machine with more memory channels and/or + very fast memory will usually be faster than a higher CPU count with a + lower memory bandwidth. In addition, the performance is not linear with + the number of cores and experimentation shows that efficiency drops above + 8 threads. For this reason the script integrates a "PARALLEL_RUNS" variable + indicating how many instances to run in parallel, each on its own patch. + This allows to make better use of the CPUs and memory bandwidth. Setting + 2 instances for 8 cores / 16 threads gives optimal results on dual memory + channel systems. + +From this point, executing this update script manually should work and produce +the result. Count around 0.5-2 mn per patch on a 8-core machine, so it can be +reasonably fast during the early development stages (before -dev1) but +unbearably long later, where it can make more sense to run it at night. It +should not report any error and should only report the total execution time. + +If interrupted (Ctrl-C, logout, out of memory etc), check for incomplete .txt +files in ~/data/in/patches*/ that can result from this interruption, and delete +them because they will not be reproduced: + + ls -lart ~/data/in/patches-3.0/*.txt + ls -lS ~/data/in/patches-3.0/*.txt + +Once the output is produced, visit ~/data/out/ using a web browser and check +that the table loads correctly. Note that after a new release or a series of +backports, the table may appear empty, it's just because all known patches are +already backported and collapsed by default. Clicking on "All" at the top left +will unhide them. + +Finally when satisfied, place it in a crontab, for example, run every hour: + + crontab -e + + # m h dom mon dow command + # run every hour at minute 02 + 2 * * * * /home/patchbot/update-3.0.sh + + +Usage +----- + +Using the HTML output is a bit rustic but efficient. The interface is split in +5 columns from left to right: + + - first column: patch number from 1 to N, just to ease navigation. Below the + number appears a radio button which allows to mark this patch as the start + of the review. When clicked, all prior patches disappear and are not listed + anymore. This can be undone by clicking on the radio button under the "All" + word in this column's header. + + + - second column: commit ID (abbreviated "CID" in the header). It's a 8-digit + shortened representation of the commit ID. It's presented as a link, which, + if clicked, will directly show that commit from the haproxy public + repository. Below the commit ID is the patch's author date in condensed + format "DD-MmmYY", e.g. "18-Dec23" for "18th December 2023". It was found + that having a date indication sometimes helps differentiate certain related + patches. + + - third column: "Subject", this is the subject of the patch, prefixed with + the 4-digit number matching the file name in the directory (e.g. helps to + remove or reprocess one if needed). This is also a link to the same commit + in the haproxy's public repository. At the lower right under the subject + is the shortened e-mail address (only user@domain keeping only the first + part of the domain, e.g. "foo@haproxy"). Just like with the date, it helps + figuring what to expect after a recent discussion with a developer. + + - fourth column: "Verdict". This column contains 4 radio buttons prefiguring + the choice for this patch between "N" for "No", represented in gray (this + patch should not be backported, let's drop it), "U" for "Uncertain" in + green (still unsure about it, most likely the author should be contacted), + "W" for "Wait" in blue (this patch should be backported but not + immediately, only after it has spent some time in the development branch), + and "Y" for "Yes" in red (this patch must be backported, let's pick it). + The choice is preselected by the scripts above, and since these are radio + buttons, the user is free to change this selection. Reloading will lose the + user's choices. When changing a selection, the line's background changes to + match a similar color tone, allowing to visually spot preselected patches. + + - fifth column: reason for the choice. The scripts try to provide an + explanation for the choice of the preselection, and try to always end with + a conclusion among "yes", "no", "wait", "uncertain". The explanation + usually fits in 2-4 lines and is faster to read than a whole commit message + and very often pretty accurate. It's also been noticed that Mistral-v0.2 + shows much less hallucinations than others (it doesn't seem to invent + information that was not part of its input), so seeing certain topics being + discussed there generally indicate that they were in the original commit + message. The scripts try to emphasize the sensitive parts of the commit + message such as risks, dependencies, referenced issues, oldest version to + backport to, etc. Elements that look like issues numbers and commit IDs are + turned to links to ease navigation. + +In addition, in order to improve readability, the top of the table shows 4 +buttons allowing to show/hide each category. For example, when trying to focus +only on "uncertain" and "wait", it can make sense to hide "N" and "Y" and click +"Y" or "N" on the displayed ones until there is none anymore. + +In order to reduce the risk of missing a misqualified patch, those marked "BUG" +or "DOC" are displayed in bold even if tagged "No". It has been shown to be +sufficient to catch the eye when scrolling and encouraging to re-visit them. + +More importantly, the script will try to also check which patches were already +backported to the previous stable version. Those that were backported will have +the first two columns colored gray, and by default, the review will start from +the first patch after the last backported one. This explains why just after a +backport, the table may appear empty with only the footer "New" checked. + +Finally, at the bottom of the table is an editable, copy-pastable text area +that is redrawn at each click. It contains a series of 4 shell commands that +can be copy-pasted at once and assign commit IDs to 4 variables, one per +category. Most often only "y" will be of interest, so for example if the +review process ends with: + + cid_y=( 7dab3e82 456ba6e9 75f5977f 917f7c74 ) + +Then copy-pasting it in a terminal already in the haproxy-2.9 directory and +issuing: + + git cherry-pick -sx ${cid_y[@]} + +Will result in all these patches to be backported to that version. + + +Criticisms +---------- + +The interface is absolutely ugly but gets the job done. Proposals to revamp it +are welcome, provided that they do not alter usability and portability (e.g. +the ability to open the locally produced file without requiring access to an +external server). + + +Thanks +------ + +This utility is the proof that boringly repetitive tasks that can be offloaded +from humans can save their time to do more productive things. This work which +started with extremely limited tools was made possible thanks to Meta, for +opening their models after leaking it, Georgi Gerganov and the community that +developed around llama.cpp, for creating the first really open engine that +builds out of the box and just works, contrary to the previous crippled Python- +only ecosystem, Tom Jobbins (aka TheBloke) for making it so easy to discover +new models every day by simply quantizing all of them and making them available +from a single location, MistralAI for producing an exceptionally good model +that surpasses all others, is the first one to feel as smart and accurate as a +real human on such tasks, is fast, and totally free, and of course, HAProxy +Technologies for investing some time on this and for the available hardware +that permits a lot of experimentation. diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-airo14-pfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-airo14-pfx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2f3fde2 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-airo14-pfx.txt @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +BEGININPUT +BEGINCONTEXT + +HAProxy's development cycle consists in one development branch, and multiple +maintenance branches. + +All the development is made into the development branch exclusively. This +includes mostly new features, doc updates, cleanups and or course, fixes. + +The maintenance branches, also called stable branches, never see any +development, and only receive ultra-safe fixes for bugs that affect them, +that are picked from the development branch. + +Branches are numbered in 0.1 increments. Every 6 months, upon a new major +release, the development branch enters maintenance and a new development branch +is created with a new, higher version. The current development branch is +2.9-dev, and maintenance branches are 2.8 and below. + +Fixes created in the development branch for issues that were introduced in an +earlier branch are applied in descending order to each and every version till +that branch that introduced the issue: 2.8 first, then 2.7, then 2.6 and so +on. This operation is called "backporting". A fix for an issue is never +backported beyond the branch that introduced the issue. An important point is +that the project maintainers really aim at zero regression in maintenance +branches, so they're never willing to take any risk backporting patches that +are not deemed strictly necessary. + +Fixes consist of patches managed using the Git version control tool and are +identified by a Git commit ID and a commit message. For this reason we +indistinctly talk about backporting fixes, commits, or patches; all mean the +same thing. When mentioning commit IDs, developers always use a short form +made of the first 8 characters only, and expect the AI assistant to do the +same. + +It seldom happens that some fixes depend on changes that were brought by other +patches that were not in some branches and that will need to be backported as +well for the fix to work. In this case, such information is explicitly provided +in the commit message by the patch's author in natural language. + +Developers are serious and always indicate if a patch needs to be backported. +Sometimes they omit the exact target branch, or they will say that the patch is +"needed" in some older branch, but it means the same. If a commit message +doesn't mention any backport instructions, it means that the commit does not +have to be backported. And patches that are not strictly bug fixes nor doc +improvements are normally not backported. For example, fixes for design +limitations, architectural improvements and performance optimizations are +considered too risky for a backport. Finally, all bug fixes are tagged as +"BUG" at the beginning of their subject line. Patches that are not tagged as +such are not bugs, and must never be backported unless their commit message +explicitly requests so. + +ENDCONTEXT + +A developer is reviewing the development branch, trying to spot which commits +need to be backported to maintenance branches. This person is already expert +on HAProxy and everything related to Git, patch management, and the risks +associated with backports, so he doesn't want to be told how to proceed nor to +review the contents of the patch. + +The goal for this developer is to get some help from the AI assistant to save +some precious time on this tedious review work. In order to do a better job, he +needs an accurate summary of the information and instructions found in each +commit message. Specifically he needs to figure if the patch fixes a problem +affecting an older branch or not, if it needs to be backported, if so to which +branches, and if other patches need to be backported along with it. + +The indented text block below after an "id" line and starting with a Subject line +is a commit message from the HAProxy development branch that describes a patch +applied to that branch, starting with its subject line, please read it carefully. + diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-pfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-pfx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cabe7f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-pfx.txt @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +### Instruction: + +HAProxy's development cycle consists in one development branch, and multiple +maintenance branches. + +All the development is made into the development branch exclusively. This +includes mostly new features, doc updates, cleanups and or course, fixes. + +The maintenance branches, also called stable branches, never see any +development, and only receive ultra-safe fixes for bugs that affect them, +that are picked from the development branch. + +Branches are numbered in 0.1 increments. Every 6 months, upon a new major +release, the development branch enters maintenance and a new development branch +is created with a new, higher version. The current development branch is +2.9-dev, and maintenance branches are 2.8 and below. + +Fixes created in the development branch for issues that were introduced in an +earlier branch are applied in descending order to each and every version till +that branch that introduced the issue: 2.8 first, then 2.7, then 2.6 and so +on. This operation is called "backporting". A fix for an issue is never +backported beyond the branch that introduced the issue. An important point is +that the project maintainers really aim at zero regression in maintenance +branches, so they're never willing to take any risk backporting patches that +are not deemed strictly necessary. + +Fixes consist of patches managed using the Git version control tool and are +identified by a Git commit ID and a commit message. For this reason we +indistinctly talk about backporting fixes, commits, or patches; all mean the +same thing. When mentioning commit IDs, developers always use a short form +made of the first 8 characters only, and expect the AI assistant to do the +same. + +It seldom happens that some fixes depend on changes that were brought by other +patches that were not in some branches and that will need to be backported as +well for the fix to work. In this case, such information is explicitly provided +in the commit message by the patch's author in natural language. + +Developers are serious and always indicate if a patch needs to be backported. +Sometimes they omit the exact target branch, or they will say that the patch is +"needed" in some older branch, but it means the same. If a commit message +doesn't mention any backport instructions, it means that the commit does not +have to be backported. And patches that are not strictly bug fixes nor doc +improvements are normally not backported. For example, fixes for design +limitations, architectural improvements and performance optimizations are +considered too risky for a backport. Finally, all bug fixes are tagged as +"BUG" at the beginning of their subject line. Patches that are not tagged as +such are not bugs, and must never be backported unless their commit message +explicitly requests so. + +A developer is reviewing the development branch, trying to spot which commits +need to be backported to maintenance branches. This person is already expert +on HAProxy and everything related to Git, patch management, and the risks +associated with backports, so he doesn't want to be told how to proceed nor to +review the contents of the patch. + +The goal for this developer is to get some help from the AI assistant to save +some precious time on this tedious review work. In order to do a better job, he +needs an accurate summary of the information and instructions found in each +commit message. Specifically he needs to figure if the patch fixes a problem +affecting an older branch or not, if it needs to be backported, if so to which +branches, and if other patches need to be backported along with it. + +The indented text block below after an "id" line and starting with a Subject line +is a commit message from the HAProxy development branch that describes a patch +applied to that branch, starting with its subject line, please read it carefully. + +### Input: diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9906132 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-alpaca-sfx.txt @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ + +### Instruction: + +You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much +as you can, responding to a single question using a single response. + +The developer wants to know if he needs to backport the patch above to fix +maintenance branches, for which branches, and what possible dependencies might +be mentioned in the commit message. Carefully study the commit message and its +backporting instructions if any (otherwise it should probably not be backported), +then provide a very concise and short summary that will help the developer decide +to backport it, or simply to skip it. + +Start by explaining in one or two sentences what you recommend for this one and why. +Finally, based on your analysis, give your general conclusion as "Conclusion: X" +where X is a single word among: + - "yes", if you recommend to backport the patch right now either because + it explicitly states this or because it's a fix for a bug that affects + a maintenance branch (2.8 or lower); + - "wait", if this patch explicitly mentions that it must be backported, but + only after waiting some time. + - "no", if nothing clearly indicates a necessity to backport this patch (e.g. + lack of explicit backport instructions, or it's just an improvement); + - "uncertain" otherwise for cases not covered above + +### Response: + +Explanation: diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-pfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-pfx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c35138e --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-pfx.txt @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +<|im_start|>system +HAProxy's development cycle consists in one development branch, and multiple +maintenance branches. + +All the development is made into the development branch exclusively. This +includes mostly new features, doc updates, cleanups and or course, fixes. + +The maintenance branches, also called stable branches, never see any +development, and only receive ultra-safe fixes for bugs that affect them, +that are picked from the development branch. + +Branches are numbered in 0.1 increments. Every 6 months, upon a new major +release, the development branch enters maintenance and a new development branch +is created with a new, higher version. The current development branch is +2.9-dev, and maintenance branches are 2.8 and below. + +Fixes created in the development branch for issues that were introduced in an +earlier branch are applied in descending order to each and every version till +that branch that introduced the issue: 2.8 first, then 2.7, then 2.6 and so +on. This operation is called "backporting". A fix for an issue is never +backported beyond the branch that introduced the issue. An important point is +that the project maintainers really aim at zero regression in maintenance +branches, so they're never willing to take any risk backporting patches that +are not deemed strictly necessary. + +Fixes consist of patches managed using the Git version control tool and are +identified by a Git commit ID and a commit message. For this reason we +indistinctly talk about backporting fixes, commits, or patches; all mean the +same thing. When mentioning commit IDs, developers always use a short form +made of the first 8 characters only, and expect the AI assistant to do the +same. + +It seldom happens that some fixes depend on changes that were brought by other +patches that were not in some branches and that will need to be backported as +well for the fix to work. In this case, such information is explicitly provided +in the commit message by the patch's author in natural language. + +Developers are serious and always indicate if a patch needs to be backported. +Sometimes they omit the exact target branch, or they will say that the patch is +"needed" in some older branch, but it means the same. If a commit message +doesn't mention any backport instructions, it means that the commit does not +have to be backported. And patches that are not strictly bug fixes nor doc +improvements are normally not backported. For example, fixes for design +limitations, architectural improvements and performance optimizations are +considered too risky for a backport. Finally, all bug fixes are tagged as +"BUG" at the beginning of their subject line. Patches that are not tagged as +such are not bugs, and must never be backported unless their commit message +explicitly requests so. + +A developer is reviewing the development branch, trying to spot which commits +need to be backported to maintenance branches. This person is already expert +on HAProxy and everything related to Git, patch management, and the risks +associated with backports, so he doesn't want to be told how to proceed nor to +review the contents of the patch. + +The goal for this developer is to get some help from the AI assistant to save +some precious time on this tedious review work. In order to do a better job, he +needs an accurate summary of the information and instructions found in each +commit message. Specifically he needs to figure if the patch fixes a problem +affecting an older branch or not, if it needs to be backported, if so to which +branches, and if other patches need to be backported along with it. + +The indented text block below after an "id" line and starting with a Subject line +is a commit message from the HAProxy development branch that describes a patch +applied to that branch, starting with its subject line, please read it carefully. +<|im_end|> +<|im_start|>user diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-sfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-sfx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..31e26d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-chatml-sfx.txt @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +<|im_end|> +<|im_start|>system + +You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much +as you can, responding to a single question using a single response. + +The developer wants to know if he needs to backport the patch above to fix +maintenance branches, for which branches, and what possible dependencies might +be mentioned in the commit message. Carefully study the commit message and its +backporting instructions if any (otherwise it should probably not be backported), +then provide a very concise and short summary that will help the developer decide +to backport it, or simply to skip it. + +Start by explaining in one or two sentences what you recommend for this one and why. +Finally, based on your analysis, give your general conclusion as "Conclusion: X" +where X is a single word among: + - "yes", if you recommend to backport the patch right now either because + it explicitly states this or because it's a fix for a bug that affects + a maintenance branch (2.8 or lower); + - "wait", if this patch explicitly mentions that it must be backported, but + only after waiting some time. + - "no", if nothing clearly indicates a necessity to backport this patch (e.g. + lack of explicit backport instructions, or it's just an improvement); + - "uncertain" otherwise for cases not covered above +<|im_end|> +<|im_start|>assistant + +Explanation: diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-mist7b-sfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-mist7b-sfx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3d1b03b --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt14-2.9-mist7b-sfx.txt @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ + +ENDINPUT +BEGININSTRUCTION + +You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much +as you can, responding to a single question using a single response. + +The developer wants to know if he needs to backport the patch above to fix +maintenance branches, for which branches, and what possible dependencies might +be mentioned in the commit message. Carefully study the commit message and its +backporting instructions if any (otherwise it should probably not be backported), +then provide a very concise and short summary that will help the developer decide +to backport it, or simply to skip it. + +Start by explaining in one or two sentences what you recommend for this one and why. +Finally, based on your analysis, give your general conclusion as "Conclusion: X" +where X is a single word among: + - "yes", if you recommend to backport the patch right now either because + it explicitly states this or because it's a fix for a bug that affects + a maintenance branch (2.8 or lower); + - "wait", if this patch explicitly mentions that it must be backported, but + only after waiting some time. + - "no", if nothing clearly indicates a necessity to backport this patch (e.g. + lack of explicit backport instructions, or it's just an improvement); + - "uncertain" otherwise for cases not covered above + +ENDINSTRUCTION + +Explanation: diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-pfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-pfx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3120167 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-pfx.txt @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ +BEGININPUT +BEGINCONTEXT + +HAProxy's development cycle consists in one development branch, and multiple +maintenance branches. + +All the development is made into the development branch exclusively. This +includes mostly new features, doc updates, cleanups and or course, fixes. + +The maintenance branches, also called stable branches, never see any +development, and only receive ultra-safe fixes for bugs that affect them, +that are picked from the development branch. + +Branches are numbered in 0.1 increments. Every 6 months, upon a new major +release, the development branch enters maintenance and a new development branch +is created with a new, higher version. The current development branch is +3.1-dev, and maintenance branches are 3.0 and below. + +Fixes created in the development branch for issues that were introduced in an +earlier branch are applied in descending order to each and every version till +that branch that introduced the issue: 3.0 first, then 2.9, then 2.8 and so +on. This operation is called "backporting". A fix for an issue is never +backported beyond the branch that introduced the issue. An important point is +that the project maintainers really aim at zero regression in maintenance +branches, so they're never willing to take any risk backporting patches that +are not deemed strictly necessary. + +Fixes consist of patches managed using the Git version control tool and are +identified by a Git commit ID and a commit message. For this reason we +indistinctly talk about backporting fixes, commits, or patches; all mean the +same thing. When mentioning commit IDs, developers always use a short form +made of the first 8 characters only, and expect the AI assistant to do the +same. + +It seldom happens that some fixes depend on changes that were brought by other +patches that were not in some branches and that will need to be backported as +well for the fix to work. In this case, such information is explicitly provided +in the commit message by the patch's author in natural language. + +Developers are serious and always indicate if a patch needs to be backported. +Sometimes they omit the exact target branch, or they will say that the patch is +"needed" in some older branch, but it means the same. If a commit message +doesn't mention any backport instructions, it means that the commit does not +have to be backported. And patches that are not strictly bug fixes nor doc +improvements are normally not backported. For example, fixes for design +limitations, architectural improvements and performance optimizations are +considered too risky for a backport. Finally, all bug fixes are tagged as +"BUG" at the beginning of their subject line. Patches that are not tagged as +such are not bugs, and must never be backported unless their commit message +explicitly requests so. + +ENDCONTEXT + +A developer is reviewing the development branch, trying to spot which commits +need to be backported to maintenance branches. This person is already expert +on HAProxy and everything related to Git, patch management, and the risks +associated with backports, so he doesn't want to be told how to proceed nor to +review the contents of the patch. + +The goal for this developer is to get some help from the AI assistant to save +some precious time on this tedious review work. In order to do a better job, he +needs an accurate summary of the information and instructions found in each +commit message. Specifically he needs to figure if the patch fixes a problem +affecting an older branch or not, if it needs to be backported, if so to which +branches, and if other patches need to be backported along with it. + +The indented text block below after an "id" line and starting with a Subject line +is a commit message from the HAProxy development branch that describes a patch +applied to that branch, starting with its subject line, please read it carefully. + diff --git a/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-sfx.txt b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-sfx.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dd4280b --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/prompts/prompt15-3.1-mist7bv2-sfx.txt @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ + +ENDINPUT +BEGININSTRUCTION + +You are an AI assistant that follows instruction extremely well. Help as much +as you can, responding to a single question using a single response. + +The developer wants to know if he needs to backport the patch above to fix +maintenance branches, for which branches, and what possible dependencies might +be mentioned in the commit message. Carefully study the commit message and its +backporting instructions if any (otherwise it should probably not be backported), +then provide a very concise and short summary that will help the developer decide +to backport it, or simply to skip it. + +Start by explaining in one or two sentences what you recommend for this one and why. +Finally, based on your analysis, give your general conclusion as "Conclusion: X" +where X is a single word among: + - "yes", if you recommend to backport the patch right now either because + it explicitly states this or because it's a fix for a bug that affects + a maintenance branch (3.0 or lower); + - "wait", if this patch explicitly mentions that it must be backported, but + only after waiting some time. + - "no", if nothing clearly indicates a necessity to backport this patch (e.g. + lack of explicit backport instructions, or it's just an improvement); + - "uncertain" otherwise for cases not covered above + +ENDINSTRUCTION + +Explanation: diff --git a/dev/patchbot/scripts/post-ai.sh b/dev/patchbot/scripts/post-ai.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..7dba63a --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/scripts/post-ai.sh @@ -0,0 +1,372 @@ +#!/bin/bash + +#### +#### Todo: +#### - change line color based on the selected radio button +#### - support collapsing lines per color/category (show/hide for each) +#### - add category "next" and see if the prompt can handle that (eg: d3e379b3) +#### - produce multiple lists on output (per category) allowing to save batches +#### + +die() { + [ "$#" -eq 0 ] || echo "$*" >&2 + exit 1 +} + +err() { + echo "$*" >&2 +} + +quit() { + [ "$#" -eq 0 ] || echo "$*" + exit 0 +} + +#### Main + +USAGE="Usage: ${0##*/} [ -h ] [ -b 'bkp_list' ] patch..." +MYSELF="$0" +GITURL="http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy.git;a=commitdiff;h=" +ISSUES="https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/" +BKP="" + +while [ -n "$1" -a -z "${1##-*}" ]; do + case "$1" in + -h|--help) quit "$USAGE" ;; + -b) BKP="$2"; shift 2 ;; + *) die "$USAGE" ;; + esac +done + +PATCHES=( "$@" ) + +if [ ${#PATCHES[@]} = 0 ]; then + die "$USAGE" +fi + +# BKP is a space-delimited list of 8-char commit IDs, we'll +# assign them to the local bkp[] associative array. + +declare -A bkp + +for cid in $BKP; do + bkp[$cid]=1 +done + +# some colors +BG_B="#e0e0e0" +BT_N="gray"; BG_N="white" +BT_U="#00e000"; BG_U="#e0ffe0" +BT_W="#0060ff"; BG_W="#e0e0ff" +BT_Y="red"; BG_Y="#ffe0e0" + +echo "" + +cat <<- EOF + + + + +EOF + +echo "" +echo -n "Show:" +echo -n " B (${#bkp[*]}) " +echo -n " N (0) " +echo -n " U (0) " +echo -n " W (0) " +echo -n " Y (0) " +echo -n " (B=show backported, N=no/drop, U=uncertain, W=wait/next, Y=yes/pick" +echo ")

" + +echo "" +echo "" +seq_num=1; do_check=1; review=0; +for patch in "${PATCHES[@]}"; do + # try to retrieve the patch's numbering (0001-9999) + pnum="${patch##*/}" + pnum="${pnum%%[^0-9]*}" + + id=$(sed -ne 's/^#id: \(.*\)/\1/p' "$patch") + resp=$(grep -v ^llama "$patch" | sed -ne '/^Explanation:/,$p' | sed -z 's/\n[\n]*/\n/g' | sed -z 's/\([^. ]\)\n\([A-Z]\)/\1.\n\2/' | tr '\012' ' ') + resp="${resp#Explanation:}"; + while [ -n "$resp" -a -z "${resp##[ .]*}" ]; do + resp="${resp#[ .]}" + done + + respl=$(echo -- "$resp" | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z') + + if [[ "${respl}" =~ (conclusion|verdict)[:\ ][^.]*yes ]]; then + verdict=yes + elif [[ "${respl}" =~ (conclusion|verdict)[:\ ][^.]*wait ]]; then + verdict=wait + elif [[ "${respl}" =~ (conclusion|verdict)[:\ ][^.]*no ]]; then + verdict=no + elif [[ "${respl}" =~ (conclusion|verdict)[:\ ][^.]*uncertain ]]; then + verdict=uncertain + elif [[ "${respl}" =~ (\"wait\"|\"yes\"|\"no\"|\"uncertain\")[^\"]*$ ]]; then + # last word under quotes in the response, sometimes happens as + # in 'thus I would conclude "no"'. + verdict=${BASH_REMATCH[1]} + else + verdict=uncertain + fi + + verdict="${verdict//[\"\',;:. ]}" + verdict=$(echo -n "$verdict" | tr '[A-Z]' '[a-z]') + + # There are two formats for the ID line: + # - old: #id: cid subject + # - new: #id: cid author date subject + # We can detect the 2nd one as the date starts with a series of digits + # followed by "-" then an upper case letter (eg: "18-Dec23"). + set -- $id + cid="$1" + author="" + date="" + if [ -n "$3" ] && [ -z "${3##[1-9]-[A-Z]*}" -o -z "${3##[0-3][0-9]-[A-Z]*}" ]; then + author="$2" + date="$3" + subj="${id#$cid $author $date }" + else + subj="${id#$cid }" + fi + + if [ -z "$cid" ]; then + echo "ERROR: commit ID not found in patch $pnum: $patch" >&2 + continue + fi + + echo "" + + echo -n "" + + # HTMLify subject and summary + subj="${subj//&/&}"; subj="${subj///>}"; + resp="${resp//&/&}"; resp="${resp///>}"; + + # turn "#XXXX" to a link to an issue + resp=$(echo "$resp" | sed -e "s|#\([0-9]\{1,5\}\)|#\1|g") + + # put links to commit IDs + resp=$(echo "$resp" | sed -e "s|\([0-9a-f]\{8,40\}\)|\1|g") + + echo -n "" + echo -n "" + echo -n "" + echo -n "" + echo -n "" + echo "" + echo + ((seq_num++)) + + # if this patch was already backported, make the review start on the next + if [ -n "${bkp[$cid]}" ]; then + review=$seq_num + do_check=1 + else + do_check= + fi +done + +echo "" + +echo "
All
CIDSubjectVerdict
N U W Y
Reason
$seq_num
" + echo -n "		$cid${date:+
$date}		${pnum:+$pnum }$subj${author:+
$author
}		" + echo -n "" + echo -n "" + echo -n "" + echo -n "" + echo -n "$resp
New
CIDSubjectVerdict
N U W Y
Reason
" +echo "

" +echo "

Output:

" +echo "" +echo "

" +echo "" +echo "" diff --git a/dev/patchbot/scripts/process-patch-v15.sh b/dev/patchbot/scripts/process-patch-v15.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..e9f718a --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/scripts/process-patch-v15.sh @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +#!/bin/bash + +# the patch itself +F="$1" +shift + +# if non-empty, force to redo the patch +FORCE="${FORCE:-}" + +CPU="${CPU:-$(nproc)}" +MODEL="${MODEL:-../models/airoboros-l2-13b-gpt4-1.4.1.Q5_K_M.gguf}" +PROMPT_PFX="${PROMPT_PFX:-prompt14-airo14-pfx.txt}" +PROMPT_SFX="${PROMPT_SFX:-prompt14-airo14-sfx.txt}" +CACHE="${CACHE:-prompt-airo14.cache}" +CACHE_RO="${CACHE_RO- --prompt-cache-ro}" +EXT="${EXT:-airo14.txt}" +OUTPUT="${OUTPUT:-$(set -- "$F"."$EXT"; echo $1)}" +MAINPROG="${MAINPROG:-./main}" + +# switch to interactive mode with this reverse-prompt at the end if set. +# Typically: INTERACTIVE="Developer". +INTERACTIVE=${INTERACTIVE:-""} + +# Compute the full prompt +# +# Input format for "$F": git-format-patch with lines in this order: +# 1: From cid ... +# 2: From: author user@... +# 3: Date: +# 4: Subject: +# ... +# n: ^---$ +# It will emit a preliminary line with the commit ID, the author, the date, +# the subject, then the whole commit message indented. The output can be +# searched using grep '^\(Bot:\|#id:\)' + +PROMPT="$(cat "$PROMPT_PFX"; cat "$F" | sed -e '/^---/,$d' -e '/^Signed-off-by:/d' -e '/^Cc:/d' -e '/^Reported-by:/d' -e '/^Acked-by:/d' -e '1s/From \([0-9a-f]\{8\}\)\([0-9a-f]\{32\}\).*/\1/' -e '2s/^From: .*<\([^<@>]*\)@\([^<.>]*\).*/\1@\2/' -e '3s/^Date:[^,]*, \([^ ]*\) \([^ ]*\) 20\([^ ]*\).*/\1-\2\3/' | sed -ne '1h;1d;2x;2G;2h;2d;3x;3G;3h;3d;4x;4G;4s/^\([^\n]*\)\n\([^\n]*\)\n\([^\n]*\)\nSubject: \(.*\)/#id: \1 \2 \3 \4\n\nSubject: \4/;p' | sed -e '3,$s/^/ \0/'; echo; cat "$PROMPT_SFX")" + +# already done: don't do it again. Note that /dev/null is OK +if [ -z "$FORCE" -a -s "$OUTPUT" ]; then + exit 0 +fi + +# In order to rebuild the prompt cache: +# OUTPUT=blah CACHE_RO= ./$0 /dev/null +# +# Note: airoboros is able to carefully isolate an entire context, tests show +# that it's possible to ask it to repeat the entire commit message and it does +# so correctly. However its logic is sometimes bizarre + + +if [ -z "$INTERACTIVE" ]; then + LANG=C "$MAINPROG" --log-disable --model "$MODEL" --threads "$CPU" --ctx_size 4096 --temp 0.36 --top_k 12 --top_p 1 --repeat_last_n 256 --batch_size 16384 --repeat_penalty 1.1 --n_predict 200 --multiline-input --prompt "$PROMPT" --prompt-cache "$CACHE" $CACHE_RO "$@" 2>&1 | grep -v ^llama_model_loader | grep -v ^llm_load_ > "${OUTPUT}" + if [ "$?" != 0 ]; then + # failed: this is likely because the text is too long + (echo "$PROMPT"; echo + echo "Explanation: the commit message was way too long, couldn't analyse it." + echo "Conclusion: uncertain" + echo) > "${OUTPUT}" + fi +else + LANG=C "$MAINPROG" --log-disable --model "$MODEL" --threads "$CPU" --ctx_size 4096 --temp 0.36 --repeat_penalty 1.1 --n_predict 200 --multiline-input --prompt "$PROMPT" --prompt-cache "$CACHE" $CACHE_RO -n -1 -i --color --in-prefix ' ' --reverse-prompt "$INTERACTIVE:" "$@" +fi diff --git a/dev/patchbot/scripts/submit-ai.sh b/dev/patchbot/scripts/submit-ai.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..d6c6710 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/scripts/submit-ai.sh @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ +#!/bin/bash + +# note: the program may re-execute itself: when it has more than one patch to +# process, it will call itself with one patch only in argument. When called +# with a single patch in argument, it will always start the analysis directly. + +# The program uses several environment variables: +# - EXT file name extension for the response +# - MODEL path to the model file (GGUF format) +# - FORCE force to re-process existing patches +# - PROGRAM path to the script to be called +# - CACHE path to the prompt cache (optional) +# - CACHE_RO force cache to remain read-only +# - PROMPT_PFX path to the prompt prefix (before the patch) +# - PROMPT_SFX path to the prompt suffix (after the patch) +# - TOT_CPUS total number of usable CPUs (def: nproc or 1) +# - SLOT_CPUS if defined, it's an array of CPU sets for each running slot +# - CPU_SLOT passed by the first level to the second one to allow binding +# to a specific CPU set based on the slot number from 0 to N-1. + +die() { + [ "$#" -eq 0 ] || echo "$*" >&2 + exit 1 +} + +err() { + echo "$*" >&2 +} + +quit() { + [ "$#" -eq 0 ] || echo "$*" + exit 0 +} + +#### Main + +# detect if running under -x, pass it down to sub-processes +#opt=; set -o | grep xtrace | grep -q on && opt=-x + +USAGE="Usage: ${0##*/} [ -s slots ] patch..." +MYSELF="$0" +TOT_CPUS=${TOT_CPUS:-$(nproc)} +TOT_CPUS=${TOT_CPUS:-1} +SLOTS=1 + + +while [ -n "$1" -a -z "${1##-*}" ]; do + case "$1" in + -s) SLOTS="$2" ; shift 2 ;; + -h|--help) quit "$USAGE" ;; + *) die "$USAGE" ;; + esac +done + +[ -n "$EXT" ] || die "Missing extension name (EXT)" +[ -n "$MODEL" ] || die "Missing model name (MODEL)" +[ -n "$PROGRAM" ] || die "Missing program name (PROGRAM)" +[ -n "$PROMPT_PFX" ] || die "Missing prompt prefix (PROMPT_PFX)" +[ -n "$PROMPT_SFX" ] || die "Missing prompt suffix (PROMPT_SFX)" + +PATCHES=( "$@" ) + +if [ ${#PATCHES[@]} = 0 ]; then + die "$USAGE" +elif [ ${#PATCHES[@]} = 1 ]; then + # really execute + taskset_cmd="" + if [ -n "$CPU_SLOT" ] && [ -n "${SLOT_CPUS[$CPU_SLOT]}" ]; then + taskset_cmd="taskset -c ${SLOT_CPUS[$CPU_SLOT]}" + fi + export CPU=$TOT_CPUS + ${taskset_cmd} ${PROGRAM} "${PATCHES[0]}" +else + # divide CPUs by number of slots + export TOT_CPUS=$(( (TOT_CPUS + SLOTS - 1) / SLOTS )) + # reexecute ourselves in parallel with a single patch each + xargs -n 1 -P "${SLOTS}" --process-slot-var=CPU_SLOT "${MYSELF}" -s 1 <<< "${PATCHES[@]}" +fi + diff --git a/dev/patchbot/scripts/update-3.0.sh b/dev/patchbot/scripts/update-3.0.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..5f8ac87 --- /dev/null +++ b/dev/patchbot/scripts/update-3.0.sh @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@ +#!/bin/bash + +SCRIPTS_DIR="$HOME/prog/scripts" +HAPROXY_DIR="$HOME/data/in/haproxy" +PATCHES_PFX="$HOME/data/in/patches" +VERDICT_DIR="$HOME/data/out" +PROMPTS_DIR="$HOME/data/prompts" +MODELS_DIR="$HOME/data/models" +MAINPROG="$HOME/prog/bin/main" + +PARALLEL_RUNS=2 + +BRANCH=$(cd "$HAPROXY_DIR" && git describe --tags HEAD|cut -f1 -d-|cut -f2- -dv) +if [ -z "$BRANCH" ]; then + echo "Couldn't guess current branch, aborting." + exit 1 +fi + +# eg: for v3.0-dev0^ we should get v2.9.0 hence "2.9" +STABLE=$(cd "$HAPROXY_DIR" && git describe --tags "v${BRANCH}-dev0^" |cut -f1,2 -d.|cut -f2- -dv) + +PATCHES_DIR="$PATCHES_PFX"-"$BRANCH" + +(cd "$HAPROXY_DIR" + git pull + last_file=$(ls -1 "$PATCHES_DIR"/*.patch 2>/dev/null | tail -n1) + if [ -n "$last_file" ]; then + restart=$(head -n1 "$last_file" | cut -f2 -d' ') + else + restart="v${BRANCH}-dev0" + fi + "$SCRIPTS_DIR"/mk-patch-list.sh -o "$PATCHES_DIR" -b v${BRANCH}-dev0 $(git log $restart.. --oneline | cut -f1 -d' ') +) + +# List backported fixes (possibly none) +BKP=( + $( + cd "$HAPROXY_DIR" + if ! git remote update "$STABLE"; then + git remote add "$STABLE" "http://git.haproxy.org/git/haproxy-${STABLE}.git/" + git remote update "$STABLE" + fi >&2 + + git log --no-decorate --reverse "v${STABLE}.0..${STABLE}/master" | + sed -ne 's,(cherry picked from commit \(.\{8\}\).*,\1,p' + ) +) + +# by far the best model for now with little uncertain and few wait +echo "${BRANCH}: mistral-7b-v0.2" + +if [ ! -e "${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt-${BRANCH}-m7bv02.cache" -o "${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt15-${BRANCH}-mist7bv2-pfx.txt" -nt "${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt-${BRANCH}-m7bv02.cache" ]; then + echo "Regenerating the prompt cache, may take 1-2 min" + rm -f "${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt-${BRANCH}-m7bv02.cache" + rm -f empty + touch empty + time EXT=m7bv02.txt MODEL=${MODELS_DIR}/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q5_K_M.gguf CACHE=${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt-${BRANCH}-m7bv02.cache CACHE_RO= PROMPT_PFX=${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt15-${BRANCH}-mist7bv2-pfx.txt PROMPT_SFX=${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt15-${BRANCH}-mist7bv2-sfx.txt MAINPROG=$MAINPROG PROGRAM="$SCRIPTS_DIR"/process-patch-v15.sh "$SCRIPTS_DIR"/submit-ai.sh empty + rm -f empty empty.m7bv02.txt + echo "Done!" +fi + +# Now process the patches, may take 1-2 hours +time EXT=m7bv02.txt MODEL=${MODELS_DIR}/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2.Q5_K_M.gguf CACHE=${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt-${BRANCH}-m7bv02.cache PROMPT_PFX=${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt15-${BRANCH}-mist7bv2-pfx.txt PROMPT_SFX=${PROMPTS_DIR}/prompt15-${BRANCH}-mist7bv2-sfx.txt MAINPROG=$MAINPROG PROGRAM="$SCRIPTS_DIR"/process-patch-v15.sh "$SCRIPTS_DIR"/submit-ai.sh -s ${PARALLEL_RUNS} ${PATCHES_DIR}/*.patch + +# generate the output, takes 3-5 seconds +"$SCRIPTS_DIR"/post-ai.sh -b "${BKP[*]}" ${PATCHES_DIR}/*.m7bv02.txt > ${VERDICT_DIR}/verdict-${BRANCH}-m7bv02.html -- cgit v1.2.3