summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tags/u/unmerged-usr.tag
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tags/u/unmerged-usr.tag')
-rw-r--r--tags/u/unmerged-usr.tag27
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tags/u/unmerged-usr.tag b/tags/u/unmerged-usr.tag
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ef65646
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tags/u/unmerged-usr.tag
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+Tag: unmerged-usr
+Severity: classification
+Check: files/hierarchy/merged-usr
+Explanation: The named file is being installed in a legacy location.
+ Many competing distributions install this file under <code>/usr</code>.
+ Debian would like to do the same, but the best way to get there is
+ presently unclear.
+ .
+ Please coordinate with the release team before you change this path to
+ the new location. There is a growing body of evidence that uncoordinated
+ action by individual package maintainers or teams may not be the best
+ path forward.
+ .
+ Debian's Technical Committee voted on February 1, 2021 that the
+ <code>bookworm</code> release should support only the merged-usr root
+ filesystem layout, thus dropping support for the non-merged-usr layout.
+See-Also:
+ https://wiki.debian.org/UsrMerge,
+ https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/MergedUsr,
+ Bug#978636,
+ https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/11/#00232,
+ https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/12/#00386,
+ https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/03/msg00001.html,
+ https://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=236,
+ https://www.linux-magazine.com/Issues/2019/228/Debian-usr-Merge,
+ https://lwn.net/Articles/773342/,
+ https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge/