diff options
| author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-08-07 13:11:22 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-08-07 13:11:22 +0000 |
| commit | b20732900e4636a467c0183a47f7396700f5f743 (patch) | |
| tree | 42f079ff82e701ebcb76829974b4caca3e5b6798 /Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst | |
| parent | Adding upstream version 6.8.12. (diff) | |
| download | linux-b20732900e4636a467c0183a47f7396700f5f743.tar.xz linux-b20732900e4636a467c0183a47f7396700f5f743.zip | |
Adding upstream version 6.9.7.upstream/6.9.7
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst b/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst index 5d3c3de3f4..ce6753a674 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/handling-regressions.rst @@ -27,11 +27,11 @@ The important bits (aka "The TL;DR") is optional, but recommended): * For mailed reports, check if the reporter included a line like ``#regzbot - introduced v5.13..v5.14-rc1``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions + introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions list in CC) containing a paragraph like the following, which tells regzbot when the issue started to happen:: - #regzbot ^introduced 1f2e3d4c5b6a + #regzbot ^introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a * When forwarding reports from a bug tracker to the regressions list (see above), include a paragraph like the following:: @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ When doing either, consider making the Linux kernel regression tracking bot "regzbot" immediately start tracking the issue: * For mailed reports, check if the reporter included a "regzbot command" like - ``#regzbot introduced 1f2e3d4c5b6a``. If not, send a reply (with the + ``#regzbot introduced: 1f2e3d4c5b6a``. If not, send a reply (with the regressions list in CC) with a paragraph like the following::: #regzbot ^introduced: v5.13..v5.14-rc1 @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ By using a 'regzbot command' in a direct or indirect reply to the mail with the regression report. These commands need to be in their own paragraph (IOW: they need to be separated from the rest of the mail using blank lines). -One such command is ``#regzbot introduced <version or commit>``, which makes +One such command is ``#regzbot introduced: <version or commit>``, which makes regzbot consider your mail as a regressions report added to the tracking, as -already described above; ``#regzbot ^introduced <version or commit>`` is another +already described above; ``#regzbot ^introduced: <version or commit>`` is another such command, which makes regzbot consider the parent mail as a report for a regression which it starts to track. @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ or itself is a reply to that mail: * Mark a regression as fixed by a commit that is heading upstream or already landed:: - #regzbot fixed-by: 1f2e3d4c5d + #regzbot fix: 1f2e3d4c5d * Mark a regression as a duplicate of another one already tracked by regzbot:: |