diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-11 08:27:49 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-11 08:27:49 +0000 |
commit | ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6 (patch) | |
tree | b2d64bc10158fdd5497876388cd68142ca374ed3 /Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/selection-api-vs-crop-api.rst | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6.tar.xz linux-ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6.zip |
Adding upstream version 6.6.15.upstream/6.6.15
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/selection-api-vs-crop-api.rst')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/selection-api-vs-crop-api.rst | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/selection-api-vs-crop-api.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/selection-api-vs-crop-api.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..f57b918001 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/selection-api-vs-crop-api.rst @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GFDL-1.1-no-invariants-or-later + +.. _selection-vs-crop: + +******************************** +Comparison with old cropping API +******************************** + +The selection API was introduced to cope with deficiencies of the +older :ref:`CROP API <crop>`, that was designed to control simple +capture devices. Later the cropping API was adopted by video output +drivers. The ioctls are used to select a part of the display were the +video signal is inserted. It should be considered as an API abuse +because the described operation is actually the composing. The +selection API makes a clear distinction between composing and cropping +operations by setting the appropriate targets. + +The CROP API lacks any support for composing to and cropping from an +image inside a memory buffer. The application could configure a +capture device to fill only a part of an image by abusing V4L2 +API. Cropping a smaller image from a larger one is achieved by setting +the field ``bytesperline`` at struct :c:type:`v4l2_pix_format`. +Introducing an image offsets could be done by modifying field +``m_userptr`` at struct :c:type:`v4l2_buffer` before calling +:ref:`VIDIOC_QBUF <VIDIOC_QBUF>`. Those operations should be avoided +because they are not portable (endianness), and do not work for +macroblock and Bayer formats and mmap buffers. + +The selection API deals with configuration of buffer +cropping/composing in a clear, intuitive and portable way. Next, with +the selection API the concepts of the padded target and constraints +flags are introduced. Finally, struct :c:type:`v4l2_crop` and struct +:c:type:`v4l2_cropcap` have no reserved fields. Therefore there is no +way to extend their functionality. The new struct +:c:type:`v4l2_selection` provides a lot of place for future +extensions. + +Driver developers are encouraged to implement only selection API. The +former cropping API would be simulated using the new one. |