summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-11 08:27:49 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-11 08:27:49 +0000
commitace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6 (patch)
treeb2d64bc10158fdd5497876388cd68142ca374ed3 /kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadlinux-ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6.tar.xz
linux-ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6.zip
Adding upstream version 6.6.15.upstream/6.6.15
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c173
1 files changed, 173 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c b/kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..fa3e9225ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/bpf/dispatcher.c
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/* Copyright(c) 2019 Intel Corporation. */
+
+#include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+#include <linux/static_call.h>
+
+/* The BPF dispatcher is a multiway branch code generator. The
+ * dispatcher is a mechanism to avoid the performance penalty of an
+ * indirect call, which is expensive when retpolines are enabled. A
+ * dispatch client registers a BPF program into the dispatcher, and if
+ * there is available room in the dispatcher a direct call to the BPF
+ * program will be generated. All calls to the BPF programs called via
+ * the dispatcher will then be a direct call, instead of an
+ * indirect. The dispatcher hijacks a trampoline function it via the
+ * __fentry__ of the trampoline. The trampoline function has the
+ * following signature:
+ *
+ * unsigned int trampoline(const void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insnsi,
+ * unsigned int (*bpf_func)(const void *,
+ * const struct bpf_insn *));
+ */
+
+static struct bpf_dispatcher_prog *bpf_dispatcher_find_prog(
+ struct bpf_dispatcher *d, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BPF_DISPATCHER_MAX; i++) {
+ if (prog == d->progs[i].prog)
+ return &d->progs[i];
+ }
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct bpf_dispatcher_prog *bpf_dispatcher_find_free(
+ struct bpf_dispatcher *d)
+{
+ return bpf_dispatcher_find_prog(d, NULL);
+}
+
+static bool bpf_dispatcher_add_prog(struct bpf_dispatcher *d,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ struct bpf_dispatcher_prog *entry;
+
+ if (!prog)
+ return false;
+
+ entry = bpf_dispatcher_find_prog(d, prog);
+ if (entry) {
+ refcount_inc(&entry->users);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ entry = bpf_dispatcher_find_free(d);
+ if (!entry)
+ return false;
+
+ bpf_prog_inc(prog);
+ entry->prog = prog;
+ refcount_set(&entry->users, 1);
+ d->num_progs++;
+ return true;
+}
+
+static bool bpf_dispatcher_remove_prog(struct bpf_dispatcher *d,
+ struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ struct bpf_dispatcher_prog *entry;
+
+ if (!prog)
+ return false;
+
+ entry = bpf_dispatcher_find_prog(d, prog);
+ if (!entry)
+ return false;
+
+ if (refcount_dec_and_test(&entry->users)) {
+ entry->prog = NULL;
+ bpf_prog_put(prog);
+ d->num_progs--;
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+int __weak arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher(void *image, void *buf, s64 *funcs, int num_funcs)
+{
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static int bpf_dispatcher_prepare(struct bpf_dispatcher *d, void *image, void *buf)
+{
+ s64 ips[BPF_DISPATCHER_MAX] = {}, *ipsp = &ips[0];
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BPF_DISPATCHER_MAX; i++) {
+ if (d->progs[i].prog)
+ *ipsp++ = (s64)(uintptr_t)d->progs[i].prog->bpf_func;
+ }
+ return arch_prepare_bpf_dispatcher(image, buf, &ips[0], d->num_progs);
+}
+
+static void bpf_dispatcher_update(struct bpf_dispatcher *d, int prev_num_progs)
+{
+ void *new, *tmp;
+ u32 noff = 0;
+
+ if (prev_num_progs)
+ noff = d->image_off ^ (PAGE_SIZE / 2);
+
+ new = d->num_progs ? d->image + noff : NULL;
+ tmp = d->num_progs ? d->rw_image + noff : NULL;
+ if (new) {
+ /* Prepare the dispatcher in d->rw_image. Then use
+ * bpf_arch_text_copy to update d->image, which is RO+X.
+ */
+ if (bpf_dispatcher_prepare(d, new, tmp))
+ return;
+ if (IS_ERR(bpf_arch_text_copy(new, tmp, PAGE_SIZE / 2)))
+ return;
+ }
+
+ __BPF_DISPATCHER_UPDATE(d, new ?: (void *)&bpf_dispatcher_nop_func);
+
+ /* Make sure all the callers executing the previous/old half of the
+ * image leave it, so following update call can modify it safely.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
+ if (new)
+ d->image_off = noff;
+}
+
+void bpf_dispatcher_change_prog(struct bpf_dispatcher *d, struct bpf_prog *from,
+ struct bpf_prog *to)
+{
+ bool changed = false;
+ int prev_num_progs;
+
+ if (from == to)
+ return;
+
+ mutex_lock(&d->mutex);
+ if (!d->image) {
+ d->image = bpf_prog_pack_alloc(PAGE_SIZE, bpf_jit_fill_hole_with_zero);
+ if (!d->image)
+ goto out;
+ d->rw_image = bpf_jit_alloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE);
+ if (!d->rw_image) {
+ u32 size = PAGE_SIZE;
+
+ bpf_arch_text_copy(d->image, &size, sizeof(size));
+ bpf_prog_pack_free((struct bpf_binary_header *)d->image);
+ d->image = NULL;
+ goto out;
+ }
+ bpf_image_ksym_add(d->image, &d->ksym);
+ }
+
+ prev_num_progs = d->num_progs;
+ changed |= bpf_dispatcher_remove_prog(d, from);
+ changed |= bpf_dispatcher_add_prog(d, to);
+
+ if (!changed)
+ goto out;
+
+ bpf_dispatcher_update(d, prev_num_progs);
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&d->mutex);
+}