summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf/log.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-08-07 13:11:22 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-08-07 13:11:22 +0000
commitb20732900e4636a467c0183a47f7396700f5f743 (patch)
tree42f079ff82e701ebcb76829974b4caca3e5b6798 /kernel/bpf/log.c
parentAdding upstream version 6.8.12. (diff)
downloadlinux-b20732900e4636a467c0183a47f7396700f5f743.tar.xz
linux-b20732900e4636a467c0183a47f7396700f5f743.zip
Adding upstream version 6.9.7.upstream/6.9.7
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/log.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/log.c65
1 files changed, 55 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/log.c b/kernel/bpf/log.c
index 594a234f12..2a243cf37c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/log.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/log.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <linux/bpf_verifier.h>
#include <linux/math64.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
#define verbose(env, fmt, args...) bpf_verifier_log_write(env, fmt, ##args)
@@ -333,7 +334,8 @@ find_linfo(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_off)
{
const struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
const struct bpf_prog *prog;
- u32 i, nr_linfo;
+ u32 nr_linfo;
+ int l, r, m;
prog = env->prog;
nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo;
@@ -342,11 +344,30 @@ find_linfo(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 insn_off)
return NULL;
linfo = prog->aux->linfo;
- for (i = 1; i < nr_linfo; i++)
- if (insn_off < linfo[i].insn_off)
- break;
+ /* Loop invariant: linfo[l].insn_off <= insns_off.
+ * linfo[0].insn_off == 0 which always satisfies above condition.
+ * Binary search is searching for rightmost linfo entry that satisfies
+ * the above invariant, giving us the desired record that covers given
+ * instruction offset.
+ */
+ l = 0;
+ r = nr_linfo - 1;
+ while (l < r) {
+ /* (r - l + 1) / 2 means we break a tie to the right, so if:
+ * l=1, r=2, linfo[l].insn_off <= insn_off, linfo[r].insn_off > insn_off,
+ * then m=2, we see that linfo[m].insn_off > insn_off, and so
+ * r becomes 1 and we exit the loop with correct l==1.
+ * If the tie was broken to the left, m=1 would end us up in
+ * an endless loop where l and m stay at 1 and r stays at 2.
+ */
+ m = l + (r - l + 1) / 2;
+ if (linfo[m].insn_off <= insn_off)
+ l = m;
+ else
+ r = m - 1;
+ }
- return &linfo[i - 1];
+ return &linfo[l];
}
static const char *ltrim(const char *s)
@@ -361,13 +382,28 @@ __printf(3, 4) void verbose_linfo(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
u32 insn_off,
const char *prefix_fmt, ...)
{
- const struct bpf_line_info *linfo;
+ const struct bpf_line_info *linfo, *prev_linfo;
+ const struct btf *btf;
+ const char *s, *fname;
if (!bpf_verifier_log_needed(&env->log))
return;
+ prev_linfo = env->prev_linfo;
linfo = find_linfo(env, insn_off);
- if (!linfo || linfo == env->prev_linfo)
+ if (!linfo || linfo == prev_linfo)
+ return;
+
+ /* It often happens that two separate linfo records point to the same
+ * source code line, but have differing column numbers. Given verifier
+ * log doesn't emit column information, from user perspective we just
+ * end up emitting the same source code line twice unnecessarily.
+ * So instead check that previous and current linfo record point to
+ * the same file (file_name_offs match) and the same line number, and
+ * avoid emitting duplicated source code line in such case.
+ */
+ if (prev_linfo && linfo->file_name_off == prev_linfo->file_name_off &&
+ BPF_LINE_INFO_LINE_NUM(linfo->line_col) == BPF_LINE_INFO_LINE_NUM(prev_linfo->line_col))
return;
if (prefix_fmt) {
@@ -378,9 +414,15 @@ __printf(3, 4) void verbose_linfo(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
va_end(args);
}
- verbose(env, "%s\n",
- ltrim(btf_name_by_offset(env->prog->aux->btf,
- linfo->line_off)));
+ btf = env->prog->aux->btf;
+ s = ltrim(btf_name_by_offset(btf, linfo->line_off));
+ verbose(env, "%s", s); /* source code line */
+
+ s = btf_name_by_offset(btf, linfo->file_name_off);
+ /* leave only file name */
+ fname = strrchr(s, '/');
+ fname = fname ? fname + 1 : s;
+ verbose(env, " @ %s:%u\n", fname, BPF_LINE_INFO_LINE_NUM(linfo->line_col));
env->prev_linfo = linfo;
}
@@ -416,6 +458,7 @@ const char *reg_type_str(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_reg_type type)
[PTR_TO_XDP_SOCK] = "xdp_sock",
[PTR_TO_BTF_ID] = "ptr_",
[PTR_TO_MEM] = "mem",
+ [PTR_TO_ARENA] = "arena",
[PTR_TO_BUF] = "buf",
[PTR_TO_FUNC] = "func",
[PTR_TO_MAP_KEY] = "map_key",
@@ -651,6 +694,8 @@ static void print_reg_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
}
verbose(env, "%s", reg_type_str(env, t));
+ if (t == PTR_TO_ARENA)
+ return;
if (t == PTR_TO_STACK) {
if (state->frameno != reg->frameno)
verbose(env, "[%d]", reg->frameno);