diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-05-18 17:40:19 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-05-18 17:40:19 +0000 |
commit | 9f0fc191371843c4fc000a226b0a26b6c059aacd (patch) | |
tree | 35f8be3ef04506ac891ad001e8c41e535ae8d01d /kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | |
parent | Releasing progress-linux version 6.6.15-2~progress7.99u1. (diff) | |
download | linux-9f0fc191371843c4fc000a226b0a26b6c059aacd.tar.xz linux-9f0fc191371843c4fc000a226b0a26b6c059aacd.zip |
Merging upstream version 6.7.7.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 37 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index 21db0df0eb..4a10e8c16f 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -218,6 +218,11 @@ static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, return try_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->owner, &old, new); } +static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_try_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) +{ + return rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current); +} + static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *old, struct task_struct *new) @@ -297,6 +302,20 @@ static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, } +static int __sched rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock); + +static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_try_acquire(struct rt_mutex_base *lock) +{ + /* + * With debug enabled rt_mutex_cmpxchg trylock() will always fail. + * + * Avoid unconditionally taking the slow path by using + * rt_mutex_slow_trylock() which is covered by the debug code and can + * acquire a non-contended rtmutex. + */ + return rt_mutex_slowtrylock(lock); +} + static __always_inline bool rt_mutex_cmpxchg_release(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *old, struct task_struct *new) @@ -1613,7 +1632,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock_block(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); if (!owner || !rtmutex_spin_on_owner(lock, waiter, owner)) - schedule(); + rt_mutex_schedule(); raw_spin_lock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); set_current_state(state); @@ -1642,7 +1661,7 @@ static void __sched rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock, WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n"); while (1) { set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); - schedule(); + rt_mutex_schedule(); } } @@ -1738,6 +1757,15 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, int ret; /* + * Do all pre-schedule work here, before we queue a waiter and invoke + * PI -- any such work that trips on rtlock (PREEMPT_RT spinlock) would + * otherwise recurse back into task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() through + * rtlock_slowlock() and will then enqueue a second waiter for this + * same task and things get really confusing real fast. + */ + rt_mutex_pre_schedule(); + + /* * Technically we could use raw_spin_[un]lock_irq() here, but this can * be called in early boot if the cmpxchg() fast path is disabled * (debug, no architecture support). In this case we will acquire the @@ -1748,6 +1776,7 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lock->wait_lock, flags); ret = __rt_mutex_slowlock_locked(lock, ww_ctx, state); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); + rt_mutex_post_schedule(); return ret; } @@ -1755,7 +1784,9 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, unsigned int state) { - if (likely(rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(lock, NULL, current))) + lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on); + + if (likely(rt_mutex_try_acquire(lock))) return 0; return rt_mutex_slowlock(lock, NULL, state); |