Adding upstream version 6.6.15.upstream/6.6.15

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 292 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/lib/sort.c b/lib/sort.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..b399bf10d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/sort.c
@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * A fast, small, non-recursive O(n log n) sort for the Linux kernel
+ *
+ * This performs n*log2(n) + 0.37*n + o(n) comparisons on average,
+ * and 1.5*n*log2(n) + O(n) in the (very contrived) worst case.
+ *
+ * Glibc qsort() manages n*log2(n) - 1.26*n for random inputs (1.63*n
+ * better) at the expense of stack usage and much larger code to avoid
+ * quicksort's O(n^2) worst case.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/sort.h>
+
+/**
+ * is_aligned - is this pointer & size okay for word-wide copying?
+ * @base: pointer to data
+ * @size: size of each element
+ * @align: required alignment (typically 4 or 8)
+ *
+ * Returns true if elements can be copied using word loads and stores.
+ * The size must be a multiple of the alignment, and the base address must
+ * be if we do not have CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
+ *
+ * For some reason, gcc doesn't know to optimize "if (a & mask || b & mask)"
+ * to "if ((a | b) & mask)", so we do that by hand.
+ */
+__attribute_const__ __always_inline
+static bool is_aligned(const void *base, size_t size, unsigned char align)
+{
+	unsigned char lsbits = (unsigned char)size;
+
+	(void)base;
+#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+	lsbits |= (unsigned char)(uintptr_t)base;
+#endif
+	return (lsbits & (align - 1)) == 0;
+}
+
+/**
+ * swap_words_32 - swap two elements in 32-bit chunks
+ * @a: pointer to the first element to swap
+ * @b: pointer to the second element to swap
+ * @n: element size (must be a multiple of 4)
+ *
+ * Exchange the two objects in memory.  This exploits base+index addressing,
+ * which basically all CPUs have, to minimize loop overhead computations.
+ *
+ * For some reason, on x86 gcc 7.3.0 adds a redundant test of n at the
+ * bottom of the loop, even though the zero flag is still valid from the
+ * subtract (since the intervening mov instructions don't alter the flags).
+ * Gcc 8.1.0 doesn't have that problem.
+ */
+static void swap_words_32(void *a, void *b, size_t n)
+{
+	do {
+		u32 t = *(u32 *)(a + (n -= 4));
+		*(u32 *)(a + n) = *(u32 *)(b + n);
+		*(u32 *)(b + n) = t;
+	} while (n);
+}
+
+/**
+ * swap_words_64 - swap two elements in 64-bit chunks
+ * @a: pointer to the first element to swap
+ * @b: pointer to the second element to swap
+ * @n: element size (must be a multiple of 8)
+ *
+ * Exchange the two objects in memory.  This exploits base+index
+ * addressing, which basically all CPUs have, to minimize loop overhead
+ * computations.
+ *
+ * We'd like to use 64-bit loads if possible.  If they're not, emulating
+ * one requires base+index+4 addressing which x86 has but most other
+ * processors do not.  If CONFIG_64BIT, we definitely have 64-bit loads,
+ * but it's possible to have 64-bit loads without 64-bit pointers (e.g.
+ * x32 ABI).  Are there any cases the kernel needs to worry about?
+ */
+static void swap_words_64(void *a, void *b, size_t n)
+{
+	do {
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+		u64 t = *(u64 *)(a + (n -= 8));
+		*(u64 *)(a + n) = *(u64 *)(b + n);
+		*(u64 *)(b + n) = t;
+#else
+		/* Use two 32-bit transfers to avoid base+index+4 addressing */
+		u32 t = *(u32 *)(a + (n -= 4));
+		*(u32 *)(a + n) = *(u32 *)(b + n);
+		*(u32 *)(b + n) = t;
+
+		t = *(u32 *)(a + (n -= 4));
+		*(u32 *)(a + n) = *(u32 *)(b + n);
+		*(u32 *)(b + n) = t;
+#endif
+	} while (n);
+}
+
+/**
+ * swap_bytes - swap two elements a byte at a time
+ * @a: pointer to the first element to swap
+ * @b: pointer to the second element to swap
+ * @n: element size
+ *
+ * This is the fallback if alignment doesn't allow using larger chunks.
+ */
+static void swap_bytes(void *a, void *b, size_t n)
+{
+	do {
+		char t = ((char *)a)[--n];
+		((char *)a)[n] = ((char *)b)[n];
+		((char *)b)[n] = t;
+	} while (n);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The values are arbitrary as long as they can't be confused with
+ * a pointer, but small integers make for the smallest compare
+ * instructions.
+ */
+#define SWAP_WORDS_64 (swap_r_func_t)0
+#define SWAP_WORDS_32 (swap_r_func_t)1
+#define SWAP_BYTES    (swap_r_func_t)2
+#define SWAP_WRAPPER  (swap_r_func_t)3
+
+struct wrapper {
+	cmp_func_t cmp;
+	swap_func_t swap;
+};
+
+/*
+ * The function pointer is last to make tail calls most efficient if the
+ * compiler decides not to inline this function.
+ */
+static void do_swap(void *a, void *b, size_t size, swap_r_func_t swap_func, const void *priv)
+{
+	if (swap_func == SWAP_WRAPPER) {
+		((const struct wrapper *)priv)->swap(a, b, (int)size);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	if (swap_func == SWAP_WORDS_64)
+		swap_words_64(a, b, size);
+	else if (swap_func == SWAP_WORDS_32)
+		swap_words_32(a, b, size);
+	else if (swap_func == SWAP_BYTES)
+		swap_bytes(a, b, size);
+	else
+		swap_func(a, b, (int)size, priv);
+}
+
+#define _CMP_WRAPPER ((cmp_r_func_t)0L)
+
+static int do_cmp(const void *a, const void *b, cmp_r_func_t cmp, const void *priv)
+{
+	if (cmp == _CMP_WRAPPER)
+		return ((const struct wrapper *)priv)->cmp(a, b);
+	return cmp(a, b, priv);
+}
+
+/**
+ * parent - given the offset of the child, find the offset of the parent.
+ * @i: the offset of the heap element whose parent is sought.  Non-zero.
+ * @lsbit: a precomputed 1-bit mask, equal to "size & -size"
+ * @size: size of each element
+ *
+ * In terms of array indexes, the parent of element j = @i/@size is simply
+ * (j-1)/2.  But when working in byte offsets, we can't use implicit
+ * truncation of integer divides.
+ *
+ * Fortunately, we only need one bit of the quotient, not the full divide.
+ * @size has a least significant bit.  That bit will be clear if @i is
+ * an even multiple of @size, and set if it's an odd multiple.
+ *
+ * Logically, we're doing "if (i & lsbit) i -= size;", but since the
+ * branch is unpredictable, it's done with a bit of clever branch-free
+ * code instead.
+ */
+__attribute_const__ __always_inline
+static size_t parent(size_t i, unsigned int lsbit, size_t size)
+{
+	i -= size;
+	i -= size & -(i & lsbit);
+	return i / 2;
+}
+
+/**
+ * sort_r - sort an array of elements
+ * @base: pointer to data to sort
+ * @num: number of elements
+ * @size: size of each element
+ * @cmp_func: pointer to comparison function
+ * @swap_func: pointer to swap function or NULL
+ * @priv: third argument passed to comparison function
+ *
+ * This function does a heapsort on the given array.  You may provide
+ * a swap_func function if you need to do something more than a memory
+ * copy (e.g. fix up pointers or auxiliary data), but the built-in swap
+ * avoids a slow retpoline and so is significantly faster.
+ *
+ * Sorting time is O(n log n) both on average and worst-case. While
+ * quicksort is slightly faster on average, it suffers from exploitable
+ * O(n*n) worst-case behavior and extra memory requirements that make
+ * it less suitable for kernel use.
+ */
+void sort_r(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
+	    cmp_r_func_t cmp_func,
+	    swap_r_func_t swap_func,
+	    const void *priv)
+{
+	/* pre-scale counters for performance */
+	size_t n = num * size, a = (num/2) * size;
+	const unsigned int lsbit = size & -size;  /* Used to find parent */
+
+	if (!a)		/* num < 2 || size == 0 */
+		return;
+
+	/* called from 'sort' without swap function, let's pick the default */
+	if (swap_func == SWAP_WRAPPER && !((struct wrapper *)priv)->swap)
+		swap_func = NULL;
+
+	if (!swap_func) {
+		if (is_aligned(base, size, 8))
+			swap_func = SWAP_WORDS_64;
+		else if (is_aligned(base, size, 4))
+			swap_func = SWAP_WORDS_32;
+		else
+			swap_func = SWAP_BYTES;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Loop invariants:
+	 * 1. elements [a,n) satisfy the heap property (compare greater than
+	 *    all of their children),
+	 * 2. elements [n,num*size) are sorted, and
+	 * 3. a <= b <= c <= d <= n (whenever they are valid).
+	 */
+	for (;;) {
+		size_t b, c, d;
+
+		if (a)			/* Building heap: sift down --a */
+			a -= size;
+		else if (n -= size)	/* Sorting: Extract root to --n */
+			do_swap(base, base + n, size, swap_func, priv);
+		else			/* Sort complete */
+			break;
+
+		/*
+		 * Sift element at "a" down into heap.  This is the
+		 * "bottom-up" variant, which significantly reduces
+		 * calls to cmp_func(): we find the sift-down path all
+		 * the way to the leaves (one compare per level), then
+		 * backtrack to find where to insert the target element.
+		 *
+		 * Because elements tend to sift down close to the leaves,
+		 * this uses fewer compares than doing two per level
+		 * on the way down.  (A bit more than half as many on
+		 * average, 3/4 worst-case.)
+		 */
+		for (b = a; c = 2*b + size, (d = c + size) < n;)
+			b = do_cmp(base + c, base + d, cmp_func, priv) >= 0 ? c : d;
+		if (d == n)	/* Special case last leaf with no sibling */
+			b = c;
+
+		/* Now backtrack from "b" to the correct location for "a" */
+		while (b != a && do_cmp(base + a, base + b, cmp_func, priv) >= 0)
+			b = parent(b, lsbit, size);
+		c = b;			/* Where "a" belongs */
+		while (b != a) {	/* Shift it into place */
+			b = parent(b, lsbit, size);
+			do_swap(base + b, base + c, size, swap_func, priv);
+		}
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort_r);
+
+void sort(void *base, size_t num, size_t size,
+	  cmp_func_t cmp_func,
+	  swap_func_t swap_func)
+{
+	struct wrapper w = {
+		.cmp  = cmp_func,
+		.swap = swap_func,
+	};
+
+	return sort_r(base, num, size, _CMP_WRAPPER, SWAP_WRAPPER, &w);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sort);