diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-11 08:27:49 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-11 08:27:49 +0000 |
commit | ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6 (patch) | |
tree | b2d64bc10158fdd5497876388cd68142ca374ed3 /net/can/j1939/address-claim.c | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | linux-ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6.tar.xz linux-ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6.zip |
Adding upstream version 6.6.15.upstream/6.6.15
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r-- | net/can/j1939/address-claim.c | 270 |
1 files changed, 270 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c b/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..ca4ad6cdd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c @@ -0,0 +1,270 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +// Copyright (c) 2010-2011 EIA Electronics, +// Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@eia.be> +// Copyright (c) 2010-2011 EIA Electronics, +// Pieter Beyens <pieter.beyens@eia.be> +// Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Pengutronix, +// Marc Kleine-Budde <kernel@pengutronix.de> +// Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Pengutronix, +// Oleksij Rempel <kernel@pengutronix.de> + +/* J1939 Address Claiming. + * Address Claiming in the kernel + * - keeps track of the AC states of ECU's, + * - resolves NAME<=>SA taking into account the AC states of ECU's. + * + * All Address Claim msgs (including host-originated msg) are processed + * at the receive path (a sent msg is always received again via CAN echo). + * As such, the processing of AC msgs is done in the order on which msgs + * are sent on the bus. + * + * This module doesn't send msgs itself (e.g. replies on Address Claims), + * this is the responsibility of a user space application or daemon. + */ + +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt + +#include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/skbuff.h> + +#include "j1939-priv.h" + +static inline name_t j1939_skb_to_name(const struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + return le64_to_cpup((__le64 *)skb->data); +} + +static inline bool j1939_ac_msg_is_request(struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb); + int req_pgn; + + if (skb->len < 3 || skcb->addr.pgn != J1939_PGN_REQUEST) + return false; + + req_pgn = skb->data[0] | (skb->data[1] << 8) | (skb->data[2] << 16); + + return req_pgn == J1939_PGN_ADDRESS_CLAIMED; +} + +static int j1939_ac_verify_outgoing(struct j1939_priv *priv, + struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb); + + if (skb->len != 8) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx address claim with dlc %i\n", + skb->len); + return -EPROTO; + } + + if (skcb->addr.src_name != j1939_skb_to_name(skb)) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx address claim with different name\n"); + return -EPROTO; + } + + if (skcb->addr.sa == J1939_NO_ADDR) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx address claim with broadcast sa\n"); + return -EPROTO; + } + + /* ac must always be a broadcast */ + if (skcb->addr.dst_name || skcb->addr.da != J1939_NO_ADDR) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx address claim with dest, not broadcast\n"); + return -EPROTO; + } + return 0; +} + +int j1939_ac_fixup(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb); + int ret; + u8 addr; + + /* network mgmt: address claiming msgs */ + if (skcb->addr.pgn == J1939_PGN_ADDRESS_CLAIMED) { + struct j1939_ecu *ecu; + + ret = j1939_ac_verify_outgoing(priv, skb); + /* return both when failure & when successful */ + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_name(priv, skcb->addr.src_name); + if (!ecu) + return -ENODEV; + + if (ecu->addr != skcb->addr.sa) + /* hold further traffic for ecu, remove from parent */ + j1939_ecu_unmap(ecu); + j1939_ecu_put(ecu); + } else if (skcb->addr.src_name) { + /* assign source address */ + addr = j1939_name_to_addr(priv, skcb->addr.src_name); + if (!j1939_address_is_unicast(addr) && + !j1939_ac_msg_is_request(skb)) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx drop: invalid sa for name 0x%016llx\n", + skcb->addr.src_name); + return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; + } + skcb->addr.sa = addr; + } + + /* assign destination address */ + if (skcb->addr.dst_name) { + addr = j1939_name_to_addr(priv, skcb->addr.dst_name); + if (!j1939_address_is_unicast(addr)) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx drop: invalid da for name 0x%016llx\n", + skcb->addr.dst_name); + return -EADDRNOTAVAIL; + } + skcb->addr.da = addr; + } + return 0; +} + +static void j1939_ac_process(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb); + struct j1939_ecu *ecu, *prev; + name_t name; + + if (skb->len != 8) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "rx address claim with wrong dlc %i\n", + skb->len); + return; + } + + name = j1939_skb_to_name(skb); + skcb->addr.src_name = name; + if (!name) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "rx address claim without name\n"); + return; + } + + if (!j1939_address_is_valid(skcb->addr.sa)) { + netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "rx address claim with broadcast sa\n"); + return; + } + + write_lock_bh(&priv->lock); + + /* Few words on the ECU ref counting: + * + * First we get an ECU handle, either with + * j1939_ecu_get_by_name_locked() (increments the ref counter) + * or j1939_ecu_create_locked() (initializes an ECU object + * with a ref counter of 1). + * + * j1939_ecu_unmap_locked() will decrement the ref counter, + * but only if the ECU was mapped before. So "ecu" still + * belongs to us. + * + * j1939_ecu_timer_start() will increment the ref counter + * before it starts the timer, so we can put the ecu when + * leaving this function. + */ + ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_name_locked(priv, name); + + if (ecu && ecu->addr == skcb->addr.sa) { + /* The ISO 11783-5 standard, in "4.5.2 - Address claim + * requirements", states: + * d) No CF shall begin, or resume, transmission on the + * network until 250 ms after it has successfully claimed + * an address except when responding to a request for + * address-claimed. + * + * But "Figure 6" and "Figure 7" in "4.5.4.2 - Address-claim + * prioritization" show that the CF begins the transmission + * after 250 ms from the first AC (address-claimed) message + * even if it sends another AC message during that time window + * to resolve the address contention with another CF. + * + * As stated in "4.4.2.3 - Address-claimed message": + * In order to successfully claim an address, the CF sending + * an address claimed message shall not receive a contending + * claim from another CF for at least 250 ms. + * + * As stated in "4.4.3.2 - NAME management (NM) message": + * 1) A commanding CF can + * d) request that a CF with a specified NAME transmit + * the address-claimed message with its current NAME. + * 2) A target CF shall + * d) send an address-claimed message in response to a + * request for a matching NAME + * + * Taking the above arguments into account, the 250 ms wait is + * requested only during network initialization. + * + * Do not restart the timer on AC message if both the NAME and + * the address match and so if the address has already been + * claimed (timer has expired) or the AC message has been sent + * to resolve the contention with another CF (timer is still + * running). + */ + goto out_ecu_put; + } + + if (!ecu && j1939_address_is_unicast(skcb->addr.sa)) + ecu = j1939_ecu_create_locked(priv, name); + + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ecu)) + goto out_unlock_bh; + + /* cancel pending (previous) address claim */ + j1939_ecu_timer_cancel(ecu); + + if (j1939_address_is_idle(skcb->addr.sa)) { + j1939_ecu_unmap_locked(ecu); + goto out_ecu_put; + } + + /* save new addr */ + if (ecu->addr != skcb->addr.sa) + j1939_ecu_unmap_locked(ecu); + ecu->addr = skcb->addr.sa; + + prev = j1939_ecu_get_by_addr_locked(priv, skcb->addr.sa); + if (prev) { + if (ecu->name > prev->name) { + j1939_ecu_unmap_locked(ecu); + j1939_ecu_put(prev); + goto out_ecu_put; + } else { + /* kick prev if less or equal */ + j1939_ecu_unmap_locked(prev); + j1939_ecu_put(prev); + } + } + + j1939_ecu_timer_start(ecu); + out_ecu_put: + j1939_ecu_put(ecu); + out_unlock_bh: + write_unlock_bh(&priv->lock); +} + +void j1939_ac_recv(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb); + struct j1939_ecu *ecu; + + /* network mgmt */ + if (skcb->addr.pgn == J1939_PGN_ADDRESS_CLAIMED) { + j1939_ac_process(priv, skb); + } else if (j1939_address_is_unicast(skcb->addr.sa)) { + /* assign source name */ + ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_addr(priv, skcb->addr.sa); + if (ecu) { + skcb->addr.src_name = ecu->name; + j1939_ecu_put(ecu); + } + } + + /* assign destination name */ + ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_addr(priv, skcb->addr.da); + if (ecu) { + skcb->addr.dst_name = ecu->name; + j1939_ecu_put(ecu); + } +} |