summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-11 08:27:49 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-11 08:27:49 +0000
commitace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6 (patch)
treeb2d64bc10158fdd5497876388cd68142ca374ed3 /net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadlinux-ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6.tar.xz
linux-ace9429bb58fd418f0c81d4c2835699bddf6bde6.zip
Adding upstream version 6.6.15.upstream/6.6.15
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--net/can/j1939/address-claim.c270
1 files changed, 270 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c b/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..ca4ad6cdd5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/can/j1939/address-claim.c
@@ -0,0 +1,270 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+// Copyright (c) 2010-2011 EIA Electronics,
+// Kurt Van Dijck <kurt.van.dijck@eia.be>
+// Copyright (c) 2010-2011 EIA Electronics,
+// Pieter Beyens <pieter.beyens@eia.be>
+// Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Pengutronix,
+// Marc Kleine-Budde <kernel@pengutronix.de>
+// Copyright (c) 2017-2019 Pengutronix,
+// Oleksij Rempel <kernel@pengutronix.de>
+
+/* J1939 Address Claiming.
+ * Address Claiming in the kernel
+ * - keeps track of the AC states of ECU's,
+ * - resolves NAME<=>SA taking into account the AC states of ECU's.
+ *
+ * All Address Claim msgs (including host-originated msg) are processed
+ * at the receive path (a sent msg is always received again via CAN echo).
+ * As such, the processing of AC msgs is done in the order on which msgs
+ * are sent on the bus.
+ *
+ * This module doesn't send msgs itself (e.g. replies on Address Claims),
+ * this is the responsibility of a user space application or daemon.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
+#include <linux/netdevice.h>
+#include <linux/skbuff.h>
+
+#include "j1939-priv.h"
+
+static inline name_t j1939_skb_to_name(const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return le64_to_cpup((__le64 *)skb->data);
+}
+
+static inline bool j1939_ac_msg_is_request(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb);
+ int req_pgn;
+
+ if (skb->len < 3 || skcb->addr.pgn != J1939_PGN_REQUEST)
+ return false;
+
+ req_pgn = skb->data[0] | (skb->data[1] << 8) | (skb->data[2] << 16);
+
+ return req_pgn == J1939_PGN_ADDRESS_CLAIMED;
+}
+
+static int j1939_ac_verify_outgoing(struct j1939_priv *priv,
+ struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb);
+
+ if (skb->len != 8) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx address claim with dlc %i\n",
+ skb->len);
+ return -EPROTO;
+ }
+
+ if (skcb->addr.src_name != j1939_skb_to_name(skb)) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx address claim with different name\n");
+ return -EPROTO;
+ }
+
+ if (skcb->addr.sa == J1939_NO_ADDR) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx address claim with broadcast sa\n");
+ return -EPROTO;
+ }
+
+ /* ac must always be a broadcast */
+ if (skcb->addr.dst_name || skcb->addr.da != J1939_NO_ADDR) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx address claim with dest, not broadcast\n");
+ return -EPROTO;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int j1939_ac_fixup(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb);
+ int ret;
+ u8 addr;
+
+ /* network mgmt: address claiming msgs */
+ if (skcb->addr.pgn == J1939_PGN_ADDRESS_CLAIMED) {
+ struct j1939_ecu *ecu;
+
+ ret = j1939_ac_verify_outgoing(priv, skb);
+ /* return both when failure & when successful */
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_name(priv, skcb->addr.src_name);
+ if (!ecu)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ if (ecu->addr != skcb->addr.sa)
+ /* hold further traffic for ecu, remove from parent */
+ j1939_ecu_unmap(ecu);
+ j1939_ecu_put(ecu);
+ } else if (skcb->addr.src_name) {
+ /* assign source address */
+ addr = j1939_name_to_addr(priv, skcb->addr.src_name);
+ if (!j1939_address_is_unicast(addr) &&
+ !j1939_ac_msg_is_request(skb)) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx drop: invalid sa for name 0x%016llx\n",
+ skcb->addr.src_name);
+ return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+ }
+ skcb->addr.sa = addr;
+ }
+
+ /* assign destination address */
+ if (skcb->addr.dst_name) {
+ addr = j1939_name_to_addr(priv, skcb->addr.dst_name);
+ if (!j1939_address_is_unicast(addr)) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "tx drop: invalid da for name 0x%016llx\n",
+ skcb->addr.dst_name);
+ return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+ }
+ skcb->addr.da = addr;
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void j1939_ac_process(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb);
+ struct j1939_ecu *ecu, *prev;
+ name_t name;
+
+ if (skb->len != 8) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "rx address claim with wrong dlc %i\n",
+ skb->len);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ name = j1939_skb_to_name(skb);
+ skcb->addr.src_name = name;
+ if (!name) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "rx address claim without name\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (!j1939_address_is_valid(skcb->addr.sa)) {
+ netdev_notice(priv->ndev, "rx address claim with broadcast sa\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ write_lock_bh(&priv->lock);
+
+ /* Few words on the ECU ref counting:
+ *
+ * First we get an ECU handle, either with
+ * j1939_ecu_get_by_name_locked() (increments the ref counter)
+ * or j1939_ecu_create_locked() (initializes an ECU object
+ * with a ref counter of 1).
+ *
+ * j1939_ecu_unmap_locked() will decrement the ref counter,
+ * but only if the ECU was mapped before. So "ecu" still
+ * belongs to us.
+ *
+ * j1939_ecu_timer_start() will increment the ref counter
+ * before it starts the timer, so we can put the ecu when
+ * leaving this function.
+ */
+ ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_name_locked(priv, name);
+
+ if (ecu && ecu->addr == skcb->addr.sa) {
+ /* The ISO 11783-5 standard, in "4.5.2 - Address claim
+ * requirements", states:
+ * d) No CF shall begin, or resume, transmission on the
+ * network until 250 ms after it has successfully claimed
+ * an address except when responding to a request for
+ * address-claimed.
+ *
+ * But "Figure 6" and "Figure 7" in "4.5.4.2 - Address-claim
+ * prioritization" show that the CF begins the transmission
+ * after 250 ms from the first AC (address-claimed) message
+ * even if it sends another AC message during that time window
+ * to resolve the address contention with another CF.
+ *
+ * As stated in "4.4.2.3 - Address-claimed message":
+ * In order to successfully claim an address, the CF sending
+ * an address claimed message shall not receive a contending
+ * claim from another CF for at least 250 ms.
+ *
+ * As stated in "4.4.3.2 - NAME management (NM) message":
+ * 1) A commanding CF can
+ * d) request that a CF with a specified NAME transmit
+ * the address-claimed message with its current NAME.
+ * 2) A target CF shall
+ * d) send an address-claimed message in response to a
+ * request for a matching NAME
+ *
+ * Taking the above arguments into account, the 250 ms wait is
+ * requested only during network initialization.
+ *
+ * Do not restart the timer on AC message if both the NAME and
+ * the address match and so if the address has already been
+ * claimed (timer has expired) or the AC message has been sent
+ * to resolve the contention with another CF (timer is still
+ * running).
+ */
+ goto out_ecu_put;
+ }
+
+ if (!ecu && j1939_address_is_unicast(skcb->addr.sa))
+ ecu = j1939_ecu_create_locked(priv, name);
+
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ecu))
+ goto out_unlock_bh;
+
+ /* cancel pending (previous) address claim */
+ j1939_ecu_timer_cancel(ecu);
+
+ if (j1939_address_is_idle(skcb->addr.sa)) {
+ j1939_ecu_unmap_locked(ecu);
+ goto out_ecu_put;
+ }
+
+ /* save new addr */
+ if (ecu->addr != skcb->addr.sa)
+ j1939_ecu_unmap_locked(ecu);
+ ecu->addr = skcb->addr.sa;
+
+ prev = j1939_ecu_get_by_addr_locked(priv, skcb->addr.sa);
+ if (prev) {
+ if (ecu->name > prev->name) {
+ j1939_ecu_unmap_locked(ecu);
+ j1939_ecu_put(prev);
+ goto out_ecu_put;
+ } else {
+ /* kick prev if less or equal */
+ j1939_ecu_unmap_locked(prev);
+ j1939_ecu_put(prev);
+ }
+ }
+
+ j1939_ecu_timer_start(ecu);
+ out_ecu_put:
+ j1939_ecu_put(ecu);
+ out_unlock_bh:
+ write_unlock_bh(&priv->lock);
+}
+
+void j1939_ac_recv(struct j1939_priv *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct j1939_sk_buff_cb *skcb = j1939_skb_to_cb(skb);
+ struct j1939_ecu *ecu;
+
+ /* network mgmt */
+ if (skcb->addr.pgn == J1939_PGN_ADDRESS_CLAIMED) {
+ j1939_ac_process(priv, skb);
+ } else if (j1939_address_is_unicast(skcb->addr.sa)) {
+ /* assign source name */
+ ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_addr(priv, skcb->addr.sa);
+ if (ecu) {
+ skcb->addr.src_name = ecu->name;
+ j1939_ecu_put(ecu);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* assign destination name */
+ ecu = j1939_ecu_get_by_addr(priv, skcb->addr.da);
+ if (ecu) {
+ skcb->addr.dst_name = ecu->name;
+ j1939_ecu_put(ecu);
+ }
+}