Adding upstream version 6.6.15.upstream/6.6.15

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 828 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology-test.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology-test.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2cd3540cec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology-test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,828 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * soc-topology-test.c  --  ALSA SoC Topology Kernel Unit Tests
+ *
+ * Copyright(c) 2021 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/firmware.h>
+#include <sound/core.h>
+#include <sound/soc.h>
+#include <sound/soc-topology.h>
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+
+/* ===== HELPER FUNCTIONS =================================================== */
+
+/*
+ * snd_soc_component needs device to operate on (primarily for prints), create
+ * fake one, as we don't register with PCI or anything else
+ * device_driver name is used in some of the prints (fmt_single_name) so
+ * we also mock up minimal one
+ */
+static struct device *test_dev;
+
+static struct device_driver test_drv = {
+	.name = "sound-soc-topology-test-driver",
+};
+
+static int snd_soc_tplg_test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	test_dev = root_device_register("sound-soc-topology-test");
+	test_dev = get_device(test_dev);
+	if (!test_dev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	test_dev->driver = &test_drv;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	put_device(test_dev);
+	root_device_unregister(test_dev);
+}
+
+/*
+ * helper struct we use when registering component, as we load topology during
+ * component probe, we need to pass struct kunit somehow to probe function, so
+ * we can report test result
+ */
+struct kunit_soc_component {
+	struct kunit *kunit;
+	int expect; /* what result we expect when loading topology */
+	struct snd_soc_component comp;
+	struct snd_soc_card card;
+	struct firmware fw;
+};
+
+static int d_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp =
+			container_of(component, struct kunit_soc_component, comp);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = snd_soc_tplg_component_load(component, NULL, &kunit_comp->fw);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(kunit_comp->kunit, kunit_comp->expect, ret,
+			    "Failed topology load");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void d_remove(struct snd_soc_component *component)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp =
+			container_of(component, struct kunit_soc_component, comp);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = snd_soc_tplg_component_remove(component);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(kunit_comp->kunit, 0, ret);
+}
+
+/*
+ * ASoC minimal boiler plate
+ */
+SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEF(dummy, DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_DUMMY()));
+
+SND_SOC_DAILINK_DEF(platform, DAILINK_COMP_ARRAY(COMP_PLATFORM("sound-soc-topology-test")));
+
+static struct snd_soc_dai_link kunit_dai_links[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "KUNIT Audio Port",
+		.id = 0,
+		.stream_name = "Audio Playback/Capture",
+		.nonatomic = 1,
+		.dynamic = 1,
+		.trigger = {SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST, SND_SOC_DPCM_TRIGGER_POST},
+		.dpcm_playback = 1,
+		.dpcm_capture = 1,
+		SND_SOC_DAILINK_REG(dummy, dummy, platform),
+	},
+};
+
+static const struct snd_soc_component_driver test_component = {
+	.name = "sound-soc-topology-test",
+	.probe = d_probe,
+	.remove = d_remove,
+};
+
+/* ===== TOPOLOGY TEMPLATES ================================================= */
+
+// Structural representation of topology which can be generated with:
+// $ touch empty
+// $ alsatplg -c empty -o empty.tplg
+// $ xxd -i empty.tplg
+
+struct tplg_tmpl_001 {
+	struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr header;
+	struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest manifest;
+} __packed;
+
+static struct tplg_tmpl_001 tplg_tmpl_empty = {
+	.header = {
+		.magic = cpu_to_le32(SND_SOC_TPLG_MAGIC),
+		.abi = cpu_to_le32(5),
+		.version = 0,
+		.type = cpu_to_le32(SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST),
+		.size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr)),
+		.vendor_type = 0,
+		.payload_size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest)),
+		.index = 0,
+		.count = cpu_to_le32(1),
+	},
+
+	.manifest = {
+		.size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest)),
+		/* rest of fields is 0 */
+	},
+};
+
+// Structural representation of topology containing SectionPCM
+
+struct tplg_tmpl_002 {
+	struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr header;
+	struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest manifest;
+	struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr pcm_header;
+	struct snd_soc_tplg_pcm pcm;
+} __packed;
+
+static struct tplg_tmpl_002 tplg_tmpl_with_pcm = {
+	.header = {
+		.magic = cpu_to_le32(SND_SOC_TPLG_MAGIC),
+		.abi = cpu_to_le32(5),
+		.version = 0,
+		.type = cpu_to_le32(SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_MANIFEST),
+		.size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr)),
+		.vendor_type = 0,
+		.payload_size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest)),
+		.index = 0,
+		.count = cpu_to_le32(1),
+	},
+	.manifest = {
+		.size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_manifest)),
+		.pcm_elems = cpu_to_le32(1),
+		/* rest of fields is 0 */
+	},
+	.pcm_header = {
+		.magic = cpu_to_le32(SND_SOC_TPLG_MAGIC),
+		.abi = cpu_to_le32(5),
+		.version = 0,
+		.type = cpu_to_le32(SND_SOC_TPLG_TYPE_PCM),
+		.size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr)),
+		.vendor_type = 0,
+		.payload_size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_pcm)),
+		.index = 0,
+		.count = cpu_to_le32(1),
+	},
+	.pcm = {
+		.size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_pcm)),
+		.pcm_name = "KUNIT Audio",
+		.dai_name = "kunit-audio-dai",
+		.pcm_id = 0,
+		.dai_id = 0,
+		.playback = cpu_to_le32(1),
+		.capture = cpu_to_le32(1),
+		.compress = 0,
+		.stream = {
+			[0] = {
+				.channels = cpu_to_le32(2),
+			},
+			[1] = {
+				.channels = cpu_to_le32(2),
+			},
+		},
+		.num_streams = 0,
+		.caps = {
+			[0] = {
+				.name = "kunit-audio-playback",
+				.channels_min = cpu_to_le32(2),
+				.channels_max = cpu_to_le32(2),
+			},
+			[1] = {
+				.name = "kunit-audio-capture",
+				.channels_min = cpu_to_le32(2),
+				.channels_max = cpu_to_le32(2),
+			},
+		},
+		.flag_mask = 0,
+		.flags = 0,
+		.priv = { 0 },
+	},
+};
+
+/* ===== TEST CASES ========================================================= */
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing NULL component as parameter to snd_soc_tplg_component_load
+
+/*
+ * need to override generic probe function with one using NULL when calling
+ * topology load during component initialization, we don't need .remove
+ * handler as load should fail
+ */
+static int d_probe_null_comp(struct snd_soc_component *component)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp =
+			container_of(component, struct kunit_soc_component, comp);
+	int ret;
+
+	/* instead of passing component pointer as first argument, pass NULL here */
+	ret = snd_soc_tplg_component_load(NULL, NULL, &kunit_comp->fw);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(kunit_comp->kunit, kunit_comp->expect, ret,
+			    "Failed topology load");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct snd_soc_component_driver test_component_null_comp = {
+	.name = "sound-soc-topology-test",
+	.probe = d_probe_null_comp,
+};
+
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_with_null_comp(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = -EINVAL; /* expect failure */
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component_null_comp, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing NULL ops as parameter to snd_soc_tplg_component_load
+
+/*
+ * NULL ops is default case, we pass empty topology (fw), so we don't have
+ * anything to parse and just do nothing, which results in return 0; from
+ * calling soc_tplg_dapm_complete in soc_tplg_process_headers
+ */
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_with_null_ops(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = 0; /* expect success */
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing NULL fw as parameter to snd_soc_tplg_component_load
+
+/*
+ * need to override generic probe function with one using NULL pointer to fw
+ * when calling topology load during component initialization, we don't need
+ * .remove handler as load should fail
+ */
+static int d_probe_null_fw(struct snd_soc_component *component)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp =
+			container_of(component, struct kunit_soc_component, comp);
+	int ret;
+
+	/* instead of passing fw pointer as third argument, pass NULL here */
+	ret = snd_soc_tplg_component_load(component, NULL, NULL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(kunit_comp->kunit, kunit_comp->expect, ret,
+			    "Failed topology load");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct snd_soc_component_driver test_component_null_fw = {
+	.name = "sound-soc-topology-test",
+	.probe = d_probe_null_fw,
+};
+
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_with_null_fw(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = -EINVAL; /* expect failure */
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component_null_fw, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing "empty" topology file
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	struct tplg_tmpl_001 *data;
+	int size;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = 0; /* expect success */
+
+	size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty);
+	data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+	memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_empty, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty));
+
+	kunit_comp->fw.data = (u8 *)data;
+	kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test "empty" topology file, but with bad "magic"
+// In theory we could loop through all possible bad values, but it takes too
+// long, so just use SND_SOC_TPLG_MAGIC + 1
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_magic(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	struct tplg_tmpl_001 *data;
+	int size;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = -EINVAL; /* expect failure */
+
+	size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty);
+	data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+	memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_empty, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty));
+	/*
+	 * override abi
+	 * any value != magic number is wrong
+	 */
+	data->header.magic = cpu_to_le32(SND_SOC_TPLG_MAGIC + 1);
+
+	kunit_comp->fw.data = (u8 *)data;
+	kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test "empty" topology file, but with bad "abi"
+// In theory we could loop through all possible bad values, but it takes too
+// long, so just use SND_SOC_TPLG_ABI_VERSION + 1
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_abi(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	struct tplg_tmpl_001 *data;
+	int size;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = -EINVAL; /* expect failure */
+
+	size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty);
+	data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+	memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_empty, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty));
+	/*
+	 * override abi
+	 * any value != accepted range is wrong
+	 */
+	data->header.abi = cpu_to_le32(SND_SOC_TPLG_ABI_VERSION + 1);
+
+	kunit_comp->fw.data = (u8 *)data;
+	kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test "empty" topology file, but with bad "size"
+// In theory we could loop through all possible bad values, but it takes too
+// long, so just use sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr) + 1
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_size(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	struct tplg_tmpl_001 *data;
+	int size;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = -EINVAL; /* expect failure */
+
+	size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty);
+	data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+	memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_empty, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty));
+	/*
+	 * override size
+	 * any value != struct size is wrong
+	 */
+	data->header.size = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(struct snd_soc_tplg_hdr) + 1);
+
+	kunit_comp->fw.data = (u8 *)data;
+	kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test "empty" topology file, but with bad "payload_size"
+// In theory we could loop through all possible bad values, but it takes too
+// long, so just use the known wrong one
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_payload_size(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	struct tplg_tmpl_001 *data;
+	int size;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = -EINVAL; /* expect failure */
+
+	size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty);
+	data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+	memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_empty, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_empty));
+	/*
+	 * override payload size
+	 * there is only explicit check for 0, so check with it, other values
+	 * are handled by just not reading behind EOF
+	 */
+	data->header.payload_size = 0;
+
+	kunit_comp->fw.data = (u8 *)data;
+	kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing topology file with PCM definition
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	u8 *data;
+	int size;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = 0; /* expect success */
+
+	size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm);
+	data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+	memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_with_pcm, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm));
+
+	kunit_comp->fw.data = data;
+	kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing topology file with PCM definition
+// with component reload
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg_reload_comp(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	u8 *data;
+	int size;
+	int ret;
+	int i;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = 0; /* expect success */
+
+	size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm);
+	data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+	memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_with_pcm, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm));
+
+	kunit_comp->fw.data = data;
+	kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+		ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+		ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+		snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+	}
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+}
+
+// TEST CASE
+// Test passing topology file with PCM definition
+// with card reload
+static void snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg_reload_card(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct kunit_soc_component *kunit_comp;
+	u8 *data;
+	int size;
+	int ret;
+	int i;
+
+	/* prepare */
+	kunit_comp = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*kunit_comp), GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, kunit_comp);
+	kunit_comp->kunit = test;
+	kunit_comp->expect = 0; /* expect success */
+
+	size = sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm);
+	data = kunit_kzalloc(kunit_comp->kunit, size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(kunit_comp->kunit, data);
+
+	memcpy(data, &tplg_tmpl_with_pcm, sizeof(tplg_tmpl_with_pcm));
+
+	kunit_comp->fw.data = data;
+	kunit_comp->fw.size = size;
+
+	kunit_comp->card.dev = test_dev,
+	kunit_comp->card.name = "kunit-card",
+	kunit_comp->card.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	kunit_comp->card.dai_link = kunit_dai_links,
+	kunit_comp->card.num_links = ARRAY_SIZE(kunit_dai_links),
+	kunit_comp->card.fully_routed = true,
+
+	/* run test */
+	ret = snd_soc_component_initialize(&kunit_comp->comp, &test_component, test_dev);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	ret = snd_soc_add_component(&kunit_comp->comp, NULL, 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, ret);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+		ret = snd_soc_register_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+		if (ret != 0 && ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+			KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to register card");
+
+		snd_soc_unregister_card(&kunit_comp->card);
+	}
+
+	/* cleanup */
+	snd_soc_unregister_component(test_dev);
+}
+
+/* ===== KUNIT MODULE DEFINITIONS =========================================== */
+
+static struct kunit_case snd_soc_tplg_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_with_null_comp),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_with_null_ops),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_with_null_fw),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_magic),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_abi),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_size),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_empty_tplg_bad_payload_size),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg_reload_comp),
+	KUNIT_CASE(snd_soc_tplg_test_load_pcm_tplg_reload_card),
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct kunit_suite snd_soc_tplg_test_suite = {
+	.name = "snd_soc_tplg_test",
+	.init = snd_soc_tplg_test_init,
+	.exit = snd_soc_tplg_test_exit,
+	.test_cases = snd_soc_tplg_test_cases,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&snd_soc_tplg_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");