summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/riscv
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-05-18 17:39:57 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-05-18 17:39:57 +0000
commitdc50eab76b709d68175a358d6e23a5a3890764d3 (patch)
treec754d0390db060af0213ff994f0ac310e4cfd6e9 /tools/testing/selftests/riscv
parentAdding debian version 6.6.15-2. (diff)
downloadlinux-dc50eab76b709d68175a358d6e23a5a3890764d3.tar.xz
linux-dc50eab76b709d68175a358d6e23a5a3890764d3.zip
Merging upstream version 6.7.7.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/riscv')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile9
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c226
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c64
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h15
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h3
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c2
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c4
7 files changed, 274 insertions, 49 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
index ebdbb3c22e..f224b84591 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/Makefile
@@ -2,9 +2,14 @@
# Copyright (C) 2021 ARM Limited
# Originally tools/testing/arm64/abi/Makefile
-TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwprobe
+CFLAGS += -I$(top_srcdir)/tools/include
+
+TEST_GEN_PROGS := hwprobe cbo
include ../../lib.mk
$(OUTPUT)/hwprobe: hwprobe.c sys_hwprobe.S
- $(CC) -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^
+ $(CC) -static -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^
+
+$(OUTPUT)/cbo: cbo.c sys_hwprobe.S
+ $(CC) -static -o$@ $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c537d52faf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/cbo.c
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2023 Ventana Micro Systems Inc.
+ *
+ * Run with 'taskset -c <cpu-list> cbo' to only execute hwprobe on a
+ * subset of cpus, as well as only executing the tests on those cpus.
+ */
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sched.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <asm/ucontext.h>
+
+#include "hwprobe.h"
+#include "../../kselftest.h"
+
+#define MK_CBO(fn) cpu_to_le32((fn) << 20 | 10 << 15 | 2 << 12 | 0 << 7 | 15)
+
+static char mem[4096] __aligned(4096) = { [0 ... 4095] = 0xa5 };
+
+static bool illegal_insn;
+
+static void sigill_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *context)
+{
+ unsigned long *regs = (unsigned long *)&((ucontext_t *)context)->uc_mcontext;
+ uint32_t insn = *(uint32_t *)regs[0];
+
+ assert(insn == MK_CBO(regs[11]));
+
+ illegal_insn = true;
+ regs[0] += 4;
+}
+
+#define cbo_insn(base, fn) \
+({ \
+ asm volatile( \
+ "mv a0, %0\n" \
+ "li a1, %1\n" \
+ ".4byte %2\n" \
+ : : "r" (base), "i" (fn), "i" (MK_CBO(fn)) : "a0", "a1", "memory"); \
+})
+
+static void cbo_inval(char *base) { cbo_insn(base, 0); }
+static void cbo_clean(char *base) { cbo_insn(base, 1); }
+static void cbo_flush(char *base) { cbo_insn(base, 2); }
+static void cbo_zero(char *base) { cbo_insn(base, 4); }
+
+static void test_no_zicbom(void *arg)
+{
+ ksft_print_msg("Testing Zicbom instructions remain privileged\n");
+
+ illegal_insn = false;
+ cbo_clean(&mem[0]);
+ ksft_test_result(illegal_insn, "No cbo.clean\n");
+
+ illegal_insn = false;
+ cbo_flush(&mem[0]);
+ ksft_test_result(illegal_insn, "No cbo.flush\n");
+
+ illegal_insn = false;
+ cbo_inval(&mem[0]);
+ ksft_test_result(illegal_insn, "No cbo.inval\n");
+}
+
+static void test_no_zicboz(void *arg)
+{
+ ksft_print_msg("No Zicboz, testing cbo.zero remains privileged\n");
+
+ illegal_insn = false;
+ cbo_zero(&mem[0]);
+ ksft_test_result(illegal_insn, "No cbo.zero\n");
+}
+
+static bool is_power_of_2(__u64 n)
+{
+ return n != 0 && (n & (n - 1)) == 0;
+}
+
+static void test_zicboz(void *arg)
+{
+ struct riscv_hwprobe pair = {
+ .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE,
+ };
+ cpu_set_t *cpus = (cpu_set_t *)arg;
+ __u64 block_size;
+ int i, j;
+ long rc;
+
+ rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, sizeof(cpu_set_t), (unsigned long *)cpus, 0);
+ block_size = pair.value;
+ ksft_test_result(rc == 0 && pair.key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_ZICBOZ_BLOCK_SIZE &&
+ is_power_of_2(block_size), "Zicboz block size\n");
+ ksft_print_msg("Zicboz block size: %llu\n", block_size);
+
+ illegal_insn = false;
+ cbo_zero(&mem[block_size]);
+ ksft_test_result(!illegal_insn, "cbo.zero\n");
+
+ if (illegal_insn || !is_power_of_2(block_size)) {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("cbo.zero check\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ assert(block_size <= 1024);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4096 / block_size; ++i) {
+ if (i % 2)
+ cbo_zero(&mem[i * block_size]);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 4096 / block_size; ++i) {
+ char expected = i % 2 ? 0x0 : 0xa5;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < block_size; ++j) {
+ if (mem[i * block_size + j] != expected) {
+ ksft_test_result_fail("cbo.zero check\n");
+ ksft_print_msg("cbo.zero check: mem[%llu] != 0x%x\n",
+ i * block_size + j, expected);
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ ksft_test_result_pass("cbo.zero check\n");
+}
+
+static void check_no_zicboz_cpus(cpu_set_t *cpus)
+{
+ struct riscv_hwprobe pair = {
+ .key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0,
+ };
+ cpu_set_t one_cpu;
+ int i = 0, c = 0;
+ long rc;
+
+ while (i++ < CPU_COUNT(cpus)) {
+ while (!CPU_ISSET(c, cpus))
+ ++c;
+
+ CPU_ZERO(&one_cpu);
+ CPU_SET(c, &one_cpu);
+
+ rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, sizeof(cpu_set_t), (unsigned long *)&one_cpu, 0);
+ assert(rc == 0 && pair.key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0);
+
+ if (pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Zicboz is only present on a subset of harts.\n"
+ "Use taskset to select a set of harts where Zicboz\n"
+ "presence (present or not) is consistent for each hart\n");
+ ++c;
+ }
+}
+
+enum {
+ TEST_ZICBOZ,
+ TEST_NO_ZICBOZ,
+ TEST_NO_ZICBOM,
+};
+
+static struct test_info {
+ bool enabled;
+ unsigned int nr_tests;
+ void (*test_fn)(void *arg);
+} tests[] = {
+ [TEST_ZICBOZ] = { .nr_tests = 3, test_zicboz },
+ [TEST_NO_ZICBOZ] = { .nr_tests = 1, test_no_zicboz },
+ [TEST_NO_ZICBOM] = { .nr_tests = 3, test_no_zicbom },
+};
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ struct sigaction act = {
+ .sa_sigaction = &sigill_handler,
+ .sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO,
+ };
+ struct riscv_hwprobe pair;
+ unsigned int plan = 0;
+ cpu_set_t cpus;
+ long rc;
+ int i;
+
+ if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "--sigill")) {
+ rc = sigaction(SIGILL, &act, NULL);
+ assert(rc == 0);
+ tests[TEST_NO_ZICBOZ].enabled = true;
+ tests[TEST_NO_ZICBOM].enabled = true;
+ }
+
+ rc = sched_getaffinity(0, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpus);
+ assert(rc == 0);
+
+ ksft_print_header();
+
+ pair.key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0;
+ rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, sizeof(cpu_set_t), (unsigned long *)&cpus, 0);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("hwprobe() failed with %ld\n", rc);
+ assert(rc == 0 && pair.key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0);
+
+ if (pair.value & RISCV_HWPROBE_EXT_ZICBOZ) {
+ tests[TEST_ZICBOZ].enabled = true;
+ tests[TEST_NO_ZICBOZ].enabled = false;
+ } else {
+ check_no_zicboz_cpus(&cpus);
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i)
+ plan += tests[i].enabled ? tests[i].nr_tests : 0;
+
+ if (plan == 0)
+ ksft_print_msg("No tests enabled.\n");
+ else
+ ksft_set_plan(plan);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); ++i) {
+ if (tests[i].enabled)
+ tests[i].test_fn(&cpus);
+ }
+
+ ksft_finished();
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
index 09f290a674..abb825811c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.c
@@ -1,14 +1,6 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
-#include <stddef.h>
-#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
-
-/*
- * Rather than relying on having a new enough libc to define this, just do it
- * ourselves. This way we don't need to be coupled to a new-enough libc to
- * contain the call.
- */
-long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, size_t pair_count,
- size_t cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned int flags);
+#include "hwprobe.h"
+#include "../../kselftest.h"
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
@@ -16,6 +8,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
unsigned long cpus;
long out;
+ ksft_print_header();
+ ksft_set_plan(5);
+
/* Fake the CPU_SET ops. */
cpus = -1;
@@ -25,13 +20,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
*/
for (long i = 0; i < 8; i++)
pairs[i].key = i;
+
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, &cpus, 0);
if (out != 0)
- return -1;
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("hwprobe() failed with %ld\n", out);
+
for (long i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
/* Fail if the kernel claims not to recognize a base key. */
if ((i < 4) && (pairs[i].key != i))
- return -2;
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to recognize base key: key != i, "
+ "key=%lld, i=%ld\n", pairs[i].key, i);
if (pairs[i].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR)
continue;
@@ -39,52 +37,30 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
if (pairs[i].value & RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA)
continue;
- return -3;
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Unexpected pair: (%lld, %llu)\n", pairs[i].key, pairs[i].value);
}
- /*
- * This should also work with a NULL CPU set, but should not work
- * with an improperly supplied CPU set.
- */
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, 0, 0);
- if (out != 0)
- return -4;
+ ksft_test_result(out == 0, "NULL CPU set\n");
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 0, &cpus, 0);
- if (out == 0)
- return -5;
+ ksft_test_result(out != 0, "Bad CPU set\n");
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 8, 1, 0, 0);
- if (out == 0)
- return -6;
+ ksft_test_result(out != 0, "NULL CPU set with non-zero count\n");
- /*
- * Check that keys work by providing one that we know exists, and
- * checking to make sure the resultig pair is what we asked for.
- */
pairs[0].key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR;
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 1, 1, &cpus, 0);
- if (out != 0)
- return -7;
- if (pairs[0].key != RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR)
- return -8;
+ ksft_test_result(out == 0 && pairs[0].key == RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_BASE_BEHAVIOR,
+ "Existing key is maintained\n");
- /*
- * Check that an unknown key gets overwritten with -1,
- * but doesn't block elements after it.
- */
pairs[0].key = 0x5555;
pairs[1].key = 1;
pairs[1].value = 0xAAAA;
out = riscv_hwprobe(pairs, 2, 0, 0, 0);
- if (out != 0)
- return -9;
-
- if (pairs[0].key != -1)
- return -10;
-
- if ((pairs[1].key != 1) || (pairs[1].value == 0xAAAA))
- return -11;
+ ksft_test_result(out == 0 && pairs[0].key == -1 &&
+ pairs[1].key == 1 && pairs[1].value != 0xAAAA,
+ "Unknown key overwritten with -1 and doesn't block other elements\n");
- return 0;
+ ksft_finished();
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..721b0ce73a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/hwprobe/hwprobe.h
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+#ifndef SELFTEST_RISCV_HWPROBE_H
+#define SELFTEST_RISCV_HWPROBE_H
+#include <stddef.h>
+#include <asm/hwprobe.h>
+
+/*
+ * Rather than relying on having a new enough libc to define this, just do it
+ * ourselves. This way we don't need to be coupled to a new-enough libc to
+ * contain the call.
+ */
+long riscv_hwprobe(struct riscv_hwprobe *pairs, size_t pair_count,
+ size_t cpu_count, unsigned long *cpus, unsigned int flags);
+
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h
index 9b8434f62f..2e0db9c5be 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ struct addresses {
int *on_56_addr;
};
+// Only works on 64 bit
+#if __riscv_xlen == 64
static inline void do_mmaps(struct addresses *mmap_addresses)
{
/*
@@ -50,6 +52,7 @@ static inline void do_mmaps(struct addresses *mmap_addresses)
mmap_addresses->on_56_addr =
mmap(on_56_bits, 5 * sizeof(int), prot, flags, 0, 0);
}
+#endif /* __riscv_xlen == 64 */
static inline int memory_layout(void)
{
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
index 66764edb0d..1dd94197da 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/v_initval_nolibc.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ int main(void)
datap = malloc(MAX_VSIZE);
if (!datap) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("fail to allocate memory for size = %lu\n", MAX_VSIZE);
+ ksft_test_result_fail("fail to allocate memory for size = %d\n", MAX_VSIZE);
exit(-1);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c
index b348b475be..8ad94e08ff 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/vector/vstate_prctl.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ int test_and_compare_child(long provided, long expected, int inherit)
}
rc = launch_test(inherit);
if (rc != expected) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("Test failed, check %d != %d\n", rc,
+ ksft_test_result_fail("Test failed, check %d != %ld\n", rc,
expected);
return -2;
}
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ int main(void)
pair.key = RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_IMA_EXT_0;
rc = riscv_hwprobe(&pair, 1, 0, NULL, 0);
if (rc < 0) {
- ksft_test_result_fail("hwprobe() failed with %d\n", rc);
+ ksft_test_result_fail("hwprobe() failed with %ld\n", rc);
return -1;
}