diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst | 93 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst index 2516fe141d..c29113a0ac 100644 --- a/Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst +++ b/Documentation/gpu/rfc/xe.rst @@ -67,14 +67,8 @@ platforms. When the time comes for Xe, the protection will be lifted on Xe and kept in i915. -Xe driver will be protected with both STAGING Kconfig and force_probe. Changes in -the uAPI are expected while the driver is behind these protections. STAGING will -be removed when the driver uAPI gets to a mature state where we can guarantee the -‘no regression’ rule. Then force_probe will be lifted only for future platforms -that will be productized with Xe driver, but not with i915. - -Xe – Pre-Merge Goals -==================== +Xe – Pre-Merge Goals - Work-in-Progress +======================================= Drm_scheduler ------------- @@ -94,41 +88,6 @@ depend on any other patch touching drm_scheduler itself that was not yet merged through drm-misc. This, by itself, already includes the reach of an agreement for uniform 1 to 1 relationship implementation / usage across drivers. -GPU VA ------- -Two main goals of Xe are meeting together here: - -1) Have an uAPI that aligns with modern UMD needs. - -2) Early upstream engagement. - -RedHat engineers working on Nouveau proposed a new DRM feature to handle keeping -track of GPU virtual address mappings. This is still not merged upstream, but -this aligns very well with our goals and with our VM_BIND. The engagement with -upstream and the port of Xe towards GPUVA is already ongoing. - -As a key measurable result, Xe needs to be aligned with the GPU VA and working in -our tree. Missing Nouveau patches should *not* block Xe and any needed GPUVA -related patch should be independent and present on dri-devel or acked by -maintainers to go along with the first Xe pull request towards drm-next. - -DRM_VM_BIND ------------ -Nouveau, and Xe are all implementing ‘VM_BIND’ and new ‘Exec’ uAPIs in order to -fulfill the needs of the modern uAPI. Xe merge should *not* be blocked on the -development of a common new drm_infrastructure. However, the Xe team needs to -engage with the community to explore the options of a common API. - -As a key measurable result, the DRM_VM_BIND needs to be documented in this file -below, or this entire block deleted if the consensus is for independent drivers -vm_bind ioctls. - -Although having a common DRM level IOCTL for VM_BIND is not a requirement to get -Xe merged, it is mandatory to enforce the overall locking scheme for all major -structs and list (so vm and vma). So, a consensus is needed, and possibly some -common helpers. If helpers are needed, they should be also documented in this -document. - ASYNC VM_BIND ------------- Although having a common DRM level IOCTL for VM_BIND is not a requirement to get @@ -138,8 +97,8 @@ memory fences. Ideally with helper support so people don't get it wrong in all possible ways. As a key measurable result, the benefits of ASYNC VM_BIND and a discussion of -various flavors, error handling and a sample API should be documented here or in -a separate document pointed to by this document. +various flavors, error handling and sample API suggestions are documented in +:doc:`The ASYNC VM_BIND document </gpu/drm-vm-bind-async>`. Userptr integration and vm_bind ------------------------------- @@ -212,6 +171,14 @@ This item ties into the GPUVA, VM_BIND, and even long-running compute support. As a key measurable result, we need to have a community consensus documented in this document and the Xe driver prepared for the changes, if necessary. +Xe – uAPI high level overview +============================= + +...Warning: To be done in follow up patches after/when/where the main consensus in various items are individually reached. + +Xe – Pre-Merge Goals - Completed +================================ + Dev_coredump ------------ @@ -229,7 +196,37 @@ infrastructure with overall possible improvements, like multiple file support for better organization of the dumps, snapshot support, dmesg extra print, and whatever may make sense and help the overall infrastructure. -Xe – uAPI high level overview -============================= +DRM_VM_BIND +----------- +Nouveau, and Xe are all implementing ‘VM_BIND’ and new ‘Exec’ uAPIs in order to +fulfill the needs of the modern uAPI. Xe merge should *not* be blocked on the +development of a common new drm_infrastructure. However, the Xe team needs to +engage with the community to explore the options of a common API. -...Warning: To be done in follow up patches after/when/where the main consensus in various items are individually reached. +As a key measurable result, the DRM_VM_BIND needs to be documented in this file +below, or this entire block deleted if the consensus is for independent drivers +vm_bind ioctls. + +Although having a common DRM level IOCTL for VM_BIND is not a requirement to get +Xe merged, it is mandatory to enforce the overall locking scheme for all major +structs and list (so vm and vma). So, a consensus is needed, and possibly some +common helpers. If helpers are needed, they should be also documented in this +document. + +GPU VA +------ +Two main goals of Xe are meeting together here: + +1) Have an uAPI that aligns with modern UMD needs. + +2) Early upstream engagement. + +RedHat engineers working on Nouveau proposed a new DRM feature to handle keeping +track of GPU virtual address mappings. This is still not merged upstream, but +this aligns very well with our goals and with our VM_BIND. The engagement with +upstream and the port of Xe towards GPUVA is already ongoing. + +As a key measurable result, Xe needs to be aligned with the GPU VA and working in +our tree. Missing Nouveau patches should *not* block Xe and any needed GPUVA +related patch should be independent and present on dri-devel or acked by +maintainers to go along with the first Xe pull request towards drm-next. |