1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..09e9b88110
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 SiFive
+ */
+
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <asm/cacheinfo.h>
+
+static struct riscv_cacheinfo_ops *rv_cache_ops;
+
+void riscv_set_cacheinfo_ops(struct riscv_cacheinfo_ops *ops)
+{
+	rv_cache_ops = ops;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(riscv_set_cacheinfo_ops);
+
+const struct attribute_group *
+cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf)
+{
+	if (rv_cache_ops && rv_cache_ops->get_priv_group)
+		return rv_cache_ops->get_priv_group(this_leaf);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static struct cacheinfo *get_cacheinfo(u32 level, enum cache_type type)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Using raw_smp_processor_id() elides a preemptability check, but this
+	 * is really indicative of a larger problem: the cacheinfo UABI assumes
+	 * that cores have a homonogenous view of the cache hierarchy.  That
+	 * happens to be the case for the current set of RISC-V systems, but
+	 * likely won't be true in general.  Since there's no way to provide
+	 * correct information for these systems via the current UABI we're
+	 * just eliding the check for now.
+	 */
+	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(raw_smp_processor_id());
+	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf;
+	int index;
+
+	for (index = 0; index < this_cpu_ci->num_leaves; index++) {
+		this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list + index;
+		if (this_leaf->level == level && this_leaf->type == type)
+			return this_leaf;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+uintptr_t get_cache_size(u32 level, enum cache_type type)
+{
+	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = get_cacheinfo(level, type);
+
+	return this_leaf ? this_leaf->size : 0;
+}
+
+uintptr_t get_cache_geometry(u32 level, enum cache_type type)
+{
+	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = get_cacheinfo(level, type);
+
+	return this_leaf ? (this_leaf->ways_of_associativity << 16 |
+			    this_leaf->coherency_line_size) :
+			   0;
+}
+
+static void ci_leaf_init(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf,
+			 struct device_node *node,
+			 enum cache_type type, unsigned int level)
+{
+	this_leaf->level = level;
+	this_leaf->type = type;
+}
+
+int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu);
+	struct cacheinfo *this_leaf = this_cpu_ci->info_list;
+	struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
+	struct device_node *prev = NULL;
+	int levels = 1, level = 1;
+
+	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
+		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
+	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
+		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
+	if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
+		ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
+
+	prev = np;
+	while ((np = of_find_next_cache_node(np))) {
+		of_node_put(prev);
+		prev = np;
+		if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "cache"))
+			break;
+		if (of_property_read_u32(np, "cache-level", &level))
+			break;
+		if (level <= levels)
+			break;
+		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "cache-size"))
+			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_UNIFIED, level);
+		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "i-cache-size"))
+			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_INST, level);
+		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "d-cache-size"))
+			ci_leaf_init(this_leaf++, np, CACHE_TYPE_DATA, level);
+		levels = level;
+	}
+	of_node_put(np);
+
+	return 0;
+}