summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches-rt/0089-printk-ringbuffer-Clarify-special-lpos-values.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--debian/patches-rt/0089-printk-ringbuffer-Clarify-special-lpos-values.patch92
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0089-printk-ringbuffer-Clarify-special-lpos-values.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0089-printk-ringbuffer-Clarify-special-lpos-values.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..397f61984c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches-rt/0089-printk-ringbuffer-Clarify-special-lpos-values.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
+Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:11:05 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH 089/134] printk: ringbuffer: Clarify special lpos values
+Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.6/older/patches-6.6.7-rt18.tar.xz
+
+For empty line records, no data blocks are created. Instead,
+these valid records are identified by special logical position
+values (in fields of @prb_desc.text_blk_lpos).
+
+Currently the macro NO_LPOS is used for empty line records.
+This name is confusing because it does not imply _why_ there is
+no data block.
+
+Rename NO_LPOS to EMPTY_LINE_LPOS so that it is clear why there
+is no data block.
+
+Also add comments explaining the use of EMPTY_LINE_LPOS as well
+as clarification to the values used to represent data-less
+blocks.
+
+Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
+Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
+---
+ kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
+ kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
+ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
++++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
+@@ -1034,9 +1034,13 @@ static char *data_alloc(struct printk_ri
+ unsigned long next_lpos;
+
+ if (size == 0) {
+- /* Specify a data-less block. */
+- blk_lpos->begin = NO_LPOS;
+- blk_lpos->next = NO_LPOS;
++ /*
++ * Data blocks are not created for empty lines. Instead, the
++ * reader will recognize these special lpos values and handle
++ * it appropriately.
++ */
++ blk_lpos->begin = EMPTY_LINE_LPOS;
++ blk_lpos->next = EMPTY_LINE_LPOS;
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+@@ -1214,10 +1218,18 @@ static const char *get_data(struct prb_d
+
+ /* Data-less data block description. */
+ if (BLK_DATALESS(blk_lpos)) {
+- if (blk_lpos->begin == NO_LPOS && blk_lpos->next == NO_LPOS) {
++ /*
++ * Records that are just empty lines are also valid, even
++ * though they do not have a data block. For such records
++ * explicitly return empty string data to signify success.
++ */
++ if (blk_lpos->begin == EMPTY_LINE_LPOS &&
++ blk_lpos->next == EMPTY_LINE_LPOS) {
+ *data_size = 0;
+ return "";
+ }
++
++ /* Data lost, invalid, or otherwise unavailable. */
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+--- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
++++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.h
+@@ -127,8 +127,22 @@ enum desc_state {
+ #define DESC_SV(id, state) (((unsigned long)state << DESC_FLAGS_SHIFT) | id)
+ #define DESC_ID_MASK (~DESC_FLAGS_MASK)
+ #define DESC_ID(sv) ((sv) & DESC_ID_MASK)
++
++/*
++ * Special data block logical position values (for fields of
++ * @prb_desc.text_blk_lpos).
++ *
++ * - Bit0 is used to identify if the record has no data block. (Implemented in
++ * the LPOS_DATALESS() macro.)
++ *
++ * - Bit1 specifies the reason for not having a data block.
++ *
++ * These special values could never be real lpos values because of the
++ * meta data and alignment padding of data blocks. (See to_blk_size() for
++ * details.)
++ */
+ #define FAILED_LPOS 0x1
+-#define NO_LPOS 0x3
++#define EMPTY_LINE_LPOS 0x3
+
+ #define FAILED_BLK_LPOS \
+ { \