1 files changed, 138 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-clk.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clk.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0ee4d2aee4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-clk.c
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Clock based PWM controller
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2021 Nikita Travkin <nikita@trvn.ru>
+ *
+ * This is an "adapter" driver that allows PWM consumers to use
+ * system clocks with duty cycle control as PWM outputs.
+ *
+ * Limitations:
+ * - Due to the fact that exact behavior depends on the underlying
+ *   clock driver, various limitations are possible.
+ * - Underlying clock may not be able to give 0% or 100% duty cycle
+ *   (constant off or on), exact behavior will depend on the clock.
+ * - When the PWM is disabled, the clock will be disabled as well,
+ *   line state will depend on the clock.
+ * - The clk API doesn't expose the necessary calls to implement
+ *   .get_state().
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+
+struct pwm_clk_chip {
+	struct pwm_chip chip;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	bool clk_enabled;
+};
+
+#define to_pwm_clk_chip(_chip) container_of(_chip, struct pwm_clk_chip, chip)
+
+static int pwm_clk_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+			 const struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+	struct pwm_clk_chip *pcchip = to_pwm_clk_chip(chip);
+	int ret;
+	u32 rate;
+	u64 period = state->period;
+	u64 duty_cycle = state->duty_cycle;
+
+	if (!state->enabled) {
+		if (pwm->state.enabled) {
+			clk_disable(pcchip->clk);
+			pcchip->clk_enabled = false;
+		}
+		return 0;
+	} else if (!pwm->state.enabled) {
+		ret = clk_enable(pcchip->clk);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+		pcchip->clk_enabled = true;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * We have to enable the clk before setting the rate and duty_cycle,
+	 * that however results in a window where the clk is on with a
+	 * (potentially) different setting. Also setting period and duty_cycle
+	 * are two separate calls, so that probably isn't atomic either.
+	 */
+
+	rate = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, period);
+	ret = clk_set_rate(pcchip->clk, rate);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED)
+		duty_cycle = period - duty_cycle;
+
+	return clk_set_duty_cycle(pcchip->clk, duty_cycle, period);
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops pwm_clk_ops = {
+	.apply = pwm_clk_apply,
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int pwm_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct pwm_clk_chip *pcchip;
+	int ret;
+
+	pcchip = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pcchip), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pcchip)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	pcchip->clk = devm_clk_get_prepared(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(pcchip->clk))
+		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(pcchip->clk),
+				     "Failed to get clock\n");
+
+	pcchip->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
+	pcchip->chip.ops = &pwm_clk_ops;
+	pcchip->chip.npwm = 1;
+
+	ret = pwmchip_add(&pcchip->chip);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to add pwm chip\n");
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcchip);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void pwm_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct pwm_clk_chip *pcchip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	pwmchip_remove(&pcchip->chip);
+
+	if (pcchip->clk_enabled)
+		clk_disable(pcchip->clk);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id pwm_clk_dt_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "clk-pwm", },
+	{ /* sentinel */ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pwm_clk_dt_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver pwm_clk_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "pwm-clk",
+		.of_match_table = pwm_clk_dt_ids,
+	},
+	.probe = pwm_clk_probe,
+	.remove_new = pwm_clk_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(pwm_clk_driver);
+
+MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pwm-clk");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Nikita Travkin <nikita@trvn.ru>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Clock based PWM driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");