1 files changed, 569 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3ad2cc4823
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/ww_mutex.h
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+
+#ifndef WW_RT
+
+#define MUTEX		mutex
+#define MUTEX_WAITER	mutex_waiter
+
+static inline struct mutex_waiter *
+__ww_waiter_first(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	struct mutex_waiter *w;
+
+	w = list_first_entry(&lock->wait_list, struct mutex_waiter, list);
+	if (list_entry_is_head(w, &lock->wait_list, list))
+		return NULL;
+
+	return w;
+}
+
+static inline struct mutex_waiter *
+__ww_waiter_next(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *w)
+{
+	w = list_next_entry(w, list);
+	if (list_entry_is_head(w, &lock->wait_list, list))
+		return NULL;
+
+	return w;
+}
+
+static inline struct mutex_waiter *
+__ww_waiter_prev(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *w)
+{
+	w = list_prev_entry(w, list);
+	if (list_entry_is_head(w, &lock->wait_list, list))
+		return NULL;
+
+	return w;
+}
+
+static inline struct mutex_waiter *
+__ww_waiter_last(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	struct mutex_waiter *w;
+
+	w = list_last_entry(&lock->wait_list, struct mutex_waiter, list);
+	if (list_entry_is_head(w, &lock->wait_list, list))
+		return NULL;
+
+	return w;
+}
+
+static inline void
+__ww_waiter_add(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter, struct mutex_waiter *pos)
+{
+	struct list_head *p = &lock->wait_list;
+	if (pos)
+		p = &pos->list;
+	__mutex_add_waiter(lock, waiter, p);
+}
+
+static inline struct task_struct *
+__ww_mutex_owner(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	return __mutex_owner(lock);
+}
+
+static inline bool
+__ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	return atomic_long_read(&lock->owner) & MUTEX_FLAG_WAITERS;
+}
+
+static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct mutex *lock)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
+}
+
+#else /* WW_RT */
+
+#define MUTEX		rt_mutex
+#define MUTEX_WAITER	rt_mutex_waiter
+
+static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
+__ww_waiter_first(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&lock->rtmutex.waiters.rb_root);
+	if (!n)
+		return NULL;
+	return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry);
+}
+
+static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
+__ww_waiter_next(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
+{
+	struct rb_node *n = rb_next(&w->tree.entry);
+	if (!n)
+		return NULL;
+	return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry);
+}
+
+static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
+__ww_waiter_prev(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
+{
+	struct rb_node *n = rb_prev(&w->tree.entry);
+	if (!n)
+		return NULL;
+	return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry);
+}
+
+static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
+__ww_waiter_last(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	struct rb_node *n = rb_last(&lock->rtmutex.waiters.rb_root);
+	if (!n)
+		return NULL;
+	return rb_entry(n, struct rt_mutex_waiter, tree.entry);
+}
+
+static inline void
+__ww_waiter_add(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter, struct rt_mutex_waiter *pos)
+{
+	/* RT unconditionally adds the waiter first and then removes it on error */
+}
+
+static inline struct task_struct *
+__ww_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	return rt_mutex_owner(&lock->rtmutex);
+}
+
+static inline bool
+__ww_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	return rt_mutex_has_waiters(&lock->rtmutex);
+}
+
+static inline void lock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	raw_spin_lock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void unlock_wait_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	raw_spin_unlock(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+{
+	lockdep_assert_held(&lock->rtmutex.wait_lock);
+}
+
+#endif /* WW_RT */
+
+/*
+ * Wait-Die:
+ *   The newer transactions are killed when:
+ *     It (the new transaction) makes a request for a lock being held
+ *     by an older transaction.
+ *
+ * Wound-Wait:
+ *   The newer transactions are wounded when:
+ *     An older transaction makes a request for a lock being held by
+ *     the newer transaction.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * Associate the ww_mutex @ww with the context @ww_ctx under which we acquired
+ * it.
+ */
+static __always_inline void
+ww_mutex_lock_acquired(struct ww_mutex *ww, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+{
+#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
+	/*
+	 * If this WARN_ON triggers, you used ww_mutex_lock to acquire,
+	 * but released with a normal mutex_unlock in this call.
+	 *
+	 * This should never happen, always use ww_mutex_unlock.
+	 */
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ww->ctx);
+
+	/*
+	 * Not quite done after calling ww_acquire_done() ?
+	 */
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ww_ctx->done_acquire);
+
+	if (ww_ctx->contending_lock) {
+		/*
+		 * After -EDEADLK you tried to
+		 * acquire a different ww_mutex? Bad!
+		 */
+		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ww_ctx->contending_lock != ww);
+
+		/*
+		 * You called ww_mutex_lock after receiving -EDEADLK,
+		 * but 'forgot' to unlock everything else first?
+		 */
+		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ww_ctx->acquired > 0);
+		ww_ctx->contending_lock = NULL;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Naughty, using a different class will lead to undefined behavior!
+	 */
+	DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ww_ctx->ww_class != ww->ww_class);
+#endif
+	ww_ctx->acquired++;
+	ww->ctx = ww_ctx;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Determine if @a is 'less' than @b. IOW, either @a is a lower priority task
+ * or, when of equal priority, a younger transaction than @b.
+ *
+ * Depending on the algorithm, @a will either need to wait for @b, or die.
+ */
+static inline bool
+__ww_ctx_less(struct ww_acquire_ctx *a, struct ww_acquire_ctx *b)
+{
+/*
+ * Can only do the RT prio for WW_RT, because task->prio isn't stable due to PI,
+ * so the wait_list ordering will go wobbly. rt_mutex re-queues the waiter and
+ * isn't affected by this.
+ */
+#ifdef WW_RT
+	/* kernel prio; less is more */
+	int a_prio = a->task->prio;
+	int b_prio = b->task->prio;
+
+	if (rt_prio(a_prio) || rt_prio(b_prio)) {
+
+		if (a_prio > b_prio)
+			return true;
+
+		if (a_prio < b_prio)
+			return false;
+
+		/* equal static prio */
+
+		if (dl_prio(a_prio)) {
+			if (dl_time_before(b->task->dl.deadline,
+					   a->task->dl.deadline))
+				return true;
+
+			if (dl_time_before(a->task->dl.deadline,
+					   b->task->dl.deadline))
+				return false;
+		}
+
+		/* equal prio */
+	}
+#endif
+
+	/* FIFO order tie break -- bigger is younger */
+	return (signed long)(a->stamp - b->stamp) > 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Wait-Die; wake a lesser waiter context (when locks held) such that it can
+ * die.
+ *
+ * Among waiters with context, only the first one can have other locks acquired
+ * already (ctx->acquired > 0), because __ww_mutex_add_waiter() and
+ * __ww_mutex_check_kill() wake any but the earliest context.
+ */
+static bool
+__ww_mutex_die(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
+	       struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+{
+	if (!ww_ctx->is_wait_die)
+		return false;
+
+	if (waiter->ww_ctx->acquired > 0 && __ww_ctx_less(waiter->ww_ctx, ww_ctx)) {
+#ifndef WW_RT
+		debug_mutex_wake_waiter(lock, waiter);
+#endif
+		wake_up_process(waiter->task);
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Wound-Wait; wound a lesser @hold_ctx if it holds the lock.
+ *
+ * Wound the lock holder if there are waiters with more important transactions
+ * than the lock holders. Even if multiple waiters may wound the lock holder,
+ * it's sufficient that only one does.
+ */
+static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct MUTEX *lock,
+			     struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx,
+			     struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx)
+{
+	struct task_struct *owner = __ww_mutex_owner(lock);
+
+	lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * Possible through __ww_mutex_add_waiter() when we race with
+	 * ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(). In that case we'll get here again
+	 * through __ww_mutex_check_waiters().
+	 */
+	if (!hold_ctx)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Can have !owner because of __mutex_unlock_slowpath(), but if owner,
+	 * it cannot go away because we'll have FLAG_WAITERS set and hold
+	 * wait_lock.
+	 */
+	if (!owner)
+		return false;
+
+	if (ww_ctx->acquired > 0 && __ww_ctx_less(hold_ctx, ww_ctx)) {
+		hold_ctx->wounded = 1;
+
+		/*
+		 * wake_up_process() paired with set_current_state()
+		 * inserts sufficient barriers to make sure @owner either sees
+		 * it's wounded in __ww_mutex_check_kill() or has a
+		 * wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state.
+		 */
+		if (owner != current)
+			wake_up_process(owner);
+
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * We just acquired @lock under @ww_ctx, if there are more important contexts
+ * waiting behind us on the wait-list, check if they need to die, or wound us.
+ *
+ * See __ww_mutex_add_waiter() for the list-order construction; basically the
+ * list is ordered by stamp, smallest (oldest) first.
+ *
+ * This relies on never mixing wait-die/wound-wait on the same wait-list;
+ * which is currently ensured by that being a ww_class property.
+ *
+ * The current task must not be on the wait list.
+ */
+static void
+__ww_mutex_check_waiters(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+{
+	struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur;
+
+	lockdep_assert_wait_lock_held(lock);
+
+	for (cur = __ww_waiter_first(lock); cur;
+	     cur = __ww_waiter_next(lock, cur)) {
+
+		if (!cur->ww_ctx)
+			continue;
+
+		if (__ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx) ||
+		    __ww_mutex_wound(lock, cur->ww_ctx, ww_ctx))
+			break;
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * After acquiring lock with fastpath, where we do not hold wait_lock, set ctx
+ * and wake up any waiters so they can recheck.
+ */
+static __always_inline void
+ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(struct ww_mutex *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	ww_mutex_lock_acquired(lock, ctx);
+
+	/*
+	 * The lock->ctx update should be visible on all cores before
+	 * the WAITERS check is done, otherwise contended waiters might be
+	 * missed. The contended waiters will either see ww_ctx == NULL
+	 * and keep spinning, or it will acquire wait_lock, add itself
+	 * to waiter list and sleep.
+	 */
+	smp_mb(); /* See comments above and below. */
+
+	/*
+	 * [W] ww->ctx = ctx	    [W] MUTEX_FLAG_WAITERS
+	 *     MB		        MB
+	 * [R] MUTEX_FLAG_WAITERS   [R] ww->ctx
+	 *
+	 * The memory barrier above pairs with the memory barrier in
+	 * __ww_mutex_add_waiter() and makes sure we either observe ww->ctx
+	 * and/or !empty list.
+	 */
+	if (likely(!__ww_mutex_has_waiters(&lock->base)))
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * Uh oh, we raced in fastpath, check if any of the waiters need to
+	 * die or wound us.
+	 */
+	lock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
+	__ww_mutex_check_waiters(&lock->base, ctx);
+	unlock_wait_lock(&lock->base);
+}
+
+static __always_inline int
+__ww_mutex_kill(struct MUTEX *lock, struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+{
+	if (ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
+#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
+		struct ww_mutex *ww;
+
+		ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
+		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(ww_ctx->contending_lock);
+		ww_ctx->contending_lock = ww;
+#endif
+		return -EDEADLK;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check the wound condition for the current lock acquire.
+ *
+ * Wound-Wait: If we're wounded, kill ourself.
+ *
+ * Wait-Die: If we're trying to acquire a lock already held by an older
+ *           context, kill ourselves.
+ *
+ * Since __ww_mutex_add_waiter() orders the wait-list on stamp, we only have to
+ * look at waiters before us in the wait-list.
+ */
+static inline int
+__ww_mutex_check_kill(struct MUTEX *lock, struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
+		      struct ww_acquire_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
+	struct ww_acquire_ctx *hold_ctx = READ_ONCE(ww->ctx);
+	struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur;
+
+	if (ctx->acquired == 0)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (!ctx->is_wait_die) {
+		if (ctx->wounded)
+			return __ww_mutex_kill(lock, ctx);
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	if (hold_ctx && __ww_ctx_less(ctx, hold_ctx))
+		return __ww_mutex_kill(lock, ctx);
+
+	/*
+	 * If there is a waiter in front of us that has a context, then its
+	 * stamp is earlier than ours and we must kill ourself.
+	 */
+	for (cur = __ww_waiter_prev(lock, waiter); cur;
+	     cur = __ww_waiter_prev(lock, cur)) {
+
+		if (!cur->ww_ctx)
+			continue;
+
+		return __ww_mutex_kill(lock, ctx);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Add @waiter to the wait-list, keep the wait-list ordered by stamp, smallest
+ * first. Such that older contexts are preferred to acquire the lock over
+ * younger contexts.
+ *
+ * Waiters without context are interspersed in FIFO order.
+ *
+ * Furthermore, for Wait-Die kill ourself immediately when possible (there are
+ * older contexts already waiting) to avoid unnecessary waiting and for
+ * Wound-Wait ensure we wound the owning context when it is younger.
+ */
+static inline int
+__ww_mutex_add_waiter(struct MUTEX_WAITER *waiter,
+		      struct MUTEX *lock,
+		      struct ww_acquire_ctx *ww_ctx)
+{
+	struct MUTEX_WAITER *cur, *pos = NULL;
+	bool is_wait_die;
+
+	if (!ww_ctx) {
+		__ww_waiter_add(lock, waiter, NULL);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	is_wait_die = ww_ctx->is_wait_die;
+
+	/*
+	 * Add the waiter before the first waiter with a higher stamp.
+	 * Waiters without a context are skipped to avoid starving
+	 * them. Wait-Die waiters may die here. Wound-Wait waiters
+	 * never die here, but they are sorted in stamp order and
+	 * may wound the lock holder.
+	 */
+	for (cur = __ww_waiter_last(lock); cur;
+	     cur = __ww_waiter_prev(lock, cur)) {
+
+		if (!cur->ww_ctx)
+			continue;
+
+		if (__ww_ctx_less(ww_ctx, cur->ww_ctx)) {
+			/*
+			 * Wait-Die: if we find an older context waiting, there
+			 * is no point in queueing behind it, as we'd have to
+			 * die the moment it would acquire the lock.
+			 */
+			if (is_wait_die) {
+				int ret = __ww_mutex_kill(lock, ww_ctx);
+
+				if (ret)
+					return ret;
+			}
+
+			break;
+		}
+
+		pos = cur;
+
+		/* Wait-Die: ensure younger waiters die. */
+		__ww_mutex_die(lock, cur, ww_ctx);
+	}
+
+	__ww_waiter_add(lock, waiter, pos);
+
+	/*
+	 * Wound-Wait: if we're blocking on a mutex owned by a younger context,
+	 * wound that such that we might proceed.
+	 */
+	if (!is_wait_die) {
+		struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
+
+		/*
+		 * See ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(). Orders setting
+		 * MUTEX_FLAG_WAITERS vs the ww->ctx load,
+		 * such that either we or the fastpath will wound @ww->ctx.
+		 */
+		smp_mb();
+		__ww_mutex_wound(lock, ww_ctx, ww->ctx);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline void __ww_mutex_unlock(struct ww_mutex *lock)
+{
+	if (lock->ctx) {
+#ifdef DEBUG_WW_MUTEXES
+		DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!lock->ctx->acquired);
+#endif
+		if (lock->ctx->acquired > 0)
+			lock->ctx->acquired--;
+		lock->ctx = NULL;
+	}
+}