From 85c675d0d09a45a135bddd15d7b385f8758c32fb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 19:35:05 +0200 Subject: Adding upstream version 6.7.7. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements') diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst index f3b605285a..cccafdaa1f 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.rst @@ -1955,12 +1955,12 @@ if offline CPUs block an RCU grace period for too long. An offline CPU's quiescent state will be reported either: -1. As the CPU goes offline using RCU's hotplug notifier (rcu_report_dead()). +1. As the CPU goes offline using RCU's hotplug notifier (rcutree_report_cpu_dead()). 2. When grace period initialization (rcu_gp_init()) detects a race either with CPU offlining or with a task unblocking on a leaf ``rcu_node`` structure whose CPUs are all offline. -The CPU-online path (rcu_cpu_starting()) should never need to report +The CPU-online path (rcutree_report_cpu_starting()) should never need to report a quiescent state for an offline CPU. However, as a debugging measure, it does emit a warning if a quiescent state was not already reported for that CPU. -- cgit v1.2.3