From b5b67adcc17e3e74dbcda09ff3f8a4636aa53486 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Baumann Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 19:40:22 +0200 Subject: Merging debian version 6.7.7-1. Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann --- ...x-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg.lintian-overrides | 14 -------------- 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 debian/linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg.lintian-overrides (limited to 'debian/linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg.lintian-overrides') diff --git a/debian/linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg.lintian-overrides b/debian/linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg.lintian-overrides deleted file mode 100644 index fa3d9da392..0000000000 --- a/debian/linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg.lintian-overrides +++ /dev/null @@ -1,14 +0,0 @@ -# Kernel dbg packages contain a full image with debug data -linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg: dbg-package-missing-depends - -# glibc doesn't seem to check for a PT_GNU_STACK section in vDSOs, so -# it's OK that they don't have it -linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg: shared-library-lacks-stack-section *usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64/vdso/vdso.so* -linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg: shared-library-lacks-stack-section *usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64/vdso/vdso32.so* - -# It is intended that 64-bit kernels provide vDSOs for 32-bit executables. -# lintian currently allows i386 executables on amd64. -linux-image-6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64-dbg: binary-from-other-architecture *usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/6.6.15-progress7.99-arm64/vdso/vdso32.so* - -# Some 32-bit architectures need 64-bit kernels and we still build -# these as the "wrong" architecture rather than mandating multiarch. -- cgit v1.2.3